Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Fri Oct 4, 2013, 09:40 PM Oct 2013

Why did the media keep referring to the Kenya hostage site as "an upscale mall"?

People were being held hostages. What difference did it make what the target demographic of the incident site was?

Were they saying it would have been ok if the hostages had been held at a discount store? That that would have made it OK for all those folks to be slaughtered in the crossfire?

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

uppityperson

(115,681 posts)
1. I think to show it was "regular" people, people who would frequent such a place vs them low downs
Fri Oct 4, 2013, 09:47 PM
Oct 2013

who would be hanging out somewhere else? Also because it was an upscale mall. I don't think it was to say it was ok for anyone to be killed. Though thinking about it now, maybe they were saying it was worse because "it could be you"?

Iris

(15,669 posts)
2. In reports I heard, people who live there and shop there talked about the security that was always
Fri Oct 4, 2013, 10:01 PM
Oct 2013

on duty. That's why people wanted to shop there but even that wasn't enough to save them. I think it has something to do with that - that this was supposed to be somewhat safe, relatively speaking.

flamingdem

(39,328 posts)
3. The NYT had an editorial written by a local
Fri Oct 4, 2013, 10:03 PM
Oct 2013

who went to the mall. He explained that the attack was partially against the mall as a symbol of decadence.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
10. That isn't something we heard from MOST of the Western media
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 07:10 PM
Oct 2013

Generally, it was spun as "Them crazy muslins wanted to kill them sum Christians".



(no, nothing was funny in this shit, but that was basically the line we were fed).

It would have looked quite different to everyone if it was reported as being, at least in part, the poor lashing out at the rich.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,365 posts)
11. I heard it quite a lot
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 07:36 PM
Oct 2013

It was explained that with a lot of foreigners and wealthier Kenyans using the mall, it was seen as a symbolic target - just as the WTC was. But you shouldn't think that it was 'the poor' doing anything - it was people who want to be seen attacking Western-influenced society.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
12. OK. Yet it does show how the resonance of an issue like inequality
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 02:40 AM
Oct 2013

can be used to further agendas ranging from cynical to downright scary.

Schema Thing

(10,283 posts)
4. I don't know, but did have a visceral :ugh: moment
Fri Oct 4, 2013, 10:42 PM
Oct 2013


when I saw the first images and realized that the "mall" the news reports were discussing in Kenya didn't need the quotes I just put around it - it very much did in fact look like any mall you'd see all across these United States of 'murka.


And I find that horrible.

Hekate

(90,827 posts)
5. .... As opposed to a village marketplace? It evokes a whole different image.
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 12:32 AM
Oct 2013

I have a friend who should be back from Kenya by tomorrow. When others recently asked me if I was worried about her my answer was that the kind of tours she takes would not have her within miles of an "upscale mall," but rather in a village marketplace if the group wanted a souvenir.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
6. Maybe all those Iraqis getting blown up should have been doing so at "upscale malls."
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 12:39 AM
Oct 2013

Then somebody might have noticed. At the same time the global media were going nuts about Nairobi, that many people were getting blown up every day in Iraq. But they were doing it in market places and in front of mosques.

How very "them" of those dead Iraqis. As opposed to the "us," you know, the ones who aspire to have a place in that global system that allows us to hang out in "upscale malls" in exotic locales with other Westerners and African elites.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
7. It might make more sense if you've been to the developing world
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 12:58 AM
Oct 2013

If you're talking about a developing world city, saying "upscale mall" immediately tells the reader a lot about it (controlled access, lots of expats, western brands, largely resented by the incredibly poor neighborhood made out of corrugated tin sheets around it, etc.)

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
9. because few people there can afford anything in that mall
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 01:18 AM
Oct 2013

Most of the customers were the local wealthy and tourists. That area isn't like America... it has far more poor people that can't afford to shop there.

http://www.homeless-international.org/our-work/where-we-work/kenya
Population: 39 million
Number of people in slums: 3.9 million
Percentage of urban population in slums: 55%
Partner organisation: Pamoja Trust; National Cooperative Housing Union (NACHU)

Kenya’s slum population is growing by almost 6 per cent each year. The situation in the capital, Nairobi, is typical of the challenges facing poor people throughout Kenya’s urban areas. Demand for land means that over half of Nairobi’s population is crammed onto just 1.5 per cent of the total land area. The threat of eviction places many people in constant fear of having their home destroyed.

Housing for Nairobi’s slum dwellers typically consists of shanties made of mud, wattle and iron sheets. There are as many as 250 shanties per hectare – in comparison, housing density in the UK reaches around 100 units per hectare in cities and 30 elsewhere.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why did the media keep re...