Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 12:57 PM Aug 2013

Glorious take-down of Jennifer Rubin

Posted yesterday in DC's alternative weekly, the City Paper: former Washington Post ombudsman Patrick Pexton's open letter to Jeff Bezos, advising him on what to do with his latest acquisition. In it, Pexton analyzes the Post in terms of the Good, the Bad, and...

The Ugly
Jennifer Rubin. Have Fred Hiatt, your editorial page editor—who I like, admire, and respect—fire opinion blogger Jennifer Rubin. Not because she’s conservative, but because she’s just plain bad. She doesn’t travel within a hundred miles of Post standards. She parrots and peddles every silly right-wing theory to come down the pike in transparent attempts to get Web hits. Her analysis of the conservative movement, which is a worthwhile and important beat that the Post should treat more seriously on its national pages, is shallow and predictable. Her columns, at best, are political pornography; they get a quick but sure rise out of the right, but you feel bad afterward.

And she is often wrong, and rarely acknowledges it. She was oh-so-wrong about Mitt Romney, week after week writing embarrassing flattery about his 2012 campaign, calling almost every move he made brilliant, and guaranteeing that he would trounce Barack Obama. When he lost, the next day she savaged him and his campaign with treachery, saying he was the worst candidate with the worst staff, ever. She was wrong about the Norway shootings being acts of al-Qaida. She was wrong about Chuck Hagel being an anti-Semite. And does she apologize? Nope.

Rubin was the No. 1 source of complaint mail about any single Post staffer while I was ombudsman, and I’m leaving out the organized email campaigns against her by leftie groups like Media Matters. Thinking conservatives didn’t like her, thinking moderates didn’t like her, government workers who knew her arguments to be unfair didn’t like her. Dump her like a dull tome on the Amazon Bargain Books page.


http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/citydesk/2013/08/14/ombo-sauce-advice-for-jeff-bezos-from-the-posts-former-in-house-critic/

Thank you, thank you, thank you!
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Glorious take-down of Jennifer Rubin (Original Post) Proud Public Servant Aug 2013 OP
Great take-down. But it could apply to any Republican. SunSeeker Aug 2013 #1
Key word there is "thinking" lastlib Aug 2013 #2
My problem with Rubin Proud Public Servant Aug 2013 #4
AIPAC will never let that happen Tom Ripley Aug 2013 #3
why would you say that? would Jeff Bezos be moved by AIPAC? Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #6
Like any American, he has no choice Tom Ripley Aug 2013 #8
kick for the first thread on this topic Pretzel_Warrior Aug 2013 #5
jennifer hack rubin.. getting her due. Priceless! Cha Aug 2013 #7

SunSeeker

(51,571 posts)
1. Great take-down. But it could apply to any Republican.
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 02:29 PM
Aug 2013

I don't know how any thinking person can be a conservative Republican.

lastlib

(23,247 posts)
2. Key word there is "thinking"
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 02:37 PM
Aug 2013

Conservatives essentially hire someone else to do the thinking for them. And they've hired some major doofuses as "employees" for the job. They never follow the logic of their ideas to the end of the chain, so they miss the ultimate points. Hence, they are never aware of the flaws.

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
4. My problem with Rubin
Thu Aug 15, 2013, 03:33 PM
Aug 2013

Is not that she's a Republican, but that she's a flack. The other conservatives on the paper's opinion page -- Will, Parker, Gerson, Thiessen -- all evidence, in their writing, actual political/ideological beliefs. Frequently these are wrong, stupid, repellent beliefs, but there are nevertheless evidence that the author has actually engaged in actual thought and are writing, in the end, about an abstraction called "conservatism." Rubin's writing is never, ever informed by thought or the defense of a philosophical position; it is informed solely by a desire to pimp the GOP (or Israel). I'd like to think that if the Post hired a writer who shilled as hard for the White House as Rubin does for the RNC, I'd be just as appalled.

Plus, say what you want about the other right-wing columnists in the Post, none of them routinely lie; Rubin does, constantly (and the Post permits it by claiming that, technically, she's a blogger and not a columnist).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Glorious take-down of Jen...