General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums2012 Or Never-An optimistic articlle if your a Lib.
"In the cold calculus of game theory, the expected response to this state of affairs would be to accommodate yourself to the growing strength of the opposing coalitionto persuade pockets of voters on the Democratic margins they might be better served by Republicans. Yet the psychology of decline does not always operate in a straightforward, rational way. A strategy of managing slow decay is unpleasant, and history is replete with instances of leaders who persuaded themselves of the opposite of the obvious conclusion. Rather than adjust themselves to their slowly weakening position, they chose instead to stage a decisive confrontation. If the terms of the fight grow more unfavorable with every passing year, well, all the more reason to have the fight sooner. This was the thought process of the antebellum southern states, sizing up the growing population and industrial might of the North. It was the thinking of the leaders of Austria-Hungary, watching their empire deteriorate and deciding they needed a decisive war with Serbia to save themselves."
http://nymag.com/news/features/gop-primary-chait-2012-3/
Second of a series...again very well written with great analysis
xchrom
(108,903 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Zombies without the makeup, blood, and tattered clothing.
Bok_Tukalo
(4,323 posts)The first being how important the 2010 election was at the State level. Redistricting will restrict the effects of demographics in the House for at least a decade.
The other is the Senate which is not a majority body and looks to be solidly Republican for the near future.
The Legislative Branch is relatively safe for Republicans.