Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

meegbear

(25,438 posts)
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 02:07 PM Feb 2012

The Rude Pundit: Yep, Media Matters Is Right ...

Iran Has Always Been a Year or Two Away From Having Nukes

This week, Media Matters came out with an article that detailed how, since 2005, conservatives have been predicting imminent death by Iranian nuclear bombs, always conveniently a year or two away from coming to full, frightening fruition. But Media Matters could have gone back even further. Because, see, pretty much as long as many of us can remember, despite the IAEA saying it's not true and, at times, despite the U.S. government denying it, Iran has been within a couple of years to a decade from having nukes. Think of this as a supplement to what is probably the most convincing argument you'll read about how irrational our media and politicians are about Iran right now:

Iran will have nukes by 1986, says AP article, April 25, 1984: "Iran is likely to have its own nuclear bomb within two years, according to press reports cited by Jane's Defense Weekly. The magazine, part of the authoritative Jane's Publications on weapons systems, said Tuesday that reports from the Persian Gulf region last week indicated the bomb was being produced at a nuclear power plant in Boushahar, southern Iran."

Or maybe 2000, says AFP, December 4, 1991: "Iran will be able to build a nuclear bomb by the year 2000 if it keeps up its present military activities, German intelligence chief Konrad Porzner said."

Or sometime between 1995 and 2000, says the Washington Post, October 18, 1992: "Gen. Uri Saguy, the head of Israel's military intelligence, estimates that Iran will have a nuclear capability by the end of the decade; British and French intelligence officials predict that Iran might join the nuclear club even earlier. Mohammed Mohaddessin, an adviser to the National Council of Resistance of Iran, said during a recent visit to Washington that he believes Iran will have nuclear devices within three to five years."

Or perhaps in 1999, according to AP, February 12, 1993: "Iran now poses the greatest threat to Israel's security, a leading Israeli newspaper said today, quoting experts who predicted Tehran would have an atomic bomb within six years."

No, more likely 2000, according to the Guardian, January 6, 1995: "Iran is much closer to producing nuclear weapons than previously thought, and could be less than five years from having an atomic bomb, several senior American and Israeli officials say. 'The date by which Iran will have nuclear weapons is no longer 10 years from now,' a senior official said recently, referring to previous estimates. 'If the Iranians maintain this intensive effort to get everything they need, they could have all their components in two years. Then it will be just a matter of technology and research. If Iran is not interrupted in this program by some foreign power, it will have the device in more or less five years.'"

Or, holy crap, they already have them, says AFP, April 9, 1998: "Iran obtained several nuclear warheads from a former Soviet republic in the early 1990s, according to Iranian documents obtained by Israel and revealed in The Jerusalem Post newspaper Thursday."

You get the idea. Hmmm. There's a common thread here that the Rude Pundit can't quite figure out, a nation involved in this fearmongering that has controlled a great deal of U.S. foreign policy in the region for decades. It's on the tip of his tongue. Gosh, he really wishes he could connect the dots. Of course, if one does ever connect 'em, one will automatically be accused of being anti...well, something or other.

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Rude Pundit: Yep, Media Matters Is Right ... (Original Post) meegbear Feb 2012 OP
awesome work Enrique Feb 2012 #1
k&r... spanone Feb 2012 #2
k&r n/t myrna minx Feb 2012 #3
Good post. Social Security was supposed to go "broke" in 1987 mistertrickster Feb 2012 #4
This is the kind of shit that makes me even grumpier. Comrade Grumpy Feb 2012 #5
Can you hear The Drums? bvar22 Feb 2012 #6
A stunning tribute to the ignorant amnesiacs who write the news we consume and consume and consume Laughing Mirror Feb 2012 #7
 

mistertrickster

(7,062 posts)
4. Good post. Social Security was supposed to go "broke" in 1987
Fri Feb 24, 2012, 02:23 PM
Feb 2012

according to Congressman George W. Bush in 1977 . . .

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
6. Can you hear The Drums?
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 01:14 PM
Feb 2012

I can.

Herman Goering said it best, and you can currently observe this process at work with the target being Iran.

"Why, of course, the people don't want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship."

"...voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."--- Herman Goering, Spandau Prison, 1946




Same Shit
Different Bag

[font size=4 color=firebrick]
If you're not FOR the WAR in Vietnam Afghanistan Iraq Libya IRAN,
you're WITH The Communists AlQaeda The Terrorists Saddam Qaddafi The Ayatollahs!!![/font]

Laughing Mirror

(4,185 posts)
7. A stunning tribute to the ignorant amnesiacs who write the news we consume and consume and consume
Sat Feb 25, 2012, 02:00 PM
Feb 2012

As if it really is news.

Hats off to Mike Burns at MediaMatters for exposing this charade and to Rude Pundit for showing it's never ending.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Rude Pundit: Yep, Med...