Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(86,005 posts)
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 10:02 AM Sep 2013

Awkward

from Hayes Brown at Think Progress:




The Most Awkward Fifteen Minutes Of President Obama’s Week

NEW YORK, New York — President Barack Obama is set to take the stage to address the United Nation General Assembly for the fifth time . . .

Thanks to the way history has played out, the top places on the speaking order at the General Assembly are always held by two countries: Brazil and the United States. When Franklin Roosevelt was first developing the concept of the United Nations, a large part of his vision orbited around the idea of the Great Powers as global policemen. The United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union were to bear the brunt of the costs involved in providing global security, a group later expanded during negotiations to include China and France. That’s how we ended up with the Permanent Five members of the U.N. Security Council.

But Roosevelt had one more policeman in mind to help take care of matters in the Western Hemisphere: Brazil. FDR’s personal pitch for Beijing’s inclusion — the key reason China has a UN veto today — was a hard enough sell to the rest of the allies; Brazil was a bridge too far. As a consolation prize, Brazil was given the Presidency of the first and second General Assemblies. Since then, by precedence, Brazil has had the honor of speaking first after the U.N. Secretary-General opens the General Debate. So when current Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff took office, she made history as the first woman to open the G.A. She was immediately followed by Obama in his role as the host country of the U.N., and nothing’s changed that order this time around.

But the 2013 speeches might not be entirely pleasant for President Obama . . . Edward Snowden happened.

It’s entirely possible that Rousseff will use her time before the world to denounce foreign spying and at least allude to the United States’ current indiscretions. Since Obama will share the stage, however briefly, with Rousseff while she concludes her speech and he prepares to give his, that could be rather uncomfortable. Obama’s speechwriters may choose, as a consequence, to acknowledge the scandal in addition to focusing on Iran and Syria as they’ve planned. But even if Rousseff doesn’t poke Obama over NSA snooping, their moment in the sun together isn’t looking to be anything but an awkward time for Obama in a place where he’s more used to accepting accolades than scorn.


read: http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/09/23/2665801/the-most-awkward-fifteen-minutes-of-president-obamas-week/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Awkward (Original Post) bigtree Sep 2013 OP
Awkward, Vanje Sep 2013 #1
Or he's saying we got caught gopiscrap Sep 2013 #2
+1 JustAnotherGen Sep 2013 #3

Vanje

(9,766 posts)
1. Awkward,
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 10:07 AM
Sep 2013

but Pres. Obama is not likely to be blind-sided by any remarks Rousseff makes.

..since his administration has access to her communications, and can prepare rebuttals in advance.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Awkward