Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 01:52 PM Sep 2013

Noam Chomsky Weighs In On Syria Strike

WASHINGTON -- A U.S.-led attack on Syria without United Nations support would be a war crime regardless of congressional approval, Noam Chomsky, the antiwar activist and author, said in response to President Barack Obama's announcement that he would seek Hill approval.

"As international support for Obama’s decision to attack Syria has collapsed, along with the credibility of government claims, the administration has fallen back on a standard pretext for war crimes when all else fails: the credibility of the threats of the self-designated policeman of the world," Chomsky told HuffPost in an email.

Chomsky recently traveled to the region to learn more about the Syria crisis, and his comments there led some to believe he was open to military intervention if negotiations failed to produce peace. "I believe you should choose the negotiating track first, and should you fail, then moving to the second option" -- backing the rebels -- "becomes more acceptable," he said.

But his comments to HuffPost indicate that he remains opposed to any military action that came without U.N. approval.

"[T]hat aggression without UN authorization would be a war crime, a very serious one, is quite clear, despite tortured efforts to invoke other crimes as precedents," he added.

in full: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/02/noam-chomsky-syria_n_3851911.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
1. I don't understand why so few Americans appear to know this....
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 01:56 PM
Sep 2013

We signed the Charter, for pete's sake. We helped write it, in fact. It defines aggression as a war crime, a crime against humanity. Are we a nation of laws, or are we a nation of rogue warriors, however well intended?

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
2. I will wait and see what transpires, and I want very much to hear how Obama's OLC
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 02:02 PM
Sep 2013

writes the reasoning for the strike.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
3. does "reasoning" overshadow the law...?
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 02:14 PM
Sep 2013

Today Ban Ki Moon reiterated publicly that attacking Syria except in self defense or under UN direction is a war crime. One cannot reason their way out of that any more than bank robbers can provide adequate justification and be relieved of responsibility for following the law.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
4. Not likely, no. But I want to read it, they need to come up with something. I just read
Tue Sep 3, 2013, 02:24 PM
Sep 2013

Boehner's support, sounded to me a combination of punishment and deterrence is the reason
to strike. Clinton's legal team wrote justification for his strike calling it humanitarian..but also
wrote that this action/reasoning should NOT be considered a precedent.

I would like to know how in the hell you can have it both ways.

I am against any strike btw and it is disturbing the UN report stories about our government
allegedly giving them a hard time...saying things like, your report won't be accurate b/c of all the
physical damage in the area. I don't like anything I am hearing so far.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Noam Chomsky Weighs In On...