Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
Mon Oct 14, 2013, 03:35 PM Oct 2013

Dianne Feinstein Can't Come Up With One Good Defense of the NSA

Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) is the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee. Today, she takes a crack at defending the NSA's domestic phone record spying program. She can't come up with one decent justification.

Which is worrisome, considering the fact that almost no one outside of the NSA is in a better position to know the alleged benefits of the massive, unaccountable domestic spying program than Dianne Feinstein. It makes sense that even moderate US citizens might be skeptical of a top secret government agency's plan to put the metadata from every phone call into America "into a lockbox that we can search when the nation needs it," as the NSA director put it. Dianne Feinstein is a Democrat, and a high ranking member of the Intelligence committee. People concerned about civil liberties will naturally turn to her for a defense of this gruesome-sounding plan. What does she have for us?

She has, in her Wall Street Journal op-ed today, nothing but a mishmash of vagaries and downright illogical factoids. Let's take them one at a time.


More here:
http://gawker.com/dianne-feinstein-cant-come-up-with-one-good-defense-of-1444887222
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dianne Feinstein Can't Come Up With One Good Defense of the NSA (Original Post) Luminous Animal Oct 2013 OP
Let's get real... TDale313 Oct 2013 #1
+1....The ONE undeniable positive of the NSA is that it provides a shitload of jobs Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #4
Democracy Now Interview with Drake, Raddick, McGovern & Rowley (Snowden is a patriot!) Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #2
^ Wilms Oct 2013 #3
Of course she can Fumesucker Oct 2013 #5
kick Luminous Animal Oct 2013 #6

TDale313

(7,820 posts)
1. Let's get real...
Mon Oct 14, 2013, 03:40 PM
Oct 2013

The reasons for the huge level of surveillance? It makes a lot of contractors very rich. Also, who knows when that info might come in handy. This has very little to do with keeping us safe.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
4. +1....The ONE undeniable positive of the NSA is that it provides a shitload of jobs
Mon Oct 14, 2013, 07:40 PM
Oct 2013

And despite all the big talk, no congresscritter is about to bite that hand....

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
2. Democracy Now Interview with Drake, Raddick, McGovern & Rowley (Snowden is a patriot!)
Mon Oct 14, 2013, 04:32 PM
Oct 2013
http://www.democracynow.org/2013/10/14/edward_snowden_is_a_patriot_ex

In a Democracy Now! special, we spend the hour with four former U.S. intelligence officials — all whistleblowers themselves — who have just returned from visiting National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia. They are former CIA analyst Ray McGovern, former FBI agent Coleen Rowley, former National Security Agency senior executive Thomas Drake, and former U.S. Justice Department ethics adviser Jesselyn Radack, now of the Government Accountability Project. On Wednesday, the group presented Snowden with an award from the Sam Adams Associates for Integrity in Intelligence. "In our visit, we told Edward Snowden that he had begun the debate by disclosing to American citizens what was going on — this massive spying upon American citizens," Rowley says. "We were happy to tell him the debate has begun, but he is very concerned, and this is actually the reason he has sacrificed so much: He wants to see these laws, these secret interpretations of the law, I should say, fixed."

JESSELYN RADACK: As we presented the award, we each read from various other famous people in history, including Martin Luther King, who—people who were also smeared as being traitors and turncoats and hurting the country, and later history realized they were heroes—other people, like Ben Franklin. We talked about that with him and how he was supported, that despite what the U.S. government is saying about 60 percent of our country is in support of NSA reform.

And I think, despite all that he’s dealing with, he is incredibly focused on whistleblower protection, on surveillance reform and on journalist-source confidentiality. So even though he has all of these other things going on, for him, he is incredibly focused on surveillance reform and that it be meaningful. And while there are a number of bills before Congress right now, most of them focus on the PATRIOT Act Section 215 and very little on FISA Section 702.

So he was very well versed, very centered, very balanced and very engaging, and has a wicked sense of humor, which was very, very fun. So I think, you know, we both felt mutually supported, and he knows that he’s not alone and that he has a lot of people in the United States and around the world who are supporting his endeavors.

AMY GOODMAN: You mention Benjamin Franklin, and I wanted to turn to Coleen Rowley, a former FBI agent, in Minneapolis, was awarded Time Person of the Year for her work around 9/11. She was a division legal counsel for 13 years and taught constitutional rights to FBI and police, also testified before Congress about the FBI’s failure to help prevent the 9/11 attacks. Coleen, what does Ben Franklin have to do with Edward Snowden?

COLEEN ROWLEY: Well, most people would not have any way of knowing that, significantly, that one of the Founding Fathers of our country was vilified exactly the same and for the same reason as Edward Snowden. In 1773 or ’74, Ben Franklin was postmaster general, and it came to his attention that there were communications between the British and the colonist overseers that American colonists did—would not be accorded the same civil rights as British citizens, and—because they thought they had to keep the American colonists, you know, at bay or whatever, so they were not according American colonists the same rights. And Ben Franklin, to his credit, became a whistleblower in 1773, only to be vilified and called every name in the book by the British and by the American governor at the time. He was actually stripped of his postmaster general status. So we can see how history and time changes everything. And in the case of Ben Franklin, it changed rather quickly.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dianne Feinstein Can't Co...