General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBill Clinton: 'Embrace' the Keystone XL pipeline.
From the Politico..
Speaking at an Energy Department conference in Maryland on Wednesday, the former president said he was surprised the project has gotten as gummed up as it has, laying the blame on pipeline builder TransCanada.
"One of the most amazing things to me about this Keystone pipeline deal is that they ever filed that route in the first place since they could've gone around the Nebraska Sandhills and avoided most of the dangers, no matter how imagined, to the Ogallala [aquifer] with a different route, which I presume we'll get now, because the extra cost of running is infinitesimal compared to the revenue that will be generated over a long period of time," he said.
"So, I think we should embrace it and develop a stakeholder-driven system of high standards for doing the work," Clinton added.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0212/73445.html
================
I think this is a trial balloon. I suspect the Obama administration wants to build the pipeline... for a number of reasons... jobs, oil, economy, politics. If the re-route minimizes environmental risks I think they are going to approve it.
PDJane
(10,103 posts)It's discouraging. The whole oil sands project is a disaster; it's going to contaminate the water table, and will be the final straw on the back of global warming. It's the wrong project at the wrong time.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)newspeak
(4,847 posts)And made that iran-contra business go away. Why am I not surprised he's for the pipeline? Wow, all of those jobs we're going to be getting-NOT, while taking people's property for it and exposing our water supply and land.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)to go down that road are either ignorant or too blinded by greed to realize that you can not eat or breath money.
saras
(6,670 posts)It's not rape if you lay back and enjoy it, right?
For chrissakes, the guy is SMARTER when he thinks with his dick.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,726 posts)This is an environmental nightmare from start to finish. Any thinking person with half a brain knows it.
MadHound
(34,179 posts)Oh, yeah, that's right, from nowhere near where the pipeline is going to run.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)result from exploiting the tar sands.
We can create more jobs putting solar panels on houses and buildings in the Southwest and finding ways to store that energy.
We have solved worse problems that storing solar energy. We can do this.
The tar sands should stay as they are, where they are.
The Clintons -- sold out again.
Joe Shlabotnik
(5,604 posts)I can't embrace any more neoliberal, environmental exploitation that serves no economic purpose other than enriching a select few. Nice try.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)"Embrace it"?
Fuck you, man. One of the reasons I vote for Democrats is the presumption that they'll protect the environment, not fucking grease shit like this along.
PB
DianaForRussFeingold
(2,552 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)3rd Way, Neo-Libs, are always open to a proposal that involves money.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)That makes me very, very glad I did not vote for your wife in 2008. As much as Obama has disappointed me, I knew giving Bill a 3rd time would be terrible.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)when all the oil produced in the Canadian oil sands has already been glommed onto by China?
Like you I suspect they are trying to arrange a deal with the oil companies to give this thing the green light in return for a lid on gas prices until after the election.
newspeak
(4,847 posts)the american people are always taking the risk for these corporations-it's getting pretty obscene.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)are we guaranteed the Canadian oil will be sold to American markets?
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,726 posts)That oil will immediately flow onto foreign markets. Oil companies have no loyalty to any country, but only to their own profits.
applegrove
(118,832 posts)Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)Once a DLCer, always a DLCer.
joshcryer
(62,277 posts)Any electable President will have the moral and ethical desire to build the thing.
Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)PB
joshcryer
(62,277 posts)Here, enjoy Rep Markey on the issue since you seemed to have misunderstood what I was saying: