Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kablooie

(18,641 posts)
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 02:43 AM Sep 2013

Why do they always think that a few bombs will cow our adversaries?

Shock and Awe --- Fooey!

Bombs seem to be mundane daily events in mideast conflicts.
There's nothing terrifying or intimidating about them to the warring powers.
The shock and awe may apply to ordinary people who get caught in the crossfire but they aren't part of the conflict and so don't count.

American leaders seem to think over and over and over again that our firepower is so terrifying that no one would risk incurring it.
But when it's used it never has any kind of definitive effect except to anger the adversary to attack the US along with their original enemy.

We've got to grow up and get over the idea that bombing other countries is the path to peace and harmony in the world.
If we attack we simply become another target and any humanitarian efforts we imagined will collapse into dust.




7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why do they always think that a few bombs will cow our adversaries? (Original Post) Kablooie Sep 2013 OP
How Many "Limited Duration, Protective Reaction" Bombing Campaigns Did We Have DallasNE Sep 2013 #1
They don't Scootaloo Sep 2013 #2
right...the way we used bombs to take out Osama Bin Laden... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #4
It's all they got... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #3
When China and Russia will veto it anyways? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2013 #5
Sure they will, but before that the US and some others will never... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #7
Cos the US has lots of bombs. sibelian Sep 2013 #6

DallasNE

(7,403 posts)
1. How Many "Limited Duration, Protective Reaction" Bombing Campaigns Did We Have
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 03:02 AM
Sep 2013

Announced by Melvin Laird in Vietnam. Not one of them did any good but it was like Nixon felt they had to be doing something so he sent the hapless Laird out there to announce still another bombing campaign. And perhaps the biggest blunder was when Nixon went with a wider war as he invaded the parrot's beak area of Cambodia and because of the destabilization that caused it was not long after that that Pol Pot came to power and depopulated the country with his killing fields.

My fear is not that we will repeat the mistakes of Iraq but that we will repeat the mistakes of Vietnam.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
2. They don't
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 03:15 AM
Sep 2013

But our foreign policy is so inbred and myopic that other ideas are not only not considered - other ideas just don't exist.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
3. It's all they got...
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 04:07 AM
Sep 2013

We really should have the UN, or some international organization, be a de facto police force for things like this, but that will never happen for a number of reasons-- not the least of which is no country willing to give up a smidgeon of its power or authority.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
7. Sure they will, but before that the US and some others will never...
Sat Sep 7, 2013, 04:20 AM
Sep 2013

give up our sovereignty or allow our troop to be put under a foreign command.

And the killings and brutality go on...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why do they always think ...