Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 07:24 AM Oct 2013

If you read only one article today, this should be it.

It's by Thomas Frank who wrote "What's The Matter With Kansas". It's actually an excerpt from his 2008 book, "The Wrecking Crew: How Conservatives Ruined Government, Enriched Themselves, and Beggared the Nation". Great background on the nutcases currently driving us over the cliff. Remember, this piece was penned in 2008 and things are much worse now- no I'm not blaming that on President Obama. It would be worse had RMoney been elected.

Reaching for the pillars: The conservative plan is sabotage

Conservative crusaders have often taken up the question of what to do about government. The utopian dream is to wreck it, an impossible goal that is nevertheless the frequent object of conservative reverie. “The mystery of government is not how Washington works,” writes the humorist P. J. O’Rourke, “but how to make it stop.” There are silver-bullet theories for destroying the state: repeal the amendment that allowed for the income tax; bring back the gold standard and thus break the state’s power over money; or—most ingeniously—interpret the eminent domain clause of the Constitution so as to invalidate almost the entire body of government regulation enacted in the twentieth century.

Every now and then conservatives give it a try. “By the time we finish this poker game, there may not be a federal government left, which would suit me just fine,” boasted Tom DeLay, the spiritual leader of the Republican Congress elected in 1994. Before long DeLay and his idealistic colleagues had parlayed a budget disagreement with President Clinton into a full-blown government shutdown, which some of them celebrated as a sweet taste of things to come, an overwhelming demonstration of their supreme ideological point. Right-wing Washington chattered gleefully about how the good folks “outside the Beltway” didn’t really care about the shutdown, and Texas senator Phil Gramm took to the airwaves to scoff, “have you missed the government?”

<big snip>

This is a theory of political venality that is deeply entangled with venality itself. When a free-market theorist says that the answer to corruption is no government and is then seconded by the leading corruptionist of the time, a “free-marketeer” who says that no government is the only way you will stop people like him, we have come very close to a union of theory and practice. Free-market theory, that is, and practices that should have turned the stomach of every believer in democracy. Seen this way, corruption is just another way to attack the liberal state, a sort of street theater in which the right-wing provocateur makes his point about government by demonstration. Give him what he wants, or he’ll do it again.

<snip>

Liberalism has indeed proven vulnerable to the tactics of its swaggering, bullying foes, but to call this suicide is like saying that your window got in the way of my brick, or that your nose smacked my fist. The correct term for the disasters that have disabled the liberal state is vandalism, conducted by a movement that refuses to play by liberalism’s rules. It loots the Treasury, dynamites the dam, takes a crowbar to the monument, and throws a wrench into the gears. It slams the locomotive into reverse, tosses something heavy on the throttle, and jumps for it.

<snip>

The middle-class America that Falwell and Co. wrecked with such gusto is not going to be easy to rebuild. For one thing, the balance of social power has been so decisively altered since those days that the political landscape itself has been radically transformed. Dramatic economic inequality of the kind conservatism has engineered has inevitably brought political inequality with it. The rich vote at higher rates than others, they contribute greater amounts to candidates, and, should they choose, they are able to afford today’s expensive campaigns for public office. They can also subsidize authors, newspaper columnists, academics, magazines, and TV shows; they can fund the careers of friendly politicians and buy off dubious ones; and they can reward right-thinking regulators and bureaucrats when these worthies’ stints in government are done. They can launch cable TV networks, buy newspapers, and bankroll think-tank operations charged with making their idiosyncratic personal ideas into the common sense of the millions.

<snip>

http://www.salon.com/2013/10/02/reaching_for_the_pillars_the_conservative_plan_is_sabotage/

54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you read only one article today, this should be it. (Original Post) cali Oct 2013 OP
"The conservative plan is sabotage" BlueMTexpat Oct 2013 #1
you bet. Love Frank. I learn so much from him cali Oct 2013 #2
The piece is by Thomas Frank for those who like credit where it is due... Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #16
um, it is. cali Oct 2013 #18
So it is. But a credit should not be buried in text. It should stand out. Bluenorthwest Oct 2013 #23
oh for fuck's sake. first you say it should be in the OP cali Oct 2013 #26
A credit should not be buried in text? What style book are you reading from? Demit Oct 2013 #51
Looks like it is in the first line... truebluegreen Oct 2013 #20
So that is ...treason. dixiegrrrrl Oct 2013 #7
It is in my book...and according to the dictionary. n/t proReality Oct 2013 #30
Your avatar pic is one of my favorite dixiegrrrrl Oct 2013 #32
Actually the word "treason" comes to mind. maddiemom Oct 2013 #14
He's brilliant BeyondGeography Oct 2013 #3
Couldn't agree with you more. cali Oct 2013 #4
he's right about being possibly beyond the point where we can recover Doctor_J Oct 2013 #5
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Oct 2013 #6
Thanks for the k&r, Uncle Joe cali Oct 2013 #8
Good morning. Uncle Joe Oct 2013 #9
It is not an ideal solution but dotymed Oct 2013 #10
Quick question Pakhet Oct 2013 #13
and what about purple states? cali Oct 2013 #15
You boot them out summarily Doctor_J Oct 2013 #28
and everyone else that lives in those places? justabob Oct 2013 #35
It is not ideal. dotymed Oct 2013 #53
This IS the United States... bjobotts Oct 2013 #46
Who in their right mind would put their cake under the sink? Agony Oct 2013 #11
K&R marmar Oct 2013 #12
Thanks for posting this. It's an excellent read. russspeakeasy Oct 2013 #17
you are most welcome. cali Oct 2013 #19
Excellent read although thet have more than one goal- theft malaise Oct 2013 #21
Excellent read. Thanks. truebluegreen Oct 2013 #22
Thanks, Cali. dgibby Oct 2013 #24
k and r, and bookmarking for after caffeine niyad Oct 2013 #25
It's good to get a grasp on the ideas driving the vandals JEB Oct 2013 #27
Great read and... Oilwellian Oct 2013 #29
Frank really is one of the shrapest and most tomg Oct 2013 #31
k & r! lonestarnot Oct 2013 #33
"The conservative plan is sabotage " ProSense Oct 2013 #34
Yep. Been their plan for years. SomeGuyInEagan Oct 2013 #39
I live in a well known blue state. It's working here as a grass roots movement. freshwest Oct 2013 #54
K&R. Excellent article. Overseas Oct 2013 #36
Big K&R nt riderinthestorm Oct 2013 #37
Frank certainly provides a framework to use while pondering the insanity... Agony Oct 2013 #38
The article was excellent, I am going to have to buy the book LiberalArkie Oct 2013 #40
Thomas Frank is amazing. SheilaT Oct 2013 #41
He is good! Thanks, Cali. mountain grammy Oct 2013 #42
I've loved this guy since his Baffler days. ancianita Oct 2013 #43
Here's Thomas Frank lecturing on The Wrecking Crew. OnyxCollie Oct 2013 #44
recommended arely staircase Oct 2013 #45
that is one powerful article. BlancheSplanchnik Oct 2013 #47
You up to it? Jim Warren Oct 2013 #48
that particular paragraph jumped out at me too cali Oct 2013 #49
And what made these conservatives so rich that they can buy a country? fasttense Oct 2013 #50
k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Oct 2013 #52
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
2. you bet. Love Frank. I learn so much from him
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 07:29 AM
Oct 2013

I'd never even heard of this guy whose book he says is foundational to modern "conservatives"- and by conservatives I mean nutcases.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
16. The piece is by Thomas Frank for those who like credit where it is due...
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 09:26 AM
Oct 2013

I think his full name should be in the OP, but I'm big into that sort of thing.....

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
18. um, it is.
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 09:29 AM
Oct 2013

first sentence in the OP:

It's by Thomas Frank who wrote "What's The Matter With Kansas". It's actually an excerpt from his 2008 book, "The Wrecking Crew: How Conservatives Ruined Government, Enriched Themselves, and Beggared the Nation".

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
23. So it is. But a credit should not be buried in text. It should stand out.
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 09:36 AM
Oct 2013

His name here is included in text that looks the same as the text Mr Frank wrote. Authorship should be apparent at a glance. The author's text and the introduction by another should also be well deleniated. Just my opinion. Not a big deal real really.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
26. oh for fuck's sake. first you say it should be in the OP
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 10:05 AM
Oct 2013

when it's pointed out to you that his full name is right in front of your nose- which points out that YOU didn't read the op- you whine that it should stand out.

 

Demit

(11,238 posts)
51. A credit should not be buried in text? What style book are you reading from?
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 08:09 AM
Oct 2013

The authorship was apparent at a glance to anyone who read the FIRST FOUR WORDS OF THE FIRST SENTENCE. Jesus.

BeyondGeography

(39,380 posts)
3. He's brilliant
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 07:29 AM
Oct 2013

His opening notes in Harper's are reason enough to keep subscribing. Way ahead of the curve.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
4. Couldn't agree with you more.
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 07:34 AM
Oct 2013

I learn so much from Frank.

Albert Jay Nock?

Never even heard of him before I read this.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
5. he's right about being possibly beyond the point where we can recover
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 08:35 AM
Oct 2013

This country is in bad, bad shape. I have some ideas about what might be done, but they are not publishable at du and would require a few thousand people who are willing to go well outside their comfort zones.

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
10. It is not an ideal solution but
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 08:49 AM
Oct 2013

perhaps we should allow theses idiots to secede from America. The red states that these idiots reside in are the biggest takers of government money. They attempt to destroy America at every chance. They definitely keep America from being a Progressive,
benevolent country where people come first.
"They" have a nightmare vision of a country where the wealthy get everything, and it has corrupted the America that most of
us strive for.
It wouldn't take long for their "country" to collapse, without taking all of us down with them.
We need a solution quickly.
A progressive country will never occur with corporatist ideology holding un-democratic influence and control of "our govt."

Perhaps we or they should be allowed to secede and pursue the govt. we desire.

It is not ideal but may be necessary for our survival.

Pakhet

(520 posts)
13. Quick question
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 09:06 AM
Oct 2013

I agree with you, but since all of the red states aren't together in a block, how do we keep them out of the blue states? And how to make the ones living in blue states from wrecking havoc? Because you know that they know, deep down, they have it better blue than red...

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
28. You boot them out summarily
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 10:23 AM
Oct 2013
And how to make the ones living in blue states from wrecking havoc? Because you know that they know, deep down, they have it better blue than red...


Send them to a red hell hole like Mississippi or Utah. In order to live in the US a person would have to abide by the laws. First offense would get them deported to the CSA.

Also after the split there would be an amnesty period where the psychopaths in CA and NY and the like would be free to go to MS or TX, while the sane people in the Banana Republic would be free to move to America.

justabob

(3,069 posts)
35. and everyone else that lives in those places?
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 10:48 AM
Oct 2013

You're basically saying fuck you to everyone else who lives in those places. I see you so graciously offered to let us into your Royal Blue Utopias... are you going to pay to move multiple generations of my family who have made their homes here, lived their whole lives here in this "hell hole"? I am so tired of all this effing regional righteousness that goes on around here. I am sure Texas is at the top of your list to be punished even though it is actually quite purple, not red (save for Colin and Tarrant Counties, and even those aren't cherry red any more).

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
53. It is not ideal.
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 09:53 AM
Oct 2013

I have no idea how the logistics could be accomplished.
I do believe that unless money ceases to be the God that the "top" (how insane that wealth is the measuring stick) PTB are allowed to ruin America, there will be a civil war.

 

bjobotts

(9,141 posts)
46. This IS the United States...
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 11:41 PM
Oct 2013

Allowing one to secede would end up damaging all the other states. Remember those progressives living in Texas who don't have a majority yet would be forced into a secession they don't want. We are in this together and greedy selfish divisive insanity should be rooted out not given into. We have solutions...they are just being blocked by a greedy few.

Agony

(2,605 posts)
11. Who in their right mind would put their cake under the sink?
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 08:52 AM
Oct 2013

...and then use that as a rationale for bludgeoning people (government). Conservatives and their friends, apparently.

"If you have a big cake, and you put it under the sink and then you wonder why the cockroaches are in your kitchen, I don’t think any sprays or blocking the holes in the walls are going to get rid of the cockroaches. You’ve got to throw the cake in the trash so that the cockroaches don’t have something to come for."

dgibby

(9,474 posts)
24. Thanks, Cali.
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 09:50 AM
Oct 2013

Great article, but I do disagree with him on one point. He says that the Conservative utopian dream to wreck the country is an impossible goal. I think it's not only possible, but probable at this point.

 

JEB

(4,748 posts)
27. It's good to get a grasp on the ideas driving the vandals
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 10:20 AM
Oct 2013

that are destroying the people's economy, the environment, our government, everything that makes our country our country.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
34. "The conservative plan is sabotage "
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 10:48 AM
Oct 2013

"In this sense, conservative Washington is a botch that will keep on working even after its formal demise. It defunded the constituencies of the liberal state while constructing a plutocracy that will stand regardless of who wins the next few elections and that will weight our politics rightward for years."

Yet people pretend it's only happening in Washington. Across the country, Republicans are digging in to help their Washington counterparts sabotage government.

Look at Wisconsin. Texas would benefit greatly if Wendy Davis won.

SomeGuyInEagan

(1,515 posts)
39. Yep. Been their plan for years.
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 09:06 PM
Oct 2013

Nothing really new here if you have been paying attention. At least they used have the decency to hide it ... But there really is no need to hide it as so many with power or voice pretend that is not their agenda.

Agony

(2,605 posts)
38. Frank certainly provides a framework to use while pondering the insanity...
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 08:40 PM
Oct 2013

reading this brought to mind two other writings on this subject.

a recent one about cooperative/competitive genotypes
http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2013/09/dilemma-cooperative-gene.html
"
In the simplest terms, at some level the efforts of human society are being directed by the interaction of two genetic predispositions.
The first predisposition views society as a loose-knit group of individuals or family units who are competing with each other for scarce resources.
The second predisposition views society as a tight-knit group of individuals or family units who are cooperating to share scarce resources.
"

and this one from 2006, Bob Altemeyer on Authoritarians endorsed by John Dean of all people.
http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/

"
This book was written in 2006, halfway through George W. Bush’s second term as president. A great deal was wrong with America then, and I thought the research on authoritarian personalities could explain a lot of it. Since then a new administration has been elected, and although it has had to deal with a very serious economic crisis brought on by others, it is taking steps to correct some of what is wrong.

However, the forces that largely caused the problems have remained on the scene, and are more active today than ever before. As I try to show in the “Comment on the Tea Party Movement” (link to the left), the research findings in this book apply at least as strongly to America today as they did four years ago. Indeed, the events of 2009 and 2010 have confirmed conclusion after conclusion in The Authoritarians. I wrote in 2006 that the authoritarians in America were not going to go away if they lost the 2008 election, that they would be infuriated if a new president tried to carry out his mandate. That has certainly been the case.
"

(John Dean on Robert Altemeyer)
http://verdict.justia.com/2012/04/06/good-luck-wisconsin-youve-got-a-classic-authoritarian-governor

If the conservative/competitive/authoritarian exists as represented here we have a long haul ahead of us.

thanks for the article, cali

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
41. Thomas Frank is amazing.
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 09:48 PM
Oct 2013

He's insightful, thoughtful, and knowledgeable. Probably a lot of other adjectives, but those are the first ones to come to mind.

I'm not sure a lot of people get it that he is actually from Kansas. They see the title "What's the Matter With Kansas" and cheerfully agree there is something very wrong there, but don't read that excellent book. He actually grew up in Kansas, and a friend of mine was one of his 7th grade teachers. I met him not long after the '04 election, when he was back home and connected to a bunch of us Democrats there.

He grew up in an affluent suburb in Kansas. Overland Park, I think, but it might have been Leawood or another one of those. They're suburbs of Kansas City, which is in Missouri which is a different state altogether. His upbringing was very Republican, and he told us that he grew up thinking his father, some sort of well-paid white collar worker, really did work very hard. It was much later that he understood the difference between that kind of hard work and the hard work of the blue collar class.

If you're not familiar with The Baffler, (http://thebaffler.com/), check it out.

Jim Warren

(2,736 posts)
48. You up to it?
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 01:44 AM
Oct 2013
"Liberalism has indeed proven vulnerable to the tactics of its swaggering, bullying foes, but to call this suicide is like saying that your window got in the way of my brick, or that your nose smacked my fist. The correct term for the disasters that have disabled the liberal state is vandalism, conducted by a movement that refuses to play by liberalism’s rules. It loots the Treasury, dynamites the dam, takes a crowbar to the monument, and throws a wrench into the gears. It slams the locomotive into reverse, tosses something heavy on the throttle, and jumps for it."

Wondering how many libs/progs are up to a fight of this nature?
 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
50. And what made these conservatives so rich that they can buy a country?
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 07:23 AM
Oct 2013

Capitalism. Maybe It's no at all about politics but about a broken maniacal economic system.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you read only one arti...