General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBox office disaster: Benedict Cumberbatch's 'The Fifth Estate' has worst debut of 2013
Benedict Cumberbatch knows he has a rabid base of Tumblr-obsessed fans. When asked whether he was worried that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange might attack his new drama The Fifth Estate, in which he plays the infamous hacker, Cumberbatch kept his cool: The Cumberitches have got my back, he told EW.
But, as it turns out, the Cumberbitches didnt have his back this weekend at least not at the box office. The Fifth Estate bombed in its opening weekend with a truly awful $1.7 million from 1,769 theaters, making it the worst debut for a film opening in at least 1,500 theaters this year. (Sorry, Paranoia!) The film, which cost DreamWorks a reported $26 million to produce, earned tepid reviews from critics and could only manage an anemic $969 location average.
Just how bad is that? Well, lets put this in perspective. Notorious stinker Movie 43 grossed $4.8 million in its opening weekend in January, almost three times as much as The Fifth Estate. Getaway, the ludicrously awful Ethan Hawke/Selena Gomez thriller drove away with $4.5 million in August. Heck, this weekends Arnold Schwarznegger/Sylvester Stallone action flick Escape Plan bombed with $9.8 million and thats still almost six times more money than The Fifth Estate made!
Luckily, there is a silver lining for Cumberbatch. His other vehicle, 12 Years a Slave, proved powerful in limited release this weekend, drawing $960,000 from just 19 theaters, which yielded a terrific $50,526 per theater average not to mention boatloads of early Oscar buzz.
http://insidemovies.ew.com/2013/10/20/box-office-disaster-benedict-cumberbatch-the-fifth-estate/
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)top of the year brings August: Osage County with an amazing cast in a film adapted from one of the best plays of recent years. It is going to be very good.
tridim
(45,358 posts)Stupid subject matter almost always results in a stupid film.
PassingFair
(22,434 posts)I'm going to see it because I didn't follow the story as closely as I would have liked.
Now that other countries are screaming about our spying, I'm even more interested.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)Or the drama over Wikileaks. There is this compulsive need lately in Hollywood to make films out of current events and political tripe. People want fiction, they want to escape.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)I probably won't even bother when it comes to On Demand.
To me "12 Years a Slave" looks like a much more compelling story.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)so close to the actual event, because some of them need to be seen in a deeper, wider context as time passes (i.e., that movie about the Facebook founder)...
It is possible to successfully pull off (All the President's Men), but very rare...
FSogol
(45,488 posts)The results and repercussions haven't all trickled in. No matter what you think about Assange, the story isn't over yet.
Cumberbatch calls his fans Cumberbitches? Pathetic.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)See also Parliamentary Elections, Australia.
I imagine that his stint as Smaug will do better box office, as did his role as Khan.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)I can't imagine what would draw me to such a thing. I'm up to here with Julian Assange already, and was just relaxing, since he's been out of the news lately. All holed up in an embassy, he seems to have dropped from sight, pretty much, and that's a good thing.
This movie will fail, big time. Nobody cares about Julian Assange.
BumRushDaShow
(129,096 posts)on Showtime or HBO. I expect that 98% of the population have no idea who Assange is or cares.