Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 03:43 PM Sep 2013

Top 20 signs you might be a counterproductive left wingnut

1. You blame Democrats for what Republicans do
Whenever the GOP does something, that becomes the Democrat's fault.

2. You imagine that President Obama is a dictator and he's deliberately making sure that Congress doesn't help people
You argue that all Obama needs to do is "fight harder" and "show some backbone" against the thinly-disguised GOP racists, and then they'd all just fall in line.

3. You're not a regular campaign volunteer. In fact, you think writing screeds on DU is activism
You don't even know what cutting-turf is. You've never actually tried to convince an uncommitted voter, rather than attack people outside your little echo chamber.

4. Most of your DU screeds are not anti-Republican, they're anti-Democratic
You constantly crow that you're just "holding feet to the fire" except the vast majority of your screeds only bash Democrats. And often take on Republican coloring, like a reflexive belief in government and Democratic administration being evil.

5. You refuse to credit the President for anything you actually like, instead focusing purely on your hatred of him
If the President gets a very good deal, 99% of what you want, you'll rant about the 1% he had to give up. "Compromise" to you means everyone agreeing with what you want 100%.

6. No one can remember the last time you actually praised anyone or anything, except someone else's hate-filled anti-Democratic screed
You seem to never have anything positive to say, leading most to believe that you're a very angry, bitter, person, with little emotional maturity. And other hate-filled screeds are all you manage to praise.

7. You refuse to acknowledge that people on the other side of a debate have any legitimate concerns at all - like trying to keep a dictatorial regime from gassing its own people
Your fellow Democrats must be obsessed with bloodlust and love war, or at least that's what you believe.

8. You never provide a argument about what should be done instead that would address the other side's concerns
An actual argument that would potentially be agreeable to both sides might actually change minds, but that would deprive you of your ability to feel sanctimonious. In fact, "Third Way" is an anathema to you.

9. You counter any moral argument with a diatribe about some past bad action taken by the U.S. - nearly always done during Republican leadership 10 to 50 years ago
All reprehensible actions taken by anyone outside the U.S. can be justified in a kindergarten "we did it once too" by bringing up some ancient cold-war wrong, nearly always done during a Republican administration.

10. Instead of congratulating Democratic leaders on making what you feel to be the right choice, you imagine you have "defeated" the people who were actually mature enough to change their minds
You live in a black and white world of a zero-sum game, where someone else's winning means your losing and vice-versa. Therefore anything you like that happened is due to a "defeat" of the Democratic President.

11. You see no difference between Democrats and Republicans
Boy, there is not a single whit of difference, because you haven't gotten your maximalist position on everything.

12. Your arguments reference no facts, but are instead filled with unsubstantiated assertions. Your counter-arguments are ROTL icons
Did you know that President Obama is secretly twisting arms to destroy Social Security? Well, just because it isn't true doesn't keep you from stating it as fact. Any vague rumor is automatically true if it shows Democrats in a bad light. Your counterarguments typically run like this: "You're Quoting the New York Times?!? " You aren't actually laughing.

13. You dismiss facts that don't fit your worldview, and personally attack people who provide them
ProSense drives you crazy, what with all her facts and figures and research that disprove your assertions. You attack people specifically when their references refuting your made-up B.S. are long and well documented.

14. You Godwin political discussions, liberally attacking other Democrats with words like "Authoritarian", "Police State", "Hitler", "Fascist", "Corporatist&quot the new dog-whistle for fascist)
You call people who explain mainstream Democratic thought Obama "apologists", ignoring that there is absolutely nothing to "apologize" for. Paradoxically, taking actions to actually stop a dictator from gassing little children to death is something you are against. You never acknowledge that Hitler wasn't stopped with a sternly-worded letter either.

15 You imagine that the DU is representative of mainstream Democratic thought, instead of being a place for the very liberal left to gather
And further, you actually argue that your positions are correct simply because the majority of the D.U. hold it. Here is a small point of fact: President Obama's approval rating among Democrats is 85%.

16. You have "left" the Democratic party and/or are sole-arbiter on who is actually a "Democrat" and who isn't
Anyone who actually likes President Obama clearly can't be a real Democrat in your mind. You have also written a "Goodbye cold cruel DU - because people don't support me right or wrong - I will never vote Democratic again". For bonus points, you've done both.

17. You continue to make excuses for Nader
And others who strengthen the GOP by dividing the Democratic coalition.

18. You imagine that anyone would pay to try to convince people like you that mainstream Democratic thinking is correct
Any time you lose an argument, or someone shows your assertion is complete bullshit by referencing established facts (see ProSense), they are clearly being paid to do so. Never mind that actual Koch propaganda is as nutcase and unconvincing as you are, it's all a grand conspiracy, I tell ya! A conspiracy!

19. You recognize many of these behaviors in the Tea Party, and recognize how much they're damaging the Republicans, but don't acknowledge the same in your own behavior
Your few moments of clarity come when you look at the GOP and see how their extremists are destroying their brand. But the similarities between the Tea Party and you (including a reflexive hatred of the U.S. government and conspiracy mongering) is something that you refuse to acknowledge.

20. You are incredibly offended by this list
Are you pissed off by this list? Maybe there is a reason for that.

615 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Top 20 signs you might be a counterproductive left wingnut (Original Post) ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 OP
This won't end well. Electric Monk Sep 2013 #1
Divide and conquer. mahina Sep 2013 #496
End? AnnetteJacobs Sep 2013 #522
What is this? A Spanish Inquisition? Taverner Sep 2013 #598
Did you write this? uppityperson Sep 2013 #2
Tough love. NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #3
your concept of "love" is seriously twisted if you think that the cali Sep 2013 #39
see #12 n/t intaglio Sep 2013 #43
See 12 Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #132
A phrase usually employed to justify, peddle or whitewash indefensible monstrosities. 2ndAmForComputers Sep 2013 #444
See #14 AnnetteJacobs Sep 2013 #523
Um tough "love" is the very opposite of love Taverner Sep 2013 #599
I like it. TheDeputy Sep 2013 #4
I guess I disagree with the premise vt_native Sep 2013 #5
What is this, some sick joke? Fantastic Anarchist Sep 2013 #6
it's a representative of the vapors crowd Skittles Sep 2013 #351
wow PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #7
Right. Troll Republicans. n/t RebelOne Sep 2013 #14
As someone who is actually running for office, and... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #8
What office are you running for? (n/t) derby378 Sep 2013 #17
Town Trustee for Southold, NY TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #225
no offense but how the flying fuck could DU possibly be any help in your endeavor? Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #412
Precisely where did I say it could? I'm quite well aware that there's little interest in... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #416
best of luck to you. think Sep 2013 #418
Thanks TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #425
um, uh you said: Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #422
That most of the points were spot on, but... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #427
It sounded to me like his point was... Vanje Sep 2013 #431
Quite frankly, we don't even know who we are, so... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #466
Omaha Steve revealed his true identity for purposes of his campaign Vanje Sep 2013 #470
There ya go again... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #484
If you dont ask DU for help.... Vanje Sep 2013 #486
it is because we are just like the Op says, or something or lack ESP, plus we hates Obama. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #489
You seem to have missed the point that I wasn't criticising DU... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #494
You want a fucking " Atta-boy"? Vanje Sep 2013 #497
A little bit of smiling and dialing from a DUer living in the area would help.... MADem Sep 2013 #455
Sure, and did he ask? Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #457
Well, aren't you the pleasant one... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #464
You posted here in support of a thread dedicated to insulting the vast majority of DU'ers. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #487
This thread *describes* a relatively small handful of counterproductive wingnuts ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #593
Your thread is flame-bait trolling of the worst sort. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #594
DU used to be more of a Village. People used to help one another out. MADem Sep 2013 #468
Not necessarily Vanje Sep 2013 #472
Yes, I am aware of that project. MADem Sep 2013 #475
"Deep pockets" No. You don't get it Vanje Sep 2013 #483
That's great that you do that. MADem Sep 2013 #492
T.B. Didnt ask for that kind of help either. Vanje Sep 2013 #495
Well, he did say this in this thread... MADem Sep 2013 #499
Agree. Vanje Sep 2013 #500
Eh, he did join in on a rather vicious OP by someone criticizing a group to which they do not belong Fumesucker Sep 2013 #515
I never said I didn't expect it. I said... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #528
If you don't like it then you know how to avoid it Fumesucker Sep 2013 #532
And I didn't say I wanted to avoid it, either... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #533
I haven't changed my views much since 2008 Fumesucker Sep 2013 #537
Nor have I. In fact I haven't changed much since... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #539
What you said.... nt. MADem Sep 2013 #540
+1,000,000 x 100 Auntie Bush Sep 2013 #576
Gawd I miss them... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #462
This is a different place than it used to be... nt MADem Sep 2013 #504
Smack the teahadist candidate around a little for us, okay? derby378 Sep 2013 #520
Workin' on it-- but he might... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #525
This message was self-deleted by its author derby378 Sep 2013 #519
You are running for office? Ruby the Liberal Sep 2013 #20
Than ks-- it's not a major office, but I don't want a huge job TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #226
How would/could DU be of help to you thucythucy Sep 2013 #97
The truth is, I'm not sure. I've mentioned running before... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #232
+1 and good luck to you--hope you win. nt MADem Sep 2013 #456
Thanks TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #460
Yeah, I almost think trying to set up thucythucy Sep 2013 #505
Thanks-- pretty much the same here... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #527
TB, good luck on your campaign! Please keep us posted on what happens good, bad or in between! Number23 Sep 2013 #141
Thanks. it's an uphill battle in this teabagging town, but... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #234
Have you even asked for DU's help? mattclearing Sep 2013 #168
Lessee now, this afternoon I put a few hours into my day job, attended a meeting... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #237
+1 and good luck. Jamaal510 Sep 2013 #227
Thanks TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #239
Good luck, TB! Bobbie Jo Sep 2013 #266
Thanks, I will. TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #268
I've actually run for office 3 times hfojvt Sep 2013 #417
It means that DU was no help-- nothing more, nothing less. It does not mean... TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #423
I think a candidate forum is a good idea. Vanje Sep 2013 #438
Let us know how much you lose by Capt. Obvious Sep 2013 #558
3b. Your (Sl)activism is reserved to signing online petitions and emailing Congresscritters NightWatcher Sep 2013 #9
This should get interesting Andy823 Sep 2013 #10
This reads more like 20 signs of a right-wing troll meow2u3 Sep 2013 #11
Yes, that is how I figure it Kolesar Sep 2013 #66
Your screen name says it all. Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2013 #12
A-hum. Speaking of "screeds". 99th_Monkey Sep 2013 #13
LOL GreenPartyVoter Sep 2013 #250
You are attacking a DUer? malaise Sep 2013 #15
.... SomethingFishy Sep 2013 #16
Top 20 Ways DLCers Try to Discredit Real Democrats cui bono Sep 2013 #18
I think "Obamabots" is fine... nxylas Sep 2013 #128
The list is just stupid. It is you I find offensive. nt. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #19
+1,000 malaise Sep 2013 #33
I would agree. n/t MuseRider Sep 2013 #41
A few points are spot on. Most aren't. Warpy Sep 2013 #55
You are right Warpy Caretha Sep 2013 #215
Thanks. I'm all the things they hate worst Warpy Sep 2013 #249
Hate? No. More like pity. ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #269
Fuzzy math cyberswede Sep 2013 #288
+1 CrispyQ Sep 2013 #398
You misunderstood. Warpy Sep 2013 #299
So......you think we should become more conservative? Th1onein Sep 2013 #315
+1,000,000 nt LWolf Sep 2013 #81
Hear hear. nt awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #123
Yup RetroLounge Sep 2013 #518
Yes. devilgrrl Sep 2013 #596
One universal sign that you are an immature troll Democracyinkind Sep 2013 #21
Uh, shouldn't you be off attacking Republicans? Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #22
Good point, Grumpy. Mighty hypocritical OP. LuvNewcastle Sep 2013 #99
Actually, I try to persuade them ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #142
What list does using the term "Comrade" fall on? n/t cui bono Sep 2013 #458
I'm reponding to a guy who named himself "Comrade Grumpy" ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #601
Why bite the hand that feeds? Scootaloo Sep 2013 #155
Hmm.... Sounds like #18 to me. I could be wrong. ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #177
You're wrong, and this is just one more example of why Scootaloo Sep 2013 #190
You accuse Democrats of being members of the John Birch society.... ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #193
Your whole OP is a list of ACCUSATIONS. GeorgeGist Sep 2013 #198
Some, yes, such as yourself and several who reccomended this thread Scootaloo Sep 2013 #200
You are assuming people think your list is correct and truthful and factual. cui bono Sep 2013 #459
I'm sensing a little passive-aggresive tone. Baitball Blogger Sep 2013 #23
I've never been a campaign volunteer, but I protested at NoNATO in Chicago. NuclearDem Sep 2013 #24
I'm sorry you see yourself in these behaviors... ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #176
There are a lot of ways to affect change, not just your way. CrispyQ Sep 2013 #401
sigh... G_j Sep 2013 #25
The ironic thing is that his description fits him better than any other DUer. nt Democracyinkind Sep 2013 #28
it fits ALL of those screaming Groupies Skittles Sep 2013 #366
The whole thing... Du is the "last bastion of magical thinking, tribalism, etc etc" uppityperson Sep 2013 #30
They're just another Hetero White Christian American being oppressed by political correctness Electric Monk Sep 2013 #73
Interesting Post gopiscrap Sep 2013 #26
hilarious. KG Sep 2013 #27
Indeed it is...absolutely no sense of historial context...only about "what's happenin' now" deutsey Sep 2013 #173
A caricature, but much of this rings true wyldwolf Sep 2013 #29
i think he was defending prosense, old chap! dionysus Sep 2013 #78
Oh really? I must have misread wyldwolf Sep 2013 #145
yes, prosense is constantly called a paid shill by a dozen or so "democrats" here on dionysus Sep 2013 #205
Great read! Summer Hathaway Sep 2013 #31
I'm incredibly bored by this list. cali Sep 2013 #32
i think there's truth in some points on the list cali, but i wouldn't apply them to you. dionysus Sep 2013 #80
I'm not saying there isn't some element of truth cali Sep 2013 #106
after reading your posts for almost 10 years i know you have integrity. dionysus Sep 2013 #107
four (or more) posts on one thread Sheepshank Sep 2013 #120
Of course attacking the left on DU, makes one what, exactly? LOL grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #34
I would love to answer that question. bunnies Sep 2013 #37
"A Conservative Democrat". SomethingFishy Sep 2013 #40
DUzy! CrispyQ Sep 2013 #404
you can take it treestar Sep 2013 #56
The OP will not answer the simple question asked by the poster you taunt. Incapable of doing Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #85
Regular Democrat??? cui bono Sep 2013 #357
So you really have to make it about that? treestar Sep 2013 #392
If you got a post hidden,Its because it might have been a rude post Vanje Sep 2013 #439
Or maybe told a LGTB Puglover Sep 2013 #443
Smearing people over their past posts treestar Sep 2013 #446
Your words. Puglover Sep 2013 #451
"You have plenty of rights." QC Sep 2013 #465
Really? You don't see how the use of "regular Democrat" implies that those you disagree with are cui bono Sep 2013 #445
Pointing out behaviors of the counterproductive left... ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #156
HAHAHA! Attacking Syria is insane. Instituting the Heritage foundations health care plan grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #211
In all fairness, Einstein never said that, and it is wrong. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #414
I think you're trying to do something good here but excessive Anger is getting in the way. BlueJazz Sep 2013 #35
Lemme guess. You write for "The Peoples View"? bunnies Sep 2013 #36
self righteous rant mick063 Sep 2013 #38
elitist thinkers that the actual elite has no awareness of BOG PERSON Sep 2013 #47
It is bookmarked mick063 Sep 2013 #158
Let me see now Andy823 Sep 2013 #244
To be honest mick063 Sep 2013 #265
So tell me Andy823 Sep 2013 #309
I'm getting my money's worth mick063 Sep 2013 #376
Interesting Andy823 Sep 2013 #403
"Putting the crazies in charge would simple be a total disaster" mick063 Sep 2013 #421
Still not answering the questions Andy823 Sep 2013 #426
I answered your question mick063 Sep 2013 #476
You're playing the lesser of two evils game. We are playing the make the lesser evil good game. n/t cui bono Sep 2013 #480
An excellent post. CrispyQ Sep 2013 #420
Stop! Enthusiast Sep 2013 #373
Sorry Andy823 Sep 2013 #405
They were responding to someone else. cui bono Sep 2013 #482
Another rant attacking Democrats for attacking Democrats Bjorn Against Sep 2013 #42
Under different circumstances, it would be avant-garde. Kennah Sep 2013 #245
20 lies n/t Enrique Sep 2013 #44
you post this and don't respond. not exactly a portrait in courage cali Sep 2013 #45
Hi Cali... ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #127
You post this piece of shit OP and then have the gall to harp about Cali's negativity? Democracyinkind Sep 2013 #344
Nonsense. There are plenty of other reasons to be offended by this list. Hissyspit Sep 2013 #360
I don't think every member of the "Reality based community" G_j Sep 2013 #370
"You will note that I don't actually call anyone out" sibelian Sep 2013 #364
Posted by a non Center/Left of Center Democrat. RC Sep 2013 #46
Creepy , It doesn't describe anyone here mitchtv Sep 2013 #48
You haven't been paying attention, have you? baldguy Sep 2013 #153
Wow, thanks ConservativeDemocrat.... sgtbenobo Sep 2013 #49
You for got "and bless your heart." Warpy Sep 2013 #58
Cause you can say anything about anyone WCLinolVir Sep 2013 #296
Oh, the worse it is the more fun it is Warpy Sep 2013 #300
If you see yourself as a douche-nozzle, I'm sorry for you ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #194
ConservativeDemocrat I've been waiting my whole life.... sgtbenobo Sep 2013 #212
You are most welcome ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #260
No, that doesn't work. sibelian Sep 2013 #361
Nails on a chalkboard..... think Sep 2013 #50
Stooge DisgustipatedinCA Sep 2013 #51
Wrong! Vanje Sep 2013 #275
Seriously Vanje. Puglover Sep 2013 #396
+1 QC Sep 2013 #530
Another hit and run from a Sensible Centrist. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #52
Oh good, another conservative LondonReign2 Sep 2013 #53
#16 is The Democratic Party Left Me!!! treestar Sep 2013 #54
I love the smell of right wing desperation Oilwellian Sep 2013 #57
Ironically, it has a gasoline smell. Kennah Sep 2013 #246
I can see I'll need to grow another arm. winter is coming Sep 2013 #59
LOL! cyberswede Sep 2013 #63
A third arm also helps with ski boxing. nt awoke_in_2003 Sep 2013 #125
Thinking about all the extra stuff I could accomplish while masturbating. Kennah Sep 2013 #247
You could be posting on DU! demwing Sep 2013 #508
Hang on a sec. I need a tissue. Kennah Sep 2013 #516
So...that tissue? demwing Sep 2013 #517
That extra stuff makes me sleepy Kennah Sep 2013 #524
#17. PowerToThePeople Sep 2013 #60
Darth Nader icymist Sep 2013 #116
Eh jsr Sep 2013 #557
Just another coward without the ambition or fortitude to go take his own party back. Egalitarian Thug Sep 2013 #61
Flamebait arikara Sep 2013 #62
K&R iandhr Sep 2013 #64
K & R, Aye, ConserativeDemocrat, you have struck some nerves here, what is more interesting Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #65
yep, this is some damn fine trolling Enrique Sep 2013 #109
Does the description given by ConserativeDemocrat fit you? Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #111
i'm a real person Enrique Sep 2013 #114
You had responded ConserativeDemocrat had 20 lies, does these describe you? Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #121
ugh.... think Sep 2013 #179
So.... let me get this right... sibelian Sep 2013 #362
See Post #367. nt Hissyspit Sep 2013 #369
You are right about it being crap again if the shoe fits then you will have to wear the shoe. Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #394
buy me a beer think Sep 2013 #395
What if it doesn't fit? sibelian Sep 2013 #450
Doth thou protest too much? Vanje Sep 2013 #454
I can't keep track of all these people I support. sibelian Sep 2013 #488
you are showing the shoe fits, enjoy Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #461
Not... really... sure... how...? sibelian Sep 2013 #490
maybe a pro counter, easy to detect Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #507
What's a pro counter? sibelian Sep 2013 #550
maybe like a real professional counter spy, they might be watching you right now. Thinkingabout Sep 2013 #571
... sibelian Sep 2013 #591
Good answer! =) cui bono Sep 2013 #501
K&R intaglio Sep 2013 #67
... Phlem Sep 2013 #68
Top 20 signs you might be trolling DU demwing Sep 2013 #69
You mean the mutual admiration and break your arm patting yourself on the back group? hobbit709 Sep 2013 #74
Yeah, but that's a really awkward acronym demwing Sep 2013 #118
also Vanje Sep 2013 #555
Foolish Yet! Stainless Sep 2013 #70
What a crock. hobbit709 Sep 2013 #71
Interesting stats and a couple of glaring "tells". dgibby Sep 2013 #72
Profile is indeed interesting. uppityperson Sep 2013 #76
Hi dgibby! ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #185
You said Caretha Sep 2013 #223
Don't go russian for the door. MIRT may help you find the way. Kennah Sep 2013 #248
"many of the people in the DU are already in a groupthink pen, Union Scribe Sep 2013 #326
Indeed. nt woo me with science Sep 2013 #478
well played sir. dionysus Sep 2013 #75
Yes you might appreciate this divisive trash aimed at splitting the party so the REpublicans will rhett o rick Sep 2013 #285
i think ppl who trash dems 24/7 do more to split the party than this OP. dionysus Sep 2013 #452
That doesnt make sense. The OP is trashing Dems and makes a habit of it. Did you rhett o rick Sep 2013 #510
So you don't see the irony in congratulating someone SomethingFishy Sep 2013 #562
Well that should end all the fuss, because scolding always works! JHB Sep 2013 #77
21. You drive Reagan Democrat douchebags to make facile lists. WilliamPitt Sep 2013 #79
ftw KG Sep 2013 #88
^this marmar Sep 2013 #151
Ha! Iggo Sep 2013 #154
Do you see yourself in this list, William? ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #163
"Conservative Democrat" WilliamPitt Sep 2013 #170
I don't believe you voted for Reagan Caretha Sep 2013 #230
"It sure sounds like you do. Or else you would not be so angry." Hissyspit Sep 2013 #276
But typical of right-wing asshats RetroLounge Sep 2013 #548
"Or else you would not be so angry." Hissyspit Sep 2013 #367
Well, no, not really. sibelian Sep 2013 #377
For the win! RetroLounge Sep 2013 #547
i'm saving this one jessie04 Sep 2013 #82
I love this list, CD! MrScorpio Sep 2013 #83
Crap! Some of those apply, such as #17, ZombieHorde Sep 2013 #84
"Democrat" JHB Sep 2013 #98
Spot on! baldguy Sep 2013 #86
A conservative democrat is not a progressive. Ciao forever. nt valerief Sep 2013 #87
Oh my Aerows Sep 2013 #89
This week two Conservative Democrats voted to defund the ACA,voted like the Republicans Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #90
Pile of shit post. Hissyspit Sep 2013 #91
Short & to the point demwing Sep 2013 #104
While I don't disagree with several of these points ... jimlup Sep 2013 #92
^^^^^^^^^ JHB Sep 2013 #112
"...threads like this only spread discordance and disagreement..." Iggo Sep 2013 #160
And a good percentage of the usual DU threads don't>? TreasonousBastard Sep 2013 #222
I have to agree with you about divisiveness. That said, we've got plenty of DUers who have MADem Sep 2013 #463
Its quite clear that the OP is a Conservative. Vanje Sep 2013 #467
Well, I would call myself a moderate-to-liberal Democrat. MADem Sep 2013 #471
Well. I guess I have a bias. Vanje Sep 2013 #477
Dividing the Democratic Party is one way to ensure that 'conservatism' prevails. MADem Sep 2013 #481
Conservatives Vanje Sep 2013 #491
Well, let's kiss Montana, Missouri, Nebraska, etc. goodbye, then... nt MADem Sep 2013 #493
I live in Idaho. Vanje Sep 2013 #498
Well, we can kiss Idaho goodbye, too... nt MADem Sep 2013 #506
.......and further more Vanje Sep 2013 #511
I think we'd all do well to just discuss differences civilly. MADem Sep 2013 #541
Have I been uncivil to you, in this thread? Vanje Sep 2013 #542
Yeah, good point.. any whining about "divisiveness" on Cha Sep 2013 #592
just on #17 alone you've damned Al Gore himself MisterP Sep 2013 #93
The biggest problem with republicans is their conservatism whatchamacallit Sep 2013 #94
Well, this was an epic fail. Le Taz Hot Sep 2013 #95
I'm enjoying the kerfunkle over the list. DevonRex Sep 2013 #96
Kerfuffle? Kolesar Sep 2013 #100
Art Garfluffle Aerows Sep 2013 #102
it's an inside joke dionysus Sep 2013 #110
touched some raw nerves, didn't it? dionysus Sep 2013 #113
same joshcryer Sep 2013 #172
Well, that's not much good for anything, is it? sibelian Sep 2013 #382
I don't know if you remember this: ProSense Sep 2013 #393
Ouche` Cryptoad Sep 2013 #410
Hypocrisy. the_sly_pig Sep 2013 #101
Was there a point to this list other than to cause a flame war? glowing Sep 2013 #103
Dumbest. Post. Today. Fuddnik Sep 2013 #105
The best shills are the ones who pretend they are one of you. zeemike Sep 2013 #108
Bingo. nt Democracyinkind Sep 2013 #115
Who is John Galt? Octafish Sep 2013 #117
You Better Believe It! Bobbie Jo Sep 2013 #221
I thought it sounded like one of those "Third Way" diatribes.... MADem Sep 2013 #485
If things hadn't been getting progressively worse for the past 30 years, Zorra Sep 2013 #119
So instead of attacking Republicans, bvar22 Sep 2013 #122
I'm not attacking anyone, bvar ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #134
Oh now you are Caretha Sep 2013 #233
HUH? treestar Sep 2013 #174
Well I can admit to three of the "qualifiers" PDittie Sep 2013 #124
Too dull to be amusingly offensive Starry Messenger Sep 2013 #126
31 Recommendations for this tripe. A new DU shame... Cooley Hurd Sep 2013 #129
I rec'd it because it brings an interesting perspective Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #139
The OP is attacking and insulting a large segment of DUers... Cooley Hurd Sep 2013 #140
And many of those folks in that large segment you're referring to... Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #144
That's irrelevant to this discussion of the OP. Cooley Hurd Sep 2013 #149
... happens daily and gets many recs... wyldwolf Sep 2013 #148
they'll be okay in the morning snooper2 Sep 2013 #399
Of course we will. That doesn't justify the OP... Cooley Hurd Sep 2013 #402
That is a stupid reason to rec and not honest. morningfog Sep 2013 #208
And that's a stupid reply to be honest. n/t Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #209
Ah! But you can look and see WHO reccomended it! Scootaloo Sep 2013 #162
You can - and, except for one, who I think recommended this for exposure... Cooley Hurd Sep 2013 #166
Bravo Zulu mick063 Sep 2013 #169
'They have something to lose if the Democratic Party changes back to what it was before Clinton' wyldwolf Sep 2013 #203
Another ransom payer mick063 Sep 2013 #264
Amazing how you simply ignored the topic we started and launched into a silly tirade wyldwolf Sep 2013 #386
You are right mick063 Sep 2013 #549
dude, the DLC no longer exists. It's your boogeyman. And you're STILL avoiding the point. wyldwolf Sep 2013 #553
I'm sure that everyone who rec'd this has been absolutely SHAMED by your comment. Number23 Sep 2013 #197
I doubt most of 'em feel shame Scootaloo Sep 2013 #262
Yes, well many of those folks that you don't "get" don't understand how a web site Number23 Sep 2013 #297
Perhaps they've been eating bad rye bread, to explain that hallucination. Scootaloo Sep 2013 #302
That's been one of the more polite suggestions. Tons of others, though... Number23 Sep 2013 #305
Have you considered that people making such a claim might just be... well... stupid? Scootaloo Sep 2013 #306
Actually, I think the people that support Assad are crazy. But that's just me. Number23 Sep 2013 #313
"you have no interest in anything beyond name-calling" Union Scribe Sep 2013 #323
You're another one. You do nothing but follow me around. I remember your posts commenting Number23 Sep 2013 #329
Oh Jesus, you're that one. Union Scribe Sep 2013 #331
Then for God's sake PUT ME ON IGNORE. Number23 Sep 2013 #336
Why would I? Union Scribe Sep 2013 #339
Do you think that your posts are invisible? You are the one tossing around personal insults Number23 Sep 2013 #341
Does the exact same thing to me. Rex Sep 2013 #529
Thanks Rex Union Scribe Sep 2013 #552
I get it from 5 or 6 people, you could interchange their names Rex Sep 2013 #584
"members of GD" Union Scribe Sep 2013 #279
People who are existing outside the walled zone of the swamp Scootaloo Sep 2013 #303
And what's sad is that you think this is clever, don't you? Number23 Sep 2013 #308
Yep! Union Scribe Sep 2013 #320
Someone alerted your post. Savannahmann Sep 2013 #214
Had I been on the jury I would have voted to hide it. davidpdx Sep 2013 #242
Recommendations (not records) are public. If you're ashamed of rec'cing something, then don't rec it Electric Monk Sep 2013 #257
Except Bobbie Jo Sep 2013 #261
That's not the post I replied to Electric Monk Sep 2013 #263
It's not about being ashamed davidpdx Sep 2013 #289
Take it up with the admins Union Scribe Sep 2013 #282
Yep I know davidpdx Sep 2013 #287
Well, when you are on the jury, vote as you will. Savannahmann Sep 2013 #301
Wow, that is ridiculous!!! So must be someone who rec'd and doesn't want anyone to know? cui bono Sep 2013 #453
"DU's resident John Birch Society members" joshcryer Sep 2013 #365
Goodbye, josh. sibelian Sep 2013 #595
You who tries so hard to appear so reasonable "love GD Drama"? Fumesucker Sep 2013 #602
I wouldn't post here if I didn't enjoy it. joshcryer Sep 2013 #605
The OP obviously spent considerable energy coming up with a sure-thing flamewar OP Fumesucker Sep 2013 #606
Yeah, like accusing DUers of being "John Birch Society members." joshcryer Sep 2013 #607
I haven't seen that OP Fumesucker Sep 2013 #608
Not an OP. Post #162 in this thread. joshcryer Sep 2013 #609
One thing I have learned here over the years is not to take anything at face value Fumesucker Sep 2013 #610
I think DU has moved further to the left. joshcryer Sep 2013 #611
There's an entire (protected) group that seems to be dedicated to attacking liberals Fumesucker Sep 2013 #612
whoa abelenkpe Sep 2013 #435
The usual ignorable 30-60 Personas bobduca Sep 2013 #292
Your entire rant.. SkyIsGrey Sep 2013 #130
Yep on the straw man arguments. I noticed that also. nt GoneFishin Sep 2013 #175
Yup. Hissyspit Sep 2013 #278
Much like any other "centrist"'s position. sibelian Sep 2013 #378
I find it difficult to let mere truedelphi Sep 2013 #131
Nice Try agent46 Sep 2013 #133
Conservative-Democrat is a non-sequitur - Try pompous-ass Douglas Carpenter Sep 2013 #135
The last four Democratic Presidents America has had were conservatives. baldguy Sep 2013 #152
the last three were center-right I suppose - Douglas Carpenter Sep 2013 #165
Your post got the responses I expected macspanicattack Sep 2013 #136
"Bravery" is posting to a message board and then running away? WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #159
I seem to see the original poster macspanicattack Sep 2013 #181
He or she finally decided to make an appearance? WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #182
Ive been on the post for at least 2 hours macspanicattack Sep 2013 #184
Add that to your list. WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #188
no prob..... macspanicattack Sep 2013 #256
Divisive trash aimed at splitting the party so the Republicans will have a better chance. nm rhett o rick Sep 2013 #281
This post really hit hard Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #137
Here, this will help you out with that Scootaloo Sep 2013 #191
Was that supposed to be funny? Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #195
maybe you can't recognize a joke BOG PERSON Sep 2013 #314
It was a sad attempt at a joke Cali_Democrat Sep 2013 #316
In the way a belly flop does, yes. nt Union Scribe Sep 2013 #327
You sold me on point number 1 (the DU version of "you had me at hello") Number23 Sep 2013 #138
Stopped reading when I realized your feelings are just hurt... GOTV Sep 2013 #143
That's why I come here. Iggo Sep 2013 #146
More attempts to divide Democrats AgingAmerican Sep 2013 #147
37 recs for this piece of mierda post? marmar Sep 2013 #150
Apparently, it's been overrun by Third-Wayers... Cooley Hurd Sep 2013 #157
Their way or the highway. mick063 Sep 2013 #171
There's a grand total of under a hundred of them, but the same names show up over and over leveymg Sep 2013 #183
True. It's the swarm effect. marmar Sep 2013 #186
Problem is that when others respond, the post gets kicked keeping it at the top of GD leveymg Sep 2013 #187
bring back downvotes n/t BOG PERSON Sep 2013 #238
Um, that kind of argument is #15 in the list ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #189
DAMN fine post. I never knew what Third Way was until GD started spewing it at half the posters Number23 Sep 2013 #199
Sorry that gravity has little effect in space, but in '08 DU was split between Obama and Hillary leveymg Sep 2013 #206
Utter fantasy. MannyGoldstein Sep 2013 #220
Do you have links for that Kucinich claim? JHB Sep 2013 #236
I'm sorry, I don't ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #253
Is this what you're looking for? Number23 Sep 2013 #304
This message was self-deleted by its author Hissyspit Sep 2013 #328
LMAOROFL@"piece of mierda"!! darkangel218 Sep 2013 #447
Numbah 22 Abukhatar Sep 2013 #161
DU rec...nt SidDithers Sep 2013 #164
Hi Sid! What took you so long? Cooley Hurd Sep 2013 #167
According to your own OP AgingAmerican Sep 2013 #178
For 20 years we've had it your way MannyGoldstein Sep 2013 #180
Meh... I troll better than you do Dragonfli Sep 2013 #192
Thank you Caretha Sep 2013 #243
This is exactly the kind of tripe they write at "the peoples view" troll website on a regular basis quinnox Sep 2013 #196
Spandan hasn't been getting much traction lately... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #202
lol, good idea, maybe the OP should set up a new website where they can post "attack the left rants" quinnox Sep 2013 #204
They can set up all the Crap Blogs they want... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #216
"Crap blogs" is right quinnox Sep 2013 #217
Especially since they're so quick to point out... WorseBeforeBetter Sep 2013 #219
Grow up. bowens43 Sep 2013 #201
I stopped reading at "Conservative" "Democrat". morningfog Sep 2013 #207
21. You criticize Obamacare more than John Boehner does (nt) Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #210
That is a good one! ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #228
You have perhaps missed the numerous posts ... Kennah Sep 2013 #251
Social Security was not enacted in a day ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #255
Universal healthcare, in all it's various forms, works in the OECD nations Kennah Sep 2013 #259
The U.S. is different than many other nations... ConservativeDemocrat Sep 2013 #273
You do realize that even in the UK with its NHS that private insurance and physicians exist? Fumesucker Sep 2013 #349
Not only that, when the UK private hospitals fuck up, who cleans up the mess? sibelian Sep 2013 #379
Big K&r Politicub Sep 2013 #213
K & R Scurrilous Sep 2013 #218
Smells like troll in here. 99Forever Sep 2013 #224
All conservatives can go to hell. ForgoTheConsequence Sep 2013 #229
If liberals are so terrible ForgoTheConsequence Sep 2013 #231
Coming from a steadfast liberal Dem, Jamaal510 Sep 2013 #235
My problem with it is the use of the word "hatred." Agnosticsherbet Sep 2013 #240
Isn't this whole list just #3? MFrohike Sep 2013 #241
Time capsule open up? Kennah Sep 2013 #252
Funny with seeds of truth pediatricmedic Sep 2013 #254
Manure always has seeds in it. Hissyspit Sep 2013 #271
Did somebody say something? Blue_In_AK Sep 2013 #258
Is this you on RedState? SMC22307 Sep 2013 #267
Hmm, no space between the two words in the name. Hissyspit Sep 2013 #270
Maybe I'm tired... SMC22307 Sep 2013 #272
ConservativeDemocrat vs. Conservative Democrat Hissyspit Sep 2013 #274
Yeah, minor detail. SMC22307 Sep 2013 #280
Oh, yeah! He's been playing with the Rolling Stones lately. Hissyspit Sep 2013 #283
Really? Good for him! I really enjoyed that set... SMC22307 Sep 2013 #286
Leaning more toward yes... SMC22307 Sep 2013 #291
Wow. n/t cherokeeprogressive Sep 2013 #295
Big Lieberman fan. Finds Dean venomous. Vanje Sep 2013 #319
Yeah, I think a pattern has been established. SMC22307 Sep 2013 #322
Oh Dear. Is that our OP? Vanje Sep 2013 #293
Not sure. But if so, maybe he's pissed off... SMC22307 Sep 2013 #298
Very good job. Interesting parallels there. nt Union Scribe Sep 2013 #332
I'm starting to think it's Spamdan... SMC22307 Sep 2013 #340
Could be Union Scribe Sep 2013 #345
Heh, I think you may be right. (n/t) SMC22307 Sep 2013 #353
Still no answer to that question. n/t QC Sep 2013 #538
I haven't kept up with replies... SMC22307 Sep 2013 #569
No denial of the blog Vanje Sep 2013 #586
Probably a coincidence, TBH. AverageJoe90 Sep 2013 #564
Too many parallels for him not to be ruled out... SMC22307 Sep 2013 #570
Wow. Wonder if this coward will respond. Maven Sep 2013 #585
That's what I find so interesting... SMC22307 Sep 2013 #589
Post removed Post removed Sep 2013 #277
Divisive trash. At least the left wing nuts stand for Democratic principles. You of the Third Way rhett o rick Sep 2013 #284
Dang. I miss Unrec. Arugula Latte Sep 2013 #290
lots of projection and denial here i vote fail nt SwampG8r Sep 2013 #294
Is this your blog?.....(Really? The NAACP Hangs people?) Vanje Sep 2013 #307
If so, his spelling has improved since then. (n/t) SMC22307 Sep 2013 #310
Post removed Post removed Sep 2013 #317
Edward Snowden had boxes in his garage and made a ballerina cry! SMC22307 Sep 2013 #318
Oh boy..Its a snow day and Joseph McCarthy has taken to the podium.. macspanicattack Sep 2013 #321
Good for you... SMC22307 Sep 2013 #324
If you want to 'INVESTIGATE' me, macspanicattack Sep 2013 #333
Is this how you make "friends," Steve? SMC22307 Sep 2013 #338
I have no problems with making friends... macspanicattack Sep 2013 #343
I have no one on ignore, so I can't answer that. SMC22307 Sep 2013 #358
This message was self-deleted by its author cherokeeprogressive Sep 2013 #312
No answer yet, it seems. Interesting. n/t QC Sep 2013 #543
Come on people.... macspanicattack Sep 2013 #311
ha! Love your posts. In BOTH threads! Number23 Sep 2013 #325
Why? Hissyspit Sep 2013 #334
Because they have good taste... macspanicattack Sep 2013 #337
Or they just don't recognize Internet B.S. when it's right in front of them? Hissyspit Sep 2013 #342
Oh, they recognize BS alright... macspanicattack Sep 2013 #346
That's it? Hissyspit Sep 2013 #352
Not in the mood tonight... macspanicattack Sep 2013 #356
Wait what? The "Tea Party" damages the Republicans? Hahahahahaha Luminous Animal Sep 2013 #330
There are actually posters who think this OP merits a serious reply. ronnie624 Sep 2013 #335
Thanks for your support keeping the thread going... macspanicattack Sep 2013 #347
No problem. ronnie624 Sep 2013 #355
Oh, he's been fully exposed. (n/t) SMC22307 Sep 2013 #359
You left out fluoridating water cthulu2016 Sep 2013 #348
#348 macspanicattack Sep 2013 #350
the other post has 187 rec's macspanicattack Sep 2013 #354
I'm pretty sure that you can rec a thread without replying to it... Cooley Hurd Sep 2013 #388
Fuck conservatism and conservatives. Maven Sep 2013 #363
/\ /\ Yes! THAT! Vanje Sep 2013 #440
LOL! Really? Enthusiast Sep 2013 #368
Spot on, CD. You're very, very observant. lamp_shade Sep 2013 #371
The ulnar nerve, perhaps. Because nothing is funnier... SMC22307 Sep 2013 #397
To all the people who are upset over this OP: If the shoe fits, B Calm Sep 2013 #372
What happens if it doesn't? sibelian Sep 2013 #384
Here is a small point of fact: President Obama's approval rating among Democrats is 79%, not 85% muriel_volestrangler Sep 2013 #374
When I think of "conservative Democrat", Art_from_Ark Sep 2013 #375
well Mr. "ConservativeDem" let me make a wild guess that you are too young to remember America Douglas Carpenter Sep 2013 #380
Your name says it all - "ConservativeDemocrat" TBF Sep 2013 #381
This is one of the most idiotic things I've ever read. BlueDogDemocrat (since I don't like Nanjing to Seoul Sep 2013 #383
All real Democrats turn their brains off and support everything Obama does unquestioningly! Dash87 Sep 2013 #385
By the way, I did the math re: recs for this vs recs for the response thread Cooley Hurd Sep 2013 #387
As I said, there are fewer than 100 of them (including sock puppets) leveymg Sep 2013 #391
there must also be several hundred DUers hfojvt Sep 2013 #411
Yes, but statistically, with the data available... Cooley Hurd Sep 2013 #413
This is a great list. bravenak Sep 2013 #389
A sign that you've been on DU longer then 10 seconds. Puglover Sep 2013 #390
K&R a gazillion Cryptoad Sep 2013 #400
Did you even read the rest of the thread? Hissyspit Sep 2013 #428
I happen to like President Obama very much! Cooley Hurd Sep 2013 #429
Nickname: ConservativeDemocrat ...yep your nickname and the attack on the supposed left makes sense. L0oniX Sep 2013 #406
Conservatives are assholes OnyxCollie Sep 2013 #407
Divisive troll. Vashta Nerada Sep 2013 #408
That is a correct assessment. 2ndAmForComputers Sep 2013 #442
What a pile of "conservative" horseshit. kentuck Sep 2013 #409
"Conservative Democrat"... rexcat Sep 2013 #415
Post removed Post removed Sep 2013 #419
I think Item #17 is recycled from the archives . Nader? Seriously? Vanje Sep 2013 #424
I mean, really!!! Cooley Hurd Sep 2013 #432
It's the rightoids who keep bringing it up to "show how foolish the Left is." And nobody else. 2ndAmForComputers Sep 2013 #441
Maybe the post was addressed to dixiegrrrrl Sep 2013 #513
i just wanted to number 431 to reply madrchsod Sep 2013 #430
...missed by 5. Cooley Hurd Sep 2013 #433
i can`t keep up! madrchsod Sep 2013 #434
Me too! The OP is so riddled with anachronisms and fallacies... Cooley Hurd Sep 2013 #436
... Hell Hath No Fury Sep 2013 #437
Hmm... GalaxyHunter Sep 2013 #448
Meh! It is hard to be offended by things I do not believe are true about DU'ers Vinnie From Indy Sep 2013 #449
Screed! Sounds like you learned a new word. Sheldon Cooper Sep 2013 #469
. darkangel218 Sep 2013 #473
Best of luck to you, OP! darkangel218 Sep 2013 #474
Uh huh. woo me with science Sep 2013 #479
I am offended by this fascist list. ChairmanAgnostic Sep 2013 #502
I am offended that an avowed Conservative posts at DU and gets over 80 recs. Vanje Sep 2013 #509
Recs for dreck like this have been steadily and unnaturally increasing since the launch of DU3. woo me with science Sep 2013 #512
That's pretty much what I think, too. Marr Sep 2013 #535
+10000 woo me with science Sep 2013 #545
Good church members pray in silence jsr Sep 2013 #559
It is a heinous insult to all of us who have struggled most of our lives to try to free our country Zorra Sep 2013 #514
DU has had a former Freeper as a forum host OnyxCollie Sep 2013 #526
We used to laugh at the funny antics of conservatives Vanje Sep 2013 #560
Perhaps you should be honest with yourself and everyone else here and A Simple Game Sep 2013 #503
Excellent - Thank you for compiling this! GoneOffShore Sep 2013 #536
I'm less worried with where the unrec button Caretha Sep 2013 #544
If this was DU 2 you'd already have been TS'd RetroLounge Sep 2013 #521
There is this: Hissyspit Sep 2013 #546
+1984 jsr Sep 2013 #556
It is incredible how your very own list fits you to a T! Rex Sep 2013 #531
The GOP's snarling loons are found in their right-wing, and so are the Democratic Party's. Marr Sep 2013 #534
Reading the replies to ths thread Summer Hathaway Sep 2013 #551
That bullshit argument fallacy Hissyspit Sep 2013 #565
I'm guessing thats a , Nope Vanje Sep 2013 #587
Boink Scurrilous Sep 2013 #554
Sure. Hissyspit Sep 2013 #566
The way this turned out... it's... it's... stevenleser Sep 2013 #561
Yes, it is fascinating to see people rec shit-stirring fallacy and projection Hissyspit Sep 2013 #567
Well hopefully everyone was paying attention to that point. Rex Sep 2013 #573
Good list. AverageJoe90 Sep 2013 #563
hummm blue14u Sep 2013 #568
garbage. n/t NRaleighLiberal Sep 2013 #572
WARNING. There is an ATA thread pushing for the banning of the 95 DUers who recced this. Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #574
I'm not surprised EM and others are looking for scalps. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #575
No one is going to be tombstoned. Hissyspit Sep 2013 #577
How good of you. Bolo Boffin Sep 2013 #579
I didn't really. Hissyspit Sep 2013 #581
O.K., I reworded my response. I see Hissyspit Sep 2013 #583
Hmm...I think that is going way too far. Not like this is the BOG. Rex Sep 2013 #580
If anyone gets banned for reccing this thread, then this isn't a site for MADem Sep 2013 #582
EM wants a Purge! Cha Sep 2013 #590
Color me shocked. NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #614
And the 21st sign? Rex Sep 2013 #578
This message was self-deleted by its author steve2470 Sep 2013 #588
Obama? Best of intentions, and the best man to get the job done Taverner Sep 2013 #597
600 Boom Sound 416 Sep 2013 #600
This will prove to be the post that KILLED DemocraticUnderground.com. cherokeeprogressive Sep 2013 #603
I wonder if any good will come out of this thread...we shall see nt steve2470 Sep 2013 #604
I've had just about enough of DU. This OP is the final nail. Quantess Sep 2013 #613
Whatever happened to the author of that long, bitter OP complaining about restaurant wait staff? merrily Nov 2014 #615
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
39. your concept of "love" is seriously twisted if you think that the
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:28 PM
Sep 2013

op reflects love of any kind.

2ndAmForComputers

(3,527 posts)
444. A phrase usually employed to justify, peddle or whitewash indefensible monstrosities.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:25 PM
Sep 2013

Usually of this kind... http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/To_Train_Up_a_Child

But, as we now see, has other uses too.

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
599. Um tough "love" is the very opposite of love
Wed Sep 25, 2013, 06:43 PM
Sep 2013

IT's what authoritarians use to justify their power binges

Next please?

vt_native

(484 posts)
5. I guess I disagree with the premise
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 03:55 PM
Sep 2013

21. You think killing Americans with drones and no trial is not justice.

22. You want a Unicorn that farts glitter (or single payer health care).

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
7. wow
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 03:56 PM
Sep 2013

I do not think there is a single person (other than trolls) that fits your post here. But I will



and see what happens.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
8. As someone who is actually running for office, and...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 03:57 PM
Sep 2013

finds DU of absolutely no help at all in that quest...

I am laughing my ass off at this bit of unfortunate truth.

DU is, however, a marvelous diversion and often quite informative if you know how to read with the jaundiced eye.

And now back to your regular programming.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
416. Precisely where did I say it could? I'm quite well aware that there's little interest in...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:20 PM
Sep 2013

these local offices outside of the localities and if the six or seven other DUers running for any kind of office begged for help here it's doubtful what they could get from people living outside the area. Fundraising maybe, and some high fives, but without a serious network little else could be accomplished by a pile of disparate anonymous people.

Be that as it may, it is nice to at least hear a few "go get 'ems" from some quarters. Nicer than "how the flying fucks..."

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
422. um, uh you said:
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:40 PM
Sep 2013

As someone who is actually running for office, and...
finds DU of absolutely no help at all in that quest...
I am laughing my ass off at this bit of unfortunate truth.

Your point was exactly what, relative to the OP?

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
431. It sounded to me like his point was...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:55 PM
Sep 2013

That DU is worthless to SERIOUS, IMPORTANT, REAL Dems like him.


Note that when Omaha Steve ran for office , he got help from DUers.
This particular counterproductive left-wingnut pitched in as much as I could at the time.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
466. Quite frankly, we don't even know who we are, so...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:14 PM
Sep 2013

no, it is of limited use.

Phone banks and mailings can be from anywhere, but small races like mine have all that covered so organizing a national bank would just add extra work for little gain.

However, if anyone out there is interested in starting some sort of national organization to help local runs, I'm in.

And, while thread has a poisonous taste, there's no need to be sarcastic in this subthread-- that's just evidence of the OP's point.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
470. Omaha Steve revealed his true identity for purposes of his campaign
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:25 PM
Sep 2013

His campaign had a paypal account for donations.

Being a civil and useful DU member, he had nothing to hide.


TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
484. There ya go again...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:59 PM
Sep 2013

I'm NOT Omaha Steve and I don't have the time or inclination to ask DU for any limited assistance I could get in this campaign.

There are 8 of us running for various offices this year and we're doing just fine with fundraising, newspaper ads, door-knocking, lawn signs, phoning, palm cards, buttons fridge magnets, and all the other crap a campaign involves.

Did anyone besides Omaha Steve ask DU for help? Anyone get any?

Since I am apparently an uncivil and useless member, I feel free to say "Stuff it."

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
494. You seem to have missed the point that I wasn't criticising DU...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:13 PM
Sep 2013

for not doing anything I didn't ask for, but noting that it's not particularly good at it, so I didn't ask.

What I am asking for, if anything, is some moral support and an attaboy or two from what should be fellow Democrats doing what many here should have an interest in, maybe even want to do themselves some day.

I haven't heard that from you-- from you I've heard accusations and insults, not even the mildest support. OK, you agree with me on the candidate forum idea, but just like that other guy in this subthread you can't bring yourself to wish me well in this little quest.

And you don't get how there's too much of that and it brings down the whole discussion illustrating some of the OP's points.

FWIW, the other 7 candidates and the thirty or so members of our local Democratic Committee would never, ever, talk like some of the people in this thread.

Maybe your crack about "real Democrats" actually has a point.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
497. You want a fucking " Atta-boy"?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:27 PM
Sep 2013

You should have asked for it BEFORE you posted that DU was useless for your campaign.

If you need actual phone-tree work. PM me.
If you need to fund leaflets , PM me.
If you need an actual campaign contribution, PM me.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
455. A little bit of smiling and dialing from a DUer living in the area would help....
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:46 PM
Sep 2013

If they were close enough, a bit of old school leafleting...

All politics is local, the way a mayor becomes a mayor is to start out in a smaller position...

DU used to have MEETUPS in the old days, and DUers actually knew one another. Those days are gone, I think....

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
457. Sure, and did he ask?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:53 PM
Sep 2013

No of course not. And it would be rather unlikely that anyone else here would be local anyway. So instead, in the context of the op, it was just a gratuitous irrelevant slam, apparently against the "left" here, for not turning out for his run for dog catcher of cabbage patch.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
464. Well, aren't you the pleasant one...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:07 PM
Sep 2013

I didn't ask because I saw no benefit in asking, particularly since my first mention of running was largely ignored.

Gratuitous slams aside, just what the fuck are you doing besides posting insults to people you should be backing, at least in spirit.

You talk about the OP and its slams on the sacred "left" but here you are proving the OP's point by doing nothing but inventing reasons to trash me.

We're supposed to be on the same side, but if this is how you normally act, I don't want you on my side.

I don't want you in the same room.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
487. You posted here in support of a thread dedicated to insulting the vast majority of DU'ers.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:04 PM
Sep 2013

And your complaint re my still unanswered question of how our unasked for non-support of your run for some very very local office was relevant as somehow starting the insults is, well weird. You trashed yourself. Again: you didn't ask for help, but somehow the "left" here is responsible for that help not showing up, thus demonstrating the validity of the crap op you are supporting.

Whatever. Good luck on your race for whatever it is.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
593. This thread *describes* a relatively small handful of counterproductive wingnuts
Wed Sep 25, 2013, 01:53 PM
Sep 2013

...and helps identify them by their behavior.

It is certainly not the vast majority of DUers, much less Democrats.

Again, however, people who engage in such behaviors as I have described are clearly counterproductive.

And you, "Warren", have descended so far in your hatred of Democrats that you are bashing someone who is actually going to go through the incredible effort of actually standing for office. Across the Democratic spectrum, he's likely holds positions significantly closer to yours than mine, but you can't stop your froth for even a few minutes to see that you are hurting what you pretend to believe in.

So who is stupid, exactly, WarrenStupidity?

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

MADem

(135,425 posts)
468. DU used to be more of a Village. People used to help one another out.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:20 PM
Sep 2013

Now it's just a Cage Match.

I don't know if he asked--ask him. And NY isn't Alaska or Montana--it's a densely populated state. Why do you think he's the only one in his area? If I lived near him, I'd drive a few miles to help, if it would make a difference. Why make fun of that, or put it down?

Did you ever offer an "attaboy" to anyone running for public office here? I make it a point to offer verbal support to any DUer I encounter who is running for office.

I also do a lot of "local shit" in my own area for people who run for office. I round up elderly folks and drive them to elections--and that includes these very local contests that don't make the local TV news, never mind the national wires. I am aggressively loyal in this duty--it consumes a fair chunk of my time, and I enjoy doing it.

I don't take those comments as a "slam." I take them as a truth; this website has gone far afield from its early days when people were kinder to one another, were interested in supporting Democrats, and less quick with the "gotcha."

Every politician without a pedigree, without deep pockets, and without a famous name started out running for "dog catcher of cabbage patch." See, that's how politicians come up --- they start locally.

The fact that you denigrate the guy's effort with snarky "dog catcher" comments doesn't say anything good about you at all. It puts you in the Keyboard Commado Crowd, the Internet Tough Guy Brigade. It makes you sound both mean and petty.

It's easy to tear down, harder to build up. Pointing this fact out shouldn't freak people out so much. We are Democrats, here--most of us, anyway, or at least, we USED to be--and we shouldn't be made to feel that supporting the work of Democrats who represent us is some kind of crime, or is "uncool" because cheering for someone like Ron or Rand Paul is "cooler." And that IS the sense I get here some days. I welcome election season here, when the more obvious Demo-denigrators are forced to shut up for a change. A lot of the posts I see here outside election season would get a cheer over at FR--and that's probably because some of them are written by denizens of that joint.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
472. Not necessarily
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:28 PM
Sep 2013

I recently sent money to help a stranger who posted of his need to DU.
I bought stars for people , even people I generally disagree with.
Have you checked out One-Grass-Root's Wishadoo project?
I donated to one DU member's campaign for office (Omaha Steve), and would enthusiastically give to any other office-seeking members.

T.B.s post rubbed me wrong because he never did ask for help. Not a word. He proclaimed DU would be useless to his campaign.
He under-estimated us, and then used it as an insult.



edited...ad infinitum, because it takes me a while to get it , so that others might actually understand it.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
475. Yes, I am aware of that project.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:46 PM
Sep 2013

I'm not talking about that kind of support, though that is a nice charitable opportunity for those with deep pockets to help out those in need. Nor is this poster talking about that kind of thing.

I'm talking about the days when DUers actually knew one another, went to meet ups, organized, and provided support of a POLITICAL nature. You know, the kind of thing that takes TIME, not money.

I don't know if TB asked for help or not, we'd have to ask him that question--but he might have been put off by the attitude around here of late.

Lately, it seems as if a large contingent of DU is doing the GOP's work for them--bashing the POTUS and taking every opportunity to nitpick and tear down politicians on our team. They create a nasty, divisive atmosphere here that makes safe-havens like the BOG necessary.

You aren't going to get a super-liberal candidate elected in conservative states, so shitting on the best candidate who can win in places like Missouri or Nevada or Texas is just hubris. But I see that kind of ignorant ranting here all the time. And then, there's the "So and So Doesn't See My POV on (FILL IN MY FAVORITE ISSUE), so fuck him!!! I'm voting for Jill "Perpetual Loser/Stage Hog" Stein!!!" People who make the perfect the enemy of the good help us LOSE elections.

I also see--and am exhausted by--preachy diatribes from people who think POTUS is king, who don't understand where appropriations come from, who don't even understand how a bill becomes law. It doesn't stop 'em from mouthing off, though, insulting people who paid attention in their civics classes in school and who don't see things their way, and it just well, to beat a phrase to death, makes DU suck.

It is possible to disagree without being completely disagreeable, and I just don't understand why more people don't try doing that. I also think that, if people do not support Democrats, they really shouldn't crap on people who do in a place called "Democratic" Underground.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
483. "Deep pockets" No. You don't get it
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:58 PM
Sep 2013

I've used DU as a chance to give, but I do not have deep pockets.
I make less than 15K a year-take home. Deep pockets , I have not. I'm a pauper.
But sometimes, if I'm careful, I can kick 25 or 50 bucks to one in need. Its not much, I grant you. Its not nearly enough...but the BEAUTY thing is, that there are a lot of us, and DU has the potential to let each of us paupers combine resources.
That results in something that might be good.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
492. That's great that you do that.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:10 PM
Sep 2013

Some of us prefer to donate what money and time we have closer to home. My current charity is in memory of a deceased family member, so my spare change this year goes to a woman's shelter in my relative's name.

The OP isn't about giving to individuals in need, though--it's about political attitudes, and TB is talking about political support--not money, but "Hey, good for you--go get 'em, Tiger!!!!" or "Can I make phone calls in support of your candidacy? Would you like me to precinct walk for you?"

Even Republicans make charitable contributions--if that were the litmus test, those Koch asswipes would be regarded as good guys.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
495. T.B. Didnt ask for that kind of help either.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:17 PM
Sep 2013

He didnt ask for any phone help. Or any other help.
He hid his light under a bushel.



And now he disses DU, because we didnt help?

T.B. can eat my shorts.......(unless he actually asks for my help, and then, I think he might be surprised. )



MADem

(135,425 posts)
499. Well, he did say this in this thread...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:34 PM
Sep 2013
http://betterment.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3711309

and I don't know if he said anything about his candidacy elsewhere.

I will say, the responses he got here aren't too nice. In fact, they're pretty vicious.

I think you're safe-he won't ask for your help.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
500. Agree.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:39 PM
Sep 2013

He wont ask for my help.

And thats a shame, because I'd likely give all the help I could.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
515. Eh, he did join in on a rather vicious OP by someone criticizing a group to which they do not belong
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 06:23 PM
Sep 2013

Getting in the middle of a mud fight and expecting not to get any on yourself is a bit naive for a political candidate.



Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
532. If you don't like it then you know how to avoid it
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 07:58 PM
Sep 2013

Not really being snide here, that's just a statement of fact.

Anyone who has been on DU for any length of time and didn't know the OP was custom designed to start the mother of all flamefests doesn't have any business commenting at all until they wise up considerably.





TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
533. And I didn't say I wanted to avoid it, either...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 08:10 PM
Sep 2013

I'm well aware that my remark would would attract flames to the moth, but you may not be aware of the contempt I hold for nameless, faceless "experts" and "activists" who must have their way and refuse to see areas of necessary compromise, have respect for the less odious and often even reasonable positions of the opposition, and, most particularly, accept their own faults and faulty positions.

And the OP certainly hit on a lot of faults and faulty positions. A lot of raw nerves around here.

The sorry truth is that I am bemused by a lot of this. Little of it affects me personally, but it beats Solitaire as a great time waster when I'm trying to avoid actual work.

Didn't used to be that way around here, but the invasion of the one-handed keyboard activists hasn't helped.



Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
537. I haven't changed my views much since 2008
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 08:28 PM
Sep 2013

In 2008 DU was a refuge to get away from constant right wing framing and libeling of liberals which was rampant practically everywhere else on the intertubes.

Now I'm reading the same crap attacks on liberals here on DU that I came here to avoid 2001-2008, at this point it's only habit and the fact I like some of the personalities here that keeps me coming back. I'm utterly disgusted by the 180 degree turn I've seen many posters make here with regards to supporting conservative policy and rhetoric.

DU is not a refuge from the right any more, it's another damn battleground.





TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
539. Nor have I. In fact I haven't changed much since...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 09:00 PM
Sep 2013

about '86. Or earlier. And some of my attitudes about property and wealth are even more radical now.

What has changed is that after 8 years of Shrub we no longer have a common enemy and swim without much direction. Sure, the Republicans in the House are far worse and more irresponsible than Shrub ever was (if that's at all possible) but we just don't have that obvious target out there. We also don't have the leadership or serious political movement to challenge the rampant teabaggery out there.

So, we allow infiltrators and the misguided to lead us in attacking ourselves under the guise of liberalism, progressivism, or some such other -ism that sounds good.

What hasn't changed about me is wanting to find a solution, and an imperfect one will do in a pinch. The absolutist calls for one solution for whatever problem is under discussion drive me nuts-- even if there aren't multiple solutions for our side to choose from, demanding just one without understanding the opposition and bargaining in good faith when it can be done is pointless and self-destructive.

Opposition is good and necessary for progress, but a government, or even a discussion board, based on simply hate for the other side is doomed.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
462. Gawd I miss them...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:01 PM
Sep 2013

been to maybe half a dozen in the Northeast.

Last one was held by two now banned DUers. Go figure.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
525. Workin' on it-- but he might...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 07:35 PM
Sep 2013

have more family in town than I do.

(That's how elections work around here.)

Response to derby378 (Reply #17)

thucythucy

(8,086 posts)
97. How would/could DU be of help to you
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 05:39 PM
Sep 2013

as you run for office?

I'm serious--is there a way DU could be of help?

Anyway, best wishes and good luck to you, TB.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
232. The truth is, I'm not sure. I've mentioned running before...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 10:22 PM
Sep 2013

and got no response so I kinda dropped the whole thing.

I know others have run and had campaign fund requests, but this one isn't that expensive and I can cover it myself. Besides, we haven't had an organized Democratic campaign around for a long time and local donors have been quite supportive.

Anyone living in the area, and there are one or two, can help with the phone calls and canvassing. Actually phone banks can be set up anywhere.

In the long run, I'd kinda like to see DU involved in phone banking, fund raising, general stuff like artwork and campaign literature, and other things that could be done by an interested group. I think such things have been tried with questionable results.

If I may add to the general hysteria in this thread, one thing we don't need is advice and complaints from the legions of one-handed typists

thucythucy

(8,086 posts)
505. Yeah, I almost think trying to set up
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 04:00 PM
Sep 2013

such things here would be more effort than they'd be worth, at least for campaigns for local office.

I'm helping out in city council campaign ("city" being a relative term, it's really a mid-sized town). Mostly it's just talking to neighbors, standing on corners with signs, writing letters to the local paper. On election day there will be a car pool to get folks to the polls. But not a lot of money involved, certainly no TV ads or anything like that. So a lot of outside stuff--or support perceived as coming from outside--could actually be counterproductive, as in "we don't need outsiders trying to tell us how to vote."

Anyway, good luck with your campaign. Let us know how it all turns out.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
527. Thanks-- pretty much the same here...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 07:44 PM
Sep 2013

local elections are pretty laid back and anyone getting nasty gets some serious pushback from the citizenry. The thing is that most of the opposition is actually pretty likable and does a pretty good job. The two most serious jobs, supervisor and clerk, are held by Republicans who are straight up, honest, and doing a great job-- makes us look kinda bitchy if we complain about them, and silly if we say we can do better. Tough to come up with a good campaign and cross-endorsing is often the best option.

Aside from small town favoritism, the biggest thing we are fighting is the Republican hold on the town with them having every elected job but one and getting into the arrogance of power trap. I won't bore you with specifics, but it's uphill.

Thanks for the good wishes and I'll start a separate thread on this in a little while.

mattclearing

(10,091 posts)
168. Have you even asked for DU's help?
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:18 PM
Sep 2013

The fact that you haven't answered the questions above suggests you may not have tried very hard.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
237. Lessee now, this afternoon I put a few hours into my day job, attended a meeting...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 10:29 PM
Sep 2013

of an organization where I'm on the board, and then a fundraiser for one of our Council candidates.

None of that was nearly as important as answering posts here.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
417. I've actually run for office 3 times
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:22 PM
Sep 2013

if you don't count my three "campaigns" to be precinct man (look, up in the sky, it's a bird, it's a plane, no, it's precinct man!!!)

That DU was "no help" means what? Was DU supposed to help? Did I join DU so it could help elect me to office?

Could DU make a difference somehow? If so, it would need to be much bigger. I tried to use DU to help re-elect Nixon in Missouri, but with probably no more than a score of views, obviously that did not make much of a difference.

I try to use DU to battle against Reaganomics and to help kill the Bush tax cuts - without much success. But what else could I do that would have more impact?

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
423. It means that DU was no help-- nothing more, nothing less. It does not mean...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:48 PM
Sep 2013

I expected help. As I said in several other posts you may have missed, DU is not set up to help local elections. Note also that our anonymity is the last thing you want in a campaign.

And, just looking at this thread, I'm not sure I would want support from some of them.

Now, I understand why someone thousands of miles away isn't interested in my concerns over beach access and erosion or cesspool rules, but I think it would be nice to get some attaboys from the crowd and general moral support.

Perhaps a candidate forum might help-- we could at least give each other moral support and share tips, tricks, stories, successes and crying shoulders

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
438. I think a candidate forum is a good idea.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:05 PM
Sep 2013

Last edited Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:36 PM - Edit history (1)

A REALLY good idea!

About the rest of your post, Even the finest tool will do you no good, if you leave it in the box, or dont know how to use it.
Dont blame the tool.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
9. 3b. Your (Sl)activism is reserved to signing online petitions and emailing Congresscritters
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 03:58 PM
Sep 2013

You've never actually left the house to DO anything.

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
66. Yes, that is how I figure it
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 05:10 PM
Sep 2013

They never canvassed for Kerry or Obama, and they certainly never donated to our candidates, either.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
12. Your screen name says it all.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:00 PM
Sep 2013
"I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever, in religion, in philosophy, in politics, or in anything else, where I was capable of thinking for myself. Such an addiction is the last degradation of a free and moral agent. If I could not go to heaven but with a party, I would not go there at all." --Thomas Jefferson to Francis Hopkinson, 1789.
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
13. A-hum. Speaking of "screeds".
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:05 PM
Sep 2013
screed |skrēd|
noun
1 a long speech or piece of writing, typically one regarded as tedious.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
18. Top 20 Ways DLCers Try to Discredit Real Democrats
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:08 PM
Sep 2013

is what you should have named this list.

And actually, I can see #19 as I type this and that is pure projection. It's the Obamabots that are the "you're with us or against us", "facts don't matter, we blindly follow our president" crowd, which is Tea Party behavior. Normally I don't use the term Obamabot or actually say Tea Party in my comparison/description, but what's good for the goose...

Speaking to #19, you are conflating dislike and criticism of certain policies with hatred of govt in its entirety. But you know that, I mean it's so obvious. Why would the left be defending medicare and SS if they hate govt? We simply hate the fact that our centrist/right president and blind followers are okay with offering it up in "negotiations". So who hates the govt???

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
128. I think "Obamabots" is fine...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:34 PM
Sep 2013

...considering that at least one of the most prolific examples actually is a bot.

Warpy

(111,316 posts)
55. A few points are spot on. Most aren't.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:54 PM
Sep 2013

#14 is downright delusional.

However, conservative Democrats also have a vague feeling that maybe the party's over for them. Their ideas have been tried too long and they've failed just as they always have in the past.

 

Caretha

(2,737 posts)
215. You are right Warpy
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:36 PM
Sep 2013

When the lib Repugs fled the Reagan Republicans and decided to join the Dems "big tent", they thought they could snow real Dems and take over the party. They don't like it one bit that the real Dem's, aka, the "counterproductive left wing-nuts", aren't buying it.

No Siree....we're not buying what you "Conservative Dems", aka, Reagan Republicans are selling one damn bit.

You can take that to the bank baby!

Warpy

(111,316 posts)
249. Thanks. I'm all the things they hate worst
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 10:54 PM
Sep 2013

in one far left package. I'm expecting a lot of whining between now and the next election.

Conservatives, of course, always think the party has to keep moving hard right, following the Republicans off the cliff.

They hate it when we point out what a minority they are.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
269. Hate? No. More like pity.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:11 AM
Sep 2013

Again with the hate business. Here's a bit of a clue: you're projecting. We don't hate you. You hate us. I might pity you a bit for being so constantly, utterly wrong, but that's a different matter.

For instance, take your statement about "what a minority" we are. Please look at the following chart.



As you can see by the poll, Very Liberal people (which is what you are, in addition to being counterproductive) comprise 10% of the Democratic party. Meanwhile, 20% of the Democratic party see themselves as "Conservative" or "Very Conservative".

So while I am under-represented on this website, to the point where some DUers will say "Conservative Democrat" is "an oxymoron", in the real world, my side of the party is twice the size of "very liberal" Democrats.

Almost too much so. I'd like to pull some of those Very Conservative Dems more to being merely Conservative. Again, contrary to your utter wrongness, our end of the party is generally very rational, and we have no desire to follow the GOP into their wingnut hellhole.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
288. Fuzzy math
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:37 AM
Sep 2013

You're comparing a single category (Very Liberal) with two combined categories (Conservative and Very Conservative).

When compared fairly, the liberal numbers really double the conservative.

Very Liberal 10%
Liberal 29%
Total 39%

Very Conservative 4%
Conservative 16%
Total 20%

Th1onein

(8,514 posts)
315. So......you think we should become more conservative?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:31 AM
Sep 2013

Hasn't this party moved to the right enough for you? Geez.

Democracyinkind

(4,015 posts)
21. One universal sign that you are an immature troll
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:10 PM
Sep 2013

--> You claim to have a monopoly on perceiving reality and don't realize that you're merely repeating the "Because I'm right!!!!!"- schtick you learned in kindergarten.

I suggest everyone check for this one too since we're obviously all feeling introspective enough today to go through the little list you posted.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
142. Actually, I try to persuade them
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:51 PM
Sep 2013

At least, those that can be.

I'd put my volunteer hours up against yours any day, "Comrade".

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
601. I'm reponding to a guy who named himself "Comrade Grumpy"
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 02:08 AM
Sep 2013

So I dunno. Maybe a reality based one? I didn't choose his name for him.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
177. Hmm.... Sounds like #18 to me. I could be wrong.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:40 PM
Sep 2013

Please clarify what you're trying to say here.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
190. You're wrong, and this is just one more example of why
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 08:09 PM
Sep 2013

I'm not saying you're paid. Why pay someone who volunteers to work for free, right?

I'm informing Comrade Grumpy that the reason that you spend all your time with your head up an orifice ranting about the awgulness of the left and liberals, instead of, you know, going after the right and conservatives, i.e., Republicans, is because you recognize that you have more in common with those people than with the people you are trying to address here.

Frankly I'm not seeing anything from you that would look out of place at any other right-wing echo chamber site. You might want to check out rightnation.us - not as crazy as FreeRepublic, but they certainly hate and loathe liberals and leftists. You'll get along well.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
193. You accuse Democrats of being members of the John Birch society....
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 08:33 PM
Sep 2013

...and are terribly offended when I outline clearly counterproductive behaviors, claiming that I am attacking not only you, but "the left and liberals".

This sort of leads me to believe, Scoot, that you have a very odd view of what constitutes the "left and liberals", if you think these kinds of behaviors are at all common.

Again, let me restate something I've said to other people. I leveled no accusation at all in my OP. So if you see yourself in the behaviors I have outlined, it is your own conscience that is trying to tell you something, not me.

Let me also state that, while it is tempting for me to point you to www.revleft.com, I'd actually rather you find your way back towards the idea that Democracy means that you don't always get 100% of what you want, but getting more than 50% of what you want is usually better than getting 0%. And that applies to internal coalition politics, as well as contests regarding the party as a whole.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

/ p.s. That you actually don't think I'm paid, I think, is a step in the right direction for you.

GeorgeGist

(25,322 posts)
198. Your whole OP is a list of ACCUSATIONS.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 08:48 PM
Sep 2013

So cut the bullshit:

I leveled no accusation at all in my OP.


Your Republican roots are showing.
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
200. Some, yes, such as yourself and several who reccomended this thread
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 08:50 PM
Sep 2013

As your own choice of name shows, you understand that there is certainly room for a Democrat to be an illiberal douchebag, correct?

And don't bother with the "I didn't exactly say quite that, wink wink nudge nudge" argument. Surprising as it might be for you, I'm not a stupid person, nor are the many, many, many other people pointing this out on your thread. You can couch your bullshit with the wobbly terminology and deny the obvious subtext all you want, but you're not doing a real good job of fooling anyone - certainly not even yourself.

I'm under no illusions about what democracy means and does not mean. I would heartily recommend, again, that if the people and discussions on DU offend you in such a grave manner, that you find greener pastures. For your own benefit, you know?

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
459. You are assuming people think your list is correct and truthful and factual.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:56 PM
Sep 2013

That is quite a reach. Nobody on the left is buying what you are trying to sell. No one who still stands on their principles could.


 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
24. I've never been a campaign volunteer, but I protested at NoNATO in Chicago.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:14 PM
Sep 2013

I guess that makes me a counterproductive wingnut.

And on #4, I'm sorry we try to hold the elected officials from our own party accountable for violating progressive policies we voted to enact. I guess lockstep is better.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
176. I'm sorry you see yourself in these behaviors...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:39 PM
Sep 2013

Especially if there is only one or two.

Let me also point out that there is a difference between a "Strong" leftist and a "Counterproductive" one.

I'm not actually asking any attacking leftist Dems, or asking them to change their beliefs. I'm asking them to become more effective. Rather than ranting ineffectually on a website, you could actually make things better.

For instance, that NoNato protest you attended, it didn't change anything. CNN didn't cover it, and people tend to ignore TV anyway. What changes things are person-to-person contacts, which you can only do through campaigns (or in a handful of extremely well organized local political parties). Knocking doors is considerably harder than marching in a parade, but you can actually have an effect in your local community.

You'll also find something else if you go this route: an appreciation for other points of view. The way I know the counterproductive left isn't actually doing anything (or harming their own cause) is due to the way they speak of boogey men that are pure inhuman evil. Most of these people don't sound like they've even met a Republican, much less a disaffected centrist. Nothing I'm saying is asking you to change your beliefs, but by talking to people face to face, you may learn they have their reasons for believing as they do, even if sometimes those reasons are wrong.

Effective leftists recognize this. You could be one if you want to.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

CrispyQ

(36,492 posts)
401. There are a lot of ways to affect change, not just your way.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 11:47 AM
Sep 2013

You are not winning over any of the 'counterproductive leftists,' with your 'my way or the highway' attitude. It feels kind of like you're telling us to sit down & shut up. We've heard that before.

Shame on you for telling another DUer that protesting did no good.

G_j

(40,367 posts)
25. sigh...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:15 PM
Sep 2013

from your journal:

"The oddest thing is the absolute pure anti-Democratic party hatred. So many here really are the mirror image of the Tea Party: mindless screaming ranters determined to tear the one organized group that is actually effective in pushing forward the policies they purport to believe in. If I were as conspiracy minded as the loons that accuse me receiving a paycheck for posting on the D.U., I'd say they were secretly all Republicans conspiring to tear Democrats down. Alas, Occam's Razor tells me that instead, it's just people too wrapped in their own internal partisan morality play to acknowledge reality or the complexities of the real world."


IMO, comparing DUers to the Tea Party should be against DU rules. Would you compare DUers who don't agree with you to the KKK? Perhaps you would, but IMHO that's not Kosher..

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
30. The whole thing... Du is the "last bastion of magical thinking, tribalism, etc etc"
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:24 PM
Sep 2013
It would be truly interesting to have a debate...

...with people on the other side of this issue who could actually acknowledge reality. Saying something like: "Yes, obviously the law allows this, but it should be changed. Here's how we could draw the line a little closer, and not interfere with our legitimate national security concerns."

Alas, I've come to the conclusion that the D.U. isn't the place to do this. It seems to be the last bastion of magical thinking, tribalism, conspiracy theories, counterproductive screeching, willingness to completely make "facts" up, and so many different kinds of logical fallacies it's hard to keep track of them all.

The oddest thing is the absolute pure anti-Democratic party hatred. So many here really are the mirror image of the Tea Party: mindless screaming ranters determined to tear the one organized group that is actually effective in pushing forward the policies they purport to believe in. If I were as conspiracy minded as the loons that accuse me receiving a paycheck for posting on the D.U., I'd say they were secretly all Republicans conspiring to tear Democrats down. Alas, Occam's Razor tells me that instead, it's just people too wrapped in their own internal partisan morality play to acknowledge reality or the complexities of the real world.

The good news is that our party isn't plagued by these people as the Republicans are. Hard leftist loons sound doubly mad because they know normal Democrats don't pay attention to them. On the GOP side though, the inmates really have taken over the asylum. Howard Dean said it best, rather recently, to a GOP consultant on Bill Maher's show. "Your party is about 49% crackpots, ours has only 10."

And at least our crackpots know how to use a spelling checker. That's a plus.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

KG

(28,752 posts)
27. hilarious.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:16 PM
Sep 2013

another adolescent screed characterizing objection to dem / obama policies as 'hatred'. isn't it time grow up from that?

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
173. Indeed it is...absolutely no sense of historial context...only about "what's happenin' now"
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:29 PM
Sep 2013

It would be laughable if not so sad.

wyldwolf

(43,868 posts)
29. A caricature, but much of this rings true
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:24 PM
Sep 2013

Your forgot the predictable reference to the DLC, but someone responded with that for you.

But, you should edit the post and remove the DUer call-out. Not good form. And the referenced DUer has been a great source for information.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
78. i think he was defending prosense, old chap!
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 05:24 PM
Sep 2013

how's it going? should we start an argument for old times sake

wyldwolf

(43,868 posts)
145. Oh really? I must have misread
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:54 PM
Sep 2013

Anyhoo, nah - you and I probably come across as two of the more sensible people on DU these days.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
205. yes, prosense is constantly called a paid shill by a dozen or so "democrats" here on
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:05 PM
Sep 2013

a daily basis. sad, really. that's what the OP refers to.

because on the New DU, you have to be paid, apparently, to support Democrats. it's nuts!

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
32. I'm incredibly bored by this list.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:25 PM
Sep 2013

I'm also incredibly bored by lists that slam people like you who I don't agree with.

It's just moronic sniping.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
80. i think there's truth in some points on the list cali, but i wouldn't apply them to you.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 05:26 PM
Sep 2013

reading DU daily, I think there's quite a few people who it fits fairly well.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
106. I'm not saying there isn't some element of truth
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 05:53 PM
Sep 2013

there, but there are some gross distortions and it really is just sniping.

In any case, I know for a fact that the op does consider me the "wingnut left".

Glad you don't.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
107. after reading your posts for almost 10 years i know you have integrity.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 05:56 PM
Sep 2013

I can think of some DUers who fit the list to a tee, but I don't feel like calling anyone out, plus its a Saturday

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
120. four (or more) posts on one thread
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:11 PM
Sep 2013

clearly hating on the OP. Funny sniping about somthing you think is sniping haa haa.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
56. you can take it
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:56 PM
Sep 2013

there have been many attacks against regular Democrats on DU, so people who make those should be able to take it too.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
85. The OP will not answer the simple question asked by the poster you taunt. Incapable of doing
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 05:29 PM
Sep 2013

so.
And what the fuck is a 'regular Democrat'? Regular is a suit size or a way to order coffee. Regular. Jesus.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
392. So you really have to make it about that?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 10:08 AM
Sep 2013

Geez. You have to get your phrasing exactly right.

People to the left of Democrats are allowed to post on DU, socialists, etc. So mainstream Democrats are a part of DU (they try to get us banned to see if they can move the board totally to the left or libertarianism, and they are getting numerous enough to hide our posts).

Oh, and so the point was, they ought to be able to take some heat, given how they dish it out. Geez.



Vanje

(9,766 posts)
439. If you got a post hidden,Its because it might have been a rude post
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:09 PM
Sep 2013

You might have called a fellow DUer a pompous A-hole.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
446. Smearing people over their past posts
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:32 PM
Sep 2013

Is what makes DU suck. I'm sure there was a context there.

Is this to try to intimidate? I think it is.

I don't bother to research posters since I stick to the issues. But I have one stalker (to whom everyone is a homophobe if they did not throw Obama under the bus over Rick Warren) and I think that is wrong and very bad behavior.

Puglover

(16,380 posts)
451. Your words.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:43 PM
Sep 2013

Get back to me on how it feels when someone tells you that "YOU have enough rights" There sure as hell was context and you know exactly what it was. Apologies work you know. You have never once expressed regret over that unbelievably cold remark.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
445. Really? You don't see how the use of "regular Democrat" implies that those you disagree with are
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:30 PM
Sep 2013

irregular? What if you referred to straight people as regular people, how do you think that would go over? Words are important.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
156. Pointing out behaviors of the counterproductive left...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:06 PM
Sep 2013

Makes one a "Democrat", obviously. The Democratic Party has no interest in being captured by crazies in the same way that the Republicans have been captured by Tea Party crazies.

Please also note that I didn't actually "attack the left". (There are plenty of people on the left who are absolute sweethearts, and quite persuasive to boot.) All I did was to point out some counterproductive behavior.

So, if you see yourself in these twenty statements, then it isn't me who is "attacking" you. It's your own conscience.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

 

grahamhgreen

(15,741 posts)
211. HAHAHA! Attacking Syria is insane. Instituting the Heritage foundations health care plan
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:27 PM
Sep 2013

is wacked.

Extending the Bush tax cuts, nuts.

Bailing out the banks, ludicrous.

And generally compromising with crazies on the right, who continually refuse to compromise, then doing it over and over is the definition of crazy.

....unless one has a different agenda....

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
414. In all fairness, Einstein never said that, and it is wrong.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:15 PM
Sep 2013

But i agree that the behavior is delusional.

 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
35. I think you're trying to do something good here but excessive Anger is getting in the way.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:27 PM
Sep 2013

I think the vast majority of DUers try to do the best that they can.
Remember, they're under a lot of stress also..

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
38. self righteous rant
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:28 PM
Sep 2013

Last edited Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:14 PM - Edit history (2)

Elitist bullshit for elitist thinkers.


"You aren't one of us" in a long winded meandering kind of way.

Satisfied with the status quo. Thinks the Democratic Party is on the right track. Roots for the team and all the glorious "winning" that comes with it. Celebrates economic disparity as better than self defined alternatives. Thinks that working a phone bank for the DLC is a certification for passing judgment.


If you think the Democratic Party has evolved into something unrecognizable, the OP gives an enlightening glimpse how.

BOG PERSON

(2,916 posts)
47. elitist thinkers that the actual elite has no awareness of
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:39 PM
Sep 2013

identifying with power won't give you power - though i suppose it might give your statements an air of authority

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
265. To be honest
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 11:52 PM
Sep 2013

I skimmed through it. Saw just enough to think it a waste of time to read it all.

I could give a shit how I am labeled. Especially by "Conservative" Democrats. I lay equal blame to them for the state of our nation.

Frankly, I'm pissed off at what the Democratic Party has become. I don't have time to wallow in the OP mire.

"Conservative Democrats"

Freaking pawns of the financial moguls. The worst possible influence on our nation. Economic Neo Cons.

You will be swallowed up by the millennials and spit out. Just a matter of time.

I'll try to help speed things up.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
309. So tell me
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:22 AM
Sep 2013

Do you ever have anything nice to say about democrats, the president, or anyone in congress? I know how you feel about president Obama, you know the "colossal failure", at least according to you. And your idea that allowing the crazies to take control will some how "help" the party get back on the right track, although letting the tea baggers, the Paul bots, and insane republicans run things would pretty much a worse problem than when George W. Bush was president.

What kind of a Supreme court do you thin we would get with the right wing nuts in charge?

What kind of programs would they put in place to help seniors, the poor, women's rights, etc.?

How about health care for those in need? Do you think that if the crazies took over they would actually help those who really need help?

How would you speed things up, but trying to encourage others to NOT vote, or to actually vote for the crazies?

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
376. I'm getting my money's worth
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 06:17 AM
Sep 2013

Both in donations and time spent. Since I'm not seeing much return for my efforts, I believe I shall vent here often.

Voted twice for the President. Have voted straight Democratic ticket since 1976.

I have probably cast as many Democratic votes as you have.

I don't have many good things to say about the Democratic leadership or our President. In my opinion, they are puppets. In my opinion, the President lied to us during his campaign.

I will, however, lavish great praise upon Warren, Brown, and Grayson. I agree with a good many things from Merkley, Akala, Boxer, Harkin, Udall, and Murray, although they I do believe they could be coerced by the President to support some of his economic agenda if lobbied hard enough.

My primary objective is to help swing the Democratic party back to being representative of the working man. I don't give a crap how it is done. If they have to be embarrassed at the polls, then so be it. I refuse to reinforce their behavior by helping them implement a financial mogul's wet dream.

You focus on beating Republicans. I focus on getting the Democratic Party back. We each have our own priorities.

Republicans in power will attempt to implement crazy with respect to social issues. It will be their death knell. Regardless, the social issues can wait as I recognize these social issues as the carrot that the third way is dangling before us. I will temporarily remove that carrot. For me, the primary issue is the concentration of wealth at the expense of the working poor. The GOP are the least of my concerns right now if the only alternative to GOP economic policy is more GOP economic policy.


I'm not going to stop.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
403. Interesting
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 11:53 AM
Sep 2013

You said you voted for him twice, yet from a lot of your posts this year, the beginning of his second term, you have said he was a total failure in one post, slammed him in many others, so as soon as he started his second term you find out that he was such a failure?

Have you posted anything positive about the president this year? If so please link be to the post and I will gladly apologize.

The problem I have with how you "want" to change the party is that turning it over to the crazies, and waiting for the next election when you say people will wake up after being subjected to the insane thinking of said crazies, doesn't make any sense. Look at the damage George W. Bush did to this country. Letting the crazies run things will make what Bush did look like a picnic in the park! Even if your theory was right and the "next" election they got voted out , how much damage would they have done "before" being voted out? In the case of 2016 and getting a president Christie, which you also have said "we could to worse", what do you think he would do to help the country? What kind of judges would he put on the Supreme court? You really need to think about some of these things because putting the nuts in office is't going to fix a thing, it will only cause more hardship for those at the bottom, and more money for those at the top.
Putting the crazies in charge would simple be a total disaster.

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
421. "Putting the crazies in charge would simple be a total disaster"
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:35 PM
Sep 2013

It sure as hell would. It would create a political upheaval. Perhaps spark a Renaissance.


Obviously you don't know my timing with the President. Look for his initial proposal to cut back on Social Security. That is when you first started to hear me grumble. It has gone down hill from there. Always more bad news. Never anything uplifting or positive.

I'm talking about things he initiates. For example, his secret trade agreement isn't related to GOP House obstructionism.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
426. Still not answering the questions
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:50 PM
Sep 2013

What kind of a Supreme court judge would one of the crazies put in office?

What kind of programs to help those in need would the crazies put in place?

What kind of a mess would here be, I think worse than the one Bush left, when they leave office?

How can things change if it takes another 20 years to clean up the mess left by Bush, and the one left by the crazies if your theory comes to be?

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
476. I answered your question
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:48 PM
Sep 2013

Enough terrible policy to create a tsunami of public backlash.


The correction factor would be considerable. The pendulum swing to the left would be significant.

The slow, methodical crumbling of the middle class by the third way is actually more effective for the tycoons. The Republicans would cause the burner to be turned up to the point where the frogs would jump out of the pot of boiling water.

The political revolution can only take place if those that recall the time before Clinton can have influence. They have tangible history for comparison. When that generation is gone, and if the third way remains in power, there will be future generations that believe our current administration is the definition of the left with respect to economics.

The boiled frog, the small incremental changes over time, the conditioning of the populace, is a much greater danger. "Shock and awe" social issues by Republicans will wake people up.

Of course this isn't the most favorable route. The most favorable route would be a Democratic Party that represents the working man. Unfortunately, the tycoons appear to be solidly imbedded. Hence, the top priority must be "fixing" the Democratic party. Greater priority then defeating Republicans.

The Republicans are their own worst enemy. They will quite naturally, defeat themselves. They are most effective at doing this when they try to impose their will.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
480. You're playing the lesser of two evils game. We are playing the make the lesser evil good game. n/t
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:56 PM
Sep 2013

CrispyQ

(36,492 posts)
420. An excellent post.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:30 PM
Sep 2013

This:

Republicans in power will attempt to implement crazy with respect to social issues. It will be their death knell. Regardless, the social issues can wait as I recognize these social issues as the carrot that the third way is dangling before us. I will temporarily remove that carrot. For me, the primary issue is the concentration of wealth at the expense of the working poor. The GOP are the least of my concerns right now if the only alternative to GOP economic policy is more GOP economic policy.




Can you have social justice without economic justice? I believe that economic justice is the foundation of a just society. I liken it to three hots & a cot, which trumps social issues. How does it benefit the 99% to have social justice, if we are oppressed economically? A democratic president was the first to suggest cuts to social security. Did he do it? No, but he suggested it, and now it's out there. In the first Borg Star Trek episode, at the end, Guinan warns Picard, "But now that they know you're out here..." Making cuts to SS is on the table now & a dem prez did it!


This may be my favorite political cartoon of the time:



This is what voting for the lesser of two evils gets you - exactly what you were voting against in the first place.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
373. Stop!
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 05:24 AM
Sep 2013

Stop writing those words right now! You have strayed outside the officially defined boundaries of 'journalism'. There will be no thinking outside the cardboard cubical, you unpatriotic fuck.

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
405. Sorry
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 11:56 AM
Sep 2013

I always did hate it when I was put into on of those boxes. I guess I just can't help myself!

Bjorn Against

(12,041 posts)
42. Another rant attacking Democrats for attacking Democrats
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:33 PM
Sep 2013

I wonder if you even realize what a hypocrite you sound like?

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
127. Hi Cali...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:32 PM
Sep 2013

...I know you are in a lot of physical pain, you've said so, so you get a pass from me, despite our obvious differences representing the different wings of the party, and your significant negativity. Being in pain sucks.

Still, I stand by this list. You will note that I don't actually call anyone out (other than to defend and laud ProSense).
I only call out counterproductive behavior.

So those who take offense at this list are, themselves, admitting to it. Kind of like this:


Party goer: "Those who snoop in the bathroom medicine cabinets of their host is an ass."

Party goer 2: "Hey! That's offensive! Don't call me an ass!"


- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

Democracyinkind

(4,015 posts)
344. You post this piece of shit OP and then have the gall to harp about Cali's negativity?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:43 AM
Sep 2013

Physician, heal thyself.

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
360. Nonsense. There are plenty of other reasons to be offended by this list.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:31 AM
Sep 2013

Yet you lecture people about fallacies.

"Hey, ConservativeDemocrat, have you quit beating your wife?"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question

A loaded question or complex question fallacy is a question which contains a controversial or unjustified assumption ( e.g., a presumption of guilt).[1]
Aside from being an informal fallacy depending on usage, such questions may be used as a rhetorical tool: the question attempts to limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner's agenda.

G_j

(40,367 posts)
370. I don't think every member of the "Reality based community"
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 05:15 AM
Sep 2013

has quite arrived at that awareness.

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
364. "You will note that I don't actually call anyone out"
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:52 AM
Sep 2013

Let's cut the crap, hm? Baiting is baiting whether you specify the target or not.
 

RC

(25,592 posts)
46. Posted by a non Center/Left of Center Democrat.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:38 PM
Sep 2013

I find your OP offensive. You maybe had a mirror in front of you when you wrote that?


You sure are not on the Left of that graphic, that's for sure

mitchtv

(17,718 posts)
48. Creepy , It doesn't describe anyone here
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:39 PM
Sep 2013

sounds like BS to me. Besides it is the blue dogs that fuck everything up by voting with pugs at every opportunity.

 

sgtbenobo

(327 posts)
49. Wow, thanks ConservativeDemocrat....
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:42 PM
Sep 2013

.... I had no idea just what a despicable douche-nozzle I really am. There's only one thing left for me to do and that is to go out on the porch, smoke a cigarette and cry, cry, cry. I never realized what a true friend you are and that you are only looking out for what's best for me. I am so ashamed. I promise I'll try and do better. Oh please, please, please, will you be my guiding light. I don't think I can do this alone. I am sorry.


Carry on.

WCLinolVir

(951 posts)
296. Cause you can say anything about anyone
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:55 AM
Sep 2013

so long as you follow with -bless his heart. Or so I've been told.

Warpy

(111,316 posts)
300. Oh, the worse it is the more fun it is
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:03 AM
Sep 2013

"Bless your/his heart" is one of the best things I took away from the south.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
194. If you see yourself as a douche-nozzle, I'm sorry for you
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 08:36 PM
Sep 2013

You will see no mention of "sgtbenobo" in my OP, or anyone else for that matter (other than ProSense, who I defend). So if you see yourself in the counterproductive behaviors I outlined, then please understand that it is not me who is leveling such an accusation. It's your own conscience.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

 

sgtbenobo

(327 posts)
212. ConservativeDemocrat I've been waiting my whole life....
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:28 PM
Sep 2013

.... for someone like you. Someone with such an astounding grasp of the obvious. Someone that can happily lead me into oblivion. Someone who is both vapid and superficial, yet so wonderfully two dimensional. What I'm trying to say my darling is I love you. ConservativeDemocrat will you marry me?


Carry on.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
260. You are most welcome
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 11:34 PM
Sep 2013

And I hope that one day you will grow up.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
361. No, that doesn't work.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:34 AM
Sep 2013

Last edited Sun Sep 22, 2013, 06:53 AM - Edit history (1)

It's quite clear that your post is a series of straw men designed to irritate. You have successfully irritated a large number of people by presenting yourself as someone who wilfully misunderstands. It isn't conscience that prompts response, it is a desire to speak the truth to you.

You are aware of this. The "conscience" thing is an attitude being struck, nothing more.

Puglover

(16,380 posts)
396. Seriously Vanje.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 11:00 AM
Sep 2013

This is a WONDERFUL opportunity our friends over at "The Peoples View" to create (if they don't already have) a chat board. Or a super duper secret chat room like (I hear) the folks DFP have. Why a lot of the posters on this very thread hang out in that one. Where they can listen to The Tombstoned Admin call DU and it's admin and posters a cesspool.

All of the posters that love this "list" could go over to those places to remove themselves from us impure and deranged troublemakers and our ideas.

It's always pretty telling. OP's like this get anywhere from 40 to in this case 77 recs. Whereas a good, well written OP from a progressive democrat on DU can garner up to 400 recs. And yeah who really cares about recs except that they are in fact an indication of how members feel about an issues.

I would suspect that this particular piece got as many recs as it did not so much for the ideas put forth but for the potential to piss off and offend lefty Democrats on this site. Heck, many posters high fived it for that and said so.

Lets face it, the posters that deride "Neo DU" hang out here because their other haunts TPV,DFP and The BOG are ghost towns.

LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
53. Oh good, another conservative
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:52 PM
Sep 2013

complaining that the Democratic party hasn't moved far enough to the right fast enough.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
54. #16 is The Democratic Party Left Me!!!
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:53 PM
Sep 2013

As if a political party isn't a big tent, it was something that was supposed to cater to you.

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
508. You could be posting on DU!
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 04:10 PM
Sep 2013

Waxing philosophic while you're waxing your carrot.

Not that I would accuse you of that. I was using the rhetorical "you." Yep.

The thing is, I've read many posts on DU that seem masturbatory, so maybe we're not far off

icymist

(15,888 posts)
116. Darth Nader
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:06 PM
Sep 2013

(((BREATH))) You must become a vegetarian Luke (((Breath))) or I am not your father (((Breath)))

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
61. Just another coward without the ambition or fortitude to go take his own party back.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 04:59 PM
Sep 2013


I'm sure you'll be very happy with the new republican Congress.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
65. K & R, Aye, ConserativeDemocrat, you have struck some nerves here, what is more interesting
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 05:09 PM
Sep 2013

Is how many actually came out of the woodwork with chips on their shoulders. This is a good post, sometimes it helps when truths are pointed out to those in need.

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
362. So.... let me get this right...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:37 AM
Sep 2013

CD posts a whole bunch of crap, people come out and point out it's crap, and that in and of itself means the shoe fits?

Oo. What a clever trick.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
454. Doth thou protest too much?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:46 PM
Sep 2013

Your response shows that the OP struck a nerve. Denial is futile! He gotcha!

<sarcasm>

Just try to deny you've been posting daily about Ralph Nader. JUST TRY!

 

demwing

(16,916 posts)
69. Top 20 signs you might be trolling DU
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 05:14 PM
Sep 2013

ok, there's just 1 sign...

1. You posted this drivel:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023707888

I'm only suggesting you might be a troll because a more personal response would be viewed as a personal attack. I'd also like to say that you shouldn't bother responding ignore-boy, but hit & run cowards don't need to be reminded of that.

Shoo fly - Back to the BOG with you

dgibby

(9,474 posts)
72. Interesting stats and a couple of glaring "tells".
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 05:18 PM
Sep 2013

"ConservativeDemocrat"=oxymoron.

Stats: joined DU 2001, 1,217 posts, 132 in last 90 days, 122 in GD last 90 days. Part of a sleeper cell or just been in a coma for 12 years?

"Tells": incorrect use of English, #8-"a argument"' ; consistently refers to DU as "the" DU. Who does that? Don't think I've ever seen that one before.



FTWIW, ConservativeDemocrat, Democrats are like cats. They can't be herded into a groupthink pen. That goes double for the democrtic wing of the Democratic Party that you so obviously disdain.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
185. Hi dgibby!
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 08:00 PM
Sep 2013

I refer to "the DU", because DU is short for "Democratic Underground". If I said "I am part of Democratic Underground" rather than "the Democratic Underground" that would be grammatically incorrect (and also make be sound Russian). Also missing a single letter in a post (a vs an) isn't exactly unheard of, although if you'll notice, I actually missed two. The one I regret more is somehow putting in ROTL instead of ROFL.

I am a bit curious about your belief that pointing out counterproductive behaviors is "herding people into a groupthink pen". It seems pretty obvious to me that that many of the people in the DU are already in a groupthink pen, which is what I'm trying to get them out of. Let me also point out that if someone actually represents the "democratic wing" of the Democratic Party, they would likely actually support the party they say they are representing.

Oh, and just love the "sleeper cell" angle. It tickles me to death that someone actually thinks I'm a spy or something. Maybe I'm Russian!

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

 

Caretha

(2,737 posts)
223. You said
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 10:01 PM
Sep 2013
I am a bit curious about your belief that pointing out counterproductive behaviors is "herding people into a groupthink pen".


You calling Liberal Democrats as having "counterproductive behaviors", doesn't make it so, dude.

So get off your fuckin' high horse, cuz that dog don't hunt.
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
285. Yes you might appreciate this divisive trash aimed at splitting the party so the REpublicans will
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:33 AM
Sep 2013

have an easier time. I think Tory is the word.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
510. That doesnt make sense. The OP is trashing Dems and makes a habit of it. Did you
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 04:16 PM
Sep 2013

forget that the left are Democrats. In fact the left has a greater claim on being Democrats than the Conservative Dems that push Republican ideologies. The Conservative Dems worship Gen Clapper.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
562. So you don't see the irony in congratulating someone
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 02:57 PM
Sep 2013

for trashing Democrats and then commenting that people who trash Democrats split the party more than the way they were trashed on this OP?


JHB

(37,161 posts)
77. Well that should end all the fuss, because scolding always works!
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 05:23 PM
Sep 2013

As someone who answers "no" to every one of your questions, I have one of my own:

Are liberals/progressives/"radical leftists"/"counterproductive left wingnuts"/etc. a part of the Democratic coalition necessary to win elections?

If the answer is "no", why should you care?

If the answer is "yes", how on earth will constant belittling improve things?


ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
163. Do you see yourself in this list, William?
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:14 PM
Sep 2013

It sure sounds like you do. Or else you would not be so angry. See #20.

Oh, and also see #12, since you clearly have decided that I voted for Reagan, a false statement. Pulling truthiness bullshit out of your ass is supposed to be a hallmark of the Republican party, let me remind you.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

 

Caretha

(2,737 posts)
230. I don't believe you voted for Reagan
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 10:17 PM
Sep 2013

I don't think you are old enough to have voted in that election, if you had been...yeah, you would have voted for him.

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
367. "Or else you would not be so angry."
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 05:09 AM
Sep 2013

Using absolutist false dichotomies and entrapping fallacies is a hallmark of Republicans too. Again:

"Hey, ConservativeDemocrat, have you quit beating your wife?"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question

A loaded question or complex question fallacy is a question which contains a controversial or unjustified assumption ( e.g., a presumption of guilt).

Aside from being an informal fallacy depending on usage, such questions may be used as a rhetorical tool: the question attempts to limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner's agenda.

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
377. Well, no, not really.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 06:35 AM
Sep 2013

It's just as possible to be angry with an accusation because it's false as because it's true.

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
92. While I don't disagree with several of these points ...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 05:36 PM
Sep 2013

I think threads like this only spread discordance and disagreement among like minded people and are thus counterproductive. It is wrong to hold the democrats blameless though obviously the Republicans are so far out there as to be insane so it isn't even debatable. Still I disagree with condemning some who see a bigger picture. It isn't entirely wrong and if you think it is you are the one who is naive.

Iggo

(47,561 posts)
160. "...threads like this only spread discordance and disagreement..."
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:12 PM
Sep 2013

Which is exactly what it was designed to do.

And it's working perfectly.

The very definition of trolling.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
463. I have to agree with you about divisiveness. That said, we've got plenty of DUers who have
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:03 PM
Sep 2013

been here for eons with high post counts who create OPs that are divisive, rude, or "can I get a witness" screeds that piss people off and get a lot of hits but they only serve to further divide.

I have no idea if the angry responders to this OP are correct that this poster is a "troll" or not, but their reaction to his remarks suggest that there's a truth in at least some of what he says.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
467. Its quite clear that the OP is a Conservative.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:19 PM
Sep 2013

Troll or no, hardly matters.

I didnt think DU was the sort of place where an avowed conservative would get enough recs to elevate him to the Greatest Page.
I thought DU was a Liberal Dem site.
My mind is rather blown.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
471. Well, I would call myself a moderate-to-liberal Democrat.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:27 PM
Sep 2013

I am fiscally cautious (I believe in paying one's bills) and I am socially liberal. I support choice, equality, and the Dream Act.

There is no "crime" in being a conservative Democrat. That's not my cuppa, but if that conservative Democrat pulls the lever on election day for the Democratic ticket, he or she is OK with me. I'm interested in winning elections.

The fact that you want to exclude Democrats who are not liberal enough to suit YOU is not a good thing, IMO. It's something you should think about.

If you want real change, you aren't going to get it from the GOP. You're going to have to put up with some of those Democrats who are "less perfect" in your head in order to get a majority in order for our team to do ANYTHING.

You cut off your nose to spite your face when you play the "exclusion" game with members of the Democratic Party. That's the kind of bullying shit the Tea Party Republicans do. I don't care for it one bit.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
477. Well. I guess I have a bias.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:50 PM
Sep 2013

I just don't think much of conservatives.
Call me crazy, but I think Conservatism is the problem , not the solution.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
481. Dividing the Democratic Party is one way to ensure that 'conservatism' prevails.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:57 PM
Sep 2013

Progress may be by inches when Democrats run things, but regression is the norm when the GOP is in charge.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
491. Conservatives
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:06 PM
Sep 2013

do not bring progress.

They may wear the red jersey. They may wear the blue jersey.

Conservatism does not deserve a nod.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
511. .......and further more
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 05:15 PM
Sep 2013

I know conservatives.
I dont court them.

and further more, surrounded by conservatives as I am 24/7 in my real world,, I certainly dont want to come to my favorite Liberal Web Site (DU) to see an avowed Conservative and his new pals, tirade against liberalism.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
541. I think we'd all do well to just discuss differences civilly.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 09:16 PM
Sep 2013

I don't have a problem with people who disagree with me, but I do have a problem with people who try to personally denigrate me, or anyone else, just because of a policy disagreement.

I see that shit all the time. I find it tiresome. It suggests a weak argument, too.



Cha

(297,464 posts)
592. Yeah, good point.. any whining about "divisiveness" on
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 07:10 PM
Sep 2013

this thread would be full blown hypocrisy.

They call anyone a "troll" who has a different opinion. One poster went to Skinner about purging those who Rec this thread. that's how I found the thead to REC. lol good company.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12593480

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
382. Well, that's not much good for anything, is it?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 07:52 AM
Sep 2013

You WANT emotionally charged disturbances? What for?

the_sly_pig

(741 posts)
101. Hypocrisy.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 05:42 PM
Sep 2013

The spectrum of liberal thought is represented by the Democratic Party. Conservatives appear cohesive because they lack the ability to understand nuance.

Liberals are designed and encouraged to conflict. Conservatives need group-think.

Calling liberals unorganized or messy is what it means to be liberal. Those that require structure and order are where they should be on the political spectrum.

You know what they say about opinions........

 

glowing

(12,233 posts)
103. Was there a point to this list other than to cause a flame war?
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 05:44 PM
Sep 2013

Pretty heavy assertions to assume about other people and what they think, how they think, and what their daily lives are sub subsisting of.

You cannot duck your head in the sand or stand behind a bad idea no matter who's it is, because we all know, unless there is major public pushback, the only voices in most people's rooms are those handing over wads of campaign cash. So, if there is a bad plan or name floated, push back.

If there is a despot doing horrible things to other people in a complicated civil war with world wide consequences, guns blazing and spurs rattling aren't always the most appropriate response.

This board to me has been somewhat, at times, a haven where normally like minded or intelligent people can discuss issues of the day... At times it's messy and, of course, we have infiltrators who wish to cause discourse.

I'm tired of "liberal" being perceived as something that is inappropriate or something we cannot achieve. Mostly, we have been right more than wrong on many issues. We aren't stupid either, we know we are up against the coprorate over lords and the likes of the Koch Bros... That being said, there is no reason we shouldn't try and try and try again .

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
108. The best shills are the ones who pretend they are one of you.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 05:56 PM
Sep 2013

And all of this sounds more like it was written by an Ayn Rand Objectivist to me....with all the never and such hyperbole typical of their immature thinking.

But what is more intestine is how many think this is great...quite revealing I think.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
485. I thought it sounded like one of those "Third Way" diatribes....
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:02 PM
Sep 2013

A bit of shit-stirring to get people riled. It even has similar verbiage!

Funny how the people who don't like this 'un like those! That's a bit revealing, too....

Where one stands depends on where one sits, I guess!

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
119. If things hadn't been getting progressively worse for the past 30 years,
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:07 PM
Sep 2013

you might have a case here.

Conservative Democrats (DLC, Third Way) have controlled the Democratic party for the past thirty years, and the country has been going downhill like a snowball to hell the entire time.


Maybe y'all should just step aside and let liberals handle things from here on out, so we can start making some real democratic progress again, before progress becomes completely impossible.


bvar22

(39,909 posts)
122. So instead of attacking Republicans,
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:18 PM
Sep 2013

....you are here attacking loyal Democrats.

What number is that on your list?

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
134. I'm not attacking anyone, bvar
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:42 PM
Sep 2013

However allow me to gently suggest that if you are terribly offended and see your own actions reflected in these counterproductive behaviors I've outlined, maybe your conscience is trying to tell you something.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

treestar

(82,383 posts)
174. HUH?
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:31 PM
Sep 2013

Who attacks Democrats daily here? Starting with the POTUS on down? And gives Republicans a pass? The irony!

PDittie

(8,322 posts)
124. Well I can admit to three of the "qualifiers"
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:25 PM
Sep 2013

but I think my label is "moonbat", and not the opposite of RWNJ.

You should at least get your ad hominem straight.

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
129. 31 Recommendations for this tripe. A new DU shame...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:36 PM
Sep 2013

Last edited Sun Sep 22, 2013, 09:12 AM - Edit history (2)

The OP, which insults 66% of DUers (i.e. Liberals), has 31 recs by those who are, apparently, perfectly happy with the status quo AND have no issue with such a blatant, broadbrush attack on 66% of their fellow DUers.

This list is DLC/Third-way horse shit. I invite you to self-delete, but since you're a drive-byer, I'm sure you won't see my post.

Regardless, I'm on the record...


On edit: as of 8:58am, this thread has 76 recs. This response thread has 225.
Doing the math, I was RIGHT on the money - 66% of all recs are for the response thread, indicating that 66% of DUers identify with it as opposed to this one.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
139. I rec'd it because it brings an interesting perspective
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:49 PM
Sep 2013

I don't agree with everything in the OP, but it's refreshing when I read something outside of the echo chamber.

This is a discussion board and there's nothing wrong with discussion.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
144. And many of those folks in that large segment you're referring to...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:53 PM
Sep 2013

attack other DUers because they dare to have another point of view.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
399. they'll be okay in the morning
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 11:34 AM
Sep 2013

Wake up and forget all about it


There will be something new...well, maybe not today, maybe tomorrow--

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
402. Of course we will. That doesn't justify the OP...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 11:52 AM
Sep 2013

...which is a broadbrush smear on 66% of DUers.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
162. Ah! But you can look and see WHO reccomended it!
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:14 PM
Sep 2013

LiberalLoner
TheDeputyAndy823
sweetlou
killbot
we can do it
Summer Hathaway
gopiscrap
Shrek
madokie
chieftain
Hayabusa
treestar
skydive forever
otohara
iandhr
Bolo Boffin
intaglio
Kolesar
warrior1
coldmountain
CAG
libodem
MrScorpio
baldguy
mckara
Adelante
4now
w4rma
denbot
Sheepshank
Tikki
pasto76
sheshe2
Number23
Cali_Democrat
giftedgirl77
WonderGrunion
farmbo

In some ways it's a who's who list of DU's resident John Birch Society members.

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
169. Bravo Zulu
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:20 PM
Sep 2013

I don't use ignore, but If I was the type......

Well there ya go.

A nice tidy list.

The DLC of DU. They have something to lose if the Democratic Party changes back to what it once was before Clinton.

wyldwolf

(43,868 posts)
203. 'They have something to lose if the Democratic Party changes back to what it was before Clinton'
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:00 PM
Sep 2013

Elections?

Just sayin'

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
264. Another ransom payer
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 11:43 PM
Sep 2013

You prefer the boiled frog approach I see.


I have another way in mind. It is called changing the Democratic Party. It begins by chastising the dopplegangers.


You have given up on progressive change or alternatively, simply align with Freidman economic ideology. You appear to be ok with the concept of "working poor".

You must be. How else can you explain supporting those that would choose Goldman Sachs to dictate your economic future?



wyldwolf

(43,868 posts)
386. Amazing how you simply ignored the topic we started and launched into a silly tirade
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 08:59 AM
Sep 2013

If you DON'T agree the Democratic party was losing more elections between LBJ's last year in office and 1992 than since then, you must living in an alternate timeline.

Regardless of the caricature you just wrote, it's really beside the point. Democrats have won more and more often since the Clinton era began.

"The DLC of DU. They have something to lose if the Democratic Party changes back to what it once was before Clinton."

Yes, elections.

 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
549. You are right
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 02:04 AM
Sep 2013

I want the DLC to lose elections.

The millennials are coming for your deities.

Just a matter of time.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
197. I'm sure that everyone who rec'd this has been absolutely SHAMED by your comment.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 08:46 PM
Sep 2013

Oh, the shame. You fit right at home in this forum and I won't say exactly what "society" I think so many members of GD would be right at home at.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
262. I doubt most of 'em feel shame
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 11:36 PM
Sep 2013

And certainly not over endorsing this sort of drek posted by ConservativeDemocrat.

Just pointed out to another poster who's bewildered by the recommendations, what sort of people are giving those recommendations. As it happens, it's the same clump of people I regularly see screeching about the awfulness of liberals and the left and what a miserable place DU is.

Yet unlike the PUMAS of yore, they lack the stomach to fuck off and do their own thing away from us terrible leftist ninnies. I don't get it.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
297. Yes, well many of those folks that you don't "get" don't understand how a web site
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:57 AM
Sep 2013

created of, for and by Democrats has been literally infested with libertarians who froth about the evils of Democrats about 10 times more than they do Republicans and literally jump at the chance to accuse President Obama of every sinister thing they can think of, facts and information be absolutely damned.

If anyone should "fuck off and do their own thing" it sure as shit should be those folks.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
302. Perhaps they've been eating bad rye bread, to explain that hallucination.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:06 AM
Sep 2013

"Overrun with libertarians," really?

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
306. Have you considered that people making such a claim might just be... well... stupid?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:16 AM
Sep 2013

Or like... crazy people? You know, the people in the heating vents are telling them the lottery numbers kind of thing?

'Cause "overrun by libertarians" is just a shockingly mindless claim to make of DU, and the people making it, well, something has placed them out of touch and well beyond reasoning capabilities.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
313. Actually, I think the people that support Assad are crazy. But that's just me.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:26 AM
Sep 2013


And the people leaping to infer every sinister motive to this president and accuse him of being stupid, dishonest, a corporatist empty suit who only works for the 1%. Those are the people that I think are crazy and beyond all hope and reason. And judging by the ban hammer that's been getting laid down around here lately, alot of other folks think the same.

Your posts in this thread have illuminated the character of the people that make these types of comments. You leap in with personal attacks of people being members of the John Birch Society. Some of the folks you made that claim towards are DUers of color, which makes your comment that much more mindlessly, needlessly stupid and inflammatory. And then you proceed with the Number23 is our Lord and Master bullshit which not only is just incredibly stupid, it really shows that you have no interest in anything beyond name-calling and shit-stirring. I'm sure you have lots of friends in this forum as a result.

Union Scribe

(7,099 posts)
323. "you have no interest in anything beyond name-calling"
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:46 AM
Sep 2013

The lack of self-awareness in that statement is mind-BOGgling.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
329. You're another one. You do nothing but follow me around. I remember your posts commenting
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:53 AM
Sep 2013

on my status as a host when DU3 got up and running. You knew before I did that I was host. You are way too preoccupied with me and what I'm doing. You have never posted ANYTHING to me that was not a personal attack as well as uncalled for and completely unprovoked. Your unasked for responses in this thread are beautiful examples. Thank you so much for lacking the self awareness and self control to stop yourself from making them.

And yet, no matter how many times I ask you to leave me the bloody hell alone, you simply refuse and then to add a dash of hilarity to the issue, post little absurd jewels like this idiocy as if I'm the one that roams DU calling people names. As if I have ever, ONCE responded to you unprovoked. Classic case of deranged projection. There's gotta be an app or a really good doctor for that.

Union Scribe

(7,099 posts)
331. Oh Jesus, you're that one.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:02 AM
Sep 2013

Every few months or so I make the mistake of replying to you and you respond with the same paranoid shit every time about how I'm "deranged" and "following you." The truth is I can't keep you BOG people straight anymore, though you're beginning to distinguish yourself by your inability to engage in banter without flying off the handle and making various psychiatric diagnoses of other posters. Why don't you just hit ignore if you have such a venomous distaste for my posts?

Number23

(24,544 posts)
336. Then for God's sake PUT ME ON IGNORE.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:12 AM
Sep 2013

My brain works just fine. I am able to manage to not REPEATEDLY respond to people that find me a plague on this web site.

If you are so addled and find my posts so utterly unbearable for God's sake PUT ME ON IGNORE and spare me any more of your nonsense. The fact that you constantly attack me and a) can't remember my name but for some reason seem to be intimately familiar with my BOG postings and b) want ME to be the one to put YOU on ignore even though you are the one that is constantly chasing after and attacking me is indicative of the nature of your posts better than anything you could have EVER typed right now.

Put me on ignore. Simple and you never have to remember if the ONLY poster on this web site with the numerals '23' in their moniker that regularly posts is that poster that you find so odious and who dislikes you even more.

Union Scribe

(7,099 posts)
339. Why would I?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:24 AM
Sep 2013

I have no problem seeing your posts. I don't find you "odious" or any of the other various emotions/motives that you've projected onto me. While I find you hyper-hypersensitive to criticism, I'm able to handle that. I don't hate you. And I'm not following you. I'm replying to a lot of people in this thread. I reply to a lot of people period. I have never had someone go off like you in response. That's on you, not me.

To sum up: I'm not stressed seeing you, but apparently you're really stressed seeing me. So if I ignore you, you'll still see my posts. That's why I suggested you ignore me.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
341. Do you think that your posts are invisible? You are the one tossing around personal insults
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:31 AM
Sep 2013

about me insulting others and then some garbage about the BOG aimed at me. Or are you also doing that to everyone in this thread too? Oh wait, or did you forget about that already, too? Are you seriously acting as though this is not your MO and it happens a hell of alot more than "every few months?"

Put me on ignore. Sick of this. Truly.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
529. Does the exact same thing to me.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 07:55 PM
Sep 2013

It is like the words are already pre-programmed in his head; IOW he lacks the ability to actually say something normal to me either so don't feel bad about it. We are pretty common and it is common treatment.

Union Scribe

(7,099 posts)
552. Thanks Rex
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 05:20 AM
Sep 2013

You're right. I've gotten used to the usual 'nothing-better-to-say' type of blah blah. But damn if one doesn't run into stranger varieties sometimes!

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
584. I get it from 5 or 6 people, you could interchange their names
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 01:37 AM
Sep 2013

and the posting style would make it impossible for you to determine which one it is. Always the same thing. Always.

Thankfully I only have a small percentage of time spent on their waste of time and MOST of the time on DU is spent talking about important things like the ACA or how we can get the House back in 2014.



 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
303. People who are existing outside the walled zone of the swamp
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:09 AM
Sep 2013

You know, us plebs and leftists, the dangerous hoi polli, the uncouth mob that should just knuckle under and accept people like Number23 as our lords and masters, because of their superior Chuckles the Sensible Woodchuck impersonations

Number23

(24,544 posts)
308. And what's sad is that you think this is clever, don't you?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:18 AM
Sep 2013

How you pulled that gibberish out of my post is something special indeed. Anyone that has to have what GD is explained to them isn't worth the time of the day. The fact that you feel the need to chime in to someone asking such a stupid, needless question is precious and adorable.

Obviously this OP has upset the two of you terribly. Good.

 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
214. Someone alerted your post.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:33 PM
Sep 2013

At Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:22 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

Ah! But you can look and see WHO reccomended it!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3708893

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS:

Rude and derisive mega call out. John Birch society? Seriously?

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:31 PM, and the Jury voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: This call out of DUers and slurring them as John Birch Society members deserves to be hidden and if there is a pattern of it may indicate the person should be tombstoned.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: The poster merely pointed out who recommended the thread. They are some of the worst of DU and are the DU version of the John Birch society.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: This whole thread goes in my trash. Silly shit going on here.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
242. Had I been on the jury I would have voted to hide it.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 10:39 PM
Sep 2013

People on DU should be free to record a thread without the threat of someone copy/pasting the information into a post deriding them. The same goes for a poll. Someone needs to grow up.

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
257. Recommendations (not records) are public. If you're ashamed of rec'cing something, then don't rec it
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 11:22 PM
Sep 2013

Transparency is good, and there's nothing wrong with copy-pasting a list of recommenders into a thread. It can be relevant.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
261. Except
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 11:35 PM
Sep 2013

using such a list of DU'ers to call them resident members of the John Birch Society is something else entirely.

This particular dick move wasn't nearly as upright and high-minded as you describe.

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
263. That's not the post I replied to
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 11:38 PM
Sep 2013
davidpdx (10,671 posts)
242. Had I been on the jury I would have voted to hide it.

People on DU should be free to record a thread without the threat of someone copy/pasting the information into a post deriding them. The same goes for a poll. Someone needs to grow up.


If it's publicly viewable info there's nothing wrong with copy-pasting the info.

The John Birch comment is an entirely different issue.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
289. It's not about being ashamed
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:39 AM
Sep 2013

Yep, they are public record, but it doesn't mean people have to use it to taunt others. It's about harassment and acting like a child. Do you really support that kind of behavior?

The person who replied to you had a point, someone can copy paste a list and say all of these people that voted for XYZ poll are fascist assholes.

All I said as a matter of principle I would have voted to hide it.

Union Scribe

(7,099 posts)
282. Take it up with the admins
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:30 AM
Sep 2013

They're the ones who let us see who "records" (you know that isn't what "rec" is short for right?) threads.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
287. Yep I know
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:34 AM
Sep 2013

I'm not saying the practice should be banned, instead that people should act like adults rather than copy/pasting lists. It is rude and borders on harassment.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
453. Wow, that is ridiculous!!! So must be someone who rec'd and doesn't want anyone to know?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:44 PM
Sep 2013

Recs are a matter of "public record". If you are ashamed of your rec then don't do it and think about why you want to rec it but are ashamed of it.

So pointing out that you can see who rec'd a post and who they are is what?
Disruptive? No. Though the OP is, wonder if the alerter also alerted on the OP.
Hurtful? No. Though the OP could be, wonder if the alerter also alerted on the OP.

I could go on but you get the point.

You can see from Juror #1 that there is some indication that there might be a concerted effort to have Scootaloo TS'd.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
365. "DU's resident John Birch Society members"
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:58 AM
Sep 2013

What a nasty characterization...

I rec'd because it's fucking hilarious. I love GD drama.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
602. You who tries so hard to appear so reasonable "love GD Drama"?
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 03:57 AM
Sep 2013

I'll keep that in mind when replying to you in the future.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
605. I wouldn't post here if I didn't enjoy it.
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 04:28 AM
Sep 2013

There are so many posters here who are just so distraught from one day to the next, if I felt even a tenth the way others appear about posting here, I wouldn't post. It must be a chore for some. For me, it's an enjoyable exercise.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
606. The OP obviously spent considerable energy coming up with a sure-thing flamewar OP
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 04:35 AM
Sep 2013

One that was filled with personal attacks covered with a remarkably thin layer of not-particularly-plausible deniability.

Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.

Drama is all about discussing people.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
610. One thing I have learned here over the years is not to take anything at face value
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 04:56 AM
Sep 2013

A lesson I don't always apply as rigorously as I should but c'est la vie, eh?

It wouldn't surprise me at all if there were JBS members on DU, anyone can register and post, some trolls have stuck around for years and tens of thousands of posts.

Increasingly these days I wonder why I'm still here since the idea of DU as a refuge from the conservative mainstream libeling of liberals has long since become one with Nineveh and Tyre.



joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
611. I think DU has moved further to the left.
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 05:03 AM
Sep 2013

Which is a good thing for my participation here.

I have an account over at Politics Forum and I have to say that there are even self-admitted fascists over there (who actually believe in it) and I don't find discussion with them very enjoyable.

I think one caricature OP bashing "the left" (frankly I don't identify with any of the caricatures in the OP and I think those that do have fallen for the troll) doesn't represent DU. I mean, when was the last one? Other than the ODS thread. Before that I can't think of one.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
612. There's an entire (protected) group that seems to be dedicated to attacking liberals
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 05:13 AM
Sep 2013

Or at least when they aren't posting pictures of moderates in swim suits.





abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
435. whoa
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:59 PM
Sep 2013

sometimes I recommend crazy stuff so people will read the crazy stuff. How do we know people on this list didn't do the same.

Altho there are some that are consistent.

bobduca

(1,763 posts)
292. The usual ignorable 30-60 Personas
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:46 AM
Sep 2013

The network can clearly deploy about around 30 Personas per shift depending on operator load.

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
378. Much like any other "centrist"'s position.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 06:39 AM
Sep 2013

"Centrism" is an inherently middlebrow, anti-intellectual position. There is no really definable "scale" along which politics can be measured as if political positions equate to an "amount" of something. The whole premise of centrism is founded on a chimera.

agent46

(1,262 posts)
133. Nice Try
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:42 PM
Sep 2013

News Flash: creating a comprehensive stereo-type you can use to frame DU into simplistic us-them scenarios might help you feel better but as a description of reality it's pretty silly.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
165. the last three were center-right I suppose -
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:15 PM
Sep 2013

but the poster of this OP is conservative in the Fox News sense - There is no political conversation, no political points to be maid - just grunting - "Something is true because I said so" - They may very well be a registered Democrat but their mindset is no different than Sean Hannity or Bill O'Reilly - They have no arguments - just - "I said so" -- granted it is hard to argue with that.

 

macspanicattack

(36 posts)
136. Your post got the responses I expected
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:44 PM
Sep 2013

From the people I expected.

Copied the post to a notepad on my desk-top. Its going to be REALLY tempting to cut and paste from the list to respond to some future posts. Bet it would really piss off a few 'PURE' Democrats!

To stir or not to stir????



By the way... provocative and discussion provoking post. 1000 points for bravery at the least.

 

macspanicattack

(36 posts)
184. Ive been on the post for at least 2 hours
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:56 PM
Sep 2013

and have seen multiple responses....I repeat who voted you the reply police?????

The arrogance!!!!

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
316. It was a sad attempt at a joke
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:31 AM
Sep 2013

Rather pathetic, really.

I have a pretty good sense of humor, but posting a picture of laxatives in response to me saying the post hit hard.....

It just wasn't very creative. Scooter could have done a lot better IMO.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
138. You sold me on point number 1 (the DU version of "you had me at hello")
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:48 PM
Sep 2013

But points number 7 and 15 made the hair on the back of my neck rise. And number 19 made me stand up and LITERALLY throw my fist in the air.

WELL FUCKING DONE. And I'm sure you've made enemies for life here with this post. But all you have to do is look at the quality of the people that you will piss off -- the angriest, most ignorant, uninformed with nothing but piss and vinegar where their lives should be people here -- with this post and that will be your surest bet that you are right on the money.

GOTV

(3,759 posts)
143. Stopped reading when I realized your feelings are just hurt...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 06:51 PM
Sep 2013

... and you need to lash out.

Put the knives away and maybe there can be discussion.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
183. There's a grand total of under a hundred of them, but the same names show up over and over
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:54 PM
Sep 2013

on each others posts. Makes the Third Wayers seem like an army, when in reality its more like a terrorist splinter group.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
187. Problem is that when others respond, the post gets kicked keeping it at the top of GD
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 08:06 PM
Sep 2013

I think DU needs to go back to the old Greatest system of recognizing popular posts - this simply rewards provocation and infighting on the board with visibility.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
189. Um, that kind of argument is #15 in the list
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 08:09 PM
Sep 2013

The DU went overwhelmingly for Kucinich for President, while the good Congressman took somewhere close to last place in 2008 among the actual Democratic electorate. So not only is Argumentum ad Populum a logical fallacy, it's not even particularly Populum.

Also, let me politely suggest that mainstream Democratic thinking isn't "terrorism". I know this may seem a shock to you, but it's true.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

Number23

(24,544 posts)
199. DAMN fine post. I never knew what Third Way was until GD started spewing it at half the posters
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 08:49 PM
Sep 2013

on this board. But all I had to do was look at the folks tossing it around as a pejorative to realize that if THEY thought it was something that was awful, then it must not be bad at all.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
206. Sorry that gravity has little effect in space, but in '08 DU was split between Obama and Hillary
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:11 PM
Sep 2013

Dennis, while admittedly the sentimental favorite of many DU progressives, barely factored into it.

There's a lovely term for those who have complete disregard for the facts and press their points to create conflict, regardless: "intellectual terrorists", and you seem to be one of them.

You're a member of a small club of RW disruptors, intellectual terrorists, who really bring little except conflict to this board.

You're welcome to disagree with the majority of DUers on issues, and most of us are progressives, but don't accuse the rest of us of being fools because of it. You can disagree, but must not be disagreeable about it. You've violated the most basic rule of all on this board: you're making DU suck with posts like this one. It's sheer divisiveness for its own sake, and it must cease.

JHB

(37,161 posts)
236. Do you have links for that Kucinich claim?
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 10:26 PM
Sep 2013

Kucinich was overrepresented here compared to the general public, but I don't remember anything approaching "DU went overwhelmingly for Kucinich for President".

Please give us something to jog our memories on that one.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
253. I'm sorry, I don't
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 11:11 PM
Sep 2013

I distinctly remember him leading by a plurality in a (obviously non-scientific) D.U. poll, one of many, in 2007. The trouble is that if you put Kucinich and D.U. into google, you get swamped with hits. I don't have all night to find things.

The best I could come up with in 10 minutes was this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3544870

...which wasn't a poll, it was self-selected. Read through the results.

Still, I'll withdraw the point about Kucinich, since I don't want to make an assertion which I can't back up with 100% fact. The broader point though remains. D.U. is significantly to the left of the Democratic Party as a whole.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

Number23

(24,544 posts)
304. Is this what you're looking for?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:10 AM
Sep 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3823886

Kooch beat Obama by more than 2 to 1 and Clinton by even more.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2287522&mesg_id=2287974

If this is not the exact one, then search again. A Google search of DU poll on Dennis Kucinich turns up a ton of threads with posters proclaiming that he was their top choice.

Response to Number23 (Reply #304)

Abukhatar

(90 posts)
161. Numbah 22
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:14 PM
Sep 2013

With limited info you read in some blog, you think you have the right solution to the problem and Obama is too naive/dumb/in bed with corporatist/cowardly/to see it your way

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
178. According to your own OP
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:40 PM
Sep 2013

You and your ilk are "counterproductive left wingnuts"

The irony is lost on you, isn't it?

Most of your DU screeds are not anti-Republican, they're anti-Democratic
Like your op? lol

No one can remember the last time you actually praised anyone or anything, except someone else's hate-filled anti-Democratic screed
Like your OP? lol

You refuse to acknowledge that people on the other side of a debate have any legitimate concerns at all
When was the last time the Third Way acknowledged that people on the other side have legitimate concerns?

You never provide a argument about what should be done instead that would address the other side's concerns
You mean arguing on issues rather than attacking those who disagree with you, like this OP does? lol

You see no difference between Democrats and Republicans
You mean like the 'libertarian Ron Paul loving Snowden worshipers" meme? lol

Your arguments reference no facts, but are instead filled with unsubstantiated assertions. Your counter-arguments are ROTL icons'
Do the Third Wayers use facts to sway others, or do they merely attack those who disagree with them, and try to obfuscate the subject at hand?

You dismiss facts that don't fit your worldview, and personally attack people who provide them
Do third wayers dismiss facts that don't fit their worldview and attack those who provide them? Yes, and do does this OP lol

You Godwin political discussions, liberally attacking other Democrats with words like "Authoritarian", "Police State", "Hitler", "Fascist", "Corporatist&quot the new dog-whistle for fascist)
Does "Rand Paul loving, Libertarian firebagger" count? lol

You recognize many of these behaviors in the Tea Party, and recognize how much they're damaging the Republicans, but don't acknowledge the same in your own behavior
Like obfuscating, attempting to derail threads, and trying to poison the well, rather than rationally defending Obama's policies? lol

About 15 of your 'talking points' apply to the Third way. By your own wacky measure, the Third Way are counterproductive leftwing nuts!

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
180. For 20 years we've had it your way
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:48 PM
Sep 2013

Perhaps *you* like the results, but I think they're horrific.

Time to return to what's *proven* to work every time it's tried: Liberalism.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
192. Meh... I troll better than you do
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 08:25 PM
Sep 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023699985

...Real Democrats like Obama, Baucus, anyone named Nelson, Rahm Emanuel, Lieberman (before the firebaggers forced him to run as a party of one) and Ed Rendell are under constant attack by racist libertarians that claim to vote for Democrats as a cover and who must be destroyed.

Their ODS inspired plot also includes discrediting great thinkers - true progressive thinkers like Milton Friedman and collaborative progressive thinkers like Will Marshall, Al From and others who were so pragmatic that they got an incredibly smart billionaire set of brothers named Koch to help fund their DLC. If billionaires as brilliant as they backed their progressive plans, all I can say is the DLC were top notch geniuses that had been working since the eighties to bring us a Democratic utopia of REAL liberal policies and we MUST carry their torch onward into the future.

The Paulite conspiracy runs so deep here at Neo-DU, that the only way to be sure of backing true Democrats is to check to make sure they are connected to the third way think tank, the progressive policy institute, are former DLC alumni, or in the case of posters on this site - Boggers in good standing with the group.

We true Democrats must have Obama's back no matter what he says or does!

We are NOT frustrated by revelations about the Obama administration's secret government spying programs or the president's support for military action in Syria and we support visionaries such as Summers and that hero Brennan just as we hope to do more for banks and for free trade. We promote kill lists and indefinite detention without rights because all these things are the true Democratic agenda and are all attempts to further the interests of the common working man and his right to be allowed to lose rights and job security in order to enable them to patriotically provide the US with the ability to be competitive on the global labor market and to also allow for a nation secure from the many domestic threats of the disgruntled far left and libertarian terrorists before they become organized. We want these things for our lessers because we love them and have their backs and know what's best for them.

If what is best for them is to reduce their earned benefits like SS and Medicare when they are whinny old farts that can't earn money for their betters anymore, we will support such cuts BECAUSE we love them and want to help them find ways not to be the useless takers that they are. The same for the poor that claim that cutting programs like food stamps will hurt them, in the reality based world if they are not hungry and useful to their betters then we have failed to help them find the bliss in working three min wage jobs to help an economy that is wisely designed to funnel cash to the only people with the ability to trickle success down upon them. I mean, how can we help them if we don't help the rich that may decide to help them at some point eventually?

In conclusion, 99.9% of true Democrats support President Obama on everything all the time and those that do not provide such complete and trusting blind support are not really Democrats or "the base", but rather ODS racist libertarians with an agenda going back to the days of that 'bagger FDR and his hatred of those financially secure enough to shower their wealth down upon us with their unfettered ingenuity. We have already paid a great price for the suffocating regulations that held back the prosperity of the nation until Rubin and Summers under the very liberal Bill Clinton removed the regulatory handcuffs that impede the creation of true and lasting prosperity that only unfettered capitalism can provide...


See, I know what it means to be a Conservative "Democrat", basically it is a combination of right wing Reaganomics, deregulation and free trade mixed with some left wing social compromises mostly having to do with gritting your teeth and supporting reproductive rights and marriage equality even tho it must pain you to do so.

Would it not be easier to banish the insane from your own party of conservatives rather than infiltrate and try to change the liberal Democratic party into the "new" Republican party of your vision?

I never did get you Baucus types.
 

Caretha

(2,737 posts)
243. Thank you
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 10:40 PM
Sep 2013

This is truth, and truth is a commodity that now a day seems sorely lacking on DU.

My question is how do we throw these Reagan Conservatives out of the Democratic "Big Tent"? I want them gone, as in yesterday.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
196. This is exactly the kind of tripe they write at "the peoples view" troll website on a regular basis
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 08:46 PM
Sep 2013

you should seriously consider signing on there as a contributer. In any case, its a good illustration of the delusional thinking that is often exhibited by BOG types --⇨

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
202. Spandan hasn't been getting much traction lately...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:00 PM
Sep 2013

so it appears they've trotted out someone a little less emotional, but just as passive-aggressive.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
204. lol, good idea, maybe the OP should set up a new website where they can post "attack the left rants"
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:04 PM
Sep 2013

on a regular basis, they could be the new and improved "the peoples view", and all the BOG-ers and others who hate DU and progressives can post their shit here!

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
216. They can set up all the Crap Blogs they want...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:40 PM
Sep 2013

they're still wrong. 30+ years of Reagan and Reagan Democrat policies don't lie, eh?!



 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
217. "Crap blogs" is right
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:42 PM
Sep 2013

These people need to get a new hobby. The writing crazed rants against liberals and the left schtick is getting old.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
219. Especially since they're so quick to point out...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:46 PM
Sep 2013

how irrelevant DU is. Must be nice to have that kinda time to waste on a website that doesn't matter.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
228. That is a good one!
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 10:12 PM
Sep 2013

And the strangest thing is, is that single-payer is still being allowed in the states. If it works well in Vermont, then it will naturally spread.

But this isn't good enough for the "I want it all, and I want it now!" crowd.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

Kennah

(14,298 posts)
251. You have perhaps missed the numerous posts ...
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 11:09 PM
Sep 2013

... by those of us who like ACA, but will frankly acknowledge aspects of it suck given that 10s of millions still won't have coverage.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
255. Social Security was not enacted in a day
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 11:17 PM
Sep 2013

It took a lot of time for the public to get used to it. I have no idea what will happen with the ACA, but all the elements are there for more public medicine like the far left wants to spread - if it proves successful.

So, do you think Medicare for everyone will be successful compared to competing independent agencies? If so, then you should be overjoyed by the ACA, since it will show a positive example to the rest of the nation. I personally have my doubts, but am willing to see how it actually works out in real life.

A nation of 350 million people does not turn on a dime.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

Kennah

(14,298 posts)
259. Universal healthcare, in all it's various forms, works in the OECD nations
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 11:34 PM
Sep 2013

Costs are lower, and outcomes are better.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
273. The U.S. is different than many other nations...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:19 AM
Sep 2013

Many things, like public transport, don't work as well. We're not as dense.

However, if Vermont's Single Payer works above and beyond, I can expect it will be used as an example by other states, and slowly spread across the North East.

Or maybe not. The Swiss health care system is run entirely by non-profit NGOs, and has extremely good cost reduction and some of the best outcomes. The internal competition, though muted, works well for them, since unlike single-payer you don't have the "Where else can you go if we screwed you" sort of problem. I can certainly see many states following that model as well.

But we shall see, won't we?

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
349. You do realize that even in the UK with its NHS that private insurance and physicians exist?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:49 AM
Sep 2013

So the "where else are you going to go if we screw you" argument falls remarkably flat.

I like the way you casually throw anyone who doesn't live in the Northeast under the insurance juggernaut bus.



sibelian

(7,804 posts)
379. Not only that, when the UK private hospitals fuck up, who cleans up the mess?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 06:45 AM
Sep 2013

The NHS.

I could tell endless stories of referrals from private hospitals to the NHS after a colossal boob, but I'm legally bound not to.

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,869 posts)
229. All conservatives can go to hell.
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 10:16 PM
Sep 2013

Democrat or Republicans. And the day a conservative thinks he can tell me how to be a Democrat is the same day I tell that conservative to go back to worshiping Reagan.


If you're pissed off by that, good.

ForgoTheConsequence

(4,869 posts)
231. If liberals are so terrible
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 10:20 PM
Sep 2013

Then why did Obama pretend to be one of us to get elected? OP probably would have HATED senator Obama.

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
240. My problem with it is the use of the word "hatred."
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 10:31 PM
Sep 2013

Hate is the most miss used word on the net, followed closely by evil.

It is a lazy way of attacking a person one doesn't agree with of acting on on irrational emotion rather than addressing their issues. Many people here who disagree with Democrats have good reason for doing so, even if we do not agree with them. It is the nature of our two party system that the two parties become a coalition of groups. It is just easier to fit into a party in a parliamentary system with many parties.

MFrohike

(1,980 posts)
241. Isn't this whole list just #3?
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 10:33 PM
Sep 2013

I can't tell if this is heavy-handed trolling or serious, but it has the feel of an well-planned, poorly executed troll. Either way, everyone seems to be having fun with it, so I guess there's that.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
267. Is this you on RedState?
Sat Sep 21, 2013, 11:59 PM
Sep 2013
http://archive.redstate.com/blogs/conservativedemocrat

"We need to cut down on the federal budget. Since obviously, Democrats won't let us cut Social Security or welfare, and Republicans would be against cutting down funding for faith-based initiatives and national security, let's start with earmarks."

....

"Steve Forbes- This guy, like him or not, has great business acumen. I went to a motivational seminar that he was speaking at...he was funny and got resounding applause from the audience. I could see him as a SECRETARY OF THE TRESUARY in either a McCain or a Huckabee administration."

....

"Today is Martin Luther King Day, and quite frankly his dream still has not been achieved. Why? Two words: Affirmative Action."

....

"John McCain is the best GOPer choice for President in 2008. While a true blue conservative, this man has farreaching support in swing states, among independents, and can even win over the bluest of Democrats. While we have no clearcut choice, and the only real conservative just dropped out, John McCain has the credentials and the chutzpah it takes to win."



Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
274. ConservativeDemocrat vs. Conservative Democrat
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:24 AM
Sep 2013

or conservativedemocrat or conservative democrat or Conservative_Democrat...

The names match when they could have not matched. It means something. Or it doesn't. Your original unedited post was on point.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
280. Yeah, minor detail.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:29 AM
Sep 2013

Could be, or not. Wouldn't surprise me, based on the tone of the OP, and subsequent replies.

(I'm watching Austin City Limits with Gary Clark, Jr., who I've never heard before, and was a bit distracted!)

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
291. Leaning more toward yes...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:43 AM
Sep 2013
Reply To This — User Info — #1

Yes, but by ConservativeDemocrat

whether you like it or not, you succeed when you bite off small chunks at a time, not by biting off more than you can chew. Right now, what are you going to say when the lefties wheel out some old lady talking about how now she can't "get her medications" and "live her life" because the right-wing crazies cut social security? We can achieve so much more when we start with the bridge and THEN move on to entitlement spending.

http://archive.redstate.com/blogs/conservativedemocrat/2008/feb/11/a_return_to_fiscal_conservatism#comment


So, 65 DUers support a RedStater. Good to know.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
319. Big Lieberman fan. Finds Dean venomous.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:36 AM
Sep 2013

"But I believe Lieberman is a great asset to the party. Not a party hack but a man of honor.

We need people like Lieberman to craft bipartisan legislation. If people like McCain and Lieberman are lost, all we are left with is no-compromise, confrontational, all-venom candidates like Dean and Santorum.

If the schism between the parties and the nation is to be healed we need more people like Lieberman who stand in the center and patiently endure the disdain from the radicals in their own party."

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/05/04/207539/-CT-Sen-Lamont-within-striking-distance

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
322. Yeah, I think a pattern has been established.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:44 AM
Sep 2013

Good find! A RedStater who believes Lieberman a man of honor. Getting recs on DU. LOL

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
293. Oh Dear. Is that our OP?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:48 AM
Sep 2013

I'd just as soon be a counterproductive left-wingnut than some anti-affirmative action dick who spouts the virtues of Forbes, and McCain.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
298. Not sure. But if so, maybe he's pissed off...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:01 AM
Sep 2013

that none of his Cabinet picks came about:

http://archive.redstate.com/blogs/conservativedemocrat/2008/feb/10/the_cabinet_come_2009

Hmm, seems he doesn't support the "-Shudder-possibility of a Billary administration."

Same snarky tone. Same lack of depth. Same bashing of "lefties."

Adorable.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
340. I'm starting to think it's Spamdan...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:28 AM
Sep 2013

only he's signed up for some online psychology courses and is now taking it out on DU.

What is YOUR conscience telling YOU?

Funny, I think I'll manage to sleep well this evening...

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
569. I haven't kept up with replies...
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 04:11 PM
Sep 2013

but I did see in one other thread a denial that he has a "login" to RedState, or something to that effect. Which might be weasel words for I had a login THEN, but don't NOW.

Why doesn't he just embrace it? Be proud of those beliefs!

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
586. No denial of the blog
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 03:28 AM
Sep 2013

where ConservativeDemocrat blames victems of Katrina for their plight, and chastices Mayor Nagin for blaming FEMA and the Feds, and for being racist.
http://conservativedemocrat-demrep.blogspot.com/2006/08/katrina-what-were-you-thinking.html



Heck of a job, ConservativeDemocrat!
Heck of a job, DU centrist reccing crew!

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
570. Too many parallels for him not to be ruled out...
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 04:17 PM
Sep 2013

as being ConservativeDemocrat at DU, Kos, and the cesspool known as redstate.com.

TOSed by whom? The site admins? How are they to prove it was CD at redstate? And if he's playing by DU's rules, why would he be TOSed?

Maven

(10,533 posts)
585. Wow. Wonder if this coward will respond.
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 03:16 AM
Sep 2013

To the people who recommended this OP, this is what you're supporting. In Obama's name, apparently. Happy?

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
589. That's what I find so interesting...
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 01:33 PM
Sep 2013

that in their zeal to condemn "the left," they're quite possibly embracing a RedStater, who is absolutely no *friend* of theirs. If the current Republican party is too extreme for folks like ConservativeDemocrat, too fucking bad, don't attempt to move the Democratic Party rightward to fill the void. Three damn decades should be long enough for folks to fully understand that that system is broken, and that too many are suffering economically.

I think CD denied being *that* CD in another thread, but there are too many parallels to rule it out.

Response to ConservativeDemocrat (Original post)

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
284. Divisive trash. At least the left wing nuts stand for Democratic principles. You of the Third Way
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:32 AM
Sep 2013

kowtow to Republicans and call it compromise. By the way Gen Clapper your new savior is a fucking Republican.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
307. Is this your blog?.....(Really? The NAACP Hangs people?)
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:17 AM
Sep 2013
http://conservativedemocrat-demrep.blogspot.com/

Heres a quote:
"It is not a black or white issue, it is taking responsibility for your own actions. Mayor Nagan is not doing any good blaming the federal government, FEMA, or anyone else. He failed to provide the leadership and control that he could have.
Now he will drive a wedge between the white and black communities with his racist rhetoric. Yes, that is what it is, if a white polotician said those things, the NAACP and ACLU would be trying to have him/her hanged!"

Response to SMC22307 (Reply #310)

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
318. Edward Snowden had boxes in his garage and made a ballerina cry!
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:35 AM
Sep 2013

A simple question has been asked. Can you answer for the OP?

 

macspanicattack

(36 posts)
321. Oh boy..Its a snow day and Joseph McCarthy has taken to the podium..
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:44 AM
Sep 2013

"Tell me....How many Republicans are posting on DU sir? Are you or have you ever been a member of the Republican party?" "Do you think you are a REAL liberal sir?" "Answer the question damn it!"

See...I can play too.



 

macspanicattack

(36 posts)
333. If you want to 'INVESTIGATE' me,
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:06 AM
Sep 2013

here is a link to my facebook page.

https://www.facebook.com/steve.mac.71465?fref=ts

Yes the photo on facebook IS me (after reading some of the madness posted on this site).

My personal website is in park at the moment

I wear a size 10 shoe.

I drink whiskey straight

And even at 53, I live to bogie!


Now...How about you? Or are you afraid to show whats behind the number?




SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
338. Is this how you make "friends," Steve?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:19 AM
Sep 2013

Now I feel kinda sorry for you.

You're safe -- you didn't swoop in offering up yet another tedious attack on the left. Although your little ankle-biter routine is kinda cute.

 

macspanicattack

(36 posts)
343. I have no problems with making friends...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:41 AM
Sep 2013

but im not here to make friends. Im here to be informed and educated on peoples Ideas and opinions. What Im not here to do is be called names because of what I post, told that im not a 'TRUE' liberal or democrat or that if I respect my President for the good he has done that im some kind of brown-noser. I hear "ignore is your friend" all the time here but how can you hear differing opinions if you have to switch people off all the time because you are being ranted at instead of talked to. Your post to me proves the point. Condescending and juvenile. And unfortunately, Ignore is in your future. Sad because maybe you actually had something wise to say to me. But because you are a wise ass....Ignore!

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
358. I have no one on ignore, so I can't answer that.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:14 AM
Sep 2013

(Guess you didn't see that...)

People who live in glass houses shouldn't... lob McCarthy accusations?

(Or that...)





Response to Vanje (Reply #307)

 

macspanicattack

(36 posts)
311. Come on people....
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:23 AM
Sep 2013

The pro-leftwingnut thread is patting itself on the back for getting to the top of the Greatest Threads list. Cant you negative nellies out there post more 'This post is just stupid so shut up about me' replies here so we can keep this thread kicked. Come on...you can do it!

Remember... great pissing contests need lots of piss!

Dig deep for the indignation. Pull that sucker right out and bang it on the keyboard.

If it feels good do it...But not of course if its for Obama.



Keep the home (hair) fires burning guys and gals!

 

macspanicattack

(36 posts)
337. Because they have good taste...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:17 AM
Sep 2013


Ow...dislocated my shoulder patting myself on the back. Hey, why not everyone is doing it!

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
342. Or they just don't recognize Internet B.S. when it's right in front of them?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:35 AM
Sep 2013

Last edited Sun Sep 22, 2013, 05:05 AM - Edit history (1)

Seriously, the defending of what is a highly questionable flame-bait post AT WORST (while I don't agree with the posting of the recommenders in the thread despite it being intentionally easily accessible public information, what exactly is someone doing referring to other DUers as "wing nuts"?), or of what is a sincere but ridiculous pile of knocked-over straw men, false-dichotomy fallacies and mirroring AT BEST, - that's what has managed to get you posting?

 

macspanicattack

(36 posts)
346. Oh, they recognize BS alright...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:45 AM
Sep 2013

Im sure they have read enough of your posts to know what it is!

But thanks for keeping this great thread going....could be one for the records!

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
352. That's it?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:55 AM
Sep 2013

That's all you've got?

Yeah, I don't mind kicking this thread at all, so everyone will have a chance to read the ENTIRE thing.

 

macspanicattack

(36 posts)
356. Not in the mood tonight...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:02 AM
Sep 2013

work is early and 8 hours entering data doesn't leave a lot for these old fingers for posting...

You'll have to wait til the next time.

lamp_shade

(14,841 posts)
371. Spot on, CD. You're very, very observant.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 05:16 AM
Sep 2013

Look at all the raw nerves you hit, as predicted in your item #20. Best OP I've seen in a long time.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
397. The ulnar nerve, perhaps. Because nothing is funnier...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 11:24 AM
Sep 2013

than (a minority of) DUers cheering a poster who may be an Erick Erickson RedStater. You know, this gasbag:



All in the name of defending Obama. *That* must be the ODS I keep seeing referenced on this board.


muriel_volestrangler

(101,347 posts)
374. Here is a small point of fact: President Obama's approval rating among Democrats is 79%, not 85%
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 05:48 AM
Sep 2013

It hasn't been 85% or more since May 19th: http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/presidential-approval-center.aspx

His approval among 'Liberals': 67%; 'Liberal Democrats' 81%.

Since you complained about people whose "arguments reference no facts, but are instead filled with unsubstantiated assertions."

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
375. When I think of "conservative Democrat",
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 06:14 AM
Sep 2013

I think of Strom Thurmond, Richard Shelby and Jesse Helms. Of course, those guys all eventually realized that they were actually Republicans masquerading as Democrats.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
380. well Mr. "ConservativeDem" let me make a wild guess that you are too young to remember America
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 07:26 AM
Sep 2013

before Ronald Reagan? Let me guess that if I was to throw out the name Bill Scranton, you would not know who he is? Am I right?

TBF

(32,084 posts)
381. Your name says it all - "ConservativeDemocrat"
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 07:50 AM
Sep 2013

This party has morphed from supporting labor to supporting causes. You've forgotten about economics entirely.

 

Nanjing to Seoul

(2,088 posts)
383. This is one of the most idiotic things I've ever read. BlueDogDemocrat (since I don't like
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 07:54 AM
Sep 2013

the name ConservativeDemocrat), if you spent this much time attacking Republicans that do this, you would have credibility.

This is a slam against anyone that puts principles over party.

Dash87

(3,220 posts)
385. All real Democrats turn their brains off and support everything Obama does unquestioningly!
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 08:56 AM
Sep 2013

Those thinkin' people are extremists, I tell you!

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
387. By the way, I did the math re: recs for this vs recs for the response thread
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 09:19 AM
Sep 2013

As of 8:58am, this thread has 76 recs. This response thread has 225.
Doing the math, I was RIGHT on the money in my response to the OP - 66% of all recs are for the response thread, indicating that 66% of DUers identify with it as opposed to this one.

Everyone who recommended this thread; you're in the minority here on DU.

To the OP - epic fail.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
391. As I said, there are fewer than 100 of them (including sock puppets)
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 09:40 AM
Sep 2013

While some of the RW Truth Squad at DU (aka, "The Swarm&quot make a valuable contribution and provide a necessary antidote to our own progressive Group Think, some are just here to disrupt and insult.

The OP is an example of a disruptive, insulting, and disrespectful post.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
411. there must also be several hundred DUers
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:09 PM
Sep 2013

who did not rec either thread.

I'd unrec this one though if I had that option.

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
413. Yes, but statistically, with the data available...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:14 PM
Sep 2013

...my math supports the overall feelings of DU as a whole.

Puglover

(16,380 posts)
390. A sign that you've been on DU longer then 10 seconds.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 09:35 AM
Sep 2013

1. You can close your eyes; click on the rec list of this OP and know about 40 of the names when you look at it.

As I read through this train wreck I see this was already said upthread. Much MUCH better then I said it.

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
428. Did you even read the rest of the thread?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:53 PM
Sep 2013

Even non-"Obama-Haters" should not like this.

Straw men arguments, entrappment fallacies ("if you disagree with this, that makes it true!&quot , loaded question fallacy, false dichotomy fallacies, projection, and mirrroring, all from someone with the same username as someone on RedState.com.

 

L0oniX

(31,493 posts)
406. Nickname: ConservativeDemocrat ...yep your nickname and the attack on the supposed left makes sense.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 11:57 AM
Sep 2013

A Conservative Democrat = oxymoron

rexcat

(3,622 posts)
415. "Conservative Democrat"...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:15 PM
Sep 2013

need anyone say anymore!

And no I am not pissed of concerning the list because they are just typical comments coming from a mouth breather.

Response to ConservativeDemocrat (Original post)

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
424. I think Item #17 is recycled from the archives . Nader? Seriously?
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 12:48 PM
Sep 2013

Nader hasn't been an active subject of discussion here for half a decade or more.
Get with the times, Lieberman guy ! Your Joementum isnt working any more.

2ndAmForComputers

(3,527 posts)
441. It's the rightoids who keep bringing it up to "show how foolish the Left is." And nobody else.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:22 PM
Sep 2013

Says volumes, huh? The non-reactionary, non-trolls, non-stealth-Republicans here have all moved on long ago.

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
436. Me too! The OP is so riddled with anachronisms and fallacies...
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:00 PM
Sep 2013

...that you just sort of riff on it and have fun.

Vinnie From Indy

(10,820 posts)
449. Meh! It is hard to be offended by things I do not believe are true about DU'ers
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:40 PM
Sep 2013

as a whole.

Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
Groucho Marx

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
469. Screed! Sounds like you learned a new word.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 02:22 PM
Sep 2013

Congratulations! Maybe you could learn another one tomorrow, and write up another charming post.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
509. I am offended that an avowed Conservative posts at DU and gets over 80 recs.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 04:16 PM
Sep 2013

DU used to be a Liberal Discussion Board.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
512. Recs for dreck like this have been steadily and unnaturally increasing since the launch of DU3.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 05:38 PM
Sep 2013

The ratio of traditional Democrats here to mysteriously awakening sleeper accounts and incoming new liberal bashers spouting the corporate line has also been steadily and unnaturally increasing.

If one estimates ten personas per propaganda account, 87 recs could reflect all of eight or nine busy corporate bees.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
535. That's pretty much what I think, too.
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 08:16 PM
Sep 2013

I always take note of the names that recommend threads like this. I'm always familiar with about 10-15 of them as regular posters, and the rest are just completely silent-- yet always present-- names who apparently do nothing but rec threads like this.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
514. It is a heinous insult to all of us who have struggled most of our lives to try to free our country
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 06:08 PM
Sep 2013

from the violence, destruction, greed, malicious ignorance, and hateful authoritarian oppression of conservatism.




Avowed conservatives (see photo above) should not be allowed to post here.

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
560. We used to laugh at the funny antics of conservatives
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 11:30 AM
Sep 2013

"Top 10 Conservative Idiots"

Now they get recs.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
503. Perhaps you should be honest with yourself and everyone else here and
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 03:50 PM
Sep 2013

drop the Democrat part from your user name.

Please read the about page linked at the bottom of every DU page. In fact let me help you because I doubt you are really interested.

The first section under the mission statement on the about page: The bolds are mine.

Democratic Underground is an online community where politically liberal people can do their part to effect political and social change by:
• Interacting with friendly, like-minded people;
• Sharing news and information, free from the corporate media filter;
• Participating in lively, thought-provoking discussions;
• Helping elect more Democrats to political office at all levels of American government; and
• Having fun!

This is first and foremost a liberal site, perhaps you are the one out of place Conservative Democrat. Again, the bold is from a liberal and one that has been proud of the fact for all of his life.

GoneOffShore

(17,340 posts)
536. Excellent - Thank you for compiling this!
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 08:18 PM
Sep 2013

You do (no sarcasm intended) win the thread.



And for the the OP -

And where did the UnRec button get to? I'm sure I saw it around somewhere.

RetroLounge

(37,250 posts)
521. If this was DU 2 you'd already have been TS'd
Sun Sep 22, 2013, 06:53 PM
Sep 2013

The fact that someone can put Conservative in their DU name and then post this steaming pile of shit that smells like something that dribbled out of Reagan's asshole is a perfect example of how people make DU suck.

and I won't even look at the names on the REC list, because I'm sure I can name most of them without trying.

PFO

RL

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
565. That bullshit argument fallacy
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 03:34 PM
Sep 2013

has been addressed multiple times in this thread. Care to weigh in on a "Conservative"'s apparent activity on other websites?

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
566. Sure.
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 03:37 PM
Sep 2013

Kick the conservative fallacious flame-bait. I'm doing it, too.

Be sure and go over to Red-State and kick the posts by that other "ConservativeDemocrat," too.

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
567. Yes, it is fascinating to see people rec shit-stirring fallacy and projection
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 03:40 PM
Sep 2013

even after it is pointed out that someone with the same username making similar arguments with similar language posts at Red State.com

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
574. WARNING. There is an ATA thread pushing for the banning of the 95 DUers who recced this.
Mon Sep 23, 2013, 06:09 PM
Sep 2013

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12593480

Fortunately Skinner seems unimpressed so far, but Electric Monk is pushing hard.....

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
577. No one is going to be tombstoned.
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 01:16 AM
Sep 2013

But I don't know why anyone would want to rec the OP considering what was pointed out multiple times throughout the thread.

DUers unwelcoming of a "Conservative" calling them wingnuts. It should come as no surprise at all that it got the reaction it did, or would have gotten had something similar been posted at any other time in DU's history.

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
583. O.K., I reworded my response. I see
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 01:31 AM
Sep 2013

why you took the wording the way you did as patronizing and that was not my intention.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
582. If anyone gets banned for reccing this thread, then this isn't a site for
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 01:24 AM
Sep 2013

Democrats who support President Obama.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
578. And the 21st sign?
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 01:17 AM
Sep 2013

You post crap titled, 'Top 20 signs you might be a counterproductive left wingnut."

Response to ConservativeDemocrat (Original post)

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
597. Obama? Best of intentions, and the best man to get the job done
Wed Sep 25, 2013, 06:42 PM
Sep 2013

HOWEVER, even Mario Andretti can't win a race with a broken VW bug

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
603. This will prove to be the post that KILLED DemocraticUnderground.com.
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 04:01 AM
Sep 2013

How ironic is it that it was posted by a "conservative" who boasts he voted for Reagan.

No one could see his intent.

No one could see his hope...

No one could see his intent...

No one could see where his loyalty lay...

Ooops...

Some could!

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
613. I've had just about enough of DU. This OP is the final nail.
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 05:23 AM
Sep 2013

I'll still come here for good articles, and I will still rec & kick the interesting articles to the top.

Now, I will send this thread to the trash!

merrily

(45,251 posts)
615. Whatever happened to the author of that long, bitter OP complaining about restaurant wait staff?
Tue Nov 18, 2014, 04:56 PM
Nov 2014

Popped into my mind for some reason.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Top 20 signs you might be...