Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Better Believe It

(18,630 posts)
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 12:44 AM Mar 2012

109 Progressive Organizations Take Issue With Obama’s Support for Fracking



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 5, 2012

109 Organizations Take Issue With Obama’s Support for Fracking


WASHINGTON - March 5 - More than 100 organizations – including environmental, religious and public health groups – expressed concern about President Obama’s endorsement of hydraulic fracturing and shale gas drilling in his recent State of the Union address.

“Amid mounting evidence of the harm and significant costs associated with drilling and fracking, it is premature to declare that government investment in shale gas drilling has been a success,” the groups wrote in a joint letter sent to the White House today (Monday, Mar. 5).

The groups, which represent more than 3 million supporters in 16 states, questioned the President’s statement that the United States sits atop a supply of natural gas that “can last America nearly 100 years.” They also disputed the claim that natural gas “will support more than 600,000 jobs by the end of the decade,” an estimate based in part on a study funded by the natural gas industry. The President repeated the job creation estimate in recent speeches on energy policy at the University of Miami on Feb. 23 and in New Hampshire on March 1.

“To consider an industrial process that has contaminated water supplies, caused rampant air pollution and disrupted communities across the country a success story is misguided,” said Adrienne Esposito, executive director of Citizens Campaign for the Environment, a non-partisan advocacy organization headquartered in New York State. “Our nation needs an energy policy based on solid, independent science, not industry hype.”

The 109 groups noted that the Environmental Protection Agency is currently conducting two studies to determine whether hydraulic fracturing can contaminate water supplies. One of the studies, focused on the town of Pavillion, Wyo., has already found that fracking had likely contaminated groundwater.

“We now know that the results of fracking with unknown chemicals have included earthquakes in Ohio, contaminated drinking water in Pennsylvania and spoiled farmland and rivers wherever wastewater is dumped,” said the Rev. Jim Deming, minister for environmental justice for the Ohio-based United Church of Christ Justice and Witness Ministries. “The administration must take concrete, meaningful steps to safeguard the health of our citizens and protect the natural resources of our communities from this unregulated industry.”

Congress has granted the industry major exemptions from important federal environmental and health protection laws, including the Clean Air, Clean Water and Safe Drinking Water acts.

“Homeowners across the country have had to witness first-hand what happens when the shale gas industry is left to regulate itself,” said Ken Cook, president of the Environmental Working Group, which drafted the letter. “We hope the administration will temper its enthusiasm for fracking until the EPA has completed its studies. We urge the President to work with Congress to not only require disclosure of fracking chemicals, but also to ensure that this industry no longer gets a free pass when it comes to compliance with major federal environmental laws.”

According to the Bloomberg news service, the job number cited by the President comes from an industry-funded study conducted by the consulting firm IHS Global Insight, whose executive vice president, Daniel Yergin, served on a federal shale gas advisory committee. In August 2011, EWG, along with federal and state lawmakers, scientists and public interest organizations objected that Mr. Yergin and five other members of the advisory committee had ties to the natural gas and oil industry. The committee’s final report sidestepped the crucial question of whether fracking should remain exempt from most federal environmental laws.
.
###

The mission of the Environmental Working Group (EWG) is to use the power of public information to protect public health and the environment. EWG is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization, founded in 1993 by Ken Cook and Richard Wiles.

http://www.ewg.org/release/109-organizations-take-issue-obama-s-support-fracking

Read the joint letter at:

http://www.ewg.org/release/109-organizations-take-issue-obama-s-support-fracking
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
109 Progressive Organizations Take Issue With Obama’s Support for Fracking (Original Post) Better Believe It Mar 2012 OP
Industry Spokesman Attacks Environmentalists Letter As "hyperbole and hairsplitting". Better Believe It Mar 2012 #1
Cut and Paste!, Cut and Paste! FSogol Mar 2012 #4
Keep trying...nt SidDithers Mar 2012 #2
You too TheKentuckian Mar 2012 #6
What's he doing? mmonk Mar 2012 #8
They never loved him. Luminous Animal Mar 2012 #3
Professional Leftist troublemakers who don't toe the party line. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2012 #5
Under the bus with 109 organizations! Better Believe It Mar 2012 #7
The one percent own both parties now. woo me with science Mar 2012 #9
du rec. nt limpyhobbler Mar 2012 #10
Those whiny Progressive organizations. Who cares about those whiny losers. BlueIris Mar 2012 #11
K&R woo me with science Mar 2012 #12
Kick woo me with science Mar 2012 #13
 

Better Believe It

(18,630 posts)
1. Industry Spokesman Attacks Environmentalists Letter As "hyperbole and hairsplitting".
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 10:40 AM
Mar 2012

Conservation groups call Obama to task over his remarks on oil and gas
Industry spokesman says criticism wrought with ‘hyperbole and hairsplitting'
John Colson
Post Independent Staff
March 6, 2012


GLENWOOD SPRINGS, Colorado — Two environmental groups active in Garfield County's oil and gas issues have joined more than 100 other groups in criticizing recent remarks by President Barack Obama about the industry. The organizations sent a letter to the president Monday to express concerns about Obama's remarks in the State of the Union address on Jan. 25.

An industry spokesman, however, called the letter “hyperbole and hairsplitting.”

“Many conservation groups continue to engage in positive, proactive dialogues with Colorado's natural gas industry,” David Ludlam, director of the Western Slope Colorado Oil & Gas Association, wrote in an email to the Post Independent. “As was the case in Colorado's groundbreaking hydraulic fracturing disclosure rule, remarkable outcomes are often the result of working together.”

Concerning the letter, Ludlam wrote, “There are always some who miss the boat and relegate themselves to the trenches of hyperbole and hairsplitting. Unfortunately, the letter to the president is wrought with both.”

Read the full article at:

http://www.postindependent.com/article/20120306/VALLEYNEWS/120309944/1083&ParentProfile=1074
 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
5. Professional Leftist troublemakers who don't toe the party line.
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 01:13 PM
Mar 2012

Besides, politicians understand the environment better than environmentalists.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»109 Progressive Organizat...