Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 07:48 AM Sep 2013

Greenwald: "Sen. Ron Wyden: NSA 'repeatedly deceived the American people'"

Sen. Ron Wyden: NSA 'repeatedly deceived the American people'

In particular, the current chair of the Senate Committee created in the mid-1970s to oversee the intelligence community just so happens to be one of the nation's most steadfast and blind loyalists of and apologists for the National Security State: Dianne Feinstein. For years she has abused her position to shield and defend the NSA and related agencies rather than provide any meaningful oversight over it, which is a primary reason why it has grown into such an out-of-control and totally unaccountable behemoth.

Underscoring the purpose of yesterday's hearing (and the purpose of Feinstein's Committee more broadly): the witnesses the Committee first heard from were all Obama officials - Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, NSA chief Gen. Keith Alexander, Deputy Attorney James Cole - who vehemently defended every aspect of the NSA. At the conclusion of their testimony, Feinstein announced that it was very, very important to hear from the two non-governmental witnesses the Committee had invited: virulent NSA defender Ben Wittes of the Brooking Institution and virulent NSA defender Timothy Edgar, a former Obama national security official. Hearing only from dedicated NSA apologists as witnesses: that's "oversight" for Dianne Feinstein and her oversight Committee.

But there are two members of that Committee who actually do take seriously its oversight mandate: Democrats Ron Wyden and Mark Udall. Those two spent years publicly winking and hinting that the NSA under President Obama was engaged in all sorts of radical and abusive domestic surveillance (although - despite the absolute immunity protection they enjoy as Senators under the Constitution - they took no action, and instead waited for Edward Snowden (who had no such immunity) to bravely step up and reveal to the American people specifically what these two Senators kept hinting at).

Wyden spoke yesterday for 6 minutes - part of of it as monologue and part of it questioning Gen. Alexander - and it's really worth watching the video, embedded below. The Oregon Democrat condemned what he called "the intrusive, constitutionally flawed surveillance system" the NSA built. About Snowden's whistleblowing, he said that NSA officials should have known from "a quick read of history, in America, the truth always managed to come out." And his primary point was this: "the leadership of NSA built an intelligence collection system that repeatedly deceived the American people."

I'm more and more amazed every day by the influence that one ordinary(ish) citizen like Snowden can have on national affairs when he has the means, motive and opportunity. Thank god for people like him, who see evil and are willing to take a stand against it.
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Greenwald: "Sen. Ron Wyden: NSA 'repeatedly deceived the American people'" (Original Post) GliderGuider Sep 2013 OP
"...totally unaccountable..."? randome Sep 2013 #1
Accountable in what ways? Accountable to who? Far closer to totally unaccountable than clearly TheKentuckian Sep 2013 #21
Even the FISA court reins in the NSA on occasion. randome Sep 2013 #22
The tech support rep at your ISP has greater oversight and is held to stricter account than the NSA TheKentuckian Sep 2013 #36
"Thank god for people like him, who see evil and are willing to take a stand against it." Scurrilous Sep 2013 #2
+1 BenzoDia Sep 2013 #5
;-) GliderGuider Sep 2013 #8
... Scurrilous Sep 2013 #12
This^^^^ stonecutter357 Sep 2013 #11
Nailed it...nt SidDithers Sep 2013 #13
Oh has the US joined the Olympic boycott? Has Obama said no to the Olympics? Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #14
Right, because if he doesn't stand against everything LondonReign2 Sep 2013 #19
that's pretty damn hilarious stupidicus Sep 2013 #20
Let a Russian Citizen expose evil in Russia. sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #23
+1 Enthusiast Sep 2013 #31
What happens in Russia, is the business of Russians, ronnie624 Sep 2013 #25
What? hootinholler Sep 2013 #28
Wyden and Udall have carried the load for democracy. Octafish Sep 2013 #3
Thanks for this important 'reminder' of Church's and for snappyturtle Sep 2013 #16
All while winking and nodding.... Historic NY Sep 2013 #17
I didn't sign off on it. In fact, I voted for a ''constitutional scholar'' to correct the abuses. Octafish Sep 2013 #26
How can you be a suspect.... Historic NY Sep 2013 #29
NSA tells the FBI I don't agree with the war or even just the Banksters. Octafish Sep 2013 #30
Excellent post, Octafish. Enthusiast Sep 2013 #32
Greenwald: How the NSA classifies Drone opponents: ''Threats'' and ''Adversaries'' Octafish Sep 2013 #34
+1. Excellent article. It is no surprise that the PTB are trying to discredit Greenwald. Enthusiast Sep 2013 #35
This stuff... whttevrr Sep 2013 #4
"Thank god for people like him" zeemike Sep 2013 #6
k and r nashville_brook Sep 2013 #7
You should be thanking the people of Oregon who were smart enough to elect him davidpdx Sep 2013 #9
I thought that was pretty much the dictionary meaning of oversight (Congressional kind) kenny blankenship Sep 2013 #10
Thank you Edward Snowden. eom dotymed Sep 2013 #15
Ron Wyden is my Senator JEB Sep 2013 #18
Direct link to video of Wyden's remarks...actually 2 videos: snappyturtle Sep 2013 #24
thank you, Ed Snowden, and Sen. Wyden. grasswire Sep 2013 #27
Kicked and recommended....nt Enthusiast Sep 2013 #33
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
1. "...totally unaccountable..."?
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 08:19 AM
Sep 2013

You can definitely argue that there isn't enough accountability but hyperbole like this deserves ridicule.

The harder Greenwald tries to sell us his goods, the more irrelevant he becomes.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
21. Accountable in what ways? Accountable to who? Far closer to totally unaccountable than clearly
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 10:58 AM
Sep 2013

accountable.

Your hyperbole is the next person's close and reasonable approximation. You may as well be screaming "hyperbole" when someone says they will be over at six and arrives either at 5:57 or 6:04. Hell, in this case you are damn near hollering "hyperbole" because it is 5:59:59.

You are splitting the hair so much that I fear you will slice an atom in the process and kill yourself and your whole city with you.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
22. Even the FISA court reins in the NSA on occasion.
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 11:09 AM
Sep 2013

Add to that the fact that many of the requested warrants are initially turned down until sufficient safeguards are added and there is definitely accountability. Like I said, there can be more but to say there is none is wrong on the face of it.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
36. The tech support rep at your ISP has greater oversight and is held to stricter account than the NSA
Sun Sep 29, 2013, 08:26 AM
Sep 2013

Rein in? What are the sanctions for violations? What are the consequences for wrong doing? What are the corrective measures for being wrong? Having a finger wagged at you and being given corrections that if you don't do them is without consequence is not accountability and sure as hell accountability gets very flimsy when in order to be even fakely accountable the "court" must wait for self reporting. If anyone goes cowboy and cuts them out of the loop then they just wait for the next report and rubberstamp or scold as they deem appropriate.

A grade school child is more accountable.

There is ZERO accountability to the American people on who's behalf the entire effort is for. Hell, the idea was for the people to be kept ignorant, call that accountability all you want but it is being an accessory after the fact. Your arguments just help to make sure there is little to no accountability by supporting and advancing flimsy pretense as serious effort.

Scurrilous

(38,687 posts)
2. "Thank god for people like him, who see evil and are willing to take a stand against it."
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 08:23 AM
Sep 2013

Rubbish. Get back to me when he takes a stand against the evil going on in Russia.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
14. Oh has the US joined the Olympic boycott? Has Obama said no to the Olympics?
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 10:33 AM
Sep 2013

Or are we still not taking a stand on that? Last time I heard Obama said it would be wrong not to attend and spend at the Putin Winter Games.
You can't pretend to be taking both a stand against Russia and a plane to Sochi.

 

stupidicus

(2,570 posts)
20. that's pretty damn hilarious
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 10:56 AM
Sep 2013

like every dogooder in the world has to tackle ALL the evil everywhere to be entitled to kudos for the good they do.

What passes for rationality and reason on this board sometimes qualifies as an evil that should be stamped out.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
23. Let a Russian Citizen expose evil in Russia.
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 11:19 AM
Sep 2013

Snowden did his duty as an American citizen. He wasn't born in Russia, he was born here. Like Ellsberg and every other courageous individual who took their job as Citizens seriously.

ronnie624

(5,764 posts)
25. What happens in Russia, is the business of Russians,
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 11:31 AM
Sep 2013

Last edited Fri Sep 27, 2013, 12:43 PM - Edit history (1)

not nosy Americans who point away from their own government, the crimes of which are much worse. If Russians were yammering about US domestic issues, I would tell them to mind their own business, because it is our responsibility to reform our own government.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
3. Wyden and Udall have carried the load for democracy.
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 08:46 AM
Sep 2013

Those making excuses for NSA domestic spying are carrying a load of something else.

BTW: NSA spied on Frank Church, the liberal Democratic senator who warned us in 1976:

“That capability at any time could be turned around on the American people and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything: telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn’t matter. There would be no place to hide. If this government ever became a tyranny, if a dictator ever took charge in this country, the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back, because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the reach of the government to know. Such is the capability of this technology.

I don’t want to see this country ever go across the bridge. I know the capability that is there to make tyranny total in America, and we must see it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision, so that we never cross over that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return.” -- Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) liberal, progressive, World War II combat veteran

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Octafish/277

Historic NY

(37,452 posts)
17. All while winking and nodding....
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 10:51 AM
Sep 2013

please they knew the security apparatus was going to change after Sept. 11th. what did they expect. America was fairly lax with domestic security issues and most people took them for granted. I've been caught up in a couple issues in Britian all related to "the troubles", while traveling, I always said we don't do security well here. When and if, things would change, it would never go back, the never again would take us all in its wake. Technology and its exploitation are the central defense our security apparatus uses and one way or another we have all signed off on it, years ago.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
26. I didn't sign off on it. In fact, I voted for a ''constitutional scholar'' to correct the abuses.
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 11:37 AM
Sep 2013

Yet, the Bill of Rights remain under assault and I am considered a suspect, based solely on my opposition to secret government and wars for profit that are illegal, immoral, unnecessary and disastrous for democracy.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
30. NSA tells the FBI I don't agree with the war or even just the Banksters.
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 07:52 PM
Sep 2013

Lookit what they did to OWS:



FBI Document—“(DELETED)” Plots To Kill Occupy Leaders “If Deemed Necessary”

By Dave Lindorff
June 27, 2013 WhoWhatWhy.org

Would you be shocked to learn that the FBI apparently knew that some organization, perhaps even a law enforcement agency or private security outfit, had contingency plans to assassinate peaceful protestors in a major American city — and did nothing to intervene?

Would you be surprised to learn that this intelligence comes not from a shadowy whistle-blower but from the FBI itself – specifically, from a document obtained from Houston FBI office last December, as part of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by the Washington, DC-based Partnership for Civil Justice Fund?

To repeat: this comes from the FBI itself. The question, then, is: What did the FBI do about it?

The Plot

Remember the Occupy Movement? The peaceful crowds that camped out in the center of a number of cities in the fall of 2011, calling for some recognition by local, state and federal authorities that our democratic system was out of whack, controlled by corporate interests, and in need of immediate repair?

That movement swept the US beginning in mid-September 2011. When, in early October, the movement came to Houston, Texas, law enforcement officials and the city’s banking and oil industry executives freaked out perhaps even more so than they did in some other cities. The push-back took the form of violent assaults by police on Occupy activists, federal and local surveillance of people seen as organizers, infiltration by police provocateurs—and, as crazy as it sounds, some kind of plot to assassinate the “leaders” of this non-violent and leaderless movement.

CONTINUED...

http://whowhatwhy.com/2013/06/27/fbi-document-deleted-plots-to-kill-occupy-leaders-if-deemed-necessary/



Secret Police. Secret Spying. Secret Laws. Secret Detentions. Secret Executions...Anyone seeing a pattern, here?

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
32. Excellent post, Octafish.
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 08:26 AM
Sep 2013

It was stroke of genius that Occupy chose not to emphasize the leadership role. Leaders would have become targets.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
34. Greenwald: How the NSA classifies Drone opponents: ''Threats'' and ''Adversaries''
Sat Sep 28, 2013, 08:04 PM
Sep 2013
UK detention of Reprieve activist consistent with NSA's view of drone opponents as 'threats' and 'adversaries'

A top secret NSA document provides context for yesterday's abusive detention of Baraa Shiban

Glenn Greenwald
The Guardian, Sept. 25, 2013

A well-known and highly respected Yemeni anti-drone activist was detained yesterday by UK officials under that country's "anti-terrorism" law at Gatwick Airport, where he had traveled to speak at an event. Baraa Shiban, the project co-ordinator for the London-based legal charity Reprieve, was held for an hour and a half and repeatedly questioned about his anti-drone work and political views regarding human rights abuses in Yemen.

When he objected that his political views had no relevance to security concerns, UK law enforcement officials threatened to detain him for the full nine hours allowed by the Terrorism Act of 2000, the same statute that was abused by UK officials last month to detain my partner, David Miranda, for nine hours.

Shiban tells his story today, here, in the Guardian, and recounts how the UK official told him "he had detained me not merely because I was from Yemen, but also because of Reprieve's work investigating and criticising the efficacy of US drone strikes in my country."

The notion that Shiban posed some sort of security threat was absurd on its face. As the Guardian reported Tuesday, "he visited the UK without incident earlier this summer and testified in May to a US congressional hearing on the impact of the covert drone programme in Yemen."

Viewing anti-drone activism as indicative of a terrorism threat is noxious. As Reprieve's Cory Crider put it yesterday, "if there were any doubt the UK was abusing its counter-terrorism powers to silence critics, this ends it."

But perceiving drone opponents as "threats" or even "adversaries" is hardly new. Top secret US government documents obtained by the Guardian from NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden characterize even the most basic political and legal opposition to drone attacks as part of "propaganda campaigns" from America's "adversaries".

CONTINUED with LINKS etc...

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/sep/25/nsa-uk-drone-opponents-threats

Russian Proverb: The tallest blade of grass is the first mown.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
35. +1. Excellent article. It is no surprise that the PTB are trying to discredit Greenwald.
Sun Sep 29, 2013, 08:06 AM
Sep 2013

Truth tellers are now seen as the enemy. There's a pertinent quote about that somewhere.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
6. "Thank god for people like him"
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 09:16 AM
Sep 2013

Amen.
Without them we would still be ignorant of what they are doing to our constitution....which would please some I suppose.
K&R for keeping this out there.

kenny blankenship

(15,689 posts)
10. I thought that was pretty much the dictionary meaning of oversight (Congressional kind)
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 10:02 AM
Sep 2013

...the current chair of the Senate Committee created in the mid-1970s to oversee the ______________ just so happens to be one of the nation's most steadfast and blind loyalists of and apologists for the ______________.

snappyturtle

(14,656 posts)
24. Direct link to video of Wyden's remarks...actually 2 videos:
Fri Sep 27, 2013, 11:28 AM
Sep 2013
&feature=share&list=UUsd3UEaoLoqX60P88BdpGGw

The second video automatically plays after the first and is comprised of
Wyden's post hearing remarks.

Regardless of speculation about the messengers that is triggered
everytime the mere mention of the names Snowden/Greenwald
appear, we need to listen to the message. Some up thread
contend we citizens have signed off years ago on the surveillance
techniques our gov't uses. I object. How could I have signed off
on these techniques and practices when they were implemented
under a less than transparent environment?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Greenwald: "Sen. Ron...