Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 06:55 PM Feb 2012

Bill Clinton: 'Embrace' the Keystone XL pipeline.

From the Politico..

Speaking at an Energy Department conference in Maryland on Wednesday, the former president said he was surprised the project has gotten as gummed up as it has, laying the blame on pipeline builder TransCanada.

"One of the most amazing things to me about this Keystone pipeline deal is that they ever filed that route in the first place since they could've gone around the Nebraska Sandhills and avoided most of the dangers, no matter how imagined, to the Ogallala [aquifer] with a different route, which I presume we'll get now, because the extra cost of running is infinitesimal compared to the revenue that will be generated over a long period of time," he said.

"So, I think we should embrace it and develop a stakeholder-driven system of high standards for doing the work," Clinton added.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/73445.html

================

I think this is a trial balloon. I suspect the Obama administration wants to build the pipeline... for a number of reasons... jobs, oil, economy, politics. If the re-route minimizes environmental risks I think they are going to approve it.

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bill Clinton: 'Embrace' the Keystone XL pipeline. (Original Post) DCBob Feb 2012 OP
It won't, actually; PDJane Feb 2012 #1
No. n/t Cali_Democrat Feb 2012 #2
i wouldn't embrace it with your dick, billy. frylock Feb 2012 #3
well, bill passed his other dad's bill-NAFTA-GATT newspeak Feb 2012 #15
Any thinking person knows the Tar Sands are a toxic nightmare. The only ones who want Vincardog Feb 2012 #4
Face it and embrace it or bend over and take it, either way they're set on screwing you saras Feb 2012 #5
Shut up, Bill. You do not know what the fuck you're talking about. CaliforniaPeggy Feb 2012 #6
Where's your drinking water coming from Billy boy? MadHound Feb 2012 #7
It isn't just about the Ogallala. It's about the environmental damage to our water that will JDPriestly Feb 2012 #8
No thanks Bill. Joe Shlabotnik Feb 2012 #9
As if I needed another reminder what a sellout the Clintons are. Poll_Blind Feb 2012 #10
"Why the Keystone pipeline would boost pump prices" DianaForRussFeingold Feb 2012 #11
"Emrace it"? Does he want the pipeline to be named Monica? Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2012 #12
It is stuff like this DonCoquixote Feb 2012 #13
Did he explain how this clusterfuck is going to make us free of foreign oil tularetom Feb 2012 #14
from the iraq bogus war to the BP oil spills newspeak Feb 2012 #16
why? ibegurpard Feb 2012 #17
And you know it won't be. CaliforniaPeggy Feb 2012 #18
I think you are right. applegrove Feb 2012 #19
Embrace THIS, Bill Canuckistanian Feb 2012 #20
The pipeline will be built, let's not kid ourselves. joshcryer Feb 2012 #21
That's a disgusting rationalization and only those with no moral keel to begin with buy into it. nt Poll_Blind Mar 2012 #22
What rationalization? That's reality. Sorry for the cynicism here. joshcryer Mar 2012 #23

PDJane

(10,103 posts)
1. It won't, actually;
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:29 PM
Feb 2012

It's discouraging. The whole oil sands project is a disaster; it's going to contaminate the water table, and will be the final straw on the back of global warming. It's the wrong project at the wrong time.

newspeak

(4,847 posts)
15. well, bill passed his other dad's bill-NAFTA-GATT
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 08:03 PM
Feb 2012

And made that iran-contra business go away. Why am I not surprised he's for the pipeline? Wow, all of those jobs we're going to be getting-NOT, while taking people's property for it and exposing our water supply and land.



Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
4. Any thinking person knows the Tar Sands are a toxic nightmare. The only ones who want
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:37 PM
Feb 2012

to go down that road are either ignorant or too blinded by greed to realize that you can not eat or breath money.

 

saras

(6,670 posts)
5. Face it and embrace it or bend over and take it, either way they're set on screwing you
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:39 PM
Feb 2012

It's not rape if you lay back and enjoy it, right?

For chrissakes, the guy is SMARTER when he thinks with his dick.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,726 posts)
6. Shut up, Bill. You do not know what the fuck you're talking about.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:40 PM
Feb 2012

This is an environmental nightmare from start to finish. Any thinking person with half a brain knows it.

 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
7. Where's your drinking water coming from Billy boy?
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:45 PM
Feb 2012

Oh, yeah, that's right, from nowhere near where the pipeline is going to run.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
8. It isn't just about the Ogallala. It's about the environmental damage to our water that will
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:45 PM
Feb 2012

result from exploiting the tar sands.

We can create more jobs putting solar panels on houses and buildings in the Southwest and finding ways to store that energy.

We have solved worse problems that storing solar energy. We can do this.

The tar sands should stay as they are, where they are.

The Clintons -- sold out again.

Joe Shlabotnik

(5,604 posts)
9. No thanks Bill.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:45 PM
Feb 2012

I can't embrace any more neoliberal, environmental exploitation that serves no economic purpose other than enriching a select few. Nice try.

Poll_Blind

(23,864 posts)
10. As if I needed another reminder what a sellout the Clintons are.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:48 PM
Feb 2012

"Embrace it"?

Fuck you, man. One of the reasons I vote for Democrats is the presumption that they'll protect the environment, not fucking grease shit like this along.

PB

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
12. "Emrace it"? Does he want the pipeline to be named Monica?
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:53 PM
Feb 2012

3rd Way, Neo-Libs, are always open to a proposal that involves money.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
13. It is stuff like this
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 07:56 PM
Feb 2012

That makes me very, very glad I did not vote for your wife in 2008. As much as Obama has disappointed me, I knew giving Bill a 3rd time would be terrible.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
14. Did he explain how this clusterfuck is going to make us free of foreign oil
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 08:02 PM
Feb 2012

when all the oil produced in the Canadian oil sands has already been glommed onto by China?

Like you I suspect they are trying to arrange a deal with the oil companies to give this thing the green light in return for a lid on gas prices until after the election.

newspeak

(4,847 posts)
16. from the iraq bogus war to the BP oil spills
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 08:06 PM
Feb 2012

the american people are always taking the risk for these corporations-it's getting pretty obscene.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,726 posts)
18. And you know it won't be.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 09:09 PM
Feb 2012

That oil will immediately flow onto foreign markets. Oil companies have no loyalty to any country, but only to their own profits.

joshcryer

(62,277 posts)
21. The pipeline will be built, let's not kid ourselves.
Wed Feb 29, 2012, 09:27 PM
Feb 2012

Any electable President will have the moral and ethical desire to build the thing.

Poll_Blind

(23,864 posts)
22. That's a disgusting rationalization and only those with no moral keel to begin with buy into it. nt
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 12:42 PM
Mar 2012

PB

joshcryer

(62,277 posts)
23. What rationalization? That's reality. Sorry for the cynicism here.
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 09:05 PM
Mar 2012

Here, enjoy Rep Markey on the issue since you seemed to have misunderstood what I was saying:

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bill Clinton: 'Embrace' t...