General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI think some of the violent extremism among young men has an economic factor.
An economic base, so to speak.
Seemingly shut out from a secure future or a foreseeable path to that future must be extremely frustrating. That applies to cultures world wide, imo.
Skittles
(153,220 posts)NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)I think this is a nearly universal phenomenon, and probably not exclusively modern.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Among the most persistent of these pressures are those attending work. Exacerbating the pressures and forces attending the widespread unemployment that is part of the new economy compromising the stability of even those who have jobs people across the job spectrum are working significantly more hours for considerably less pay. Factoring in rising costs of housing, education, transportation, etc., we see that people are experiencing far more pressures compared to the recent past, while at the same time seeing the reduction of those supports (income, rest, etc.) that allowed them to sustain these pressures. As a result, these pressures become more intense, concentrated, and destructive.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/08/10/mass-murders-and-the-new-economy/
gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)LAGC
(5,330 posts)dem in texas
(2,674 posts)I read somewhere that you get violent extremism where you have a large population of young people and high unemployment. When you stop to think about, that makes sense. In some of the middle eastern countries, over half the population is under age 25 and the employment rate is running 40 t0 50 percent.
Igel
(35,374 posts)Which is what you're seeing in the ME. We like to think it's all pro-democracy, because the people most likely to speak our lingo in the social media we frequent are Western-trained and speak in those terms.
Look just past them and you see, as in Tunisia, as in Libya, as in Egypt, the expectation that democracy = prosperity, and that as soon as you have democracy things must be prosperous.
For them "democracy" is more an economic than a political term and emphasizes outcomes and not processes. In the US, educated folk tend to regard democracy as a purely political term that is compatible with a variety of economic systems. We also tend to regard economic outcomes as imperfectly correlated to economic systems, so a capitalist system may produce greater average/overall prosperity but allows depressions, a command-and-control system might produce some kinds of economic growth but in the long term will falter, etc. The popular view flattens those two layers of thought.
Moreover, it's not just economic but also sexual and social. No economic prosperity = can't afford wife = can't be properly adult and meet adult obligations = humiliation. And that's the dominant way of expressing such concerns.