Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 12:54 PM Sep 2013

Lawrence Wilkerson: Hypocrisy Of War Over Chemical Weapon Use (VIDEO)

http://egbertowillies.com/2013/09/06/hypocrisy-war-syria/

Hypocrisy Of War Over Chemical Weapon Use (VIDEO)
September 6, 2013 by Egberto Willies

The vast majority of Americans are not only fatigued from war. They are tired of being lied to and false choices. Lest one forget, NPR recently reported that in more than one instance Reagan tacitly supported its use with his inaction. In other words countries have looked the other way when its use did not directly affect them. While this may seem like an inhumane stance most times a political solution is the only solution that ultimately causes the least amount of deaths.

How is having a bomb explode with the shrapnel shredding muscles and bones in the legs humans any more inhumane than poisonous gas? How are millions of land mines that maim and kill any more humane? There are all kinds of killing that occur in war. They are all painful and inhumane. To go into a destabilizing military action helps neither America or the average Syrian citizen.

Retired Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson gave the best perspective on this on “All In With Chris Hayes”. He lays out the flaw in making this use of chemical weapons the real red line.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawrence Wilkerson: Hypocrisy Of War Over Chemical Weapon Use (VIDEO) (Original Post) Coyotl Sep 2013 OP
U.S. hypocrisy is finally catching up with us. polichick Sep 2013 #1
sorry, but that's an easy one - and it's why CW should be outlawed Schema Thing Sep 2013 #2

Schema Thing

(10,283 posts)
2. sorry, but that's an easy one - and it's why CW should be outlawed
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 01:22 PM
Sep 2013

"How is having a bomb explode with the shrapnel shredding muscles and bones in the legs humans any more inhumane than poisonous gas?"


Bombs and bullets can be targeted, and with a fair amount of precision, at combatants (no need to lecture me on collateral damage and targeting errors, I'm well aware, we're all well aware).

Chemical Weapons are MORE likely to kill civilians and house pets than they are to kill soldiers - as soldiers are much more likely to be prepared.

And indeed, when they have been used in recent years, they have actually been crudely targeted at civilians.

Assad only wanted to us poison gas to kill a relatively few innocent civilians - to send a message - the large number of deaths this time was probably a mistake. Or maybe not; maybe it was a gamble.

Hussein wanted to kill an entire village in Halabja. He didn't use shrapnel.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lawrence Wilkerson: Hypo...