Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

markpkessinger

(8,401 posts)
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 01:36 AM Oct 2013

Alarming paragraph in NY Times article

In the article on the Times site titled, "As Pressure Mounts, House G.O.P. Weighs Short-Term Debt Deal," this paragraph practically jumped off the page at me:

Democrats showed their own cracks. Twenty-six House Democrats planned to attend a bipartisan event on Thursday morning with the group No Labels, calling for negotiations to start immediately, a challenge to the president and to Democratic leaders who say they will not negotiate until the government reopens and the debt ceiling is lifted.


WTF?! Does anybody know who these 26 idiots are?
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alarming paragraph in NY Times article (Original Post) markpkessinger Oct 2013 OP
Why worry about House Dems? It's Senate Dems that would be concerning. dkf Oct 2013 #1
I suppose you're right about that . . . markpkessinger Oct 2013 #2
True. dkf Oct 2013 #3
Your point remains valid. I'd be interested in knowing who these dweebs are. MADem Oct 2013 #7
Appeasers in a Civics lesson. Loudly Oct 2013 #4
Republicans who meet with this group do it in defiance of the tea party. gordianot Oct 2013 #5
Mostly first termers nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #6

MADem

(135,425 posts)
7. Your point remains valid. I'd be interested in knowing who these dweebs are.
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 02:12 AM
Oct 2013

"No Labels" my ass.

There are Democrats, and there are "Nut Jobs." Those labels are entirely descriptive, IMO!

I think the constituents of these individuals deserve to know what their elected reps are playing at, quite frankly.

 

Loudly

(2,436 posts)
4. Appeasers in a Civics lesson.
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 01:44 AM
Oct 2013

Listen, the line item veto was tried. Given to the Executive and shut down by SCOTUS as essentially being a breach of the separation of powers.

If you hear anybody claim that the House gets to fund the government by way of a Constitutional separation of powers, tell them to remember this:

The check and balance built into the thing is that you must vote to fund the government even though it contains items you do not support.

You don't get to pick and choose, rebs.

It is addressed as a package. Not as some bundle to unwravel as you seek to impose your own local and/or deranged political agenda.


gordianot

(15,245 posts)
5. Republicans who meet with this group do it in defiance of the tea party.
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 01:48 AM
Oct 2013

The Republicans may actually represent votes that might end this mess with a clean CR. The Democrats appear to be moderates. For even appearing with this group Republicans could face a primary challange from the Cruz bat shit crazy wing of the GOP.

I understand your concern never trust a Republican.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
6. Mostly first termers
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 01:48 AM
Oct 2013

The group is formed by mostly members of the Freshman class and it has both Ds and Rs

Go ahead and "blame me" for it. Part if the bright idea came from pie in the sky, Bilbray would have made zero difference, blue dog Scott Peters. Yup, my great democratic rep.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Alarming paragraph in NY ...