Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 04:59 AM Oct 2013

Amnesty says US officials should face war crimes charges over drone strikes

Joint report with Human Rights Watch judges attacks in Yemen and Pakistan to have broken international human rights law

US officials responsible for the secret CIA drone campaign against suspected terrorists in Pakistan may have committed war crimes and should stand trial, a report by a leading human rights group warns. Amnesty International has highlighted the case of a grandmother who was killed while she was picking vegetables and other incidents which could have broken international laws designed to protect civilians.

The report is issued in conjunction with an investigation by Human Rights Watch detailing missile attacks in Yemen which the group believes could contravene the laws of armed conflict, international human rights law and Barack Obama's own guidelines on drones.

The reports are being published while Nawaz Sharif, Pakistan's prime minister, is in Washington. Sharif has promised to tell Obama that the drone strikes – which have caused outrage in Pakistan – must end.

Getting to the bottom of individual strikes is exceptionally difficult in the restive areas bordering Afghanistan, where thousands of militants have settled. People are often terrified of speaking out, fearing retribution from both militants and the state, which is widely suspected of colluding with the CIA-led campaign.

<snip>

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/22/amnesty-us-officials-war-crimes-drones

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Amnesty says US officials should face war crimes charges over drone strikes (Original Post) cali Oct 2013 OP
and from the NYT cali Oct 2013 #1
interesting that no one has a word to say about this accusation. cali Oct 2013 #2
perhaps somebody from "mini" will stand up to defend atrocities? Warren Stupidity Oct 2013 #4
"mini"? cali Oct 2013 #5
Minitrue. NuclearDem Oct 2013 #13
K&R nt Mnemosyne Oct 2013 #3
More 'wink-wink, nudge-nudge'? randome Oct 2013 #6
Agreed. cali Oct 2013 #7
Amnesty is right. Iggo Oct 2013 #8
kick. DU doesn't want to deal with this cali Oct 2013 #9
^ Wilms Oct 2013 #10
K&R Solly Mack Oct 2013 #11
Amnesty under the bus in 3...2...1... NuclearDem Oct 2013 #12
It's been my experience in posting drone threads cali Oct 2013 #14
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
1. and from the NYT
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 05:10 AM
Oct 2013

<snip>

“The drones are like the angels of death,” said Nazeer Gul, a shopkeeper in Miram Shah. “Only they know when and where they will strike.”

Their claims of distress are now being backed by a new Amnesty International investigation that found, among other points, that at least 19 civilians in the surrounding area of North Waziristan had been killed in just two of the drone attacks since January 2012 — a time when the Obama administration has held that strikes have been increasingly accurate and free of mistakes.

The study is to be officially released on Tuesday along with a separate Human Rights Watch report on American drone strikes in Yemen, as the issue is again surfacing on other fronts. On Wednesday, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, a vocal critic of the drone campaign, is to meet with President Obama in the White House. And on Friday, the drone debate is scheduled to spill onto the floor of the United Nations, whose officials have recently published reports that attacked America’s lack of transparency over drones.

But nowhere has the issue played out more directly than in Miram Shah, in northwestern Pakistan. It has become a fearful and paranoid town, dealt at least 13 drone strikes since 2008, with an additional 25 in adjoining districts — more than any other urban settlement in the world.

Even when the missiles do not strike, buzzing drones hover day and night, scanning the alleys and markets with roving high-resolution cameras.

<snip>

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/22/world/asia/civilian-deaths-in-drone-strikes-cited-in-report.html?google_editors_picks=true

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
6. More 'wink-wink, nudge-nudge'?
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 08:14 AM
Oct 2013

If Sharif is to make an unequivocal statement about the drone strikes ceasing, then I agree we need to stop.

But there have been too many ambiguous positions on this in the past. For instance, the military routinely clears airspace for a drone.

Sharif needs to make a public statement, not converse in private with Obama and then emerge saying, "I told him. Really. I did."
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
14. It's been my experience in posting drone threads
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 01:10 PM
Oct 2013

that most people here avoid them like the plague.

Of course, with a little help from my friends, I kick the shit out of them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Amnesty says US officials...