Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLawrence Wilkerson: Hypocrisy Of War Over Chemical Weapon Use (VIDEO)
http://egbertowillies.com/2013/09/06/hypocrisy-war-syria/Hypocrisy Of War Over Chemical Weapon Use (VIDEO)
September 6, 2013 by Egberto Willies
The vast majority of Americans are not only fatigued from war. They are tired of being lied to and false choices. Lest one forget, NPR recently reported that in more than one instance Reagan tacitly supported its use with his inaction. In other words countries have looked the other way when its use did not directly affect them. While this may seem like an inhumane stance most times a political solution is the only solution that ultimately causes the least amount of deaths.
How is having a bomb explode with the shrapnel shredding muscles and bones in the legs humans any more inhumane than poisonous gas? How are millions of land mines that maim and kill any more humane? There are all kinds of killing that occur in war. They are all painful and inhumane. To go into a destabilizing military action helps neither America or the average Syrian citizen.
Retired Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson gave the best perspective on this on All In With Chris Hayes. He lays out the flaw in making this use of chemical weapons the real red line.
How is having a bomb explode with the shrapnel shredding muscles and bones in the legs humans any more inhumane than poisonous gas? How are millions of land mines that maim and kill any more humane? There are all kinds of killing that occur in war. They are all painful and inhumane. To go into a destabilizing military action helps neither America or the average Syrian citizen.
Retired Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson gave the best perspective on this on All In With Chris Hayes. He lays out the flaw in making this use of chemical weapons the real red line.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 697 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawrence Wilkerson: Hypocrisy Of War Over Chemical Weapon Use (VIDEO) (Original Post)
Coyotl
Sep 2013
OP
polichick
(37,152 posts)1. U.S. hypocrisy is finally catching up with us.
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)2. sorry, but that's an easy one - and it's why CW should be outlawed
"How is having a bomb explode with the shrapnel shredding muscles and bones in the legs humans any more inhumane than poisonous gas?"
Bombs and bullets can be targeted, and with a fair amount of precision, at combatants (no need to lecture me on collateral damage and targeting errors, I'm well aware, we're all well aware).
Chemical Weapons are MORE likely to kill civilians and house pets than they are to kill soldiers - as soldiers are much more likely to be prepared.
And indeed, when they have been used in recent years, they have actually been crudely targeted at civilians.
Assad only wanted to us poison gas to kill a relatively few innocent civilians - to send a message - the large number of deaths this time was probably a mistake. Or maybe not; maybe it was a gamble.
Hussein wanted to kill an entire village in Halabja. He didn't use shrapnel.