General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMichael Bloomberg to buy big for Terry McAuliffe
Michael Bloombergs pro-gun-control super PAC will drop $1.1 million on ads for Democrat Terry McAuliffe in the final two weeks of the Virginia governors race.
The billionaire New York City mayors money will be siphoned through Independence USA PAC into broadcast television commercials in the D.C. market, according to two sources tracking the air war.
An adviser to the outgoing mayor did not respond to an email seeking more detail on the ads, which will begin running Tuesday and continue through the eve of the Nov. 5 election.
McAuliffe has courted and wooed Bloomberg, privately seeking his support on a trip to New York City Hall in August.
<snip>
http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=321222E7-5225-42B1-8B95-980252267A3A
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)Neither of these two guys fill me with pride. Bloomberg is the asshole who vigorously defended New York's Stop and Frisk policy and McAuliffe is the guy under who the Democrats lost election after election. I'd like to see the Democratic Party do better than these two losers.
cali
(114,904 posts)in any case, Bloomberg is not a democrat. Never has been.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)one of the best slogans since I Bill Maher's - "Vote Democratic - We're pathetic - but the other guys are nuts"
cali
(114,904 posts)alas, I've forgotten for whom. Some southern governor, I think.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)LBJ versus Goldwater.
FSogol
(45,488 posts)while? We are trying to win an election.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)Then it needs to send out a clear message that it's the party of the people, ALL PEOPLE. Palling around with a guy who made all minorities criminals and subject to constant police harassment is not a good way to achieve this.
Besides, McAulliffe is going to stomp on Kookinelli anyways.
FSogol
(45,488 posts)funding Cuccinelli?
Campaigning against Democratic candidates two weeks before the election is against DU's terms of service.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)What I'm saying is that if the Democratic Party doesn't stop pandering to assholes like Bloomberg, then eventually the Independents and others will leave and vote Republican again. All you have to do is look at 2010 for that.
If, on the other hand, the Democrats were to actually take a stand and refuse Bloomberg's help on the basis that he championed the oppression of minorities, then I think they could win over a majority for generations. Ever notice that whenever Democrats actually stand up to Republicans they tend to come out on top, whereas when they cater to them they tend to lose? Obama and the Democrats were slipping in the polls prior to the shutdown, the result of the NSA scandal and Obama's brief Syria war campaigning. But when they took a stand, the Republicans crashed and burned and Obama came out looking like a superstar.
I want the Democrats to win. Pandering to assholes like Bloomberg is not the way to do that in the long term. Republican lite NEVER does that. And if you doubt that, just look at McAuliffe's record as DNC chairman.
FSogol
(45,488 posts)Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)For about the hundredth time, it was moderates and Independents that abandoned the Dems in 2010, not true progressives. And they abandoned them because they had gone Republican lite, as they will every time Dems make a lurch to the right.
Your inability to accept history is why we have the nutty teabaggers in power we do now, not the other way around.
Rex
(65,616 posts)It is so sad really, they hate conspiracy theories...unless it is theirs!
cali
(114,904 posts)your posts are sickening with their, er, antipathy. If I accurately described the nature of your posts directed at me, I'd have a post hidden. Not worth it.
Let me just say this about ALL your posts:
oceans of it.
cali
(114,904 posts)what hatred? are you so motivated by antipathy for me that you're blinded by it? This is a piece that is good news for the dems in VA. duh.
and I've posted several other ops lately about the good news in the VA race.
yikes. take a chill pill and deal with YOUR, er, antipathy.
FSogol
(45,488 posts)positive for Democrats in VA? Spin, spin, spin!
I suppose I did miss your other pro-McAuliffe posts, so for that I do apologize.
There is no antipathy or anything else against you. If you look at your posts, you'll see that I quite often rec what you write.
My only point: If you want to bash McAuliffe and encourage others to do so, do it before the primary. We have an election to win.
cali
(114,904 posts)Are YOU actually claiming that McAuliffe is trying to sabotage his own campaign???
Mind boggling spin of the silliest kind.
This isn't bashing. It's a pro-McAuliffe post.
thanks for the apology.
now stop with nonsense that the op is antii-McAuliffe.
FSogol
(45,488 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)to what will help his campaign?
bwahahaha and unfuckingbelievable.
Rex
(65,616 posts)His posts went downhill the moment he decided to bring up hate, while hating on a fellow DUer. Why is it the people that shout for party solidarity, are always hating on fellow Dems?
What is up with that?
cali
(114,904 posts)I should be used to this idiotic crap.
Rex
(65,616 posts)I've seen typed here in a long time.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)McAulliffe is going to win easily. It's not even close. So take your party purism someplace where people are actually stupid enough to listen to it.
cali
(114,904 posts)because you are wrong.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023890979
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023319379
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023717854
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251328353
I'm so sick of lies. And the lies that I haven't posted anything against Cuccinelli during this campaign are just that, disgusting lies.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)But who are on the right side at least a few times, so we have to put up with them!
hack89
(39,171 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)My little head is just going to explode! NOBODY does that in politics! EVA!
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)I mean, lots of politicians do, so why not?
You mean to tell me there are some billionaires that don't represent the progressive values and that we should really stay away from? Go figure.