Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama’s Guns of August - From Slate
http://mobile.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/war_stories/2013/08/barack_obama_s_logic_for_bombing_syria_the_united_states_will_seek_to_put.htmlA good read, and worth the click.
Snips:
"It seems likely that President Obama will bomb Syria sometime in the coming weeks.
His top civilian and military advisers are meeting in the White House on Saturday to discuss options. American warships are heading toward the area; those already there, at least one of which had been scheduled for a port call, are standing by. Most telling perhaps is a story in the New York Times, noting that Obamas national-security aides are studying the 1999 air war in Kosovo as a possible blueprint for action in Syria.
In that conflict 14 years ago, ethnic Albanians in Kosovo, an autonomous province of Serbia, were being massacred by Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic. President Bill Clinton, after much reluctance, decided to intervene, but couldnt get authorization from the U.N. Security Council, where RussiaSerbias main allywas certain to veto any resolution on the use of force. So Clinton turned to NATO, an appropriate instrument to deal with a crisis in the middle of Europe."
Much more at the link.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1551 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama’s Guns of August - From Slate (Original Post)
riqster
Aug 2013
OP
David__77
(23,421 posts)1. Fred Kaplan WISHES.
He wants US treasure to be spend supporting terrorism in Syria, but there are no indications that Obama is seriously considering such a move, which would of course destroy his presidency.
riqster
(13,986 posts)2. I'm not sure about that. Action or inaction could fuck his shit up.
A big fucking mess no matter what we do.
David__77
(23,421 posts)3. Not intervening is best for Obama politically. No doubt.
In fact, doing everything possible to force the opposition to the table with Assad would be a winning situation. It would defuse the insurgency by taking the wind out of its sails, and make it more likely for Russia and Iran to agree to a solution as well. There is zero popular demand for the US to "own" the Syria conflict. But once the US touches it, it owns it for all history.