Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 06:19 PM Oct 2013

It's way past time to end the "War on Terror".

It's excessive. It's heavy handed. There's an excellent argument that it creates more terrorists than it kills. It's expensive. It diverts resources. It creates and stokes fear and division.

Unending wars are bad in a myriad of ways, not the least of which is that it becomes the norm. We grow accustomed to living in a perpetual state of war.

the steady march of the war on terror is has turned us into fearful sheep. It has whittled away civil liberties. It has put this countries police forces on steroids.

It's bad for us with regards to the rest of the world. it's bad for us within our borders.

Ending the war on terror doesn't mean ending vigilance.

It's time to call it a victory and move on.


15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's way past time to end the "War on Terror". (Original Post) cali Oct 2013 OP
what would "ending the war on terror" look like? Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #1
first of all, just declaring an end to it would be of value cali Oct 2013 #3
"stop raids on suspected terrorists and militants in other countries" geek tragedy Oct 2013 #7
trust you to mischaracterize... everything cali Oct 2013 #9
Under your calculus, it was a travesty for us to take bin Laden out. geek tragedy Oct 2013 #11
Can't fight a feeling... ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #2
R.E.O. Speedwagon could have told you that way back in the 80's Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #4
Right, because no one is trying to kill jazzimov Oct 2013 #5
and that's new just how? cali Oct 2013 #6
Agreed. But I'd say it's time to call it a lie BelgianMadCow Oct 2013 #8
DU has changed. Now they're are lots of rah rah war types running around cali Oct 2013 #10
I don't know about the rah rah war types BelgianMadCow Oct 2013 #13
K&R Brickbat Oct 2013 #12
aint gonna happen but wildbilln864 Oct 2013 #14
K&R woo me with science Oct 2013 #15
 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
1. what would "ending the war on terror" look like?
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 06:22 PM
Oct 2013

stop freezing assets of known terror groups or those funding them?
reduce security screening at airports?
stop using drones to target militant terrorists in other countries?
end ground war in Afghanistan?

what steps would you take to end it? And how to you forecast your efforts would effect global security from terrorist acts in 10 years?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
3. first of all, just declaring an end to it would be of value
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 06:32 PM
Oct 2013

we froze the assets of terror groups before the onset of the WoT. You should know that.

No, we don't have to stop common sense screening at airports.

stop the use of signature strikes. Do you have any idea what those are?

Stop raids on suspected terrorists and militants in other countries.

Stop the abusive use of the NSA in our own country as well as in other countries- particularly allies.



 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
7. "stop raids on suspected terrorists and militants in other countries"
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 06:38 PM
Oct 2013

I don't think the "Just Leave the Terrorists Alone Act" will be passing Congress any time soon. Maybe the alternate title "It Was Wrong to Kill Bin Laden Act" would be more persuasive.

It's one thing to have stricter controls/rules to avoid civilian casualties. To adopt a policy of granting them safe havens across the globe is quite another.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
9. trust you to mischaracterize... everything
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 06:43 PM
Oct 2013

It's hardly the "Just leave the terrorists alone act", geek.

Our deploying troops in sovereign nations that we are not at war with is at least as much a liability as it is a benefit.

but then some of you think the U.S. has special dispensation to do what we wish when we wish and to hell with international law.

You believe in a repuke type of American exceptionalism. I don't.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
11. Under your calculus, it was a travesty for us to take bin Laden out.
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 06:47 PM
Oct 2013

Just like it was a travesty for us to grab Al Libi.

And it would be a big no-no to go after Al Shahab militants.

If they're in Waziristan, or Afghanistan, or Somalia, or tribal Yemen, or tribal areas of Libya, your rule would be just leave them be without any interference from us.

That's the pacifist stance on the issue. Sensibly rejected by the vast majority of Americans.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/147395/Americans-Back-Bin-Laden-Mission-Credit-Military-CIA.aspx

Approve: 93%
Disapprove: 5%

I await your attempt to oust rightwing exceptionalist militarist jingoist Bernie Sanders from office.

http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/release-statement-on-osama-bin-laden

BURLINGTON, Vt., May 2, 2011 - U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) issued the following statement today on the U.S. operation in Pakistan that killed Osama bin Laden:

"The death of Osama bin Laden is a historic moment in our fight against international terrorism and his Al Qaeda organization.

"I applaud the extraordinary bravery of those American military personnel who participated in this highly-effective operation, the intelligence operation that made it possible and the leadership of President Obama. At this moment, we also must not forget the American men and women from Vermont and around the country whose service and sacrifice in the struggle to defend our country has made us safer."

"It is impossible to predict the future, but I hope the death of Osama bin Laden and the growth of democratic movements in the Muslim world marks a momentous turning point, which leads the region toward peace and prosperity and away from terrorism, death and destruction


Unless you're going to sit there and pretend that the bin laden killing wasn't a " raid on suspected terrorists and militants in other countries."

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)
8. Agreed. But I'd say it's time to call it a lie
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 06:39 PM
Oct 2013

but that's just me, looking back to when it started.

The entire thing is far, far beyond reason. The things done in the name of the WoT, what they cost, what they are supposedly good for - it's all BS. If the goal is saving lives, there's a whole range of things that are much, much better value for money.

The goal of the WoT is unreachable, and definitely when the means used create blowback. Therefore, that's not its true goal. Can you say MIC?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
10. DU has changed. Now they're are lots of rah rah war types running around
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 06:45 PM
Oct 2013

lots of believers in American exceptionalism.

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)
13. I don't know about the rah rah war types
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 06:53 PM
Oct 2013

yes, they're here. But not like in a majority, by far, I'd guess.

But the exceptionalism, yep that is alive and well. It bothers me greatly to be honest, as a foreigner. The way in which for example torture or spying or droning policies are deemed OK as long as it's "not on Americans". The very idea that it's OK to go kill some civilians in a country you're not at war with because you have a beef with some people running around there...

How about another country kills some civilians in a drone strike that was targeting the teahadists, who clearly are terrorists by the very definition of the word? Hypothetical of course, I'd be against that. I once started a thread like that. Won't do that again very soon :-/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's way past time to end...