General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTop 20 signs you might be a counterproductive left wingnut
1. You blame Democrats for what Republicans doWhenever the GOP does something, that becomes the Democrat's fault.
2. You imagine that President Obama is a dictator and he's deliberately making sure that Congress doesn't help people
You argue that all Obama needs to do is "fight harder" and "show some backbone" against the thinly-disguised GOP racists, and then they'd all just fall in line.
3. You're not a regular campaign volunteer. In fact, you think writing screeds on DU is activism
You don't even know what cutting-turf is. You've never actually tried to convince an uncommitted voter, rather than attack people outside your little echo chamber.
4. Most of your DU screeds are not anti-Republican, they're anti-Democratic
You constantly crow that you're just "holding feet to the fire" except the vast majority of your screeds only bash Democrats. And often take on Republican coloring, like a reflexive belief in government and Democratic administration being evil.
5. You refuse to credit the President for anything you actually like, instead focusing purely on your hatred of him
If the President gets a very good deal, 99% of what you want, you'll rant about the 1% he had to give up. "Compromise" to you means everyone agreeing with what you want 100%.
6. No one can remember the last time you actually praised anyone or anything, except someone else's hate-filled anti-Democratic screed
You seem to never have anything positive to say, leading most to believe that you're a very angry, bitter, person, with little emotional maturity. And other hate-filled screeds are all you manage to praise.
7. You refuse to acknowledge that people on the other side of a debate have any legitimate concerns at all - like trying to keep a dictatorial regime from gassing its own people
Your fellow Democrats must be obsessed with bloodlust and love war, or at least that's what you believe.
8. You never provide a argument about what should be done instead that would address the other side's concerns
An actual argument that would potentially be agreeable to both sides might actually change minds, but that would deprive you of your ability to feel sanctimonious. In fact, "Third Way" is an anathema to you.
9. You counter any moral argument with a diatribe about some past bad action taken by the U.S. - nearly always done during Republican leadership 10 to 50 years ago
All reprehensible actions taken by anyone outside the U.S. can be justified in a kindergarten "we did it once too" by bringing up some ancient cold-war wrong, nearly always done during a Republican administration.
10. Instead of congratulating Democratic leaders on making what you feel to be the right choice, you imagine you have "defeated" the people who were actually mature enough to change their minds
You live in a black and white world of a zero-sum game, where someone else's winning means your losing and vice-versa. Therefore anything you like that happened is due to a "defeat" of the Democratic President.
11. You see no difference between Democrats and Republicans
Boy, there is not a single whit of difference, because you haven't gotten your maximalist position on everything.
12. Your arguments reference no facts, but are instead filled with unsubstantiated assertions. Your counter-arguments are ROTL icons
Did you know that President Obama is secretly twisting arms to destroy Social Security? Well, just because it isn't true doesn't keep you from stating it as fact. Any vague rumor is automatically true if it shows Democrats in a bad light. Your counterarguments typically run like this: "You're Quoting the New York Times?!? " You aren't actually laughing.
13. You dismiss facts that don't fit your worldview, and personally attack people who provide them
ProSense drives you crazy, what with all her facts and figures and research that disprove your assertions. You attack people specifically when their references refuting your made-up B.S. are long and well documented.
14. You Godwin political discussions, liberally attacking other Democrats with words like "Authoritarian", "Police State", "Hitler", "Fascist", "Corporatist" the new dog-whistle for fascist)
You call people who explain mainstream Democratic thought Obama "apologists", ignoring that there is absolutely nothing to "apologize" for. Paradoxically, taking actions to actually stop a dictator from gassing little children to death is something you are against. You never acknowledge that Hitler wasn't stopped with a sternly-worded letter either.
15 You imagine that the DU is representative of mainstream Democratic thought, instead of being a place for the very liberal left to gather
And further, you actually argue that your positions are correct simply because the majority of the D.U. hold it. Here is a small point of fact: President Obama's approval rating among Democrats is 85%.
16. You have "left" the Democratic party and/or are sole-arbiter on who is actually a "Democrat" and who isn't
Anyone who actually likes President Obama clearly can't be a real Democrat in your mind. You have also written a "Goodbye cold cruel DU - because people don't support me right or wrong - I will never vote Democratic again". For bonus points, you've done both.
17. You continue to make excuses for Nader
And others who strengthen the GOP by dividing the Democratic coalition.
18. You imagine that anyone would pay to try to convince people like you that mainstream Democratic thinking is correct
Any time you lose an argument, or someone shows your assertion is complete bullshit by referencing established facts (see ProSense), they are clearly being paid to do so. Never mind that actual Koch propaganda is as nutcase and unconvincing as you are, it's all a grand conspiracy, I tell ya! A conspiracy!
19. You recognize many of these behaviors in the Tea Party, and recognize how much they're damaging the Republicans, but don't acknowledge the same in your own behavior
Your few moments of clarity come when you look at the GOP and see how their extremists are destroying their brand. But the similarities between the Tea Party and you (including a reflexive hatred of the U.S. government and conspiracy mongering) is something that you refuse to acknowledge.
20. You are incredibly offended by this list
Are you pissed off by this list? Maybe there is a reason for that.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)mahina
(17,686 posts)Stand together.
AnnetteJacobs
(142 posts)What makes you think it'll have an end?
Taverner
(55,476 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)And, Provocative!
I like it.
cali
(114,904 posts)op reflects love of any kind.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)Usually of this kind... http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/To_Train_Up_a_Child
But, as we now see, has other uses too.
AnnetteJacobs
(142 posts)Taverner
(55,476 posts)IT's what authoritarians use to justify their power binges
Next please?
TheDeputy
(224 posts)Prepare to be flamed.
vt_native
(484 posts)21. You think killing Americans with drones and no trial is not justice.
22. You want a Unicorn that farts glitter (or single payer health care).
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Skittles
(153,174 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)I do not think there is a single person (other than trolls) that fits your post here. But I will
and see what happens.
RebelOne
(30,947 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)finds DU of absolutely no help at all in that quest...
I am laughing my ass off at this bit of unfortunate truth.
DU is, however, a marvelous diversion and often quite informative if you know how to read with the jaundiced eye.
And now back to your regular programming.
derby378
(30,252 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)these local offices outside of the localities and if the six or seven other DUers running for any kind of office begged for help here it's doubtful what they could get from people living outside the area. Fundraising maybe, and some high fives, but without a serious network little else could be accomplished by a pile of disparate anonymous people.
Be that as it may, it is nice to at least hear a few "go get 'ems" from some quarters. Nicer than "how the flying fucks..."
think
(11,641 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)As someone who is actually running for office, and...
finds DU of absolutely no help at all in that quest...
I am laughing my ass off at this bit of unfortunate truth.
Your point was exactly what, relative to the OP?
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)the howling masses apparently have no mirrors.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)That DU is worthless to SERIOUS, IMPORTANT, REAL Dems like him.
Note that when Omaha Steve ran for office , he got help from DUers.
This particular counterproductive left-wingnut pitched in as much as I could at the time.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)no, it is of limited use.
Phone banks and mailings can be from anywhere, but small races like mine have all that covered so organizing a national bank would just add extra work for little gain.
However, if anyone out there is interested in starting some sort of national organization to help local runs, I'm in.
And, while thread has a poisonous taste, there's no need to be sarcastic in this subthread-- that's just evidence of the OP's point.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)His campaign had a paypal account for donations.
Being a civil and useful DU member, he had nothing to hide.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)I'm NOT Omaha Steve and I don't have the time or inclination to ask DU for any limited assistance I could get in this campaign.
There are 8 of us running for various offices this year and we're doing just fine with fundraising, newspaper ads, door-knocking, lawn signs, phoning, palm cards, buttons fridge magnets, and all the other crap a campaign involves.
Did anyone besides Omaha Steve ask DU for help? Anyone get any?
Since I am apparently an uncivil and useless member, I feel free to say "Stuff it."
Vanje
(9,766 posts)Then don't fucking criticize DU for not helping you!!!
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)for not doing anything I didn't ask for, but noting that it's not particularly good at it, so I didn't ask.
What I am asking for, if anything, is some moral support and an attaboy or two from what should be fellow Democrats doing what many here should have an interest in, maybe even want to do themselves some day.
I haven't heard that from you-- from you I've heard accusations and insults, not even the mildest support. OK, you agree with me on the candidate forum idea, but just like that other guy in this subthread you can't bring yourself to wish me well in this little quest.
And you don't get how there's too much of that and it brings down the whole discussion illustrating some of the OP's points.
FWIW, the other 7 candidates and the thirty or so members of our local Democratic Committee would never, ever, talk like some of the people in this thread.
Maybe your crack about "real Democrats" actually has a point.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)You should have asked for it BEFORE you posted that DU was useless for your campaign.
If you need actual phone-tree work. PM me.
If you need to fund leaflets , PM me.
If you need an actual campaign contribution, PM me.
MADem
(135,425 posts)If they were close enough, a bit of old school leafleting...
All politics is local, the way a mayor becomes a mayor is to start out in a smaller position...
DU used to have MEETUPS in the old days, and DUers actually knew one another. Those days are gone, I think....
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)No of course not. And it would be rather unlikely that anyone else here would be local anyway. So instead, in the context of the op, it was just a gratuitous irrelevant slam, apparently against the "left" here, for not turning out for his run for dog catcher of cabbage patch.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)I didn't ask because I saw no benefit in asking, particularly since my first mention of running was largely ignored.
Gratuitous slams aside, just what the fuck are you doing besides posting insults to people you should be backing, at least in spirit.
You talk about the OP and its slams on the sacred "left" but here you are proving the OP's point by doing nothing but inventing reasons to trash me.
We're supposed to be on the same side, but if this is how you normally act, I don't want you on my side.
I don't want you in the same room.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)And your complaint re my still unanswered question of how our unasked for non-support of your run for some very very local office was relevant as somehow starting the insults is, well weird. You trashed yourself. Again: you didn't ask for help, but somehow the "left" here is responsible for that help not showing up, thus demonstrating the validity of the crap op you are supporting.
Whatever. Good luck on your race for whatever it is.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)...and helps identify them by their behavior.
It is certainly not the vast majority of DUers, much less Democrats.
Again, however, people who engage in such behaviors as I have described are clearly counterproductive.
And you, "Warren", have descended so far in your hatred of Democrats that you are bashing someone who is actually going to go through the incredible effort of actually standing for office. Across the Democratic spectrum, he's likely holds positions significantly closer to yours than mine, but you can't stop your froth for even a few minutes to see that you are hurting what you pretend to believe in.
So who is stupid, exactly, WarrenStupidity?
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)But thanks for the gratuitous personal insult.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Now it's just a Cage Match.
I don't know if he asked--ask him. And NY isn't Alaska or Montana--it's a densely populated state. Why do you think he's the only one in his area? If I lived near him, I'd drive a few miles to help, if it would make a difference. Why make fun of that, or put it down?
Did you ever offer an "attaboy" to anyone running for public office here? I make it a point to offer verbal support to any DUer I encounter who is running for office.
I also do a lot of "local shit" in my own area for people who run for office. I round up elderly folks and drive them to elections--and that includes these very local contests that don't make the local TV news, never mind the national wires. I am aggressively loyal in this duty--it consumes a fair chunk of my time, and I enjoy doing it.
I don't take those comments as a "slam." I take them as a truth; this website has gone far afield from its early days when people were kinder to one another, were interested in supporting Democrats, and less quick with the "gotcha."
Every politician without a pedigree, without deep pockets, and without a famous name started out running for "dog catcher of cabbage patch." See, that's how politicians come up --- they start locally.
The fact that you denigrate the guy's effort with snarky "dog catcher" comments doesn't say anything good about you at all. It puts you in the Keyboard Commado Crowd, the Internet Tough Guy Brigade. It makes you sound both mean and petty.
It's easy to tear down, harder to build up. Pointing this fact out shouldn't freak people out so much. We are Democrats, here--most of us, anyway, or at least, we USED to be--and we shouldn't be made to feel that supporting the work of Democrats who represent us is some kind of crime, or is "uncool" because cheering for someone like Ron or Rand Paul is "cooler." And that IS the sense I get here some days. I welcome election season here, when the more obvious Demo-denigrators are forced to shut up for a change. A lot of the posts I see here outside election season would get a cheer over at FR--and that's probably because some of them are written by denizens of that joint.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)I recently sent money to help a stranger who posted of his need to DU.
I bought stars for people , even people I generally disagree with.
Have you checked out One-Grass-Root's Wishadoo project?
I donated to one DU member's campaign for office (Omaha Steve), and would enthusiastically give to any other office-seeking members.
T.B.s post rubbed me wrong because he never did ask for help. Not a word. He proclaimed DU would be useless to his campaign.
He under-estimated us, and then used it as an insult.
edited...ad infinitum, because it takes me a while to get it , so that others might actually understand it.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I'm not talking about that kind of support, though that is a nice charitable opportunity for those with deep pockets to help out those in need. Nor is this poster talking about that kind of thing.
I'm talking about the days when DUers actually knew one another, went to meet ups, organized, and provided support of a POLITICAL nature. You know, the kind of thing that takes TIME, not money.
I don't know if TB asked for help or not, we'd have to ask him that question--but he might have been put off by the attitude around here of late.
Lately, it seems as if a large contingent of DU is doing the GOP's work for them--bashing the POTUS and taking every opportunity to nitpick and tear down politicians on our team. They create a nasty, divisive atmosphere here that makes safe-havens like the BOG necessary.
You aren't going to get a super-liberal candidate elected in conservative states, so shitting on the best candidate who can win in places like Missouri or Nevada or Texas is just hubris. But I see that kind of ignorant ranting here all the time. And then, there's the "So and So Doesn't See My POV on (FILL IN MY FAVORITE ISSUE), so fuck him!!! I'm voting for Jill "Perpetual Loser/Stage Hog" Stein!!!" People who make the perfect the enemy of the good help us LOSE elections.
I also see--and am exhausted by--preachy diatribes from people who think POTUS is king, who don't understand where appropriations come from, who don't even understand how a bill becomes law. It doesn't stop 'em from mouthing off, though, insulting people who paid attention in their civics classes in school and who don't see things their way, and it just well, to beat a phrase to death, makes DU suck.
It is possible to disagree without being completely disagreeable, and I just don't understand why more people don't try doing that. I also think that, if people do not support Democrats, they really shouldn't crap on people who do in a place called "Democratic" Underground.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)I've used DU as a chance to give, but I do not have deep pockets.
I make less than 15K a year-take home. Deep pockets , I have not. I'm a pauper.
But sometimes, if I'm careful, I can kick 25 or 50 bucks to one in need. Its not much, I grant you. Its not nearly enough...but the BEAUTY thing is, that there are a lot of us, and DU has the potential to let each of us paupers combine resources.
That results in something that might be good.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Some of us prefer to donate what money and time we have closer to home. My current charity is in memory of a deceased family member, so my spare change this year goes to a woman's shelter in my relative's name.
The OP isn't about giving to individuals in need, though--it's about political attitudes, and TB is talking about political support--not money, but "Hey, good for you--go get 'em, Tiger!!!!" or "Can I make phone calls in support of your candidacy? Would you like me to precinct walk for you?"
Even Republicans make charitable contributions--if that were the litmus test, those Koch asswipes would be regarded as good guys.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)He didnt ask for any phone help. Or any other help.
He hid his light under a bushel.
And now he disses DU, because we didnt help?
T.B. can eat my shorts.......(unless he actually asks for my help, and then, I think he might be surprised. )
MADem
(135,425 posts)and I don't know if he said anything about his candidacy elsewhere.
I will say, the responses he got here aren't too nice. In fact, they're pretty vicious.
I think you're safe-he won't ask for your help.
He wont ask for my help.
And thats a shame, because I'd likely give all the help I could.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Getting in the middle of a mud fight and expecting not to get any on yourself is a bit naive for a political candidate.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)I don't like it.
Should i like it?
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Not really being snide here, that's just a statement of fact.
Anyone who has been on DU for any length of time and didn't know the OP was custom designed to start the mother of all flamefests doesn't have any business commenting at all until they wise up considerably.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)I'm well aware that my remark would would attract flames to the moth, but you may not be aware of the contempt I hold for nameless, faceless "experts" and "activists" who must have their way and refuse to see areas of necessary compromise, have respect for the less odious and often even reasonable positions of the opposition, and, most particularly, accept their own faults and faulty positions.
And the OP certainly hit on a lot of faults and faulty positions. A lot of raw nerves around here.
The sorry truth is that I am bemused by a lot of this. Little of it affects me personally, but it beats Solitaire as a great time waster when I'm trying to avoid actual work.
Didn't used to be that way around here, but the invasion of the one-handed keyboard activists hasn't helped.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)In 2008 DU was a refuge to get away from constant right wing framing and libeling of liberals which was rampant practically everywhere else on the intertubes.
Now I'm reading the same crap attacks on liberals here on DU that I came here to avoid 2001-2008, at this point it's only habit and the fact I like some of the personalities here that keeps me coming back. I'm utterly disgusted by the 180 degree turn I've seen many posters make here with regards to supporting conservative policy and rhetoric.
DU is not a refuge from the right any more, it's another damn battleground.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)about '86. Or earlier. And some of my attitudes about property and wealth are even more radical now.
What has changed is that after 8 years of Shrub we no longer have a common enemy and swim without much direction. Sure, the Republicans in the House are far worse and more irresponsible than Shrub ever was (if that's at all possible) but we just don't have that obvious target out there. We also don't have the leadership or serious political movement to challenge the rampant teabaggery out there.
So, we allow infiltrators and the misguided to lead us in attacking ourselves under the guise of liberalism, progressivism, or some such other -ism that sounds good.
What hasn't changed about me is wanting to find a solution, and an imperfect one will do in a pinch. The absolutist calls for one solution for whatever problem is under discussion drive me nuts-- even if there aren't multiple solutions for our side to choose from, demanding just one without understanding the opposition and bargaining in good faith when it can be done is pointless and self-destructive.
Opposition is good and necessary for progress, but a government, or even a discussion board, based on simply hate for the other side is doomed.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)Well said MADem
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)been to maybe half a dozen in the Northeast.
Last one was held by two now banned DUers. Go figure.
MADem
(135,425 posts)derby378
(30,252 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)have more family in town than I do.
(That's how elections work around here.)
Response to derby378 (Reply #17)
derby378 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)Hey - best of luck to you and thank you for doing that!
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)thucythucy
(8,086 posts)as you run for office?
I'm serious--is there a way DU could be of help?
Anyway, best wishes and good luck to you, TB.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)and got no response so I kinda dropped the whole thing.
I know others have run and had campaign fund requests, but this one isn't that expensive and I can cover it myself. Besides, we haven't had an organized Democratic campaign around for a long time and local donors have been quite supportive.
Anyone living in the area, and there are one or two, can help with the phone calls and canvassing. Actually phone banks can be set up anywhere.
In the long run, I'd kinda like to see DU involved in phone banking, fund raising, general stuff like artwork and campaign literature, and other things that could be done by an interested group. I think such things have been tried with questionable results.
If I may add to the general hysteria in this thread, one thing we don't need is advice and complaints from the legions of one-handed typists
MADem
(135,425 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)thucythucy
(8,086 posts)such things here would be more effort than they'd be worth, at least for campaigns for local office.
I'm helping out in city council campaign ("city" being a relative term, it's really a mid-sized town). Mostly it's just talking to neighbors, standing on corners with signs, writing letters to the local paper. On election day there will be a car pool to get folks to the polls. But not a lot of money involved, certainly no TV ads or anything like that. So a lot of outside stuff--or support perceived as coming from outside--could actually be counterproductive, as in "we don't need outsiders trying to tell us how to vote."
Anyway, good luck with your campaign. Let us know how it all turns out.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)local elections are pretty laid back and anyone getting nasty gets some serious pushback from the citizenry. The thing is that most of the opposition is actually pretty likable and does a pretty good job. The two most serious jobs, supervisor and clerk, are held by Republicans who are straight up, honest, and doing a great job-- makes us look kinda bitchy if we complain about them, and silly if we say we can do better. Tough to come up with a good campaign and cross-endorsing is often the best option.
Aside from small town favoritism, the biggest thing we are fighting is the Republican hold on the town with them having every elected job but one and getting into the arrogance of power trap. I won't bore you with specifics, but it's uphill.
Thanks for the good wishes and I'll start a separate thread on this in a little while.
Number23
(24,544 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)we're giving it a good shot.
mattclearing
(10,091 posts)The fact that you haven't answered the questions above suggests you may not have tried very hard.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)of an organization where I'm on the board, and then a fundraiser for one of our Council candidates.
None of that was nearly as important as answering posts here.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Keep us posted with your progress.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)if you don't count my three "campaigns" to be precinct man (look, up in the sky, it's a bird, it's a plane, no, it's precinct man!!!)
That DU was "no help" means what? Was DU supposed to help? Did I join DU so it could help elect me to office?
Could DU make a difference somehow? If so, it would need to be much bigger. I tried to use DU to help re-elect Nixon in Missouri, but with probably no more than a score of views, obviously that did not make much of a difference.
I try to use DU to battle against Reaganomics and to help kill the Bush tax cuts - without much success. But what else could I do that would have more impact?
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)I expected help. As I said in several other posts you may have missed, DU is not set up to help local elections. Note also that our anonymity is the last thing you want in a campaign.
And, just looking at this thread, I'm not sure I would want support from some of them.
Now, I understand why someone thousands of miles away isn't interested in my concerns over beach access and erosion or cesspool rules, but I think it would be nice to get some attaboys from the crowd and general moral support.
Perhaps a candidate forum might help-- we could at least give each other moral support and share tips, tricks, stories, successes and crying shoulders
Vanje
(9,766 posts)Last edited Sun Sep 22, 2013, 01:36 PM - Edit history (1)
A REALLY good idea!
About the rest of your post, Even the finest tool will do you no good, if you leave it in the box, or dont know how to use it.
Dont blame the tool.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)You've never actually left the house to DO anything.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)meow2u3
(24,767 posts)than a so-called "left" wingnut.
Kolesar
(31,182 posts)They never canvassed for Kerry or Obama, and they certainly never donated to our candidates, either.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)noun
1 a long speech or piece of writing, typically one regarded as tedious.
GreenPartyVoter
(72,381 posts)malaise
(269,123 posts)Good luck - enjoy the pizza
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)is what you should have named this list.
And actually, I can see #19 as I type this and that is pure projection. It's the Obamabots that are the "you're with us or against us", "facts don't matter, we blindly follow our president" crowd, which is Tea Party behavior. Normally I don't use the term Obamabot or actually say Tea Party in my comparison/description, but what's good for the goose...
Speaking to #19, you are conflating dislike and criticism of certain policies with hatred of govt in its entirety. But you know that, I mean it's so obvious. Why would the left be defending medicare and SS if they hate govt? We simply hate the fact that our centrist/right president and blind followers are okay with offering it up in "negotiations". So who hates the govt???
nxylas
(6,440 posts)...considering that at least one of the most prolific examples actually is a bot.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)malaise
(269,123 posts)MuseRider
(34,112 posts)Warpy
(111,316 posts)#14 is downright delusional.
However, conservative Democrats also have a vague feeling that maybe the party's over for them. Their ideas have been tried too long and they've failed just as they always have in the past.
Caretha
(2,737 posts)When the lib Repugs fled the Reagan Republicans and decided to join the Dems "big tent", they thought they could snow real Dems and take over the party. They don't like it one bit that the real Dem's, aka, the "counterproductive left wing-nuts", aren't buying it.
No Siree....we're not buying what you "Conservative Dems", aka, Reagan Republicans are selling one damn bit.
You can take that to the bank baby!
Warpy
(111,316 posts)in one far left package. I'm expecting a lot of whining between now and the next election.
Conservatives, of course, always think the party has to keep moving hard right, following the Republicans off the cliff.
They hate it when we point out what a minority they are.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)Again with the hate business. Here's a bit of a clue: you're projecting. We don't hate you. You hate us. I might pity you a bit for being so constantly, utterly wrong, but that's a different matter.
For instance, take your statement about "what a minority" we are. Please look at the following chart.
As you can see by the poll, Very Liberal people (which is what you are, in addition to being counterproductive) comprise 10% of the Democratic party. Meanwhile, 20% of the Democratic party see themselves as "Conservative" or "Very Conservative".
So while I am under-represented on this website, to the point where some DUers will say "Conservative Democrat" is "an oxymoron", in the real world, my side of the party is twice the size of "very liberal" Democrats.
Almost too much so. I'd like to pull some of those Very Conservative Dems more to being merely Conservative. Again, contrary to your utter wrongness, our end of the party is generally very rational, and we have no desire to follow the GOP into their wingnut hellhole.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)You're comparing a single category (Very Liberal) with two combined categories (Conservative and Very Conservative).
When compared fairly, the liberal numbers really double the conservative.
Very Liberal 10%
Liberal 29%
Total 39%
Very Conservative 4%
Conservative 16%
Total 20%
Your hate for Obama was supposed to blind you to the math.
Warpy
(111,316 posts)Pronouns are important.
Th1onein
(8,514 posts)Hasn't this party moved to the right enough for you? Geez.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)RetroLounge
(37,250 posts)This is what DU has become.
On this OP I
RL
devilgrrl
(21,318 posts)Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)--> You claim to have a monopoly on perceiving reality and don't realize that you're merely repeating the "Because I'm right!!!!!"- schtick you learned in kindergarten.
I suggest everyone check for this one too since we're obviously all feeling introspective enough today to go through the little list you posted.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)LuvNewcastle
(16,847 posts)ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)At least, those that can be.
I'd put my volunteer hours up against yours any day, "Comrade".
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
cui bono
(19,926 posts)ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)So I dunno. Maybe a reality based one? I didn't choose his name for him.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)Please clarify what you're trying to say here.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I'm not saying you're paid. Why pay someone who volunteers to work for free, right?
I'm informing Comrade Grumpy that the reason that you spend all your time with your head up an orifice ranting about the awgulness of the left and liberals, instead of, you know, going after the right and conservatives, i.e., Republicans, is because you recognize that you have more in common with those people than with the people you are trying to address here.
Frankly I'm not seeing anything from you that would look out of place at any other right-wing echo chamber site. You might want to check out rightnation.us - not as crazy as FreeRepublic, but they certainly hate and loathe liberals and leftists. You'll get along well.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)...and are terribly offended when I outline clearly counterproductive behaviors, claiming that I am attacking not only you, but "the left and liberals".
This sort of leads me to believe, Scoot, that you have a very odd view of what constitutes the "left and liberals", if you think these kinds of behaviors are at all common.
Again, let me restate something I've said to other people. I leveled no accusation at all in my OP. So if you see yourself in the behaviors I have outlined, it is your own conscience that is trying to tell you something, not me.
Let me also state that, while it is tempting for me to point you to www.revleft.com, I'd actually rather you find your way back towards the idea that Democracy means that you don't always get 100% of what you want, but getting more than 50% of what you want is usually better than getting 0%. And that applies to internal coalition politics, as well as contests regarding the party as a whole.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
/ p.s. That you actually don't think I'm paid, I think, is a step in the right direction for you.
GeorgeGist
(25,322 posts)So cut the bullshit:
Your Republican roots are showing.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)As your own choice of name shows, you understand that there is certainly room for a Democrat to be an illiberal douchebag, correct?
And don't bother with the "I didn't exactly say quite that, wink wink nudge nudge" argument. Surprising as it might be for you, I'm not a stupid person, nor are the many, many, many other people pointing this out on your thread. You can couch your bullshit with the wobbly terminology and deny the obvious subtext all you want, but you're not doing a real good job of fooling anyone - certainly not even yourself.
I'm under no illusions about what democracy means and does not mean. I would heartily recommend, again, that if the people and discussions on DU offend you in such a grave manner, that you find greener pastures. For your own benefit, you know?
cui bono
(19,926 posts)That is quite a reach. Nobody on the left is buying what you are trying to sell. No one who still stands on their principles could.
Baitball Blogger
(46,753 posts)I could be wrong.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)I guess that makes me a counterproductive wingnut.
And on #4, I'm sorry we try to hold the elected officials from our own party accountable for violating progressive policies we voted to enact. I guess lockstep is better.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)Especially if there is only one or two.
Let me also point out that there is a difference between a "Strong" leftist and a "Counterproductive" one.
I'm not actually asking any attacking leftist Dems, or asking them to change their beliefs. I'm asking them to become more effective. Rather than ranting ineffectually on a website, you could actually make things better.
For instance, that NoNato protest you attended, it didn't change anything. CNN didn't cover it, and people tend to ignore TV anyway. What changes things are person-to-person contacts, which you can only do through campaigns (or in a handful of extremely well organized local political parties). Knocking doors is considerably harder than marching in a parade, but you can actually have an effect in your local community.
You'll also find something else if you go this route: an appreciation for other points of view. The way I know the counterproductive left isn't actually doing anything (or harming their own cause) is due to the way they speak of boogey men that are pure inhuman evil. Most of these people don't sound like they've even met a Republican, much less a disaffected centrist. Nothing I'm saying is asking you to change your beliefs, but by talking to people face to face, you may learn they have their reasons for believing as they do, even if sometimes those reasons are wrong.
Effective leftists recognize this. You could be one if you want to.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
CrispyQ
(36,492 posts)You are not winning over any of the 'counterproductive leftists,' with your 'my way or the highway' attitude. It feels kind of like you're telling us to sit down & shut up. We've heard that before.
Shame on you for telling another DUer that protesting did no good.
G_j
(40,367 posts)from your journal:
"The oddest thing is the absolute pure anti-Democratic party hatred. So many here really are the mirror image of the Tea Party: mindless screaming ranters determined to tear the one organized group that is actually effective in pushing forward the policies they purport to believe in. If I were as conspiracy minded as the loons that accuse me receiving a paycheck for posting on the D.U., I'd say they were secretly all Republicans conspiring to tear Democrats down. Alas, Occam's Razor tells me that instead, it's just people too wrapped in their own internal partisan morality play to acknowledge reality or the complexities of the real world."
IMO, comparing DUers to the Tea Party should be against DU rules. Would you compare DUers who don't agree with you to the KKK? Perhaps you would, but IMHO that's not Kosher..
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)Skittles
(153,174 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)...with people on the other side of this issue who could actually acknowledge reality. Saying something like: "Yes, obviously the law allows this, but it should be changed. Here's how we could draw the line a little closer, and not interfere with our legitimate national security concerns."
Alas, I've come to the conclusion that the D.U. isn't the place to do this. It seems to be the last bastion of magical thinking, tribalism, conspiracy theories, counterproductive screeching, willingness to completely make "facts" up, and so many different kinds of logical fallacies it's hard to keep track of them all.
The oddest thing is the absolute pure anti-Democratic party hatred. So many here really are the mirror image of the Tea Party: mindless screaming ranters determined to tear the one organized group that is actually effective in pushing forward the policies they purport to believe in. If I were as conspiracy minded as the loons that accuse me receiving a paycheck for posting on the D.U., I'd say they were secretly all Republicans conspiring to tear Democrats down. Alas, Occam's Razor tells me that instead, it's just people too wrapped in their own internal partisan morality play to acknowledge reality or the complexities of the real world.
The good news is that our party isn't plagued by these people as the Republicans are. Hard leftist loons sound doubly mad because they know normal Democrats don't pay attention to them. On the GOP side though, the inmates really have taken over the asylum. Howard Dean said it best, rather recently, to a GOP consultant on Bill Maher's show. "Your party is about 49% crackpots, ours has only 10."
And at least our crackpots know how to use a spelling checker. That's a plus.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)(and note what it was in reply to)
gopiscrap
(23,762 posts)KG
(28,752 posts)another adolescent screed characterizing objection to dem / obama policies as 'hatred'. isn't it time grow up from that?
deutsey
(20,166 posts)It would be laughable if not so sad.
wyldwolf
(43,868 posts)Your forgot the predictable reference to the DLC, but someone responded with that for you.
But, you should edit the post and remove the DUer call-out. Not good form. And the referenced DUer has been a great source for information.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)how's it going? should we start an argument for old times sake
wyldwolf
(43,868 posts)Anyhoo, nah - you and I probably come across as two of the more sensible people on DU these days.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)a daily basis. sad, really. that's what the OP refers to.
because on the New DU, you have to be paid, apparently, to support Democrats. it's nuts!
Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)I'm also incredibly bored by lists that slam people like you who I don't agree with.
It's just moronic sniping.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)reading DU daily, I think there's quite a few people who it fits fairly well.
cali
(114,904 posts)there, but there are some gross distortions and it really is just sniping.
In any case, I know for a fact that the op does consider me the "wingnut left".
Glad you don't.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)I can think of some DUers who fit the list to a tee, but I don't feel like calling anyone out, plus its a Saturday
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)clearly hating on the OP. Funny sniping about somthing you think is sniping haa haa.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)But it'd be hidden.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Now be nice to me as those are "Left Wingnut ROFL's"
CrispyQ
(36,492 posts)on edit: I know we don't have them anymore, but if we did...
treestar
(82,383 posts)there have been many attacks against regular Democrats on DU, so people who make those should be able to take it too.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)so.
And what the fuck is a 'regular Democrat'? Regular is a suit size or a way to order coffee. Regular. Jesus.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)WTF is that supposed to be or mean? Geez.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Geez. You have to get your phrasing exactly right.
People to the left of Democrats are allowed to post on DU, socialists, etc. So mainstream Democrats are a part of DU (they try to get us banned to see if they can move the board totally to the left or libertarianism, and they are getting numerous enough to hide our posts).
Oh, and so the point was, they ought to be able to take some heat, given how they dish it out. Geez.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)You might have called a fellow DUer a pompous A-hole.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)person that "you have enough rights"
treestar
(82,383 posts)Is what makes DU suck. I'm sure there was a context there.
Is this to try to intimidate? I think it is.
I don't bother to research posters since I stick to the issues. But I have one stalker (to whom everyone is a homophobe if they did not throw Obama under the bus over Rick Warren) and I think that is wrong and very bad behavior.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)Get back to me on how it feels when someone tells you that "YOU have enough rights" There sure as hell was context and you know exactly what it was. Apologies work you know. You have never once expressed regret over that unbelievably cold remark.
QC
(26,371 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)irregular? What if you referred to straight people as regular people, how do you think that would go over? Words are important.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)Makes one a "Democrat", obviously. The Democratic Party has no interest in being captured by crazies in the same way that the Republicans have been captured by Tea Party crazies.
Please also note that I didn't actually "attack the left". (There are plenty of people on the left who are absolute sweethearts, and quite persuasive to boot.) All I did was to point out some counterproductive behavior.
So, if you see yourself in these twenty statements, then it isn't me who is "attacking" you. It's your own conscience.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)is wacked.
Extending the Bush tax cuts, nuts.
Bailing out the banks, ludicrous.
And generally compromising with crazies on the right, who continually refuse to compromise, then doing it over and over is the definition of crazy.
....unless one has a different agenda....
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)But i agree that the behavior is delusional.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)I think the vast majority of DUers try to do the best that they can.
Remember, they're under a lot of stress also..
bunnies
(15,859 posts)If not, you should. Its right up your alley.
mick063
(2,424 posts)Last edited Sat Sep 21, 2013, 07:14 PM - Edit history (2)
Elitist bullshit for elitist thinkers.
"You aren't one of us" in a long winded meandering kind of way.
Satisfied with the status quo. Thinks the Democratic Party is on the right track. Roots for the team and all the glorious "winning" that comes with it. Celebrates economic disparity as better than self defined alternatives. Thinks that working a phone bank for the DLC is a certification for passing judgment.
If you think the Democratic Party has evolved into something unrecognizable, the OP gives an enlightening glimpse how.
BOG PERSON
(2,916 posts)identifying with power won't give you power - though i suppose it might give your statements an air of authority
mick063
(2,424 posts)Will be linked every time I see GOTV posted here.
Every. Single. Time.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)How many on the list fit you? Just asking.
mick063
(2,424 posts)I skimmed through it. Saw just enough to think it a waste of time to read it all.
I could give a shit how I am labeled. Especially by "Conservative" Democrats. I lay equal blame to them for the state of our nation.
Frankly, I'm pissed off at what the Democratic Party has become. I don't have time to wallow in the OP mire.
"Conservative Democrats"
Freaking pawns of the financial moguls. The worst possible influence on our nation. Economic Neo Cons.
You will be swallowed up by the millennials and spit out. Just a matter of time.
I'll try to help speed things up.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)Do you ever have anything nice to say about democrats, the president, or anyone in congress? I know how you feel about president Obama, you know the "colossal failure", at least according to you. And your idea that allowing the crazies to take control will some how "help" the party get back on the right track, although letting the tea baggers, the Paul bots, and insane republicans run things would pretty much a worse problem than when George W. Bush was president.
What kind of a Supreme court do you thin we would get with the right wing nuts in charge?
What kind of programs would they put in place to help seniors, the poor, women's rights, etc.?
How about health care for those in need? Do you think that if the crazies took over they would actually help those who really need help?
How would you speed things up, but trying to encourage others to NOT vote, or to actually vote for the crazies?
mick063
(2,424 posts)Both in donations and time spent. Since I'm not seeing much return for my efforts, I believe I shall vent here often.
Voted twice for the President. Have voted straight Democratic ticket since 1976.
I have probably cast as many Democratic votes as you have.
I don't have many good things to say about the Democratic leadership or our President. In my opinion, they are puppets. In my opinion, the President lied to us during his campaign.
I will, however, lavish great praise upon Warren, Brown, and Grayson. I agree with a good many things from Merkley, Akala, Boxer, Harkin, Udall, and Murray, although they I do believe they could be coerced by the President to support some of his economic agenda if lobbied hard enough.
My primary objective is to help swing the Democratic party back to being representative of the working man. I don't give a crap how it is done. If they have to be embarrassed at the polls, then so be it. I refuse to reinforce their behavior by helping them implement a financial mogul's wet dream.
You focus on beating Republicans. I focus on getting the Democratic Party back. We each have our own priorities.
Republicans in power will attempt to implement crazy with respect to social issues. It will be their death knell. Regardless, the social issues can wait as I recognize these social issues as the carrot that the third way is dangling before us. I will temporarily remove that carrot. For me, the primary issue is the concentration of wealth at the expense of the working poor. The GOP are the least of my concerns right now if the only alternative to GOP economic policy is more GOP economic policy.
I'm not going to stop.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)You said you voted for him twice, yet from a lot of your posts this year, the beginning of his second term, you have said he was a total failure in one post, slammed him in many others, so as soon as he started his second term you find out that he was such a failure?
Have you posted anything positive about the president this year? If so please link be to the post and I will gladly apologize.
The problem I have with how you "want" to change the party is that turning it over to the crazies, and waiting for the next election when you say people will wake up after being subjected to the insane thinking of said crazies, doesn't make any sense. Look at the damage George W. Bush did to this country. Letting the crazies run things will make what Bush did look like a picnic in the park! Even if your theory was right and the "next" election they got voted out , how much damage would they have done "before" being voted out? In the case of 2016 and getting a president Christie, which you also have said "we could to worse", what do you think he would do to help the country? What kind of judges would he put on the Supreme court? You really need to think about some of these things because putting the nuts in office is't going to fix a thing, it will only cause more hardship for those at the bottom, and more money for those at the top.
Putting the crazies in charge would simple be a total disaster.
mick063
(2,424 posts)It sure as hell would. It would create a political upheaval. Perhaps spark a Renaissance.
Obviously you don't know my timing with the President. Look for his initial proposal to cut back on Social Security. That is when you first started to hear me grumble. It has gone down hill from there. Always more bad news. Never anything uplifting or positive.
I'm talking about things he initiates. For example, his secret trade agreement isn't related to GOP House obstructionism.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)What kind of a Supreme court judge would one of the crazies put in office?
What kind of programs to help those in need would the crazies put in place?
What kind of a mess would here be, I think worse than the one Bush left, when they leave office?
How can things change if it takes another 20 years to clean up the mess left by Bush, and the one left by the crazies if your theory comes to be?
mick063
(2,424 posts)Enough terrible policy to create a tsunami of public backlash.
The correction factor would be considerable. The pendulum swing to the left would be significant.
The slow, methodical crumbling of the middle class by the third way is actually more effective for the tycoons. The Republicans would cause the burner to be turned up to the point where the frogs would jump out of the pot of boiling water.
The political revolution can only take place if those that recall the time before Clinton can have influence. They have tangible history for comparison. When that generation is gone, and if the third way remains in power, there will be future generations that believe our current administration is the definition of the left with respect to economics.
The boiled frog, the small incremental changes over time, the conditioning of the populace, is a much greater danger. "Shock and awe" social issues by Republicans will wake people up.
Of course this isn't the most favorable route. The most favorable route would be a Democratic Party that represents the working man. Unfortunately, the tycoons appear to be solidly imbedded. Hence, the top priority must be "fixing" the Democratic party. Greater priority then defeating Republicans.
The Republicans are their own worst enemy. They will quite naturally, defeat themselves. They are most effective at doing this when they try to impose their will.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)CrispyQ
(36,492 posts)This:
Republicans in power will attempt to implement crazy with respect to social issues. It will be their death knell. Regardless, the social issues can wait as I recognize these social issues as the carrot that the third way is dangling before us. I will temporarily remove that carrot. For me, the primary issue is the concentration of wealth at the expense of the working poor. The GOP are the least of my concerns right now if the only alternative to GOP economic policy is more GOP economic policy.
Can you have social justice without economic justice? I believe that economic justice is the foundation of a just society. I liken it to three hots & a cot, which trumps social issues. How does it benefit the 99% to have social justice, if we are oppressed economically? A democratic president was the first to suggest cuts to social security. Did he do it? No, but he suggested it, and now it's out there. In the first Borg Star Trek episode, at the end, Guinan warns Picard, "But now that they know you're out here..." Making cuts to SS is on the table now & a dem prez did it!
This may be my favorite political cartoon of the time:
This is what voting for the lesser of two evils gets you - exactly what you were voting against in the first place.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Stop writing those words right now! You have strayed outside the officially defined boundaries of 'journalism'. There will be no thinking outside the cardboard cubical, you unpatriotic fuck.
Andy823
(11,495 posts)I always did hate it when I was put into on of those boxes. I guess I just can't help myself!
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)I wonder if you even realize what a hypocrite you sound like?
Kennah
(14,298 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)...I know you are in a lot of physical pain, you've said so, so you get a pass from me, despite our obvious differences representing the different wings of the party, and your significant negativity. Being in pain sucks.
Still, I stand by this list. You will note that I don't actually call anyone out (other than to defend and laud ProSense).
I only call out counterproductive behavior.
So those who take offense at this list are, themselves, admitting to it. Kind of like this:
Party goer: "Those who snoop in the bathroom medicine cabinets of their host is an ass."
Party goer 2: "Hey! That's offensive! Don't call me an ass!"
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)Physician, heal thyself.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Yet you lecture people about fallacies.
"Hey, ConservativeDemocrat, have you quit beating your wife?"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question
A loaded question or complex question fallacy is a question which contains a controversial or unjustified assumption ( e.g., a presumption of guilt).[1]
Aside from being an informal fallacy depending on usage, such questions may be used as a rhetorical tool: the question attempts to limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner's agenda.
G_j
(40,367 posts)has quite arrived at that awareness.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Let's cut the crap, hm? Baiting is baiting whether you specify the target or not.
RC
(25,592 posts)I find your OP offensive. You maybe had a mirror in front of you when you wrote that?
You sure are not on the Left of that graphic, that's for sure
mitchtv
(17,718 posts)sounds like BS to me. Besides it is the blue dogs that fuck everything up by voting with pugs at every opportunity.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)Try reading some of these replies.
sgtbenobo
(327 posts).... I had no idea just what a despicable douche-nozzle I really am. There's only one thing left for me to do and that is to go out on the porch, smoke a cigarette and cry, cry, cry. I never realized what a true friend you are and that you are only looking out for what's best for me. I am so ashamed. I promise I'll try and do better. Oh please, please, please, will you be my guiding light. I don't think I can do this alone. I am sorry.
Carry on.
Warpy
(111,316 posts)That's in the southern sense, of course.
WCLinolVir
(951 posts)so long as you follow with -bless his heart. Or so I've been told.
Warpy
(111,316 posts)"Bless your/his heart" is one of the best things I took away from the south.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)You will see no mention of "sgtbenobo" in my OP, or anyone else for that matter (other than ProSense, who I defend). So if you see yourself in the counterproductive behaviors I outlined, then please understand that it is not me who is leveling such an accusation. It's your own conscience.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
sgtbenobo
(327 posts).... for someone like you. Someone with such an astounding grasp of the obvious. Someone that can happily lead me into oblivion. Someone who is both vapid and superficial, yet so wonderfully two dimensional. What I'm trying to say my darling is I love you. ConservativeDemocrat will you marry me?
Carry on.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)And I hope that one day you will grow up.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Last edited Sun Sep 22, 2013, 06:53 AM - Edit history (1)
It's quite clear that your post is a series of straw men designed to irritate. You have successfully irritated a large number of people by presenting yourself as someone who wilfully misunderstands. It isn't conscience that prompts response, it is a desire to speak the truth to you.
You are aware of this. The "conscience" thing is an attitude being struck, nothing more.
think
(11,641 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Vanje
(9,766 posts)Thats Bloviated Stooge.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)This is a WONDERFUL opportunity our friends over at "The Peoples View" to create (if they don't already have) a chat board. Or a super duper secret chat room like (I hear) the folks DFP have. Why a lot of the posters on this very thread hang out in that one. Where they can listen to The Tombstoned Admin call DU and it's admin and posters a cesspool.
All of the posters that love this "list" could go over to those places to remove themselves from us impure and deranged troublemakers and our ideas.
It's always pretty telling. OP's like this get anywhere from 40 to in this case 77 recs. Whereas a good, well written OP from a progressive democrat on DU can garner up to 400 recs. And yeah who really cares about recs except that they are in fact an indication of how members feel about an issues.
I would suspect that this particular piece got as many recs as it did not so much for the ideas put forth but for the potential to piss off and offend lefty Democrats on this site. Heck, many posters high fived it for that and said so.
Lets face it, the posters that deride "Neo DU" hang out here because their other haunts TPV,DFP and The BOG are ghost towns.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)How utterly predictable.
LondonReign2
(5,213 posts)complaining that the Democratic party hasn't moved far enough to the right fast enough.
treestar
(82,383 posts)As if a political party isn't a big tent, it was something that was supposed to cater to you.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)It tingles my senses every time.
Kennah
(14,298 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)There are occasions when a double facepalm just isn't enough.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Nice to see you, winter is coming!
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)Kennah
(14,298 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)Waxing philosophic while you're waxing your carrot.
Not that I would accuse you of that. I was using the rhetorical "you." Yep.
The thing is, I've read many posts on DU that seem masturbatory, so maybe we're not far off
Kennah
(14,298 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)It's full of all the extra stuff you just accomplished, isn't it?
Kennah
(14,298 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Because it is fun.
icymist
(15,888 posts)(((BREATH))) You must become a vegetarian Luke (((Breath))) or I am not your father (((Breath)))
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)I'm sure you'll be very happy with the new republican Congress.
arikara
(5,562 posts)Should be disappeared.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Is how many actually came out of the woodwork with chips on their shoulders. This is a good post, sometimes it helps when truths are pointed out to those in need.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)not a straw man
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)think
(11,641 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)CD posts a whole bunch of crap, people come out and point out it's crap, and that in and of itself means the shoe fits?
Oo. What a clever trick.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)think
(11,641 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)Do I still have to wear it?
Vanje
(9,766 posts)Your response shows that the OP struck a nerve. Denial is futile! He gotcha!
<sarcasm>
Just try to deny you've been posting daily about Ralph Nader. JUST TRY!
sibelian
(7,804 posts)I'm kind of lost.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)That's a little unlikely.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)intaglio
(8,170 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)-p
demwing
(16,916 posts)ok, there's just 1 sign...
1. You posted this drivel:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023707888
I'm only suggesting you might be a troll because a more personal response would be viewed as a personal attack. I'd also like to say that you shouldn't bother responding ignore-boy, but hit & run cowards don't need to be reminded of that.
Shoo fly - Back to the BOG with you
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)The MAABYAPYOTBG!
I think I just broke a lip...
Didnt Rec the Sunday LoLcats.
The descriptor, "Conservative" gives a clue as well.
Stainless
(718 posts)Really, you are.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)dgibby
(9,474 posts)"ConservativeDemocrat"=oxymoron.
Stats: joined DU 2001, 1,217 posts, 132 in last 90 days, 122 in GD last 90 days. Part of a sleeper cell or just been in a coma for 12 years?
"Tells": incorrect use of English, #8-"a argument"' ; consistently refers to DU as "the" DU. Who does that? Don't think I've ever seen that one before.
FTWIW, ConservativeDemocrat, Democrats are like cats. They can't be herded into a groupthink pen. That goes double for the democrtic wing of the Democratic Party that you so obviously disdain.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)I refer to "the DU", because DU is short for "Democratic Underground". If I said "I am part of Democratic Underground" rather than "the Democratic Underground" that would be grammatically incorrect (and also make be sound Russian). Also missing a single letter in a post (a vs an) isn't exactly unheard of, although if you'll notice, I actually missed two. The one I regret more is somehow putting in ROTL instead of ROFL.
I am a bit curious about your belief that pointing out counterproductive behaviors is "herding people into a groupthink pen". It seems pretty obvious to me that that many of the people in the DU are already in a groupthink pen, which is what I'm trying to get them out of. Let me also point out that if someone actually represents the "democratic wing" of the Democratic Party, they would likely actually support the party they say they are representing.
Oh, and just love the "sleeper cell" angle. It tickles me to death that someone actually thinks I'm a spy or something. Maybe I'm Russian!
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
Caretha
(2,737 posts)I am a bit curious about your belief that pointing out counterproductive behaviors is "herding people into a groupthink pen".
You calling Liberal Democrats as having "counterproductive behaviors", doesn't make it so, dude.
So get off your fuckin' high horse, cuz that dog don't hunt.
Kennah
(14,298 posts)Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)which is what I'm trying to get them out of."
So go fuckin' get 'em! http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1102
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)dionysus
(26,467 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)have an easier time. I think Tory is the word.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)forget that the left are Democrats. In fact the left has a greater claim on being Democrats than the Conservative Dems that push Republican ideologies. The Conservative Dems worship Gen Clapper.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)for trashing Democrats and then commenting that people who trash Democrats split the party more than the way they were trashed on this OP?
JHB
(37,161 posts)As someone who answers "no" to every one of your questions, I have one of my own:
Are liberals/progressives/"radical leftists"/"counterproductive left wingnuts"/etc. a part of the Democratic coalition necessary to win elections?
If the answer is "no", why should you care?
If the answer is "yes", how on earth will constant belittling improve things?
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)marmar
(77,086 posts)ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)It sure sounds like you do. Or else you would not be so angry. See #20.
Oh, and also see #12, since you clearly have decided that I voted for Reagan, a false statement. Pulling truthiness bullshit out of your ass is supposed to be a hallmark of the Republican party, let me remind you.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)Res ipsa loquitor.
Maybe you were too young in '80 and '84.
Sad for you.
Caretha
(2,737 posts)I don't think you are old enough to have voted in that election, if you had been...yeah, you would have voted for him.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Crap logical fallacy.
RetroLounge
(37,250 posts)RL
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Using absolutist false dichotomies and entrapping fallacies is a hallmark of Republicans too. Again:
"Hey, ConservativeDemocrat, have you quit beating your wife?"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question
A loaded question or complex question fallacy is a question which contains a controversial or unjustified assumption ( e.g., a presumption of guilt).
Aside from being an informal fallacy depending on usage, such questions may be used as a rhetorical tool: the question attempts to limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner's agenda.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)It's just as possible to be angry with an accusation because it's false as because it's true.
RetroLounge
(37,250 posts)RL
jessie04
(1,528 posts).
MrScorpio
(73,631 posts)BRAVO!
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)but most do not. Now how am I to know how to label myself!
JHB
(37,161 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)The people you describe are the best friends the GOP has right now.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)This thread is going places.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)they really are.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)and accurate as hell...thanks
jimlup
(7,968 posts)I think threads like this only spread discordance and disagreement among like minded people and are thus counterproductive. It is wrong to hold the democrats blameless though obviously the Republicans are so far out there as to be insane so it isn't even debatable. Still I disagree with condemning some who see a bigger picture. It isn't entirely wrong and if you think it is you are the one who is naive.
Iggo
(47,561 posts)Which is exactly what it was designed to do.
And it's working perfectly.
The very definition of trolling.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)been here for eons with high post counts who create OPs that are divisive, rude, or "can I get a witness" screeds that piss people off and get a lot of hits but they only serve to further divide.
I have no idea if the angry responders to this OP are correct that this poster is a "troll" or not, but their reaction to his remarks suggest that there's a truth in at least some of what he says.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)Troll or no, hardly matters.
I didnt think DU was the sort of place where an avowed conservative would get enough recs to elevate him to the Greatest Page.
I thought DU was a Liberal Dem site.
My mind is rather blown.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I am fiscally cautious (I believe in paying one's bills) and I am socially liberal. I support choice, equality, and the Dream Act.
There is no "crime" in being a conservative Democrat. That's not my cuppa, but if that conservative Democrat pulls the lever on election day for the Democratic ticket, he or she is OK with me. I'm interested in winning elections.
The fact that you want to exclude Democrats who are not liberal enough to suit YOU is not a good thing, IMO. It's something you should think about.
If you want real change, you aren't going to get it from the GOP. You're going to have to put up with some of those Democrats who are "less perfect" in your head in order to get a majority in order for our team to do ANYTHING.
You cut off your nose to spite your face when you play the "exclusion" game with members of the Democratic Party. That's the kind of bullying shit the Tea Party Republicans do. I don't care for it one bit.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)I just don't think much of conservatives.
Call me crazy, but I think Conservatism is the problem , not the solution.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Progress may be by inches when Democrats run things, but regression is the norm when the GOP is in charge.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)do not bring progress.
They may wear the red jersey. They may wear the blue jersey.
Conservatism does not deserve a nod.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Vanje
(9,766 posts)I know conservatives.
I dont court them.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Vanje
(9,766 posts)I know conservatives.
I dont court them.
and further more, surrounded by conservatives as I am 24/7 in my real world,, I certainly dont want to come to my favorite Liberal Web Site (DU) to see an avowed Conservative and his new pals, tirade against liberalism.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I don't have a problem with people who disagree with me, but I do have a problem with people who try to personally denigrate me, or anyone else, just because of a policy disagreement.
I see that shit all the time. I find it tiresome. It suggests a weak argument, too.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)Cha
(297,464 posts)this thread would be full blown hypocrisy.
They call anyone a "troll" who has a different opinion. One poster went to Skinner about purging those who Rec this thread. that's how I found the thead to REC. lol good company.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12593480
MisterP
(23,730 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)therefore we should be attacking you. #sillyfailboy
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Flame bait. <yawn>
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Kolesar
(31,182 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Like I said, this thread is really going places.
dionysus
(26,467 posts)dionysus
(26,467 posts)people are almost ready to break out their riffles!
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)You WANT emotionally charged disturbances? What for?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)the_sly_pig
(741 posts)The spectrum of liberal thought is represented by the Democratic Party. Conservatives appear cohesive because they lack the ability to understand nuance.
Liberals are designed and encouraged to conflict. Conservatives need group-think.
Calling liberals unorganized or messy is what it means to be liberal. Those that require structure and order are where they should be on the political spectrum.
You know what they say about opinions........
glowing
(12,233 posts)Pretty heavy assertions to assume about other people and what they think, how they think, and what their daily lives are sub subsisting of.
You cannot duck your head in the sand or stand behind a bad idea no matter who's it is, because we all know, unless there is major public pushback, the only voices in most people's rooms are those handing over wads of campaign cash. So, if there is a bad plan or name floated, push back.
If there is a despot doing horrible things to other people in a complicated civil war with world wide consequences, guns blazing and spurs rattling aren't always the most appropriate response.
This board to me has been somewhat, at times, a haven where normally like minded or intelligent people can discuss issues of the day... At times it's messy and, of course, we have infiltrators who wish to cause discourse.
I'm tired of "liberal" being perceived as something that is inappropriate or something we cannot achieve. Mostly, we have been right more than wrong on many issues. We aren't stupid either, we know we are up against the coprorate over lords and the likes of the Koch Bros... That being said, there is no reason we shouldn't try and try and try again .
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)So far.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)And all of this sounds more like it was written by an Ayn Rand Objectivist to me....with all the never and such hyperbole typical of their immature thinking.
But what is more intestine is how many think this is great...quite revealing I think.
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)BINGO!
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)A bit of shit-stirring to get people riled. It even has similar verbiage!
Funny how the people who don't like this 'un like those! That's a bit revealing, too....
Where one stands depends on where one sits, I guess!
Zorra
(27,670 posts)you might have a case here.
Conservative Democrats (DLC, Third Way) have controlled the Democratic party for the past thirty years, and the country has been going downhill like a snowball to hell the entire time.
Maybe y'all should just step aside and let liberals handle things from here on out, so we can start making some real democratic progress again, before progress becomes completely impossible.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)....you are here attacking loyal Democrats.
What number is that on your list?
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)However allow me to gently suggest that if you are terribly offended and see your own actions reflected in these counterproductive behaviors I've outlined, maybe your conscience is trying to tell you something.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
Caretha
(2,737 posts)"Mr. Conscience". Spare me mr conservative republican.
Who attacks Democrats daily here? Starting with the POTUS on down? And gives Republicans a pass? The irony!
PDittie
(8,322 posts)but I think my label is "moonbat", and not the opposite of RWNJ.
You should at least get your ad hominem straight.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Sorry, you're all net.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Last edited Sun Sep 22, 2013, 09:12 AM - Edit history (2)
The OP, which insults 66% of DUers (i.e. Liberals), has 31 recs by those who are, apparently, perfectly happy with the status quo AND have no issue with such a blatant, broadbrush attack on 66% of their fellow DUers.
This list is DLC/Third-way horse shit. I invite you to self-delete, but since you're a drive-byer, I'm sure you won't see my post.
Regardless, I'm on the record...
On edit: as of 8:58am, this thread has 76 recs. This response thread has 225.
Doing the math, I was RIGHT on the money - 66% of all recs are for the response thread, indicating that 66% of DUers identify with it as opposed to this one.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I don't agree with everything in the OP, but it's refreshing when I read something outside of the echo chamber.
This is a discussion board and there's nothing wrong with discussion.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)attack other DUers because they dare to have another point of view.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Sorry.
wyldwolf
(43,868 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)Wake up and forget all about it
There will be something new...well, maybe not today, maybe tomorrow--
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...which is a broadbrush smear on 66% of DUers.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)LiberalLoner
TheDeputyAndy823
sweetlou
killbot
we can do it
Summer Hathaway
gopiscrap
Shrek
madokie
chieftain
Hayabusa
treestar
skydive forever
otohara
iandhr
Bolo Boffin
intaglio
Kolesar
warrior1
coldmountain
CAG
libodem
MrScorpio
baldguy
mckara
Adelante
4now
w4rma
denbot
Sheepshank
Tikki
pasto76
sheshe2
Number23
Cali_Democrat
giftedgirl77
WonderGrunion
farmbo
In some ways it's a who's who list of DU's resident John Birch Society members.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...no big surprises.
mick063
(2,424 posts)I don't use ignore, but If I was the type......
Well there ya go.
A nice tidy list.
The DLC of DU. They have something to lose if the Democratic Party changes back to what it once was before Clinton.
wyldwolf
(43,868 posts)Elections?
Just sayin'
mick063
(2,424 posts)You prefer the boiled frog approach I see.
I have another way in mind. It is called changing the Democratic Party. It begins by chastising the dopplegangers.
You have given up on progressive change or alternatively, simply align with Freidman economic ideology. You appear to be ok with the concept of "working poor".
You must be. How else can you explain supporting those that would choose Goldman Sachs to dictate your economic future?
wyldwolf
(43,868 posts)If you DON'T agree the Democratic party was losing more elections between LBJ's last year in office and 1992 than since then, you must living in an alternate timeline.
Regardless of the caricature you just wrote, it's really beside the point. Democrats have won more and more often since the Clinton era began.
"The DLC of DU. They have something to lose if the Democratic Party changes back to what it once was before Clinton."
Yes, elections.
mick063
(2,424 posts)I want the DLC to lose elections.
The millennials are coming for your deities.
Just a matter of time.
wyldwolf
(43,868 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)Oh, the shame. You fit right at home in this forum and I won't say exactly what "society" I think so many members of GD would be right at home at.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)And certainly not over endorsing this sort of drek posted by ConservativeDemocrat.
Just pointed out to another poster who's bewildered by the recommendations, what sort of people are giving those recommendations. As it happens, it's the same clump of people I regularly see screeching about the awfulness of liberals and the left and what a miserable place DU is.
Yet unlike the PUMAS of yore, they lack the stomach to fuck off and do their own thing away from us terrible leftist ninnies. I don't get it.
Number23
(24,544 posts)created of, for and by Democrats has been literally infested with libertarians who froth about the evils of Democrats about 10 times more than they do Republicans and literally jump at the chance to accuse President Obama of every sinister thing they can think of, facts and information be absolutely damned.
If anyone should "fuck off and do their own thing" it sure as shit should be those folks.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)"Overrun with libertarians," really?
Number23
(24,544 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Or like... crazy people? You know, the people in the heating vents are telling them the lottery numbers kind of thing?
'Cause "overrun by libertarians" is just a shockingly mindless claim to make of DU, and the people making it, well, something has placed them out of touch and well beyond reasoning capabilities.
Number23
(24,544 posts)And the people leaping to infer every sinister motive to this president and accuse him of being stupid, dishonest, a corporatist empty suit who only works for the 1%. Those are the people that I think are crazy and beyond all hope and reason. And judging by the ban hammer that's been getting laid down around here lately, alot of other folks think the same.
Your posts in this thread have illuminated the character of the people that make these types of comments. You leap in with personal attacks of people being members of the John Birch Society. Some of the folks you made that claim towards are DUers of color, which makes your comment that much more mindlessly, needlessly stupid and inflammatory. And then you proceed with the Number23 is our Lord and Master bullshit which not only is just incredibly stupid, it really shows that you have no interest in anything beyond name-calling and shit-stirring. I'm sure you have lots of friends in this forum as a result.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)The lack of self-awareness in that statement is mind-BOGgling.
Number23
(24,544 posts)on my status as a host when DU3 got up and running. You knew before I did that I was host. You are way too preoccupied with me and what I'm doing. You have never posted ANYTHING to me that was not a personal attack as well as uncalled for and completely unprovoked. Your unasked for responses in this thread are beautiful examples. Thank you so much for lacking the self awareness and self control to stop yourself from making them.
And yet, no matter how many times I ask you to leave me the bloody hell alone, you simply refuse and then to add a dash of hilarity to the issue, post little absurd jewels like this idiocy as if I'm the one that roams DU calling people names. As if I have ever, ONCE responded to you unprovoked. Classic case of deranged projection. There's gotta be an app or a really good doctor for that.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)Every few months or so I make the mistake of replying to you and you respond with the same paranoid shit every time about how I'm "deranged" and "following you." The truth is I can't keep you BOG people straight anymore, though you're beginning to distinguish yourself by your inability to engage in banter without flying off the handle and making various psychiatric diagnoses of other posters. Why don't you just hit ignore if you have such a venomous distaste for my posts?
Number23
(24,544 posts)My brain works just fine. I am able to manage to not REPEATEDLY respond to people that find me a plague on this web site.
If you are so addled and find my posts so utterly unbearable for God's sake PUT ME ON IGNORE and spare me any more of your nonsense. The fact that you constantly attack me and a) can't remember my name but for some reason seem to be intimately familiar with my BOG postings and b) want ME to be the one to put YOU on ignore even though you are the one that is constantly chasing after and attacking me is indicative of the nature of your posts better than anything you could have EVER typed right now.
Put me on ignore. Simple and you never have to remember if the ONLY poster on this web site with the numerals '23' in their moniker that regularly posts is that poster that you find so odious and who dislikes you even more.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)I have no problem seeing your posts. I don't find you "odious" or any of the other various emotions/motives that you've projected onto me. While I find you hyper-hypersensitive to criticism, I'm able to handle that. I don't hate you. And I'm not following you. I'm replying to a lot of people in this thread. I reply to a lot of people period. I have never had someone go off like you in response. That's on you, not me.
To sum up: I'm not stressed seeing you, but apparently you're really stressed seeing me. So if I ignore you, you'll still see my posts. That's why I suggested you ignore me.
Number23
(24,544 posts)about me insulting others and then some garbage about the BOG aimed at me. Or are you also doing that to everyone in this thread too? Oh wait, or did you forget about that already, too? Are you seriously acting as though this is not your MO and it happens a hell of alot more than "every few months?"
Put me on ignore. Sick of this. Truly.
Rex
(65,616 posts)It is like the words are already pre-programmed in his head; IOW he lacks the ability to actually say something normal to me either so don't feel bad about it. We are pretty common and it is common treatment.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)You're right. I've gotten used to the usual 'nothing-better-to-say' type of blah blah. But damn if one doesn't run into stranger varieties sometimes!
Rex
(65,616 posts)and the posting style would make it impossible for you to determine which one it is. Always the same thing. Always.
Thankfully I only have a small percentage of time spent on their waste of time and MOST of the time on DU is spent talking about important things like the ACA or how we can get the House back in 2014.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)What the hell is that?
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)You know, us plebs and leftists, the dangerous hoi polli, the uncouth mob that should just knuckle under and accept people like Number23 as our lords and masters, because of their superior Chuckles the Sensible Woodchuck impersonations
Number23
(24,544 posts)How you pulled that gibberish out of my post is something special indeed. Anyone that has to have what GD is explained to them isn't worth the time of the day. The fact that you feel the need to chime in to someone asking such a stupid, needless question is precious and adorable.
Obviously this OP has upset the two of you terribly. Good.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)"Walled zone" I love that.
Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)At Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:22 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Ah! But you can look and see WHO reccomended it!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3708893
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
Rude and derisive mega call out. John Birch society? Seriously?
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Sep 21, 2013, 09:31 PM, and the Jury voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: This call out of DUers and slurring them as John Birch Society members deserves to be hidden and if there is a pattern of it may indicate the person should be tombstoned.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: The poster merely pointed out who recommended the thread. They are some of the worst of DU and are the DU version of the John Birch society.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: This whole thread goes in my trash. Silly shit going on here.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)People on DU should be free to record a thread without the threat of someone copy/pasting the information into a post deriding them. The same goes for a poll. Someone needs to grow up.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)Transparency is good, and there's nothing wrong with copy-pasting a list of recommenders into a thread. It can be relevant.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)using such a list of DU'ers to call them resident members of the John Birch Society is something else entirely.
This particular dick move wasn't nearly as upright and high-minded as you describe.
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)242. Had I been on the jury I would have voted to hide it.
People on DU should be free to record a thread without the threat of someone copy/pasting the information into a post deriding them. The same goes for a poll. Someone needs to grow up.
If it's publicly viewable info there's nothing wrong with copy-pasting the info.
The John Birch comment is an entirely different issue.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Yep, they are public record, but it doesn't mean people have to use it to taunt others. It's about harassment and acting like a child. Do you really support that kind of behavior?
The person who replied to you had a point, someone can copy paste a list and say all of these people that voted for XYZ poll are fascist assholes.
All I said as a matter of principle I would have voted to hide it.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)They're the ones who let us see who "records" (you know that isn't what "rec" is short for right?) threads.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I'm not saying the practice should be banned, instead that people should act like adults rather than copy/pasting lists. It is rude and borders on harassment.
Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)That's all I can suggest.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Recs are a matter of "public record". If you are ashamed of your rec then don't do it and think about why you want to rec it but are ashamed of it.
So pointing out that you can see who rec'd a post and who they are is what?
Disruptive? No. Though the OP is, wonder if the alerter also alerted on the OP.
Hurtful? No. Though the OP could be, wonder if the alerter also alerted on the OP.
I could go on but you get the point.
You can see from Juror #1 that there is some indication that there might be a concerted effort to have Scootaloo TS'd.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)What a nasty characterization...
I rec'd because it's fucking hilarious. I love GD drama.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I'll keep that in mind when replying to you in the future.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)There are so many posters here who are just so distraught from one day to the next, if I felt even a tenth the way others appear about posting here, I wouldn't post. It must be a chore for some. For me, it's an enjoyable exercise.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)One that was filled with personal attacks covered with a remarkably thin layer of not-particularly-plausible deniability.
Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.
Drama is all about discussing people.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Do you have a link?
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)A lesson I don't always apply as rigorously as I should but c'est la vie, eh?
It wouldn't surprise me at all if there were JBS members on DU, anyone can register and post, some trolls have stuck around for years and tens of thousands of posts.
Increasingly these days I wonder why I'm still here since the idea of DU as a refuge from the conservative mainstream libeling of liberals has long since become one with Nineveh and Tyre.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Which is a good thing for my participation here.
I have an account over at Politics Forum and I have to say that there are even self-admitted fascists over there (who actually believe in it) and I don't find discussion with them very enjoyable.
I think one caricature OP bashing "the left" (frankly I don't identify with any of the caricatures in the OP and I think those that do have fallen for the troll) doesn't represent DU. I mean, when was the last one? Other than the ODS thread. Before that I can't think of one.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Or at least when they aren't posting pictures of moderates in swim suits.
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)sometimes I recommend crazy stuff so people will read the crazy stuff. How do we know people on this list didn't do the same.
Altho there are some that are consistent.
bobduca
(1,763 posts)The network can clearly deploy about around 30 Personas per shift depending on operator load.
SkyIsGrey
(378 posts)is a hodgepodge of Straw-man arguments and False dilemmas.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)But that apparently was the point.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)"Centrism" is an inherently middlebrow, anti-intellectual position. There is no really definable "scale" along which politics can be measured as if political positions equate to an "amount" of something. The whole premise of centrism is founded on a chimera.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Cliches offend me.
agent46
(1,262 posts)News Flash: creating a comprehensive stereo-type you can use to frame DU into simplistic us-them scenarios might help you feel better but as a description of reality it's pretty silly.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)If you hadn't noticed.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)but the poster of this OP is conservative in the Fox News sense - There is no political conversation, no political points to be maid - just grunting - "Something is true because I said so" - They may very well be a registered Democrat but their mindset is no different than Sean Hannity or Bill O'Reilly - They have no arguments - just - "I said so" -- granted it is hard to argue with that.
macspanicattack
(36 posts)From the people I expected.
Copied the post to a notepad on my desk-top. Its going to be REALLY tempting to cut and paste from the list to respond to some future posts. Bet it would really piss off a few 'PURE' Democrats!
To stir or not to stir????
By the way... provocative and discussion provoking post. 1000 points for bravery at the least.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)Really?
macspanicattack
(36 posts)replying to some of the responses. Are you the 'reply police'?
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)How thoughtful.
macspanicattack
(36 posts)and have seen multiple responses....I repeat who voted you the reply police?????
The arrogance!!!!
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)No skin off my nose.
macspanicattack
(36 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Oh my
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Did the OP touch a nerve?
BOG PERSON
(2,916 posts)unless it's signified by a
?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Rather pathetic, really.
I have a pretty good sense of humor, but posting a picture of laxatives in response to me saying the post hit hard.....
It just wasn't very creative. Scooter could have done a lot better IMO.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)But points number 7 and 15 made the hair on the back of my neck rise. And number 19 made me stand up and LITERALLY throw my fist in the air.
WELL FUCKING DONE. And I'm sure you've made enemies for life here with this post. But all you have to do is look at the quality of the people that you will piss off -- the angriest, most ignorant, uninformed with nothing but piss and vinegar where their lives should be people here -- with this post and that will be your surest bet that you are right on the money.
GOTV
(3,759 posts)... and you need to lash out.
Put the knives away and maybe there can be discussion.
Iggo
(47,561 posts)To be lectured by conservatives.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)This sort of crap will surely help us come the midterms.
marmar
(77,086 posts)DU, where are you?
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)mick063
(2,424 posts)Which way are you going?
leveymg
(36,418 posts)on each others posts. Makes the Third Wayers seem like an army, when in reality its more like a terrorist splinter group.
marmar
(77,086 posts)nt
leveymg
(36,418 posts)I think DU needs to go back to the old Greatest system of recognizing popular posts - this simply rewards provocation and infighting on the board with visibility.
BOG PERSON
(2,916 posts)ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)The DU went overwhelmingly for Kucinich for President, while the good Congressman took somewhere close to last place in 2008 among the actual Democratic electorate. So not only is Argumentum ad Populum a logical fallacy, it's not even particularly Populum.
Also, let me politely suggest that mainstream Democratic thinking isn't "terrorism". I know this may seem a shock to you, but it's true.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
Number23
(24,544 posts)on this board. But all I had to do was look at the folks tossing it around as a pejorative to realize that if THEY thought it was something that was awful, then it must not be bad at all.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Dennis, while admittedly the sentimental favorite of many DU progressives, barely factored into it.
There's a lovely term for those who have complete disregard for the facts and press their points to create conflict, regardless: "intellectual terrorists", and you seem to be one of them.
You're a member of a small club of RW disruptors, intellectual terrorists, who really bring little except conflict to this board.
You're welcome to disagree with the majority of DUers on issues, and most of us are progressives, but don't accuse the rest of us of being fools because of it. You can disagree, but must not be disagreeable about it. You've violated the most basic rule of all on this board: you're making DU suck with posts like this one. It's sheer divisiveness for its own sake, and it must cease.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Just like your OP.
Utter. Total. Fantasy.
Just like your political views.
JHB
(37,161 posts)Kucinich was overrepresented here compared to the general public, but I don't remember anything approaching "DU went overwhelmingly for Kucinich for President".
Please give us something to jog our memories on that one.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)I distinctly remember him leading by a plurality in a (obviously non-scientific) D.U. poll, one of many, in 2007. The trouble is that if you put Kucinich and D.U. into google, you get swamped with hits. I don't have all night to find things.
The best I could come up with in 10 minutes was this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3544870
...which wasn't a poll, it was self-selected. Read through the results.
Still, I'll withdraw the point about Kucinich, since I don't want to make an assertion which I can't back up with 100% fact. The broader point though remains. D.U. is significantly to the left of the Democratic Party as a whole.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
Number23
(24,544 posts)Kooch beat Obama by more than 2 to 1 and Clinton by even more.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2287522&mesg_id=2287974
If this is not the exact one, then search again. A Google search of DU poll on Dennis Kucinich turns up a ton of threads with posters proclaiming that he was their top choice.
Response to Number23 (Reply #304)
Hissyspit This message was self-deleted by its author.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Abukhatar
(90 posts)With limited info you read in some blog, you think you have the right solution to the problem and Obama is too naive/dumb/in bed with corporatist/cowardly/to see it your way
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)You and your ilk are "counterproductive left wingnuts"
The irony is lost on you, isn't it?
Most of your DU screeds are not anti-Republican, they're anti-Democratic
Like your op? lol
No one can remember the last time you actually praised anyone or anything, except someone else's hate-filled anti-Democratic screed
Like your OP? lol
You refuse to acknowledge that people on the other side of a debate have any legitimate concerns at all
When was the last time the Third Way acknowledged that people on the other side have legitimate concerns?
You never provide a argument about what should be done instead that would address the other side's concerns
You mean arguing on issues rather than attacking those who disagree with you, like this OP does? lol
You see no difference between Democrats and Republicans
You mean like the 'libertarian Ron Paul loving Snowden worshipers" meme? lol
Your arguments reference no facts, but are instead filled with unsubstantiated assertions. Your counter-arguments are ROTL icons'
Do the Third Wayers use facts to sway others, or do they merely attack those who disagree with them, and try to obfuscate the subject at hand?
You dismiss facts that don't fit your worldview, and personally attack people who provide them
Do third wayers dismiss facts that don't fit their worldview and attack those who provide them? Yes, and do does this OP lol
You Godwin political discussions, liberally attacking other Democrats with words like "Authoritarian", "Police State", "Hitler", "Fascist", "Corporatist" the new dog-whistle for fascist)
Does "Rand Paul loving, Libertarian firebagger" count? lol
You recognize many of these behaviors in the Tea Party, and recognize how much they're damaging the Republicans, but don't acknowledge the same in your own behavior
Like obfuscating, attempting to derail threads, and trying to poison the well, rather than rationally defending Obama's policies? lol
About 15 of your 'talking points' apply to the Third way. By your own wacky measure, the Third Way are counterproductive leftwing nuts!
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Perhaps *you* like the results, but I think they're horrific.
Time to return to what's *proven* to work every time it's tried: Liberalism.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)Their ODS inspired plot also includes discrediting great thinkers - true progressive thinkers like Milton Friedman and collaborative progressive thinkers like Will Marshall, Al From and others who were so pragmatic that they got an incredibly smart billionaire set of brothers named Koch to help fund their DLC. If billionaires as brilliant as they backed their progressive plans, all I can say is the DLC were top notch geniuses that had been working since the eighties to bring us a Democratic utopia of REAL liberal policies and we MUST carry their torch onward into the future.
The Paulite conspiracy runs so deep here at Neo-DU, that the only way to be sure of backing true Democrats is to check to make sure they are connected to the third way think tank, the progressive policy institute, are former DLC alumni, or in the case of posters on this site - Boggers in good standing with the group.
We true Democrats must have Obama's back no matter what he says or does!
We are NOT frustrated by revelations about the Obama administration's secret government spying programs or the president's support for military action in Syria and we support visionaries such as Summers and that hero Brennan just as we hope to do more for banks and for free trade. We promote kill lists and indefinite detention without rights because all these things are the true Democratic agenda and are all attempts to further the interests of the common working man and his right to be allowed to lose rights and job security in order to enable them to patriotically provide the US with the ability to be competitive on the global labor market and to also allow for a nation secure from the many domestic threats of the disgruntled far left and libertarian terrorists before they become organized. We want these things for our lessers because we love them and have their backs and know what's best for them.
If what is best for them is to reduce their earned benefits like SS and Medicare when they are whinny old farts that can't earn money for their betters anymore, we will support such cuts BECAUSE we love them and want to help them find ways not to be the useless takers that they are. The same for the poor that claim that cutting programs like food stamps will hurt them, in the reality based world if they are not hungry and useful to their betters then we have failed to help them find the bliss in working three min wage jobs to help an economy that is wisely designed to funnel cash to the only people with the ability to trickle success down upon them. I mean, how can we help them if we don't help the rich that may decide to help them at some point eventually?
In conclusion, 99.9% of true Democrats support President Obama on everything all the time and those that do not provide such complete and trusting blind support are not really Democrats or "the base", but rather ODS racist libertarians with an agenda going back to the days of that 'bagger FDR and his hatred of those financially secure enough to shower their wealth down upon us with their unfettered ingenuity. We have already paid a great price for the suffocating regulations that held back the prosperity of the nation until Rubin and Summers under the very liberal Bill Clinton removed the regulatory handcuffs that impede the creation of true and lasting prosperity that only unfettered capitalism can provide...
See, I know what it means to be a Conservative "Democrat", basically it is a combination of right wing Reaganomics, deregulation and free trade mixed with some left wing social compromises mostly having to do with gritting your teeth and supporting reproductive rights and marriage equality even tho it must pain you to do so.
Would it not be easier to banish the insane from your own party of conservatives rather than infiltrate and try to change the liberal Democratic party into the "new" Republican party of your vision?
I never did get you Baucus types.
Caretha
(2,737 posts)This is truth, and truth is a commodity that now a day seems sorely lacking on DU.
My question is how do we throw these Reagan Conservatives out of the Democratic "Big Tent"? I want them gone, as in yesterday.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)you should seriously consider signing on there as a contributer. In any case, its a good illustration of the delusional thinking that is often exhibited by BOG types --⇨
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)so it appears they've trotted out someone a little less emotional, but just as passive-aggressive.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)on a regular basis, they could be the new and improved "the peoples view", and all the BOG-ers and others who hate DU and progressives can post their shit here!
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)they're still wrong. 30+ years of Reagan and Reagan Democrat policies don't lie, eh?!
quinnox
(20,600 posts)These people need to get a new hobby. The writing crazed rants against liberals and the left schtick is getting old.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)how irrelevant DU is. Must be nice to have that kinda time to waste on a website that doesn't matter.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Trolly.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)And the strangest thing is, is that single-payer is still being allowed in the states. If it works well in Vermont, then it will naturally spread.
But this isn't good enough for the "I want it all, and I want it now!" crowd.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
Kennah
(14,298 posts)... by those of us who like ACA, but will frankly acknowledge aspects of it suck given that 10s of millions still won't have coverage.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)It took a lot of time for the public to get used to it. I have no idea what will happen with the ACA, but all the elements are there for more public medicine like the far left wants to spread - if it proves successful.
So, do you think Medicare for everyone will be successful compared to competing independent agencies? If so, then you should be overjoyed by the ACA, since it will show a positive example to the rest of the nation. I personally have my doubts, but am willing to see how it actually works out in real life.
A nation of 350 million people does not turn on a dime.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
Kennah
(14,298 posts)Costs are lower, and outcomes are better.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)Many things, like public transport, don't work as well. We're not as dense.
However, if Vermont's Single Payer works above and beyond, I can expect it will be used as an example by other states, and slowly spread across the North East.
Or maybe not. The Swiss health care system is run entirely by non-profit NGOs, and has extremely good cost reduction and some of the best outcomes. The internal competition, though muted, works well for them, since unlike single-payer you don't have the "Where else can you go if we screwed you" sort of problem. I can certainly see many states following that model as well.
But we shall see, won't we?
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)So the "where else are you going to go if we screw you" argument falls remarkably flat.
I like the way you casually throw anyone who doesn't live in the Northeast under the insurance juggernaut bus.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)The NHS.
I could tell endless stories of referrals from private hospitals to the NHS after a colossal boob, but I'm legally bound not to.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Teabagger troll, in fact.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,869 posts)Democrat or Republicans. And the day a conservative thinks he can tell me how to be a Democrat is the same day I tell that conservative to go back to worshiping Reagan.
If you're pissed off by that, good.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,869 posts)Then why did Obama pretend to be one of us to get elected? OP probably would have HATED senator Obama.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)this is among the most sensible posts I've read in a long time in GD.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Hate is the most miss used word on the net, followed closely by evil.
It is a lazy way of attacking a person one doesn't agree with of acting on on irrational emotion rather than addressing their issues. Many people here who disagree with Democrats have good reason for doing so, even if we do not agree with them. It is the nature of our two party system that the two parties become a coalition of groups. It is just easier to fit into a party in a parliamentary system with many parties.
MFrohike
(1,980 posts)I can't tell if this is heavy-handed trolling or serious, but it has the feel of an well-planned, poorly executed troll. Either way, everyone seems to be having fun with it, so I guess there's that.
Kennah
(14,298 posts)pediatricmedic
(397 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)"We need to cut down on the federal budget. Since obviously, Democrats won't let us cut Social Security or welfare, and Republicans would be against cutting down funding for faith-based initiatives and national security, let's start with earmarks."
....
"Steve Forbes- This guy, like him or not, has great business acumen. I went to a motivational seminar that he was speaking at...he was funny and got resounding applause from the audience. I could see him as a SECRETARY OF THE TRESUARY in either a McCain or a Huckabee administration."
....
"Today is Martin Luther King Day, and quite frankly his dream still has not been achieved. Why? Two words: Affirmative Action."
....
"John McCain is the best GOPer choice for President in 2008. While a true blue conservative, this man has farreaching support in swing states, among independents, and can even win over the bluest of Democrats. While we have no clearcut choice, and the only real conservative just dropped out, John McCain has the credentials and the chutzpah it takes to win."
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)I'm just saying....
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)what space?
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)or conservativedemocrat or conservative democrat or Conservative_Democrat...
The names match when they could have not matched. It means something. Or it doesn't. Your original unedited post was on point.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Could be, or not. Wouldn't surprise me, based on the tone of the OP, and subsequent replies.
(I'm watching Austin City Limits with Gary Clark, Jr., who I've never heard before, and was a bit distracted!)
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)and he's pretty cute. Alabama Shakes is up now.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Yes, but by ConservativeDemocrat
whether you like it or not, you succeed when you bite off small chunks at a time, not by biting off more than you can chew. Right now, what are you going to say when the lefties wheel out some old lady talking about how now she can't "get her medications" and "live her life" because the right-wing crazies cut social security? We can achieve so much more when we start with the bridge and THEN move on to entitlement spending.
http://archive.redstate.com/blogs/conservativedemocrat/2008/feb/11/a_return_to_fiscal_conservatism#comment
So, 65 DUers support a RedStater. Good to know.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Vanje
(9,766 posts)"But I believe Lieberman is a great asset to the party. Not a party hack but a man of honor.
We need people like Lieberman to craft bipartisan legislation. If people like McCain and Lieberman are lost, all we are left with is no-compromise, confrontational, all-venom candidates like Dean and Santorum.
If the schism between the parties and the nation is to be healed we need more people like Lieberman who stand in the center and patiently endure the disdain from the radicals in their own party."
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/05/04/207539/-CT-Sen-Lamont-within-striking-distance
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Good find! A RedStater who believes Lieberman a man of honor. Getting recs on DU. LOL
Vanje
(9,766 posts)I'd just as soon be a counterproductive left-wingnut than some anti-affirmative action dick who spouts the virtues of Forbes, and McCain.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)that none of his Cabinet picks came about:
http://archive.redstate.com/blogs/conservativedemocrat/2008/feb/10/the_cabinet_come_2009
Hmm, seems he doesn't support the "-Shudder-possibility of a Billary administration."
Same snarky tone. Same lack of depth. Same bashing of "lefties."
Adorable.
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)only he's signed up for some online psychology courses and is now taking it out on DU.
What is YOUR conscience telling YOU?
Funny, I think I'll manage to sleep well this evening...
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)Frankly he could be a couple people in this thread, lol.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)but I did see in one other thread a denial that he has a "login" to RedState, or something to that effect. Which might be weasel words for I had a login THEN, but don't NOW.
Why doesn't he just embrace it? Be proud of those beliefs!
Vanje
(9,766 posts)where ConservativeDemocrat blames victems of Katrina for their plight, and chastices Mayor Nagin for blaming FEMA and the Feds, and for being racist.
http://conservativedemocrat-demrep.blogspot.com/2006/08/katrina-what-were-you-thinking.html
Heck of a job, ConservativeDemocrat!
Heck of a job, DU centrist reccing crew!
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)He probably would have been TOSed by now if so.....
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)as being ConservativeDemocrat at DU, Kos, and the cesspool known as redstate.com.
TOSed by whom? The site admins? How are they to prove it was CD at redstate? And if he's playing by DU's rules, why would he be TOSed?
Maven
(10,533 posts)To the people who recommended this OP, this is what you're supporting. In Obama's name, apparently. Happy?
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)that in their zeal to condemn "the left," they're quite possibly embracing a RedStater, who is absolutely no *friend* of theirs. If the current Republican party is too extreme for folks like ConservativeDemocrat, too fucking bad, don't attempt to move the Democratic Party rightward to fill the void. Three damn decades should be long enough for folks to fully understand that that system is broken, and that too many are suffering economically.
I think CD denied being *that* CD in another thread, but there are too many parallels to rule it out.
Response to ConservativeDemocrat (Original post)
Post removed
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)kowtow to Republicans and call it compromise. By the way Gen Clapper your new savior is a fucking Republican.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Vanje
(9,766 posts)Heres a quote:
"It is not a black or white issue, it is taking responsibility for your own actions. Mayor Nagan is not doing any good blaming the federal government, FEMA, or anyone else. He failed to provide the leadership and control that he could have.
Now he will drive a wedge between the white and black communities with his racist rhetoric. Yes, that is what it is, if a white polotician said those things, the NAACP and ACLU would be trying to have him/her hanged!"
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Response to SMC22307 (Reply #310)
Post removed
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)A simple question has been asked. Can you answer for the OP?
macspanicattack
(36 posts)"Tell me....How many Republicans are posting on DU sir? Are you or have you ever been a member of the Republican party?" "Do you think you are a REAL liberal sir?" "Answer the question damn it!"
See...I can play too.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)have a cookie.
macspanicattack
(36 posts)here is a link to my facebook page.
https://www.facebook.com/steve.mac.71465?fref=ts
Yes the photo on facebook IS me (after reading some of the madness posted on this site).
My personal website is in park at the moment
I wear a size 10 shoe.
I drink whiskey straight
And even at 53, I live to bogie!
Now...How about you? Or are you afraid to show whats behind the number?
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Now I feel kinda sorry for you.
You're safe -- you didn't swoop in offering up yet another tedious attack on the left. Although your little ankle-biter routine is kinda cute.
macspanicattack
(36 posts)but im not here to make friends. Im here to be informed and educated on peoples Ideas and opinions. What Im not here to do is be called names because of what I post, told that im not a 'TRUE' liberal or democrat or that if I respect my President for the good he has done that im some kind of brown-noser. I hear "ignore is your friend" all the time here but how can you hear differing opinions if you have to switch people off all the time because you are being ranted at instead of talked to. Your post to me proves the point. Condescending and juvenile. And unfortunately, Ignore is in your future. Sad because maybe you actually had something wise to say to me. But because you are a wise ass....Ignore!
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)(Guess you didn't see that...)
People who live in glass houses shouldn't... lob McCarthy accusations?
(Or that...)
Response to Vanje (Reply #307)
cherokeeprogressive This message was self-deleted by its author.
QC
(26,371 posts)macspanicattack
(36 posts)The pro-leftwingnut thread is patting itself on the back for getting to the top of the Greatest Threads list. Cant you negative nellies out there post more 'This post is just stupid so shut up about me' replies here so we can keep this thread kicked. Come on...you can do it!
Remember... great pissing contests need lots of piss!
Dig deep for the indignation. Pull that sucker right out and bang it on the keyboard.
If it feels good do it...But not of course if its for Obama.
Keep the home (hair) fires burning guys and gals!
Number23
(24,544 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)macspanicattack
(36 posts)Ow...dislocated my shoulder patting myself on the back. Hey, why not everyone is doing it!
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Last edited Sun Sep 22, 2013, 05:05 AM - Edit history (1)
Seriously, the defending of what is a highly questionable flame-bait post AT WORST (while I don't agree with the posting of the recommenders in the thread despite it being intentionally easily accessible public information, what exactly is someone doing referring to other DUers as "wing nuts"?), or of what is a sincere but ridiculous pile of knocked-over straw men, false-dichotomy fallacies and mirroring AT BEST, - that's what has managed to get you posting?
macspanicattack
(36 posts)Im sure they have read enough of your posts to know what it is!
But thanks for keeping this great thread going....could be one for the records!
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)That's all you've got?
Yeah, I don't mind kicking this thread at all, so everyone will have a chance to read the ENTIRE thing.
macspanicattack
(36 posts)work is early and 8 hours entering data doesn't leave a lot for these old fingers for posting...
You'll have to wait til the next time.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)They ARE the Republicans.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)Funny.
macspanicattack
(36 posts)ronnie624
(5,764 posts)Here's another kick. This person needs exposure.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)macspanicattack
(36 posts)Way to go ConservativeDemocrat. Keep them posting and kicking!
macspanicattack
(36 posts)but only 93 posts......
Curious!
OK, who's double dipping?
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Maven
(10,533 posts)Vanje
(9,766 posts)Exactly.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)lamp_shade
(14,841 posts)Look at all the raw nerves you hit, as predicted in your item #20. Best OP I've seen in a long time.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)than (a minority of) DUers cheering a poster who may be an Erick Erickson RedStater. You know, this gasbag:
All in the name of defending Obama. *That* must be the ODS I keep seeing referenced on this board.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)wear it!
sibelian
(7,804 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,347 posts)It hasn't been 85% or more since May 19th: http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/presidential-approval-center.aspx
His approval among 'Liberals': 67%; 'Liberal Democrats' 81%.
Since you complained about people whose "arguments reference no facts, but are instead filled with unsubstantiated assertions."
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)I think of Strom Thurmond, Richard Shelby and Jesse Helms. Of course, those guys all eventually realized that they were actually Republicans masquerading as Democrats.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)before Ronald Reagan? Let me guess that if I was to throw out the name Bill Scranton, you would not know who he is? Am I right?
TBF
(32,084 posts)This party has morphed from supporting labor to supporting causes. You've forgotten about economics entirely.
Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)the name ConservativeDemocrat), if you spent this much time attacking Republicans that do this, you would have credibility.
This is a slam against anyone that puts principles over party.
Dash87
(3,220 posts)Those thinkin' people are extremists, I tell you!
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)As of 8:58am, this thread has 76 recs. This response thread has 225.
Doing the math, I was RIGHT on the money in my response to the OP - 66% of all recs are for the response thread, indicating that 66% of DUers identify with it as opposed to this one.
Everyone who recommended this thread; you're in the minority here on DU.
To the OP - epic fail.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)While some of the RW Truth Squad at DU (aka, "The Swarm" make a valuable contribution and provide a necessary antidote to our own progressive Group Think, some are just here to disrupt and insult.
The OP is an example of a disruptive, insulting, and disrespectful post.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)who did not rec either thread.
I'd unrec this one though if I had that option.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...my math supports the overall feelings of DU as a whole.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)It applies to many. And they will be the angriest repliers you will get.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)1. You can close your eyes; click on the rec list of this OP and know about 40 of the names when you look at it.
As I read through this train wreck I see this was already said upthread. Much MUCH better then I said it.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)The Obama Haters are not going to like this!
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Even non-"Obama-Haters" should not like this.
Straw men arguments, entrappment fallacies ("if you disagree with this, that makes it true!" , loaded question fallacy, false dichotomy fallacies, projection, and mirrroring, all from someone with the same username as someone on RedState.com.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)But this thread is a pile of garbage.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)A Conservative Democrat = oxymoron
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)regardless of party affiliation.
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)kentuck
(111,106 posts)A big stinking pile.
rexcat
(3,622 posts)need anyone say anymore!
And no I am not pissed of concerning the list because they are just typical comments coming from a mouth breather.
Response to ConservativeDemocrat (Original post)
Post removed
Vanje
(9,766 posts)Nader hasn't been an active subject of discussion here for half a decade or more.
Get with the times, Lieberman guy ! Your Joementum isnt working any more.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Nader? 2013?? NADER???
2ndAmForComputers
(3,527 posts)Says volumes, huh? The non-reactionary, non-trolls, non-stealth-Republicans here have all moved on long ago.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)really really really really REALLY old people?
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)madrchsod
(58,162 posts)i love these types of replies....
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)...that you just sort of riff on it and have fun.
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)GalaxyHunter
(271 posts)Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)as a whole.
Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
Groucho Marx
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)Congratulations! Maybe you could learn another one tomorrow, and write up another charming post.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)darkangel218
(13,985 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Thanks, "Matthew."
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Vanje
(9,766 posts)DU used to be a Liberal Discussion Board.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)The ratio of traditional Democrats here to mysteriously awakening sleeper accounts and incoming new liberal bashers spouting the corporate line has also been steadily and unnaturally increasing.
If one estimates ten personas per propaganda account, 87 recs could reflect all of eight or nine busy corporate bees.
Marr
(20,317 posts)I always take note of the names that recommend threads like this. I'm always familiar with about 10-15 of them as regular posters, and the rest are just completely silent-- yet always present-- names who apparently do nothing but rec threads like this.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)jsr
(7,712 posts)and operate in stealth mode
Zorra
(27,670 posts)from the violence, destruction, greed, malicious ignorance, and hateful authoritarian oppression of conservatism.
Avowed conservatives (see photo above) should not be allowed to post here.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)so this doesn't surprise me.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)"Top 10 Conservative Idiots"
Now they get recs.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)drop the Democrat part from your user name.
Please read the about page linked at the bottom of every DU page. In fact let me help you because I doubt you are really interested.
The first section under the mission statement on the about page: The bolds are mine.
Democratic Underground is an online community where politically liberal people can do their part to effect political and social change by:
Interacting with friendly, like-minded people;
Sharing news and information, free from the corporate media filter;
Participating in lively, thought-provoking discussions;
Helping elect more Democrats to political office at all levels of American government; and
Having fun!
This is first and foremost a liberal site, perhaps you are the one out of place Conservative Democrat. Again, the bold is from a liberal and one that has been proud of the fact for all of his life.
GoneOffShore
(17,340 posts)You do (no sarcasm intended) win the thread.
And for the the OP -
And where did the UnRec button get to? I'm sure I saw it around somewhere.
Caretha
(2,737 posts)went, than where in the hell did the tombstones go?
RetroLounge
(37,250 posts)The fact that someone can put Conservative in their DU name and then post this steaming pile of shit that smells like something that dribbled out of Reagan's asshole is a perfect example of how people make DU suck.
and I won't even look at the names on the REC list, because I'm sure I can name most of them without trying.
PFO
RL
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)And yet this: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023711201
...is what happens.
Pathetic.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Well done!
Marr
(20,317 posts)Odd.
Summer Hathaway
(2,770 posts)reminds me of the old adage that it's the hit dog that yelps.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)has been addressed multiple times in this thread. Care to weigh in on a "Conservative"'s apparent activity on other websites?
Vanje
(9,766 posts)Heres what Number23's new friend has to say about Hurricane Katrina:
http://conservativedemocrat-demrep.blogspot.com/2006/08/katrina-what-were-you-thinking.html
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Kick the conservative fallacious flame-bait. I'm doing it, too.
Be sure and go over to Red-State and kick the posts by that other "ConservativeDemocrat," too.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)even after it is pointed out that someone with the same username making similar arguments with similar language posts at Red State.com
Rex
(65,616 posts)nt.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Not so sure about 3 or 8......but it's still well done, I suppose.
blue14u
(575 posts)well my hair is on fire!
you get (4) long noses for this BS!
NRaleighLiberal
(60,018 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/12593480
Fortunately Skinner seems unimpressed so far, but Electric Monk is pushing hard.....
Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)This OP snatched a lot of wigs.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)But I don't know why anyone would want to rec the OP considering what was pointed out multiple times throughout the thread.
DUers unwelcoming of a "Conservative" calling them wingnuts. It should come as no surprise at all that it got the reaction it did, or would have gotten had something similar been posted at any other time in DU's history.
Bolo Boffin
(23,796 posts)Kindly refrain from dictating how I should think and recommend here at DU, thanks.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)why you took the wording the way you did as patronizing and that was not my intention.
Rex
(65,616 posts)nt.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Democrats who support President Obama.
Cha
(297,464 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Shocked, I tell you.
Not gonna happen, but funny to see it!
Rex
(65,616 posts)You post crap titled, 'Top 20 signs you might be a counterproductive left wingnut."
Response to ConservativeDemocrat (Original post)
steve2470 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)HOWEVER, even Mario Andretti can't win a race with a broken VW bug
Boom Sound 416
(4,185 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)How ironic is it that it was posted by a "conservative" who boasts he voted for Reagan.
No one could see his intent.
No one could see his hope...
No one could see his intent...
No one could see where his loyalty lay...
Ooops...
Some could!
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)I'll still come here for good articles, and I will still rec & kick the interesting articles to the top.
Now, I will send this thread to the trash!
merrily
(45,251 posts)Popped into my mind for some reason.