General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPrivate Business is Efficient at One Thing:
It's efficient at enriching the 1%.
Labor pays for that efficiency with more hours, more work, and less pay.
When you hear the canard about business efficiency, ask, from whose perspective? Actually, siphoning off profits (and not reinvesting them) is terribly inefficient. When a Jamie Dimon can accrue his wealth by destroying the economy, well yeah, that's very efficient ... for him ... not much for everyone else.
Speaking in terms of efficiency, it's all about who's the beneficiary, and from whose perspective you are relating.
When 400 people have more wealth than roughly 150 million Americans combined, you really have to ask yourself, is that an efficient allocation of wealth and resources?
Edited sufficient to efficient in the last sentence.
liberal N proud
(60,339 posts)Further enrichment of the 1%.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)They have about ten employees and serve fairly good Mexican food. They are not the 1%, but upper middle class.
The plumber that replaced my toilet last month owns his own private business. He is his only employee. He is not in the 1%.
In fact, most private businesses are owned by middle class people making less than $75,000 a year.
I think you mean "Big Business." I do not disagree with the premise of this OP, only your terminology.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)And by private business, I was, in fact, referring to corporations (mega, trans-national, etc.).
But, yes, the point remains the same.