General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDept. Store Barneys Calls Police on Black Teen for Buying Expensive Belt.
Lawsuit has been filed, as it should. Disgusting.
Trayon Christian, 19, told the Daily News he filed a lawsuit after he was targeted by staffers at Barneys Madison Ave. flagship store and detained by police because they didnt believe a young black man could possibly afford to buy such an expensive belt.
The fashion-forward teen, who lives with his mom in Corona, Queens, is studying engineering at the New York City College of Technology, where he had a work-study job.
It was a quick trip. I gave them my debit card, I signed my name, he said.
According to his lawsuit, the clerk asked Christian to show his ID, which he did.
I showed my state ID, he told The News.
The clerk didnt react as he signed for his purchase and left, he said.
But he got no more than a block from the store when two undercover NYPD detectives stopped him near E. 60th St., the lawsuit said.
They said my card wasnt real, it was fake. They said someone at Barneys called to report it, said Christian.
He was handcuffed and taken to the 19th Precinct stationhouse, he said.
According to his lawsuit, he was detained in a holding cell for about two hours.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/barneys-accused-stealing-black-teen-article-1.1493101#ixzz2iYn7AnAg
Orrex
(63,219 posts)Last edited Wed Oct 23, 2013, 01:50 PM - Edit history (1)
1. What kind of an asshole buys a $349 belt?
2. What kind of asshole calls the cops on somebody for buying a $349 belt?
3. What kind of assholes arrest somebody for buying a $349 belt?
RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)I wouldn't, but I'm not going to criticize him...he's 19, works and goes to school.
The answer to your other 2 questions are huge, racist assholes.
Orrex
(63,219 posts)I had hoped that triviality of question #1 would be sufficiently self-evident to stand in stark contrast to questions 2 & 3.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...I think you're being a bit harsh on the young man.
When I was 19, I spent a summer doing temp work in NYC. It was the first time I lived away from home, and I stayed in a cheap room, and I had some spending money. One of the very first things I spent that money on was a small leather purse that cost $80. That was a lot of money then, very similar to buying a $349 belt nowadays.
Since then, I have not been the kind of person to buy expensive handbags. But whenever I find myself asking what kind of person does buy expensive handbags (and I do find myself asking that, from time to time...), I remember myself as a young woman, looking at all the fine leather items in that store, and being irresistibly drawn to that handbag.
Well at least no one arrested me for it.
Orrex
(63,219 posts)And it's sad but unsurprising that he was singled out because a black male making a high-price purchase on a credit card is an automatic alarm bell for a certain type of personality.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...and I did recognize the point you were making, and that #1 was more of a rhetorical device than your actual opinion of the young man. It just seemed worth pointing out that buying a $349 belt is not that horrible.
Orrex
(63,219 posts)I'd like to see a picture of it, though.
To paraphrase a comedian from years ago, if I paid $349 for a belt, you can bet that it's the only thing I would wear, to make sure that people notice it.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...you for thinking he's an a**hole for buying a $349 belt, or me for chalking it up to youthful folly. These days, young people do seem to put a premium on expensive brand-name items, and I do disapprove, so I guess our outlooks aren't really that different. My only issue was calling him an a**hole, but again, clearly you were going for a rhetorical effect.
Orrex
(63,219 posts)Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)trumad
(41,692 posts)Orrex
(63,219 posts)So I guess it doesn't apply to him.
trumad
(41,692 posts)If he kept it is he still an asshole.
Oh never the fuck mind.
Orrex
(63,219 posts)Very easily pushed.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)are a relatively good investment of clothing dollars because they last so long.
I have a black leather clutch purse that I paid WAY too much for over 30 years ago when money was very tight (school loans, car loan, entry level income), but I bought it to KEEP, and if I was lucky, use until I died. It's looking like that will happen.
I knew quality, and I knew I wouldn't get that sort of sale price on an item I REALLY liked for a very long time. It's a Philippe. Don't know if the company is around anymore, but that gorgeous leather handbag was worth every dime I paid.
trumad
(41,692 posts)Response to ljm2002 (Reply #10)
Name removed Message auto-removed
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)I've seen women do that kind of stuff frequently (even college age women)...Money is relative to some people...Isn't there some famous high-end joint in NYC that sells an $80 cheeseburger? What kind of person pays $1.5 million for a new car??
Questions 2 and 3; the answer is the same -- People who racially profile...
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I'd buy it...
Just saying.
Thats your first fucking question?
Shame on you
Orrex
(63,219 posts)trumad
(41,692 posts)The kid was big time discriminated against and you call him an asshole.
WTF
Orrex
(63,219 posts)I have replied more expansively elsewhere in-thread.
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)You called him one right here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3907344
trumad
(41,692 posts)I didn't say he was an asshole.
Orrex
(63,219 posts)You post a bikini of Halle Berry in order to proclaim your outrage at a "hottest celebrities" thread, but because you missed the point of my post--which most other people have grasped pretty readily--you think that I'm confused.
trumad
(41,692 posts)1. What kind of an asshole buys a $349 belt?
2. What kind of asshole calls the cops on somebody for buying a $349 belt?
3. What kind of assholes arrest someobody for buying a $349 belt?
Please explain question one?
You called the kid an asshole and now you're trying to pull the comment out of your ass.
Orrex
(63,219 posts)Most readers were able to understand this pretty readily.
trumad
(41,692 posts)Are you an asshole for missing a glaringly obvious rhetorical point? No.
But it is curious that you harp on this one issue as if you simply can't see past it.
trumad
(41,692 posts)Orrex
(63,219 posts)RZM
(8,556 posts)That shit better be endorsed by Batman himself.
But hey, if he wants to pay that much for a belt, that's his call.
Response to Orrex (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Orrex
(63,219 posts)uppityperson
(115,678 posts)thesquanderer
(11,990 posts)uponit7771
(90,348 posts)Orrex
(63,219 posts)sendero
(28,552 posts).. it ^^^^^
uponit7771
(90,348 posts)SCVDem
(5,103 posts)You've got spending options.
In California, not having a car is not much of an option.
$$$$$$
uponit7771
(90,348 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)1: Youngsters that don't have a lot of other responsibilities and people that have never had to learn the value of a dollar (the privileged)
2: Racists, ageists and ignoramuses (although they are often one in the same).
3. See answer 2.
Dr. Strange
(25,921 posts)I don't know if you've been paying attention to the youth culture, but there is an epidemic of pants falling below the waist level.
Sometimes lower.
Kids today need belts with latent super-powers to keep their pants up.
MsLeopard
(1,265 posts)Unbelievable.
marmar
(77,086 posts)Amurka.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)NYPD and Barney's stepped in it big time.
Historic NY
(37,452 posts)police are in trouble for making the stop period, it was a legal purchase, once the card was accepted in full for payment....Where were the store dicks? Who signed the complaint?
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)(in essence) working for Barneys? For example, check out the bolded part of the article... Gee, I wonder if the NYPD would ever be found in plain clothes 'periodically visiting' a store in Queens or Harlem with a similar issue? Somehow, I doubt it.
The NYPD said it has gotten 53 grand larceny complaints this year for credit card fraud at Barneys Madison Ave. store and has made more than 47 arrests. But its unclear how many of those arrested were actually charged with a crime and how many were, like Christian, released.
Plainclothes officers visit Barneys periodically because of problems with fraudulent use of cards, the NYPD said.
The whole incident is infuriating on a number of levels.
I hope the young man is well compensated for this. I thought racial profiling in NYC was supposed to end w/the Stop & Frisk policy. It obviously didn't, and probably never will. At least not in the near future. Sad.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)would be to see more civil lawsuit awards that cost municipalities millions of dollars.
gopiscrap
(23,763 posts)Response to gopiscrap (Reply #5)
Name removed Message auto-removed
phantom power
(25,966 posts)raging moderate
(4,307 posts)I am so tired of this. Again and again these monsters let their masks slip and reveal their true purpose. I apologize to Mr. Trayon Christian, on behalf of his fellow Americans.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Bingo!!!!
The hidden layer of racism....you have no RIGHT to have what we have.
Rex
(65,616 posts)That is what really happened! UGH.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)matt819
(10,749 posts)Oh, I don't know. Let's say Barney's actually trained its employees to behave professionally and pay them a living wage. Cause you can be pretty sure that this retail worker at an upscale store wasn't raking in the big bucks.
But instead of doing that Barney's is going to pay maybe a half million dollars hourly for the two hours this former Barney's customer spent in lock-up.
Training and $40 vs. untrained racist and $1 million (or so).
Was it a MasterCard? Priceless.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Then they earn a commission on top of that. A "counter manager" who could be a cashier or a manager of a men's accessories counter makes 20/hr.
Training is very important and so is a live able wage which those numbers don't represent especially in NYC.
dembotoz
(16,820 posts)their hobby
they paint them, they buy and sell them on ebay
mind you not over 300 bucks at one time
but over time---damn
my youngest flips a bunch of burgers to afford it
but at the end of the day
it is his money
Orrex
(63,219 posts)BklnDem75
(2,918 posts)Probably had an ulcer after seeing the front page of the Daily News.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)indepat
(20,899 posts)but so many others cannot come to grips with their not-so-subtle racism.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)Hutzpa
(11,461 posts)then emerged from bankruptcy in 1999.
The store has changed hands twice which is obviously from bad management, but they're harassing
a black kid for splurging.
Funny, the criminal pointing finger at the innocent to create a diversion.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)and the CUSTOMER is the criminal ???
frazzled
(18,402 posts)When they wouldn't show her (the black woman) the $12,000 (I can't remember how much it was; I just remember it was a lot; maybe it was $36,000) handbag.
If your face is black, you are immediately under suspicion, whether you are a 19-year-old engineering student or one of the richest and most famous women in the world.
This is a special kind of discrimination. I grew up in postwar America, during the Civil Rights era. I remember as a preteen when the rabbi of the temple we went to came to tell us kids about the experiences he'd just had marching next to MLK in Selma. And he told us to remember one thing, as members of a group that had been discriminated against: no matter what kind of discrimination you thought you faced (redlining, job discrimination, and other forms of discrimination were still prevalent in US cities and towns), you were still privileged as "white-looking" Americans. Black youth our age could never mask the color of their skin, and that would be an ever-present mark for bigots to discriminate against, every day in every way. He wanted us to feel what that was like.
Nothing's changed much since the early 1960s. (I take that back, a lot has changed, but remnants of this kind of discrimination are still widespread in our society.)
surrealAmerican
(11,362 posts)Yes, the racist stereotyping is similar, but nobody at the shop in Switzerland called the police about the matter. This young man was actually arrested here - despite the fact that the sale was made (which means his debit card account had the funds to cover this purchase).
Orrex
(63,219 posts)If he signed for it, as the article indicates, then they likely (but not definitely) ran it as a credit card rather than debit. That means a customer could potentially lack sufficient funds yet still complete the transaction depending on the time of day (around 19:00, apparently) and other factors.
Of course, that absolutely doesn't explain why the cops were so quick to track him down and pounce on him like that.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)I think not.
Orrex
(63,219 posts)I think not.
The question was whether or not the transaction verified the funds in his account, and it was asserted here that he used his debit card.
If he had to sign for it, it's more likely that it was processed as a credit card transaction.
That doesn't say anything at all about the obvious racism in this case; it simply examines the mechanics of the transaction.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)If not...your point is moot.
Orrex
(63,219 posts)You seem to thnk that you're zinging me with the fact that they called the cops on him because he's black, but reply #44 states outright that the mechanics of the transaction are independent of that fact.
In short, I already made the point that you're trying to make now.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Orrex
(63,219 posts)Tough week for retail racism.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)i will never set foot in that place.
sendero
(28,552 posts)... to run the card as a debit? Probably not. Which makes it their problem.
And it could be that the DIDN'T want to run it as a debit to get a signature, thinking they had snared a dangerous belt thief.
I'm pretty sure the clerk that rang up this transaction is looking for another job.
Orrex
(63,219 posts)I've been to lots of stores that don't offer debit as an option, requiring signatures for every transaction. They might have run it as credit simply because that's how they do it.
1. They accept only credit, not debit.
2. They accept both credit and debit but default to credit unless the customer stipulates otherwise.
3. They accept both credit and debit and let the customer choose
4. They accept both credit and debit but default to credit above a certain limit
5. They accept both credit and debit but default to credit after a certain time of day
6. They accept both credit and debit but required a signature for debit in this case
7. Employee error caused the transaction to process as credit
8. They accept both credit and debit but processed as credit for the reason you identify
I could probably think of a dozen or more permutations beyond that, but it's clear that there are more possibilities at play than "they process as debit unless they're racially profiling."
Regardless, in the current case--as I've stated previously--their policy doesn't justify siccing the cops on him.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Richard D
(8,759 posts)get the red out
(13,468 posts)He had his ID and produced it. If the name was the same as on the debit card WTF???
When I was that age, waaaay back in the early 80's, all I wanted on EARTH one Christmas was a Gucci purse. It didn't have to be a big one, it just needed to be GUCCI! It was exciting as anything to get my hands on that bag. Young people are into fashion, everything is fresh and new. They don't have the thoughts I now have like "yea, I remember when that was in style about 20 years ago". The world is so new it is all really important to get little pieces of it's shine.
A college kid that wants something that looks really cool is hardly new. Unfortunately neither is disgusting racism.
malaise
(269,144 posts)WTF???
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)this happened in the northern state of New York? I've been led to believe things like this only happened in the racist south.
Yeah, it's sarcasm.
Niceguy1
(2,467 posts)NYPD screwed up.
ecstatic
(32,727 posts)Sad, but that's the state of things in this country. smh