Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FourScore

(9,704 posts)
Sun Oct 6, 2013, 11:57 PM Oct 2013

Why You Want to Live in a Blue State

The Factoid That Explains Why You Want to Live in a Blue State
BY MICHAEL SCHAFFER @michaelschaffer

How much of a difference does living in a Democratic-run state make? Here's the difference between what a family of three—a working parent with two dependants—would have to make in Minnesota and Alabama in order to qualify for subsidized insurance. Meaning: In Alabama, a family that brings in as little as $3,500 a year is out of luck. In Minnesota, the country's most generous state, that family can get help if their income is up to $40,000.



A key difference: Minnesota has the country's most generous Medicaid eligibility rules. Alabama, on the other hand, makes it almost impossible for the working poor to get Medicaid. And now it is among those states refusing to participate in the Affordable Care Act's expansion of Medicaid. As a result, a low-income family of one adult and two children wouldn't benefit from the new law unless its income is above the poverty line, which would be about $19,500 a year. At higher incomes, the family would become eligible for subsidies in the new federally run exchange—money that state officials have no power to reject, as Alabama's have. In other words, if your 2014 income is between $3,500 and $19,500, you're out of luck.

The American Prospect's Paul Waldman created a handy chart that lays out the red-blue differences across the country in 2013. Our numbers, above, come from the Kaiser Commision on Medicaid and the Uninsured's projections for 2014. And while it's true that Minnesota is an exceedingly generous outlier even by blue, northern standards, Alabama is in good company at the ruby-red bottom of the chart.

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115027/obamacare-medicaid-expansion-blue-states-are-more-generous?utm_source=internal&utm_medium=flyout&utm_campaign=mostpopular
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why You Want to Live in a Blue State (Original Post) FourScore Oct 2013 OP
Bring us your tired, your poor, your tempest-tossed. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #1
Mahalo FourScore! Cha Oct 2013 #2
Meanwhile, the Right rails about Detroit. Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2013 #3
I was wasting time this evening reading the AARP's website about "best cities to retire in," Lydia Leftcoast Oct 2013 #4
All I can do is shake blue14u Oct 2013 #6
I don't know about Corvallis and Burlington, but Ithaca has a LuvNewcastle Oct 2013 #7
If you're referring to Burlington, Vermont cali Oct 2013 #8
And Corvallis, Oregon Lydia Leftcoast Oct 2013 #9
Yep. Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #5
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
1. Bring us your tired, your poor, your tempest-tossed.
Mon Oct 7, 2013, 12:33 AM
Oct 2013

We lift our lights beside the golden door.

As our population in the blue states increases, so does our political power.

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
4. I was wasting time this evening reading the AARP's website about "best cities to retire in,"
Mon Oct 7, 2013, 02:49 AM
Oct 2013

and I found some of their choices odd, to say the least. As online commenters pointed out, some of the cities mentioned are very unpleasant, with high crime rates, bad air pollution, no public transit, all that bad stuff.

But here's the odd thing. Some of the cities suggested, including Burlington VT, Ithaca NY, and Corvallis OR are actually quite pleasant places if you can afford them.

Yet several right-wingers blasted the authors of the article, not for choosing cities with a poor quality of life but for choosing places "full of Socialist tax and spend types." They thought that the authors should have chosen more cities in the South with golf courses and lots of shopping malls.

And there, folks, is your Tea Party base.

LuvNewcastle

(16,855 posts)
7. I don't know about Corvallis and Burlington, but Ithaca has a
Mon Oct 7, 2013, 05:44 AM
Oct 2013

major university. That's usually a good sign that a town is good to live in. I've found that towns with a lot of churches per capita aren't usually all that great. I would steer clear of places with a lot of golf courses and malls, too. That's usually a sign of a large presence of Republicans.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
8. If you're referring to Burlington, Vermont
Mon Oct 7, 2013, 06:28 AM
Oct 2013

yes, the University of Vermont, several other colleges and Middlebury down the road.

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
9. And Corvallis, Oregon
Mon Oct 7, 2013, 12:55 PM
Oct 2013

is the home of the Oregon State University. I lived there for two years, and I'd probably still be there if the university administration hadn't been so mindlessly bureaucratic and determined to nickel and dime the faculty. (We weren't even allowed to Xerox anything but our syllabus, midterm, and final. If we wanted to give the students handouts, we had to take the master copies to Kinkos and have the students buy packets. Administration also threatened to take the phones --which were only extensions of the main office phone, not separate lines--out of our offices. There's more, but I won't go into detail.)

Lovely town, close to the Pacific Coast, with the Coast Range always visible to the west and the Cascades often visible to the east, a funky ex-hippie atmosphere, completely navigable by bicycle with covered bicycle parking downtown and at many apartment complexes, good restaurants, a lively folk music scene, etc.)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why You Want to Live in a...