General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSantorum: ‘Higher-income people don’t have to pay taxes’
Santorum: Higher-income people dont have to pay taxes
Republican presidential Rick Santorum is advising President Barack Obama not to raise taxes on the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans because higher-income people dont have to pay taxes if they dont want to.
Once we defeat Barack Obama this economy will start turning around, the former Pennsylvania senator told a crowd in Miamisburg, Ohio. Because youll know you have someone in there whos going to unshackle businesses, reduce rates, not increase them. The presidents promised increased taxes if hes re-elected.
All he wants to do to solve the deficit problem is increase taxes on people, particularly higher-income people, Santorum continued. You see, that sounds very populist. Go after the 1 percent. Its interesting because the British just did this. They went after the 1 percent in Britain. They dramatically increased taxes on the highest-income Brits. And guess what? It failed.
What happened? Well, higher-income people dont have to pay taxes if they dont want to because they can move their money somewhere else, they can move their investments. They can stop investing. They can stop working. They dont need to work. Theyre higher-income people.
more:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/03/05/santorum-higher-income-people-dont-have-to-pay-taxes/
Happyhippychick
(8,379 posts)CanonRay
(14,111 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)He's more like the clown I got into an argument with about 20 years ago.
My reply to him was "I've always wanted to say that I've met a pompous prig, and now I can."
bluedigger
(17,087 posts)RP isn't going to like him stealing his thunder.
Bluerthanblue
(13,669 posts)must keep the people in their place.
Mr. Santorum good catholic that he is seems to ignore the sin of avarice:
Avarice
Avarice (from Latin avarus, "greedy"; "to crave" is the inordinate love for riches. Its special malice, broadly speaking, lies in that it makes the getting and keeping of money, possessions, and the like, a purpose in itself to live for. It does not see that these things are valuable only as instruments for the conduct of a rational and harmonious life, due regard being paid of course to the special social condition in which one is placed. It is called a capital vice because it has as its object that for the gaining or holding of which many other sins are committed. It is more to be dreaded in that it often cloaks itself as a virtue, or insinuates itself under the pretext of making a decent provision for the future. In so far as avarice is an incentive to injustice in acquiring and retaining of wealth, it is frequently a grievous sin. In itself, however, and in so far as it implies simply an excessive desire of, or pleasure in, riches, it is commonly not a mortal sin.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02148b.htm
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Low class is still class, right?
part man all 86
(367 posts)Javaman
(62,531 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)I am really sick of these people
nobodyspecial
(2,286 posts)And I am so sick of this argument that if you increase taxes, rich people will stop working. It's ludicrous.
Johonny
(20,864 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)dumb enough to say this again.
eppur_se_muova
(36,275 posts)"Only little people pay taxes!"
Initech
(100,090 posts)If the teabaggers think this guy or Rmoney are going to be doing any better job of fixing the economy than Obama they're sadly deluded.