Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,900 posts)
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 06:22 PM Oct 2013

Analysis: Little evidence yet that Obamacare costing full-time jobs

Source: Reuters

Analysis: Little evidence yet that Obamacare costing full-time jobs

By Jason Lange
WASHINGTON | Tue Oct 22, 2013 5:29pm EDT

(Reuters) - There is little evidence that employers are sacrificing full-time jobs by hiring more part-timers or reducing existing employee hours because of the costs of providing health coverage under Obamacare.

Conservative Republicans have pointed to the high level of part-time employment as evidence businesses are cutting hours for staff in response to the new healthcare law, which will require them to offer health insurance to full-time workers.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

But there is little discernible impact in the employment figures released in recent months, including the September numbers out on Tuesday. The number of people with part-time jobs who want full-time work, for example, was essentially flat in September at 7.9 million.

"We are not seeing any effect in the data," Jason Furman, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, told Reuters Insider.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/22/us-usa-healthcare-hiring-analysis-idUSBRE99L1F220131022
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Analysis: Little evidence yet that Obamacare costing full-time jobs (Original Post) Eugene Oct 2013 OP
Really? econoclast Oct 2013 #1
I'm not a graph reader, please explain your point. DonViejo Oct 2013 #2
That graph shows a high correlation between recession and part-time jobs DireStrike Oct 2013 #3
Graph shows ... econoclast Oct 2013 #4
I suspect that given time "Obamacare" will prove to be extremely popular. ... spin Oct 2013 #5

DireStrike

(6,452 posts)
3. That graph shows a high correlation between recession and part-time jobs
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 06:51 PM
Oct 2013

It DOESN'T show a high correlation between the existence of Obamacare and part time jobs.

If that chart had the correct dates(the date is not really visible), it would be apparent that the crash started in 2008, before Obama even won the election.

econoclast

(543 posts)
4. Graph shows ...
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 07:11 PM
Oct 2013

Full time employees as a percent of the population

We seem - contrary to other post recession periods - to be stuck at a very very low level of full time employment.

spin

(17,493 posts)
5. I suspect that given time "Obamacare" will prove to be extremely popular. ...
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 07:17 PM
Oct 2013

However I am greatly disturbed that the initial roll out has encountered serious problems.

If there is any truth in the assertion that the new healthcare system will be more expensive and less effective than what we had, I fear our party will face difficulty in the midterm and presidential elections. Our previous medical care system was the most expensive and far from the best healthcare system in the world. It would be inexcusable if "Obamacare" proves to be even more expensive and offered a lower level of healthcare. If so, it will require a major overhaul and some compromise with Republicans. Unfortunately Republicans appear unwilling to compromise and instead seem to favor scrapping the program entirely. In fact they seem willing to do everything they can to insure that "Obamacare" fails.

One of the main reasons that I have supported the Democratic Party over the years has been the fact that it favored overhauling our healthcare system. There is absolutely no reason that I can see why a nation as rich as ours can not offer quality healthcare to all citizens for a reasonable cost. Unfortunately this might mean that healthcare can no longer be a for profit system that benefits the major companies that make prescription drugs and the insurance companies and allows them to gain enormous profit.

We can do better and perhaps "Obamacare" will be a good first step. I am currently retired and greatly appreciate the fact that I am on Medicare. I have a supplemental policy and recently had an operation which cost me absolutely nothing including no copays at the doctor's offices. I also supplement my income with Social Security which enables me to avoid eating cat food to survive.

I have to admit that sometimes I feel that the people we elect are more concerned with getting donations from the big corporations than making life easier for the people who elect them. This results from the tremendous expense of running a campaign for election. The "little people" in our nation can't afford to contribute enough money to offset the influence of the rich and powerful.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Analysis: Little evidence...