General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYou Are Super Rich If You Can Afford
"A Russian sable coat at $240,000, a facelift for $18,500, a thoroughbred yearling racehorse at $319,340, a Sikorsky helicopter at $14.8m, an arrangement of flowers changed weekly for six rooms at $98,100 or a year's tuition at Harvard at $56,652. . .a week at the Golden Door Spa in California, $6,750, or 45 minutes with an Upper East side shrink for $325. "
To be among the 1% The Socialist Worker estimates you have to make 150,000pounds/$237,000 annual income. To qualify as super rich you need an income of $100 million.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2012/feb/24/why-super-rich-love-uk
Get the point as to how poverty stricken that leaves the rest of us?
bluerum
(6,109 posts)on a discretionary purchase, you are at risk.
davidthegnome
(2,983 posts)Must be nice to be in that 1%. I make 50 dollars a week washing dishes. Are you super poor if you can't afford gas?
MarkCharles
(2,261 posts)Where you work less than 7 hours a week, or do this just to keep your hands in dishwater.
The minimum wage, last I checked, was over $7 and more in some states. 7x7=49
Response to dynasaw (Original post)
orpupilofnature57 This message was self-deleted by its author.
dynasaw
(998 posts)You can either afford to buy gas (to make it to your marginal paying job) or eat. Been that route.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)I figure 35% of the country is middle class (management, licensed professionals, master artisans, business owners); 65% is lower or "working class" (hourly employees, laborers, small farmers); and an insignificant number are upper class (owners of major corporations, trusts, large amounts of land, major public officials--professions is usually irrelevant to upper class status).
lastlib
(23,286 posts)...you are probably super-rich....
And you probably can't empathize with people making less than thirty thousand bucks a year.....
elias7
(4,026 posts)There are rich selfish power brokers primarily captains of industry or the financial world who dictate policy and build fortunes on the misfortunes and hard work of others, and then there are the rest of us.
It's not about income, it's about wealth
When I see people quibble over some imaginary line, it drives me nuts. There's no line. It's an arbitrary number that is catchy so OWS uses it. The real line might be 99.23/0.77. Who knows?
If you make 236k you're a good guy, if you make 238k, you're an asshole? These are not 1% ers. These are upper middle class people who are well off (depending on where they live).
It's really not even an income thing. It's a wealth thing. The Greenwich CT family with a 4 million dollar home and millions stashed away in accounts: the parents and the kids and their kids' kids are "1%ers". Their teenager at Exeter is a one percenter making no income. Their doctor taking care of the kid's lacrosse injury may make 240k but is no 1%er in the real sense of the concept.
sheesh