General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHey look who it is! John Yoo rears his ugly, criminal, neocon head.
John Choon Yoo (born July 10, 1967)[4] is an American attorney, law professor, and author. He served as a political appointee, the Deputy Assistant U.S. Attorney General in the Office of Legal Counsel, Department of Justice (OLC), during the George W. Bush administration. He is best known for his opinions concerning the Geneva Conventions which legitimized the War on Terror by the United States. He also authored the so-called Torture Memos, which concerned the use of what the Central Intelligence Agency called enhanced interrogation techniques including waterboarding. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Yoo
The Benefits Outweigh the Costs in Syria
International law permits using force to improve international peace and security.
John Yoo | National Review Online
August 30, 2013
President Barack Obama and his advisers are hesitating to punish Syrias use of chemical weapons because of concerns about international law. This latest tragedy in Syrias civil war shows the damage done by a legalistic approach to international security: Earlier intervention by the United States might well have ended the Assad regime, forestalled the deaths of more than 100,000 civilians, and prevented the opening of the Pandoras box of chemical weapons.
Under the administrations reading of the U.N. Charter, however, the United States may resort to force only in self-defense or when authorized by the Security Council. President Obama delayed war in Libya until the Security Council approved, and it so far has refused to stop the killing in Syria on the same grounds. In his quest to be the antiGeorge W. Bush, whom he accused of waging an illegal war in Iraq, Mr. Obama has refused to provide aid to the Syrian rebels, impose a no-fly zone, or attack regime targets, allowing the civil war to kill civilians, displace millions, and further destabilize the Middle East.
It is time for the United States to stop hiding behind such obsolete, formalistic views of the laws of war and embrace a pragmatic approach in keeping with long American practice. Instead of blindly following the U.N. Charters ban on war, the United States can argue that protecting international peace and security takes precedence. The U.N. Charter aims to prevent the great-power wars that destroyed Europe in 1914 and 1939, but which have largely disappeared during the long peace of the post-war world. International law should not outlaw force that promotes international peace and security by stopping civil wars, humanitarian catastrophes, rogue nations, terrorist groups, or failing states.
http://www.aei.org/article/foreign-and-defense-policy/regional/the-benefits-outweigh-the-costs-in-syria/
The noecons are pushing hard, folks.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)It's criminal.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Smarmy bastard makes me .
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Reading that article gave me a sick feeling of deja vu - same bullshit we were fed on Iraq.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Look at the bright side:
A law professor is calling for law to be ignored in favor of what we want to do. In a word, he is calling for straight criminal behavior.
The mask is off. In every sense of the word.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)I stole my sigline icon from another DUer. I forgot who:
It's not just the criminal NSA.
It's not just the criminal banks.
It's not just the criminal wars and the criminal slaughter.
It's not just the shredding of the Constitution.
I still expect to wake up from this nightmare sometimes. I still cannot believe that the United States of America has come to this.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)JEB
(4,748 posts)I'm sure the NSA could provide exact coordinates for droning or Tomahawking Yoo, W, Deadeye Dick etc.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)War criminals in the service of evil we condone are excempt from outrage, US and international law, civil suit, good manners, common sense, and human decency as well as being excempt from "humanitarian bombings".
If/when Syria starts making moral sense and adds crushing the testicles of children to it's game plan perhaps then they too will be exempt.
Of course Yoo is a good man, Obama respects a good ball buster with such impeccable moral standards. Who wouldn't?
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)The side Yoo is on is the wrong side.
Supersedeas
(20,630 posts)Solly Mack
(90,788 posts)Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)as usual.
Yoo is a disgrace, as is his tortured Republicon logic.
Precisely
(358 posts)when you're not the one paying the price
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Do not strike Syria.