Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 06:47 PM Sep 2013

"Corporate subsidies" is the wrong term. What's the term we're looking for?

A subsidy is a direct payment to produce or not produce goods or services.

What do we call a system when people are told to purchase a product from a for-profit corporation under threat of being arrested by armed police, dragged through the time and expense of court prosecution and probably sent to prison?

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Corporate subsidies" is the wrong term. What's the term we're looking for? (Original Post) Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 OP
Handouts? Welfare? Coercion? xfundy Sep 2013 #1
There was no single payer in any of it. Puzzledtraveller Sep 2013 #2
There never was any single payer allowed into the debate, so the republicans didn't Egalitarian Thug Sep 2013 #5
I think the term is 'illegal'. JaneyVee Sep 2013 #3
Fascism. n/t Egalitarian Thug Sep 2013 #4
For those who are execs at Big Insurance firms, it would be called truedelphi Sep 2013 #6

xfundy

(5,105 posts)
1. Handouts? Welfare? Coercion?
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 08:19 PM
Sep 2013

Or are you talking about mandatory health insurance? In that case, it's something that everyone needs, just like car insurance. Reduces the tax burden from paying for emergency room visits, sickness spreading and becoming endemic, loss of productivity. Reduces the tax burden far more than it will cost.

Repigs stripped out single-payer.

Not going to speculate on your motives here.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
5. There never was any single payer allowed into the debate, so the republicans didn't
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 08:40 PM
Sep 2013

strip it out. Like the professionals that are expected to do the work, single payer was never allowed into the discussion at all by the Democrats.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
6. For those who are execs at Big Insurance firms, it would be called
Tue Sep 24, 2013, 09:30 PM
Sep 2013

"Profit and bonuses," and second third fourth and fifth homes. (Plus possibly ownership of a sports team or two as well.)

For those who are optimistic, I'd say the term is delusional. (Sure it could all lead down the primrose path of arriving at Universal Single Payer HC, but I actually think it will mean more laws and regs for those buying the "product." Who knows, should a consumer take up more than ten minutes of some doctor's time, and it could be, in the near future, a felony.)

For those of us who remember an ardent, passionate and seemingly sincere young man running for the Illinois Senate, it could be called a "betrayal of hope."

For FDR's ghost, it could be called "spinning in the grave."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Corporate subsidies...