Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riqster

(13,986 posts)
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 05:57 PM Aug 2013

Obama’s Guns of August - From Slate

http://mobile.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2013/08/barack_obama_s_logic_for_bombing_syria_the_united_states_will_seek_to_put.html

A good read, and worth the click.

Snips:
"It seems likely that President Obama will bomb Syria sometime in the coming weeks.

His top civilian and military advisers are meeting in the White House on Saturday to discuss options. American warships are heading toward the area; those already there, at least one of which had been scheduled for a port call, are standing by. Most telling perhaps is a story in the New York Times, noting that Obama’s national-security aides are studying the 1999 air war in Kosovo as a possible blueprint for action in Syria.

In that conflict 14 years ago, ethnic Albanians in Kosovo, an autonomous province of Serbia, were being massacred by Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic. President Bill Clinton, after much reluctance, decided to intervene, but couldn’t get authorization from the U.N. Security Council, where Russia—Serbia’s main ally—was certain to veto any resolution on the use of force. So Clinton turned to NATO, an appropriate instrument to deal with a crisis in the middle of Europe."


Much more at the link.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama’s Guns of August - From Slate (Original Post) riqster Aug 2013 OP
Fred Kaplan WISHES. David__77 Aug 2013 #1
I'm not sure about that. Action or inaction could fuck his shit up. riqster Aug 2013 #2
Not intervening is best for Obama politically. No doubt. David__77 Aug 2013 #3

David__77

(23,421 posts)
1. Fred Kaplan WISHES.
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 06:08 PM
Aug 2013

He wants US treasure to be spend supporting terrorism in Syria, but there are no indications that Obama is seriously considering such a move, which would of course destroy his presidency.

riqster

(13,986 posts)
2. I'm not sure about that. Action or inaction could fuck his shit up.
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 06:11 PM
Aug 2013

A big fucking mess no matter what we do.

David__77

(23,421 posts)
3. Not intervening is best for Obama politically. No doubt.
Sat Aug 24, 2013, 06:20 PM
Aug 2013

In fact, doing everything possible to force the opposition to the table with Assad would be a winning situation. It would defuse the insurgency by taking the wind out of its sails, and make it more likely for Russia and Iran to agree to a solution as well. There is zero popular demand for the US to "own" the Syria conflict. But once the US touches it, it owns it for all history.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama’s Guns of August - ...