Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate/House Negotiators Give Up On Grand Bargain
Senate/House Negotiators Give Up On Grand Bargain
by TomP
At least for now. That is what is being reported in the New York Times. Patty Murray and Paul Ryan and the others are looking small and incremental, building a budget compromise rather than another attempt at a Grand Bargain that few want.
It appears the Grand Bargain is dead, at least for now:
New York Times
I never liked the Grand Bargain premise, and it looks as if there is no real constituency for it. The Republicans will not agree to new taxes or loophole closing for new revenue and Democrats (rightfully) will not cut Social Security or Medicare as the Republicans want. Even chained cpi, while not gutting Social Security, is not a good idea because it will harm people. If Social Security needs adjustments in the future, rasing the tax cut-off to $200,000 (or another higher figure) likely will solve many potential problems.
It looks as if they are playing smaller ball up there, and that is good. Nonetheless, it is good that the AFL-CIO came out strongly yesterday against changes to Social Security.
The Plum Line
So moderately good news. Now we need to focus on 2014 and winning back the House.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/18/1248564/-Senate-House-Negotiators-Give-Up-On-Grand-Bargain
by TomP
At least for now. That is what is being reported in the New York Times. Patty Murray and Paul Ryan and the others are looking small and incremental, building a budget compromise rather than another attempt at a Grand Bargain that few want.
It appears the Grand Bargain is dead, at least for now:
With the government reopened and a debt default averted for now, Congressional negotiators on Thursday plunged into difficult budget talks to avoid a repeat crisis within months, and quickly agreed to lower their sights from the sort of grand bargain that has eluded the two parties for three years.
snip
To improve the prospects for some success, the negotiators largely agreed at a closed-door breakfast on Thursday that a deal involving significant new tax revenues and large-scale changes to Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, whose growth in an aging population is driving long-term projections of growing debt, is not going to happen.
Instead, they agreed, the talks will aim at a more modest, confidence-building measure to replace the sequestration cuts in 2014. Negotiators could aim higher, for a deal saving at least $1 trillion over the next nine years to substitute completely for the arbitrary sequestration cuts. But neither side was hopeful of that.
Even with lower sights, negotiators face the same hurdle over taxes that has ended a series of bipartisan talks in 2011 between Mr. Obama and Speaker John A. Boehner; between Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Representative Eric Cantor, the House majority leader; and between lawmakers on a so-called supercommittee.
New York Times
I never liked the Grand Bargain premise, and it looks as if there is no real constituency for it. The Republicans will not agree to new taxes or loophole closing for new revenue and Democrats (rightfully) will not cut Social Security or Medicare as the Republicans want. Even chained cpi, while not gutting Social Security, is not a good idea because it will harm people. If Social Security needs adjustments in the future, rasing the tax cut-off to $200,000 (or another higher figure) likely will solve many potential problems.
It looks as if they are playing smaller ball up there, and that is good. Nonetheless, it is good that the AFL-CIO came out strongly yesterday against changes to Social Security.
In an interview, Damon Silvers, the policy director of the AFL-CIO, laid down a hard line, putting Dems on notice that any agreement that cuts entitlement benefits even in a deal that includes GOP concessions on tax hikes is a nonstarter. Silvers strongly suggested labor would withhold support in 2014 from any Dem lawmaker who supports such a deal.
We are opposed to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid benefits cuts. Period, Silvers told me. There will be no cover for members of either party who vote for such a thing.
Silvers said the AFL-CIO also opposes the entitlements cuts in the Presidents budget, such as Chained CPI and a form of Medicare means testing. Its unclear how, or whether, those will figure in what Dems bring to the table in the budget talks, which are mandated by the deal just reached to end the crisis.
The Plum Line
So moderately good news. Now we need to focus on 2014 and winning back the House.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/10/18/1248564/-Senate-House-Negotiators-Give-Up-On-Grand-Bargain
Sanders Named to Budget Conference
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023870099
The day the right lost the economic argument
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023877964
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 987 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate/House Negotiators Give Up On Grand Bargain (Original Post)
ProSense
Oct 2013
OP
'Grand Bargain', Ma'am, Needs To Be Staked, Burned, And Buried In The Marianas Trench
The Magistrate
Oct 2013
#5
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)1. Excellent News!
Now lets get on with business....
Andy823
(11,495 posts)11. I agree
We don't need to get off track, we need to get the job done so we don't have to put up with another shutdown. The problem will be getting republicans to stand up to the tea party nuts. I think the war within the republican party is going to get a lot worse!
ProSense
(116,464 posts)2. Kick for
the obvious death of a dumb idea.
Democrats should stand firm on their budget, which ends the sequester.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)3. Time to Hone the Art
of listening carefully to what they Don't say................
ProSense
(116,464 posts)6. It's still the third rail. n/t
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)4. GOTV 2014! nt
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)5. 'Grand Bargain', Ma'am, Needs To Be Staked, Burned, And Buried In The Marianas Trench
Any fix required for Social Security should come from increased revenues.
Any reduction in spending deemed necessary should come from military outlays.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)7. Exactly, and they should be talking about increasing benefits. n/t
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)8. "At least for now."
I'd say that's a significant qualification.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)9. K & R
Andy823
(11,495 posts)10. K&R nt
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)12. Good.