Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 03:48 PM Oct 2013

Um, I seem to have misunderstood part of the ACA - can someone straighten me out?

I took a look at my employer's crappy health plan for 2014 ( Sign-ups taking place now)

Here's the thing: The brochure flat out states that there is a limit on coverage and doctor's visits ($200 a year, which can add up quickly!)

I thought that the ACA made such limits illegal.

I should add - I'm not worried about getting health insurance, I've always been covered by my husband's plan because my plan is so crappy. I'm just wondering what's gong on with this company.

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Um, I seem to have misunderstood part of the ACA - can someone straighten me out? (Original Post) hedgehog Oct 2013 OP
What? $200 a year? I think you misread NoOneMan Oct 2013 #1
I did find this info after posting - hedgehog Oct 2013 #3
All those laws to tinker with the piece of shit system are so ridiculous NoOneMan Oct 2013 #4
if employer mandates can be delayed, any part can alc Oct 2013 #32
As I said - it's a crappy plan! I did some more looking and I think hedgehog Oct 2013 #6
There's actually no fine next year (the employer mandate was delayed to 2015). n/t PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #7
OK - maybe that means they can stick with their crappy offering one more year. hedgehog Oct 2013 #9
I think you are misunderstanding the limit. Can you please type exactly what the brochure says. n/t PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #2
I think I found the problem - I was referred to this web site by the company- hedgehog Oct 2013 #5
So what is the annual limit? B2G Oct 2013 #8
Not only is the limit $200, the cost is $25 a week! hedgehog Oct 2013 #11
What? B2G Oct 2013 #12
I copied this from the page - it's a PDF, so I can't cut and paste - hedgehog Oct 2013 #14
Just reading this, it looks like B2G Oct 2013 #17
I think the key words there are "preventive care", hedgehog Oct 2013 #21
I tried cut and paste from a PDF, so the columns are out of line - but hedgehog Oct 2013 #23
Hell, I have no idea, the law is a convoluted mess, apparently I might fall through a loophole... Humanist_Activist Oct 2013 #10
Based on my income, I would qualify for a subsidy, but based on our joint income, I wouldn't, hedgehog Oct 2013 #27
That's not nearly enough information. **Link to help you here** DevonRex Oct 2013 #13
Thank you! I'm bookmarking this to really sit down and go through carefully. hedgehog Oct 2013 #15
You're welcome. DevonRex Oct 2013 #16
I thought if you had a crappy employer plan you were just stuck with it and there was no way to get kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #18
Anyone can go on the exchange (I think) but your costs will vary - hedgehog Oct 2013 #19
If you have qualified employer insurance available to you you can still buy a policy on the exchange PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #31
The employer mandate has been dropped for next year Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #20
No. theirbplans still have to comply B2G Oct 2013 #22
Given that few corporations do anything out of the good of their hearts, hedgehog Oct 2013 #24
that must be the deductible Enrique Oct 2013 #25
I know it sounds ludicrous, which I why I've never bought it! hedgehog Oct 2013 #26
Let us know what their 2014 plan looks like B2G Oct 2013 #28
I've asked for materials to be sent to me, but everything I've posted is from the PDF hedgehog Oct 2013 #29
me too B2G Oct 2013 #30
 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
1. What? $200 a year? I think you misread
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 03:50 PM
Oct 2013

Not even the worse insurance plan would do that. Or is it, $200 max per doctor visit and you pay rest? But then there is a yearly limit as well of out of pocket. Doesn't sound right

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
3. I did find this info after posting -
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 03:57 PM
Oct 2013

Starting in 2014, the Affordable Care Act bans annual dollar limits. Until then, annual limits are restricted under the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations published in June 2010.

For plan years starting between September 23, 2010 and September 22, 2011, plans may not limit annual coverage of essential benefits such as hospital, physician and pharmacy benefits to less than $750,000. The restricted annual limit will be $1.25 million for plan years starting on or after September 23, 2011, and $2 million for plan years starting between September 23, 2012 and January 1, 2014. For plans issued or renewed beginning January 1, 2014, all annual dollar limits on coverage of essential health benefits will be prohibited.
Protecting Coverage for Workers

A small number of workers and individuals only have access to limited benefit, or “mini-med,” plans with lower annual limits than are generally permitted by law and which can provide very limited protection from high health care costs. Employers and insurers estimated that requiring mini-med plans to comply with the new rules could cause mini-med premiums to increase significantly, forcing employers to drop coverage and leaving some workers without even the minimal insurance coverage they have today.

In order to protect coverage for workers in mini-med plans until more affordable and more valuable coverage is available in 2014, the law and regulations issued on annual limits allow the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to grant temporary waivers from this one provision of the law that phases out annual limits if compliance would result in a significant decrease in access to benefits or a significant increase in premiums. Plans that receive waivers must comply with all other provisions of the law and must alert consumers that the plan has restrictive coverage and includes low annual limits. Additionally, these waivers are temporary and after 2014, no waivers of the annual limit provision are allowed.

http://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Programs-and-Initiatives/Health-Insurance-Market-Reforms/Annual-Limits.html


Something here is not making sense. It looks like the coverage the brochure describes would be illegal after January1, 2014. Maybe this has something to do with the 1 year extension for employers? Looking over the brochure, there is no reference at all to the ACA.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
4. All those laws to tinker with the piece of shit system are so ridiculous
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 04:00 PM
Oct 2013

It produces an uniquely American steaming pile of shit. Seriously, what a nightmare everyone went out on a limb for (still).

Yeah, yeah, I know. Single payer was never viable because Democrats aren't progressive enough for it or some other reasonable excuse

alc

(1,151 posts)
32. if employer mandates can be delayed, any part can
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 07:41 PM
Oct 2013

Many waivers have been given. Even if it's not a waiver, the president thinks he can delay any part of the law he wants without congress (hope we don't have an R president in 2016).

This waiver was very common a couple of years ago. I thought this one hat had stopped, but it looks like they are still giving the waiver instead of having employers drop coverage completely (which is what employers - mostly restaurants - threatened).

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
6. As I said - it's a crappy plan! I did some more looking and I think
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 04:04 PM
Oct 2013

the problem is that they haven't updated the web site with next year's plan. It's my guess they will drop coverage, pay the fine and refer employees to the exchanges.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
9. OK - maybe that means they can stick with their crappy offering one more year.
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 04:10 PM
Oct 2013

I think I saw elsewhere that if the employer's plan does not meet the standard, you have the option to go out on the exchange.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
5. I think I found the problem - I was referred to this web site by the company-
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 04:02 PM
Oct 2013

and the PDF is labeled Enrollment Guide 2013 but inside in fine print there is a notice -

"Brochure effective for December 31, 2012"

which makes me think they still have last year's brochure posted, not the coverage for 2014.

Here's what the brochure states:


"Basic benefits to keep you well
See a doctor when you need to. Get preventive care to keep you and your family well.
With UnitedHealth Basics, many of your basic health care needs are covered, up to an annual limit for
each covered service.
What’s included in UnitedHealth Basics?
Covered services are available up to an annual limit for:
•Doctor’s
office
visits

In-network
preventive
care
is
covered
at
100%
with
no
annual
dollar
limit

Coverage
for
accidental
injuries
treated
in
the
Emergency
Department

Hospital
care

Outpatient
surgery
and
diagnostics
• Prescription
drugs
All plans include a nurse telephone hotline that you can call anytime, night or day. Just another tool to
help you make the most of your medical plan benefits.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
12. What?
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 04:13 PM
Oct 2013

So you're saying that you pay $200 a month in premiums but your annual limit is $200?

I think you're confused.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
14. I copied this from the page - it's a PDF, so I can't cut and paste -
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 04:24 PM
Oct 2013

Here’s how this plan works
Option 1 Plan with low Rx, $30,000 in-patient hospital max
Weekly Rates:
Employee $25.59

The plan pays for maximum benefit per person per year in network payment out of network payment

annual deductible (does not apply to office visits $200 $200

Doctor’s Office Visits
Covers preventive care or
diagnosis and treatment of a
sickness or injury $200 You pay $15 per visit The plan pays 50%

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
17. Just reading this, it looks like
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 04:36 PM
Oct 2013

Your annual DEDUCTIBLE is $200. Your in-patient max alone is $30,000.

Preventative care is covered at 100%.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
23. I tried cut and paste from a PDF, so the columns are out of line - but
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 05:23 PM
Oct 2013

the maximum amount for doctor's visits is $200 per year. Down below, the maximum coverage for prescriptions is $500. ( )

Here's what it says elsewhere:

"This brochure contains information about UnitedHealth Basics. We encourage you to learn
about this limited health benefits program that can help you and your family stay healthy and
spend less on health care.

The plans give you coverage up to a set maximum amount per person per year for
common health care needs and preventive care.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
10. Hell, I have no idea, the law is a convoluted mess, apparently I might fall through a loophole...
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 04:10 PM
Oct 2013

where I'm too poor to be penalized for not having employer provided insurance, but too "rich" to get on a subsidized plan on the exchange. Try to figure that one out.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
27. Based on my income, I would qualify for a subsidy, but based on our joint income, I wouldn't,
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 05:41 PM
Oct 2013

so I'm really hoping I can stay on my husband's plan. Even if I can't, my family still makes out better since two of my grown kids will be able to get decent coverage for the first time!

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
13. That's not nearly enough information. **Link to help you here**
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 04:18 PM
Oct 2013

By law all policies have to meet minimum value, minimum essential coverage and affordability. Basically it's 60% of health care and the insured's policy for self only can't be above 9-1/2% of household income.

There are many ways to calculate all this. But this is the best way to find out. It has links that will help. Note the portion I've copied and pasted. The first link in it will help greatly.
http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=c2eec094-8da5-4014-ba18-ae614f4edde6

Summary of Benefits and Coverage

As reported in our July 19, 2012 Navigating Health Care Reform Alert, Summary of Benefits and Coverage for Group Health Plans, employers offering group health plan coverage are now required to provide their employees with an SBC. In addition to the summary plan description, the SBC summarizes the health plan or coverage offered by the employer and is intended to make it easier for employers to compare different plans and coverage.

In February 2012, the Department of Labor (“DOL”) published templates to be used for SBCs for health coverage beginning before January 1, 2014. When these templates were issued, the DOL indicated that it would update the SBC materials for subsequent years. Recently, the DOL released updated guidance in the form of Frequently Asked Questions and issued a new SBC template.

The new SBC template adds two important statements. The employer must include in the SBC (1) a statement as to whether the health plan provides minimum essential coverage, and (2) a statement as to whether the health plan meets the minimum value requirements. The updated template is authorized for use for coverage beginning on or after January 1, 2014 and before January 1, 2015.

The DOL has provided some transition relief for those employers that have already begun to prepare their SBCs for the 2014 plan year using the old template. If an employer is already in the process of preparing its SBC and the addition of the two statements regarding minimum essential coverage and minimum value would be an administrative burden, the employer does not have to include the statements in the SBC. However, in order to qualify for this relief, the employer must provide a cover letter or similar disclosure with its SBC indicating whether the plan provides minimum essential coverage and whether the plan meets the minimum value requirements. The Frequently Asked Questions guidance provides specific language to be included in the cover letter.

As a result of this new guidance, employers must update their SBCs with statements regarding minimum essential coverage and minimum value for coverage beginning on or after January 1, 2014. Most employers will have to update their SBCs to include the additional information for open enrollment in the fall of 2013, for the 2014 plan year. These statements can be provided by using the updated SBC template or as a disclosure provided in connection with the old SBC template.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
16. You're welcome.
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 04:28 PM
Oct 2013

The Kaiser Family Foundation also has a lot of very good information., It's their nonprofit research group.


http://kff.org/

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
18. I thought if you had a crappy employer plan you were just stuck with it and there was no way to get
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 04:59 PM
Oct 2013

into a plan with the new stuff like free preventives and relatively low deductibles and out-of-pocket caps.

People with employer based insurance can refuse that and get a plan the ACA applies to????

If you can get out from a crappy employer plan, I'd do it. Bankrupt those vampires.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
31. If you have qualified employer insurance available to you you can still buy a policy on the exchange
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 06:29 PM
Oct 2013

but you will not be eligible for any premium subsidy.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
20. The employer mandate has been dropped for next year
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 05:14 PM
Oct 2013

so it allows your employer to do this. ACA is not in effect for employers until 2015, by decision of the Obama administration.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
24. Given that few corporations do anything out of the good of their hearts,
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 05:32 PM
Oct 2013

that may be a distinction without a difference!

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
25. that must be the deductible
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 05:32 PM
Oct 2013

in which case $200 doesn't sound crappy at all, depending on the coverage.

I imagine it would be already illegal to have a cap on benefits of $200 a year. It would be fraudulent to call that insurance.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
26. I know it sounds ludicrous, which I why I've never bought it!
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 05:39 PM
Oct 2013

From the brochure

"Remember,UnitedHealth Basics
provides limited coverage only. It
does not provide medical benefits
for a major illness.

**************************************
This policy allowed the company to advertise that they provide employees the opportunity to buy health insurance. IIRC, Walmart makes a similar claim for a crap policy. There's a reason the ACA sets minimum standards!

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
28. Let us know what their 2014 plan looks like
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 05:50 PM
Oct 2013

I'm pretty sure their coverage will go up, along with the premiums.

hedgehog

(36,286 posts)
29. I've asked for materials to be sent to me, but everything I've posted is from the PDF
Thu Oct 10, 2013, 05:53 PM
Oct 2013

I was referred to so I could sign up on-line! Here's hoping someone screwed up royal!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Um, I seem to have misund...