Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Drale

(7,932 posts)
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:34 AM Oct 2013

Aren't these ACA website problems ultimately the Republicans fault?

because they refused to set up state run exchange sites in most of their states so the Federal site had far more people trying to sign up on the first days then it ever should have?

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Aren't these ACA website problems ultimately the Republicans fault? (Original Post) Drale Oct 2013 OP
That would work if it was just a load issue NoOneMan Oct 2013 #1
Wait just a minute! What about the "five millions lines of code?" Atman Oct 2013 #6
They are just now bringing in outside IT experts B2G Oct 2013 #7
I believe that is a line from Jurassic Park... Wounded Bear Oct 2013 #8
Thom Hartmann seems to think so. Cleita Oct 2013 #2
Yep. When something in gov't goes wrong, you can bet on it the Republicans are behind it. BlueCaliDem Oct 2013 #3
plus I believe they refused $$ G_j Oct 2013 #4
yep. Blue_Roses Oct 2013 #5
Which is why the President took responsibility? Puzzledtraveller Oct 2013 #9
Of course its the baggers fault kydo Oct 2013 #10
 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
1. That would work if it was just a load issue
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:36 AM
Oct 2013

But it isn't just a load issue. That is why they are looking at rewriting code

Atman

(31,464 posts)
6. Wait just a minute! What about the "five millions lines of code?"
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:52 AM
Oct 2013

One of the GOP/Media talking point is the "five million lines of code" which must be re-written. Let me just say BULLSHIT.

I've coded plenty of web sites. I got out of that part of the business not too long ago because I just wasn't interested anymore -- it took too much time, too much concentration, and not enough creativity. At least, not the visual creativity my career was focused on.

Anyway, as usual the media is trying to terrify the ignorant and conflate the Healthcare.gov issue into something it is not. IOW, while the web site might have "five million lines of code," it is not as if they're going back in and re-writing five million lines of code! A huge amount of this code is pre-written, boilerplate, cut n' paste stuff describing the particular language the site supports, looking for what type of browser the user is on, what fonts to use, how to fill the monitor, what OS is being used, etc. In other words, it's like saying the airbag is broken on your car...and your car has 20,000 individual parts. Sure, it might have 20,000 individual parts, but you don't disassemble the entire transmission and engine and body just because the airbags don't work!

Once again, the media is doing the bidding of the right-wing hysteria-mongers. "OMG! THEY HAVE TO RE-WRITE 5,000,000 LINES OF CODE!" Run for the hills with your hair on fire. Mistakes were clearly made, especially the outsourcing to massive for-profit corporations who knew full well that the United States Government will pay it's bills no matter what they charge.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
7. They are just now bringing in outside IT experts
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:57 AM
Oct 2013

They have no idea yet how many lines of code need to be rewritten. It might be more, it might be less. The first thing they have to do is a code review. Not just of the website itself, but of all of the interfacing applications, both on the government side and the insurance sides of the house.

That is not an quick and easy process.

This is going to take time if it's going to be done right.

Wounded Bear

(58,666 posts)
8. I believe that is a line from Jurassic Park...
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 12:00 PM
Oct 2013

and since it was in a movie, everybody knows it and is impressed by it. Thus, it is perfect propaganda.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
2. Thom Hartmann seems to think so.
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:37 AM
Oct 2013

He took calls yesterday on his show from people who had tried to set up health care accounts. It seems that those whose states had not set up the exchanges and refused the Medicaid money were the ones who had problems.

Seems to point to whose really at fault here.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
3. Yep. When something in gov't goes wrong, you can bet on it the Republicans are behind it.
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:45 AM
Oct 2013

They aren't kidding when they say they loathe government. Of course, they never mention that factoid during campaigning, but it's what they've been consistently saying all throughout.

Thankfully, it's beginning to seep through to Republican voters. When a poll shows that 52% of right-leaning voters would like to replace the Republicans in Congress, that tells me that they're waking up to the fact, however slowly, that having Republicans in gov't doesn't serve their interests.

kydo

(2,679 posts)
10. Of course its the baggers fault
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 12:03 PM
Oct 2013

They obstructed Obamacare every step of the way, tried under fund, and undermine the whole thing since day one.

Typical bagger MO. Remember the bagger trying to blame the park ranger for something he did? And the baggers on the Hill holding hearings on why the National Parks were closed when they shutdown the Government?

If the Dems wouldn't have been able avert the debt ceiling almost apocalypse caused by the baggers - the baggers would have blamed the Dems for not stopping from destroying the country.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Aren't these ACA website ...