Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 09:54 AM Oct 2013

Box office disaster: Benedict Cumberbatch's 'The Fifth Estate' has worst debut of 2013

Benedict Cumberbatch knows he has a rabid base of Tumblr-obsessed fans. When asked whether he was worried that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange might attack his new drama The Fifth Estate, in which he plays the infamous hacker, Cumberbatch kept his cool: “The Cumberitches have got my back,” he told EW.

But, as it turns out, the Cumberbitches didn’t have his back this weekend — at least not at the box office. The Fifth Estate bombed in its opening weekend with a truly awful $1.7 million from 1,769 theaters, making it the worst debut for a film opening in at least 1,500 theaters this year. (Sorry, Paranoia!) The film, which cost DreamWorks a reported $26 million to produce, earned tepid reviews from critics and could only manage an anemic $969 location average.

Just how bad is that? Well, let’s put this in perspective. Notorious stinker Movie 43 grossed $4.8 million in its opening weekend in January, almost three times as much as The Fifth Estate. Getaway, the ludicrously awful Ethan Hawke/Selena Gomez thriller drove away with $4.5 million in August. Heck, this weekend’s Arnold Schwarznegger/Sylvester Stallone action flick Escape Plan bombed with $9.8 million — and that’s still almost six times more money than The Fifth Estate made!

Luckily, there is a silver lining for Cumberbatch. His other vehicle, 12 Years a Slave, proved powerful in limited release this weekend, drawing $960,000 from just 19 theaters, which yielded a terrific $50,526 per theater average — not to mention boatloads of early Oscar buzz.

http://insidemovies.ew.com/2013/10/20/box-office-disaster-benedict-cumberbatch-the-fifth-estate/

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
1. The film looks not so good. 12 Years a Slave looks great and for fans of his
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 09:59 AM
Oct 2013

top of the year brings August: Osage County with an amazing cast in a film adapted from one of the best plays of recent years. It is going to be very good.

tridim

(45,358 posts)
2. The World already knows Assange is nothing more than a salesman for RW Libertarianism.
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 10:00 AM
Oct 2013

Stupid subject matter almost always results in a stupid film.

PassingFair

(22,434 posts)
3. Anyone want to weigh in on how it stands factually?
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:08 AM
Oct 2013

I'm going to see it because I didn't follow the story as closely as I would have liked.

Now that other countries are screaming about our spying, I'm even more interested.

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
4. The average movie goer doesn't know who the fak Julian Assange is.
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:15 AM
Oct 2013

Or the drama over Wikileaks. There is this compulsive need lately in Hollywood to make films out of current events and political tripe. People want fiction, they want to escape.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
5. It just doesn't look interesting to me.
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:19 AM
Oct 2013

I probably won't even bother when it comes to On Demand.

To me "12 Years a Slave" looks like a much more compelling story.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
6. I'm just not a fan of "true life" stories
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:24 AM
Oct 2013

so close to the actual event, because some of them need to be seen in a deeper, wider context as time passes (i.e., that movie about the Facebook founder)...

It is possible to successfully pull off (All the President's Men), but very rare...

FSogol

(45,488 posts)
7. The problem with doing an Assange film is that it is too soon.
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:32 AM
Oct 2013

The results and repercussions haven't all trickled in. No matter what you think about Assange, the story isn't over yet.

Cumberbatch calls his fans Cumberbitches? Pathetic.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
8. Because very few people actually give a shit about Julian Assange.
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:36 AM
Oct 2013

See also Parliamentary Elections, Australia.

I imagine that his stint as Smaug will do better box office, as did his role as Khan.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
9. Who wants to see a movie about Julian Assange?
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:37 AM
Oct 2013

I can't imagine what would draw me to such a thing. I'm up to here with Julian Assange already, and was just relaxing, since he's been out of the news lately. All holed up in an embassy, he seems to have dropped from sight, pretty much, and that's a good thing.

This movie will fail, big time. Nobody cares about Julian Assange.

BumRushDaShow

(129,096 posts)
10. Probably should have been a made-for-cable movie
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:38 AM
Oct 2013

on Showtime or HBO. I expect that 98% of the population have no idea who Assange is or cares.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Box office disaster: Bene...