General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumswar on contraception goes mainstream
The War on Contraception Goes Mainstream
The Catholic Churchs fight with the White House makes an extreme stance seem reasonable.
BY Sady Doyle
. . . .
In her book How The Pro-Choice Movement Saved America, Page argues that right-wing attacks on abortion are cover for a far more radical agenda. The real target of organized anti-choicers, she says, is not abortion. Abortion is just the divisive, emotional topic used to mobilize grassroots support. The real target of the organized anti-choice movementas opposed to individuals who are anti-abortionhas always been birth control. Page told me shes been recommending since 2008 that reporters ask all GOP candidates about their position on contraception.
. . . .
Its worth noting how very far from the mainstream the roots of the anti-contraception movement are. In our conversation, Page mentioned Quiverfull, a radical religious movement aligned with the Christian Patriarchy Movement. (Yes, they actually call themselves the Patriarchy Movement.) Quiverfull believes that children are a blessing, and that to refuse such a blessingunder any circumstances, in any way, or for any reasonis a sin. Oh, and also that true believers will impregnate their wives as many times as humanly possible, in order to raise an army and eventually rule the United States. In the grand scheme of wacky cult strategies for world domination, this ones fairly practical: They plan to overcome us through sheer numbers.
But examining the Patriarchy Movement is useful to understanding what it would look like if we lost the War on Contraception. In practice, women within Quiverfull and similar evangelical anti-contraception movements can have well over a dozen children. Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar, the most high-profile representatives of the movement (who star in The Learning Channel show 19 Kids and Counting), recently tried for their twentieth. Women are kept from working not only by religious rhetoric, but by the sheer physical burden of cycling rapidly through pregnancy and childbirth while bearing sole responsibility for massive amounts of domestic work. Daughters are enlisted early to assist, and like their mothers, they work full-time; home schooling is central to the movement.
Of course, denying women education and income and putting them in a near-perpetual state of physical vulnerability makes them totally dependent on men. Which is the point: As Libby Anne, a woman raised in the Christian Patriarchy Movement, put it, a woman is always under male authority, first her father, then her husband, and perhaps, someday, her son. And if she wants out, she cant get out, because shes been systematically denied the economic and social power necessary to escape. Anne got free because her parents took the fairly heretical step of allowing her to attend college.
Page argues that this vision, dystopian and unlikely as it sounds, is essential to understanding anti-choice conservatism. She lists the seemingly paradoxical stances of the anti-choice movement: Theyre against abortion, but also against contraception that reduces the likelihood of abortion, but also against child care for working parents.
. . . . .
http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/12757/the_war_on_contraception_goes_mainstream/
This is an important article. We all need to understand the real agenda.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Sucks for them, but they're never going to turn back the clock on this.
niyad
(113,553 posts)including a coup (ever read "the handmaid's tale"??)
lunatica
(53,410 posts)If they raised their own army they'd probably beat us in 100 years or so when they declare war on us.
Or starve to death from overpopulation and not enough food.
Their logic is full of non sequiturs.
treestar
(82,383 posts)I suppose. What loons. They will have prayer in the schools by then and control of everyone's minds. Which shows in how they hate to have ideas they don't like discussed, and think that by hiding those arguments, no one else will think of them and they'll go away. They are strong believers in the idea they can control other people's minds.
ProfessionalLeftist
(4,982 posts)That's different, and one must consider that difference and the motives behind their opposition. In one word: control.
niyad
(113,553 posts)cilla4progress
(24,766 posts)rather than the Constitution, and believe our laws should adhere to IT (the Bible).
niyad
(113,553 posts)or lack thereof.
cilla4progress
(24,766 posts)that separation of church and state isn't absolute.
Oh, it's OK if HIS CHURCH wants to impose their "VALUES" on me, but -- the other way around, NO WAY.
HE makes ME want to throw up.