Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 08:32 AM Sep 2013

The US Government Has Betrayed the Internet. We Need To Take It Back by Bruce Schneier

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/09/06


Government and industry have betrayed the internet, and us.

By subverting the internet at every level to make it a vast, multi-layered and robust surveillance platform, the NSA has undermined a fundamental social contract. The companies that build and manage our internet infrastructure, the companies that create and sell us our hardware and software, or the companies that host our data: we can no longer trust them to be ethical internet stewards.

This is not the internet the world needs, or the internet its creators envisioned. We need to take it back.

And by we, I mean the engineering community.
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The US Government Has Betrayed the Internet. We Need To Take It Back by Bruce Schneier (Original Post) xchrom Sep 2013 OP
Correct on both counts. bemildred Sep 2013 #1
LOL! The internet began as a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) project!!!!! stevenleser Sep 2013 #2
Since when has DARPA meant 'violate the constitution'? Trillo Sep 2013 #4
While your straw man is interesting in its creativity, it has nothing to do with my point. nt stevenleser Sep 2013 #10
Your other reply to the OP, "your point" seems to mean the government was violating the 4th Trillo Sep 2013 #23
And whoever thought of AT&T, Verizon, cable companies... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #6
Use a program to block trackers... TxGrandpa Sep 2013 #19
Hardly my point-- should I care enough I know how to set up... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #25
There's no doubt it's being used as a spying and marketing machine... TxGrandpa Sep 2013 #33
I can assure you Mr. Schneier knows all about that. nt bemildred Sep 2013 #7
I can assure you Mr. Schneier failed to appreciate the irony of his words. nt stevenleser Sep 2013 #11
I quite agree he would see no irony. nt bemildred Sep 2013 #13
I agree, he is oblivious. nt stevenleser Sep 2013 #14
No, just no irony. You see irony, other people do not. bemildred Sep 2013 #15
LOL! stevenleser Sep 2013 #16
Your argument is silly, Steve. longship Sep 2013 #9
It's not an argument. It's pointing out the unintended humor and irony in the article. nt stevenleser Sep 2013 #12
Well, I trust Schneier on this issue. longship Sep 2013 #17
+1 from another who remembers the internet before the WWW hootinholler Sep 2013 #24
Ah yes. The glory days of HDB UUCP Paulie Sep 2013 #32
Bruce Schneier is one of the most rational voices on this subject. eggplant Sep 2013 #28
The interstate system was a federal project. JoeyT Sep 2013 #31
K&R AnotherMcIntosh Sep 2013 #3
k/r marmar Sep 2013 #5
K & R !!! WillyT Sep 2013 #8
DARPA - Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency MineralMan Sep 2013 #18
It doesn't mean the military has the right to do as the wish Harmony Blue Sep 2013 #20
Did I say anything of the sort? I don't think so. MineralMan Sep 2013 #22
Hah,, Cryptoad Sep 2013 #21
I think people probably don't get the distinction overall, BUT AtheistCrusader Sep 2013 #29
if we all stil had landlines DBoon Sep 2013 #26
If you have any talent as an engineer to work on such a thing AtheistCrusader Sep 2013 #27
Recommend jsr Sep 2013 #30
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
2. LOL! The internet began as a Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) project!!!!!
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 08:56 AM
Sep 2013

That article is hilarious unintended comedy. The internet began as a defense department research project.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET

http://www.darpa.mil/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=2554

Trillo

(9,154 posts)
23. Your other reply to the OP, "your point" seems to mean the government was violating the 4th
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 10:01 AM
Sep 2013

amendment long before DARPA or the Internet, and that by developing it, it was always intended as a privacy-violating surveillance tool.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
6. And whoever thought of AT&T, Verizon, cable companies...
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 09:19 AM
Sep 2013

as "ethical internet stewards"?

Or ever imagined email to be secure?

I'm a lot more bothered by what Google and Bing do with my search history, or anyone else does with cookies and scripts than the government spying.

Here's just a few from yesterday's browser history:

doubleclick.com
zedo.com
fw.adsafeprotected.com
googleads.g.doubleclick.com
googleadservices.com
ib.adnxs.com
load.exelator.com
match.rtbidder.net

I can't imagine anyone with seriously dirty doings doing them online.


WTF is this crap?

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
25. Hardly my point-- should I care enough I know how to set up...
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 10:09 AM
Sep 2013

proxies and which search engines and browsers reduce tracking.

But, the web now is set up to be a major spying and marketing machine. It knows far too much about all of us, and the government is probably the least of our problems.

TxGrandpa

(124 posts)
33. There's no doubt it's being used as a spying and marketing machine...
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 08:28 AM
Sep 2013

..but we do have resources to cut down on tracking. I clean out my internet files and cookies frequently but notice that there hasn't been as many since using those utilities.

longship

(40,416 posts)
9. Your argument is silly, Steve.
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 09:35 AM
Sep 2013

DARPA funds a lot of pure research. Arpanet was designed to allow research institutions to share data and communicate with one another. That was the original goal. The NSA wasn't part of that equation because nobody at that time knew where Arpanet was going to go.

When I started using the Internet, commerce was forbidden on it.

longship

(40,416 posts)
17. Well, I trust Schneier on this issue.
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 09:46 AM
Sep 2013

He's the go to guy on security issues. What he says carries a lot of weight with those who understand and work with the technology.

I guess I didn't understand your post. I don't know if I still understand it.

Sorry.

eggplant

(3,911 posts)
28. Bruce Schneier is one of the most rational voices on this subject.
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 11:18 AM
Sep 2013

He is a well respected long time member of the technical community who literally wrote the book on cryptography. He is not known to bluster.

Your implication is that he is unaware of the origins of the internet, and as such is somewhat offensive.

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
31. The interstate system was a federal project.
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 11:11 PM
Sep 2013

So we should totally support warrantless searches for anyone driving on the interstate.

Use of a system that was initially created by the federal government doesn't mean that you sign away all rights while using it.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
18. DARPA - Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 09:47 AM
Sep 2013

The Internet is a child of the military establishment. That's who created it. It has become something other than it was envisioned, but it started as a military project.

Harmony Blue

(3,978 posts)
20. It doesn't mean the military has the right to do as the wish
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 09:56 AM
Sep 2013

are you ready to hand back your microwave? Yeah thought so.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
22. Did I say anything of the sort? I don't think so.
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 10:00 AM
Sep 2013

My comment was to the OP, whose source said it was time to turn the Internet back over to its creators. It appears that that source does not understand who created it.

DARPA is and has been involved in developing many things we use and many things we dislike. It is in the business of doing research that has military applications.

DARPA is what DARPA is. I'm neither praising it or condemning it.

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
21. Hah,,
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 09:58 AM
Sep 2013

The Internet has always been public domain,,,,,,, how funny that people now think it should be a private domain.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
29. I think people probably don't get the distinction overall, BUT
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 11:19 AM
Sep 2013

when you drive on public roads, you have certain expectations as to the privacy of the contents of your car. That's a little bit analogous to the very reasonable expectation that most people have that private communications on the internet are, (at least the contents) private. Maybe not the fact that there was a communication, who it was from and who it was to, and how long or how large it is, but the contents, one can, I think, reasonably expect to be kept private.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
27. If you have any talent as an engineer to work on such a thing
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 11:16 AM
Sep 2013

chances are you're already employed by the NSA. If not, you will be made an offer when you make yourself relevant.

(I am not denigrating you, and an offer might be 'give us a private key or we throw you in jail' rather than a corner office with a view)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The US Government Has Bet...