General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGeneral Wesley Clark's warning about the Pentagon's Plan for the Middle East.
Last edited Sat Aug 24, 2013, 03:32 AM - Edit history (1)
This is an excerpt of Gen. Wesley Clark in a Democracy Now interview with Amy Goodman:
GEN. WESLEY CLARK: I knew why, because I had been through the Pentagon right after 9/11. About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, "Sir, you've got to come in and talk to me a second." I said, "Well, you're too busy." He said, "No, no." He says, "We've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq." This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, "We're going to war with Iraq? Why?" He said, "I don't know." He said, "I guess they don't know what else to do." So I said, "Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?" He said, "No, no." He says, "There's nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq." He said, "I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists, but we've got a good military and we can take down governments." And he said, "I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail."
So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, "Are we still going to war with Iraq?" And he said, "Oh, it's worse than that." He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, "I just got this down from upstairs" -- meaning the Secretary of Defense's office -- "today." And he said, "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran." I said, "Is it classified?" He said, "Yes, sir." I said, "Well, don't show it to me." And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, "You remember that?" He said, "Sir, I didn't show you that memo! I didn't show it to you!"
AMY GOODMAN: I'm sorry. What did you say his name was?
GEN. WESLEY CLARK: I'm not going to give you his name.
AMY GOODMAN: So, go through the countries again.
GEN. WESLEY CLARK: Well, starting with Iraq, then Syria and Lebanon, then Libya, then Somalia and Sudan, and back to Iran.
http://warisacrime.org/node/19200
This is his speech on Oct.3 2007
Commonwealth Club of California
San Francisco
He discribes the national Coup and the Pentagon's plan to take out countries in the middle east
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts).
Gravitycollapse
(8,155 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Why didn't he tell America about this in 2001 and save lives? I guess he didn't want to be a whistle blower.
BTW.. the second video is even more revealing.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)but the bu$h-Cheney juggernaut was steam-rolling everything and everyone in its way.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)In the DN interview Clark said "seven countries in five years" so it seems they missed their mark. Thankfully.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)if they had been right then the time scale would have work but they weren't
"I can't tell you if the use of force in Iraq today would last five days, or five weeks, or five months, but it certainly isn't going to last any longer than that."
--Donald Rumsfeld, November 14, 2002
"It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months"
-- Donald Rumsfeld, February 7, 2003
"I think it will go relatively quickly. Weeks rather than months."
-- Dick Cheney, March 16, 2003
"No one is talking about occupying Iraq for five to ten years."
-- Richard Perle, March 9, 2003
Before we jump into Syria I want independent conformation of the Sarin attack and then let the UN handle it. Who benefits long term by the attack?
The Rebels or the Regime in Syria?
Don't forget Dr. David Kelly
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)newfie11
(8,159 posts)Wonder how much we are behind what's happening in Syria today.
Remember South America, we are quite good at covert overthrow of countries.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Right there it would have been WWIII. Just with Afghanistan and Iraq alone we pretty much depleted our military resources. The idea that we were going to invade half a dozen more countries is nuts.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)simultaneously wouldn't that stretch us so thin that we then would indeed be more vulnerable to attack. I mean who's going to be standing guard on the home front if all of our soldiers are overseas?
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)But not only attacks, but being able to respond to help in case of national disasters (floods, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, etc). would be harder. Many of the national guard units got called up which depletes their resources as well.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)And the Pipelines needed in the spring of 2001
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/documents/cheney_energy_task_force.html
http://www.projectcensored.org/8-secrets-of-cheneys-energy-task-force-come-to-light/
Syrias proven oil reserves, amounting to 2.5 billion barrels, are greater than those of all neighboring countries except Iraq: according to the U.S. Energy Information Administrations estimation of its oil reserves. This makes Syria one of the largest producers and exporters of crude oil in the Middle East.
The country also has large reserves of natural gas, hitherto used for domestic consumption, especially for conversion to gas-fired power plants. But there is a problem, the U.S agency reported that since 1964 the license for the exploration and exploitation of mineral deposits has been reserved for Syrian government agencies. Until 201O an annual income of more than $ 4 billion was procured from the export of oil, particularly to Europe. But things are changing with the war.
The Free Syrian Army has taken control of important oil fields in Deir Ezzor. Other fields, in the Rumeilan, are controlled by the Kurdish Democratic Union Party, who are also hostile to the rebels with whom they have repeatedly clashed.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/oil-and-pipeline-geopolitics-the-us-nato-race-for-syrias-black-gold/5330216
bluedeathray
(511 posts)Does not bode well for the future of humanity. Brought to you by the American government. Terrorists you know...
DFW
(54,410 posts)It has been about 7 or 8 years since I last talked with Wes Clark one on one, but at the time he told me he feared that Cheneybush was absolutely going to invade Iran. Although not in the military, I still couldn't see it. Republicans are basically cowards at heart, and they usually don't like to pick hot fights with enemies they know will shoot back. Iraq was already a bad miscalculation (Rumsfeld had said in 2003 that Iraq would take "maybe six days, maybe six weeks, certainly not six months" . Even Cheneybush knew that an invasion of Iran would encounter massive Iranian popular resistance and involve tens of thousands of American casualties along with millions of Iranians. But Wes was still convinced, despite all the common sense that argued against it, they were planning to invade Iran. I couldn't figure out what made him so sure and he wouldn't say. Considering his source, no wonder he was so sure that such plans existed. He wasn't just sure. He knew. How lucky we all are that Cheney never got to implement them!
BillyRibs
(787 posts)NGO's Overturning governments, and False flag ops to get us into endless wars abound! Now, Who's a conspiracy Nut? eah?