Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Fri Oct 18, 2013, 10:57 AM Oct 2013

Grand Bargain postponed until after 2014 elections, at the earliest

To improve the prospects for some success, the negotiators largely agreed at a closed-door breakfast on Thursday that a deal involving significant new tax revenues and large-scale changes to Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, whose growth in an aging population is driving long-term projections of growing debt, is not going to happen.

Instead, they agreed, the talks will aim at a more modest, confidence-building measure to replace the sequestration cuts in 2014. Negotiators could aim higher, for a deal saving at least $1 trillion over the next nine years to substitute completely for the arbitrary sequestration cuts. But neither side was hopeful of that.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/18/us/two-parties-start-work-to-avoid-repeat-crisis.html?_r=1&hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1382102810-Goenh+nTrM/khtEVnJFEcA&

What does this mean? If you're worried sick that Obama will cut a deal with Republicans to cut SS and Medicare, the best way to stop it is to put Nancy Pelosi back in the Speaker's chair.

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
1. Actually, Pelosi's in favor of cutting Social Security
Fri Oct 18, 2013, 11:00 AM
Oct 2013

Thank God that Reid's been steadfastly opposed. He may have other issues, but he knows enough not to attack those who are already hurting badly.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
15. Be careful what you wish for. There's no guarantee that the next Democratic speaker
Fri Oct 18, 2013, 12:26 PM
Oct 2013

will be to Pelosi's left, or that they'll be as effective as her in keeping the caucus together. If we win in 2014, the Blue Dogs will start hogging the spotlight again.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
10. You're exactly right
Fri Oct 18, 2013, 12:02 PM
Oct 2013

Reid is the only Dem leader who isn't drooling over the prospect of Chained CPI. I've collected video clips of every single one of them, except Reid, who are in support of Chained CPI. There are several of Pelosi saying she would support the cuts. I searched thoroughly for Reid's possible support for cuts and it does not exist.

The fact that it's been tabled til after campaign 2014 is good and bad. Good because they're feeling the heat, bad because it's kicking the can down the road and is still a threat. Oh well, it gives me more time to hone this video I'm working on that exposes their plans, and will continue to wait for the right time to release it. I've always made videos exposing Republican corruption. Never thought I'd be waiting in the wings to expose those Democrats who want to join the Republicans and steal from us, yet again.

The Third Way is just the Republican Way in disguise.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
12. What doubly-irritates me about Pelosi is that she says chained CPI isn't a cut
Fri Oct 18, 2013, 12:06 PM
Oct 2013

Disagreeing is one thing, but that's just dishonest.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
3. Great. This provides an opportunity.
Fri Oct 18, 2013, 11:01 AM
Oct 2013

Let's call on candidates to state clearly and unequivically "No cuts to SS, Medicare, or Medicaid. Those programs are off the table". Both in the primary (if there is one) and then in GE against the Repub.

That should make things very clear.

GeorgeGist

(25,321 posts)
5. The Raw Deal marches on ...
Fri Oct 18, 2013, 11:12 AM
Oct 2013
Republicans enter these new talks with one advantage: if the negotiations fail, the next round of across-the-board spending cuts known as sequestration will hit automatically, even deeper than the first. Democrats want to avoid that far more than Republicans do.
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. Not exactly true that the next round of cuts is worse for Democrats.
Fri Oct 18, 2013, 11:21 AM
Oct 2013

It defunds the Military Industrial Complex quite a bit.

 

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)
9. That's fine with me.... a "grand bargain" is a fools errand anyway, guaranteed to cut entitlements
Fri Oct 18, 2013, 11:56 AM
Oct 2013

We don't have a deficit issue. As Cheney said, "Deficits don't matter".


Fund the government.... as much as we can get away with. It is a stimulus package, and with interest rates effectively 0%, we're being negligent by not taking the opportunity to have a massive infrastructure program that generates jobs and grows the economy.


No "grand bargain" until Dems hold both houses and the Presidency.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
13. Exactly right.
Fri Oct 18, 2013, 12:08 PM
Oct 2013

"What does this mean? If you're worried sick that Obama will cut a deal with Republicans to cut SS and Medicare, the best way to stop it is to put Nancy Pelosi back in the Speaker's chair"

The purists can promise to sit home because they don't like corporatist Democrats, but as usual they will fuck themselves and their goals if they do.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Grand Bargain postponed u...