Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 11:43 AM Oct 2013

Dept. Store Barneys Calls Police on Black Teen for Buying Expensive Belt.

Lawsuit has been filed, as it should. Disgusting.


Trayon Christian, 19, told the Daily News he filed a lawsuit after he was targeted by staffers at Barneys’ Madison Ave. flagship store and detained by police because they didn’t believe a young black man could possibly afford to buy such an expensive belt.

The fashion-forward teen, who lives with his mom in Corona, Queens, is studying engineering at the New York City College of Technology, where he had a work-study job.

It was a quick trip. I gave them my debit card, I signed my name,” he said.

According to his lawsuit, the clerk asked Christian to show his ID, which he did.

“I showed my state ID,” he told The News.

The clerk didn’t react as he signed for his purchase and left, he said.

But he got no more than a block from the store when two undercover NYPD detectives stopped him near E. 60th St., the lawsuit said.

“They said my card wasn’t real, it was fake. They said someone at Barneys called to report it,” said Christian.

He was handcuffed and taken to the 19th Precinct stationhouse, he said.

According to his lawsuit, he was detained in a holding cell for about two hours.


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/barneys-accused-stealing-black-teen-article-1.1493101#ixzz2iYn7AnAg




88 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dept. Store Barneys Calls Police on Black Teen for Buying Expensive Belt. (Original Post) RiffRandell Oct 2013 OP
Three questions. Orrex Oct 2013 #1
If the kid wanted to pay that much for a belt, that's his business. RiffRandell Oct 2013 #7
You're right of course Orrex Oct 2013 #19
As to your first question... ljm2002 Oct 2013 #10
As others have noted, he's welcome to buy whatever he wants Orrex Oct 2013 #22
Yes, of course he is... ljm2002 Oct 2013 #27
I suppose not Orrex Oct 2013 #39
Well I don't know that either of us is correct on this... ljm2002 Oct 2013 #42
I think you've said it very nicely. Orrex Oct 2013 #43
Ferragamo Jesus Malverde Oct 2013 #64
But yet you call the kid an asshole trumad Oct 2013 #38
Well, he returned it. Orrex Oct 2013 #40
He returned it as a statement against the company. trumad Oct 2013 #45
You should do something about your buttons Orrex Oct 2013 #50
Really? Maybe he knows that good handmade leather articles of clothing and accessories kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #52
Again---you're barking at the wrong guy trumad Oct 2013 #56
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2013 #47
WTF????? n/t ljm2002 Oct 2013 #49
Well, for question #1 Blue_Tires Oct 2013 #12
If it was an Aston Martin One-77... Agschmid Oct 2013 #23
Seriously? trumad Oct 2013 #13
What does Halle Berry say about it? Orrex Oct 2013 #16
That's your reply? trumad Oct 2013 #28
That's my reply to you Orrex Oct 2013 #35
Make up your own mind. He's either an asshole, or he isn't, right? kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #53
I think you're confused. trumad Oct 2013 #55
I'm sure that you do. Orrex Oct 2013 #63
Here are your 3 questions. trumad Oct 2013 #65
Question 1 is explained by questions 2 and 3 Orrex Oct 2013 #68
Is the kid an asshole for spending that much on a belt? trumad Oct 2013 #69
No. Orrex Oct 2013 #71
it wasn't rhetorical. ..and you know it. trumad Oct 2013 #72
It was. .. and you don't know it. Orrex Oct 2013 #73
If I'm paying $349 for a belt RZM Oct 2013 #18
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2013 #31
I look forward to your long and bright future at DU Orrex Oct 2013 #36
Alas, mirt got there first. But don't worry, she'll be back. uppityperson Oct 2013 #37
Yup, $350 is a lot for a belt. Why didn't he spend it on crack like he was obviously supposed to? nt thesquanderer Oct 2013 #57
+1 uponit7771 Oct 2013 #60
Way to spot the question within the question Orrex Oct 2013 #62
Nailed. sendero Oct 2013 #81
1st question, someone who wants a 350usd belt... uponit7771 Oct 2013 #59
when you don't own a car.... SCVDem Oct 2013 #61
Same in Texas, not much mass transit uponit7771 Oct 2013 #67
Answers: Live and Learn Oct 2013 #78
In regards to your first question... Dr. Strange Oct 2013 #85
It's a great country,isn't it? MsLeopard Oct 2013 #2
Dios mio. ..... And sadly, this is hardly surprising. marmar Oct 2013 #3
He'll be able to upgrade his entire wardrobe with the settlement he'll win. geek tragedy Oct 2013 #4
+1 Historic NY Oct 2013 #11
I was thinking the same thing. Why is the NYPD PotatoChip Oct 2013 #34
Fastest way to get social change on LE issues Old and In the Way Oct 2013 #33
bunch of racists, I hope he sues the shit out of them gopiscrap Oct 2013 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2013 #58
I hope he rakes Barney's over the coals for that shit. phantom power Oct 2013 #6
No, they just believe a young black man has NO RIGHT to have that much money. raging moderate Oct 2013 #8
"they just believe a young black man has NO RIGHT to have that much money." dixiegrrrrl Oct 2013 #14
Spot on! Rex Oct 2013 #29
And we have our winner. Brigid Oct 2013 #74
Let's see how this might otherwise have gone matt819 Oct 2013 #9
Glass door says the salaries are 10-11 and hour for sales people... Agschmid Oct 2013 #25
my sons pay stupid sums of money for warhammer 40000 guys dembotoz Oct 2013 #15
Last I checked, $300 will buy most of a box of seven Eldar figures Orrex Oct 2013 #24
More ankle weights for Lhota BklnDem75 Oct 2013 #17
Well, he should afford an ensemble, now. Eleanors38 Oct 2013 #20
The crime of living in 'Murika while black must be getting old to so many, indepat Oct 2013 #21
he will soon be able to afford even more. nt arely staircase Oct 2013 #26
So the store went bankrupt in 1996 Hutzpa Oct 2013 #30
They charge $349 for a belt (sold in a store with no carpet or wall coverings btw) KurtNYC Oct 2013 #48
Reminiscent of the Oprah incident in Switzerland frazzled Oct 2013 #32
This is far worse. surrealAmerican Oct 2013 #41
One minor thing Orrex Oct 2013 #44
So that means the treat white credit card users the same way? noiretextatique Oct 2013 #75
Was that the question? Orrex Oct 2013 #76
Do they call the cops when white people use credit cards? noiretextatique Oct 2013 #77
Did you actually read reply #44? Orrex Oct 2013 #80
OK noiretextatique Oct 2013 #86
Well, that answers questions 2 and 3 Orrex Oct 2013 #87
indeed noiretextatique Oct 2013 #88
Did they ASK... sendero Oct 2013 #82
Depends on the store Orrex Oct 2013 #83
It's all part of "Shopping While Black" /nt frazzled Oct 2013 #46
Lawsuit. Richard D Oct 2013 #51
This is idiotic! get the red out Oct 2013 #54
It's open season on black people malaise Oct 2013 #66
I'm shocked.... ohheckyeah Oct 2013 #70
sounds like the Niceguy1 Oct 2013 #79
I'm glad he wasn't killed. ecstatic Oct 2013 #84

Orrex

(63,219 posts)
1. Three questions.
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 11:46 AM
Oct 2013

Last edited Wed Oct 23, 2013, 01:50 PM - Edit history (1)

1. What kind of an asshole buys a $349 belt?

2. What kind of asshole calls the cops on somebody for buying a $349 belt?

3. What kind of assholes arrest somebody for buying a $349 belt?

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
7. If the kid wanted to pay that much for a belt, that's his business.
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 11:56 AM
Oct 2013

I wouldn't, but I'm not going to criticize him...he's 19, works and goes to school.

The answer to your other 2 questions are huge, racist assholes.

Orrex

(63,219 posts)
19. You're right of course
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:18 PM
Oct 2013

I had hoped that triviality of question #1 would be sufficiently self-evident to stand in stark contrast to questions 2 & 3.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
10. As to your first question...
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 11:58 AM
Oct 2013

...I think you're being a bit harsh on the young man.

When I was 19, I spent a summer doing temp work in NYC. It was the first time I lived away from home, and I stayed in a cheap room, and I had some spending money. One of the very first things I spent that money on was a small leather purse that cost $80. That was a lot of money then, very similar to buying a $349 belt nowadays.

Since then, I have not been the kind of person to buy expensive handbags. But whenever I find myself asking what kind of person does buy expensive handbags (and I do find myself asking that, from time to time...), I remember myself as a young woman, looking at all the fine leather items in that store, and being irresistibly drawn to that handbag.

Well at least no one arrested me for it.

Orrex

(63,219 posts)
22. As others have noted, he's welcome to buy whatever he wants
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:25 PM
Oct 2013

And it's sad but unsurprising that he was singled out because a black male making a high-price purchase on a credit card is an automatic alarm bell for a certain type of personality.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
27. Yes, of course he is...
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:33 PM
Oct 2013

...and I did recognize the point you were making, and that #1 was more of a rhetorical device than your actual opinion of the young man. It just seemed worth pointing out that buying a $349 belt is not that horrible.

Orrex

(63,219 posts)
39. I suppose not
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:54 PM
Oct 2013

I'd like to see a picture of it, though.


To paraphrase a comedian from years ago, if I paid $349 for a belt, you can bet that it's the only thing I would wear, to make sure that people notice it.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
42. Well I don't know that either of us is correct on this...
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 01:00 PM
Oct 2013

...you for thinking he's an a**hole for buying a $349 belt, or me for chalking it up to youthful folly. These days, young people do seem to put a premium on expensive brand-name items, and I do disapprove, so I guess our outlooks aren't really that different. My only issue was calling him an a**hole, but again, clearly you were going for a rhetorical effect.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
45. He returned it as a statement against the company.
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 01:15 PM
Oct 2013

If he kept it is he still an asshole.

Oh never the fuck mind.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
52. Really? Maybe he knows that good handmade leather articles of clothing and accessories
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 01:51 PM
Oct 2013

are a relatively good investment of clothing dollars because they last so long.

I have a black leather clutch purse that I paid WAY too much for over 30 years ago when money was very tight (school loans, car loan, entry level income), but I bought it to KEEP, and if I was lucky, use until I died. It's looking like that will happen.

I knew quality, and I knew I wouldn't get that sort of sale price on an item I REALLY liked for a very long time. It's a Philippe. Don't know if the company is around anymore, but that gorgeous leather handbag was worth every dime I paid.

Response to ljm2002 (Reply #10)

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
12. Well, for question #1
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:02 PM
Oct 2013

I've seen women do that kind of stuff frequently (even college age women)...Money is relative to some people...Isn't there some famous high-end joint in NYC that sells an $80 cheeseburger? What kind of person pays $1.5 million for a new car??

Questions 2 and 3; the answer is the same -- People who racially profile...

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
28. That's your reply?
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:34 PM
Oct 2013

The kid was big time discriminated against and you call him an asshole.

WTF

Orrex

(63,219 posts)
63. I'm sure that you do.
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 03:10 PM
Oct 2013

You post a bikini of Halle Berry in order to proclaim your outrage at a "hottest celebrities" thread, but because you missed the point of my post--which most other people have grasped pretty readily--you think that I'm confused.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
65. Here are your 3 questions.
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 03:13 PM
Oct 2013

1. What kind of an asshole buys a $349 belt?

2. What kind of asshole calls the cops on somebody for buying a $349 belt?

3. What kind of assholes arrest someobody for buying a $349 belt?

Please explain question one?

You called the kid an asshole and now you're trying to pull the comment out of your ass.

Orrex

(63,219 posts)
68. Question 1 is explained by questions 2 and 3
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 03:43 PM
Oct 2013

Most readers were able to understand this pretty readily.

Orrex

(63,219 posts)
71. No.
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 04:16 PM
Oct 2013

Are you an asshole for missing a glaringly obvious rhetorical point? No.


But it is curious that you harp on this one issue as if you simply can't see past it.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
18. If I'm paying $349 for a belt
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:14 PM
Oct 2013

That shit better be endorsed by Batman himself.

But hey, if he wants to pay that much for a belt, that's his call.

Response to Orrex (Reply #1)

thesquanderer

(11,990 posts)
57. Yup, $350 is a lot for a belt. Why didn't he spend it on crack like he was obviously supposed to? nt
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 02:26 PM
Oct 2013
 

SCVDem

(5,103 posts)
61. when you don't own a car....
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 02:39 PM
Oct 2013

You've got spending options.

In California, not having a car is not much of an option.

$$$$$$

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
78. Answers:
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 04:27 AM
Oct 2013

1: Youngsters that don't have a lot of other responsibilities and people that have never had to learn the value of a dollar (the privileged)

2: Racists, ageists and ignoramuses (although they are often one in the same).

3. See answer 2.

Dr. Strange

(25,921 posts)
85. In regards to your first question...
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 11:44 AM
Oct 2013
1. What kind of an asshole buys a $349 belt?


I don't know if you've been paying attention to the youth culture, but there is an epidemic of pants falling below the waist level.


Sometimes lower.


Kids today need belts with latent super-powers to keep their pants up.
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
4. He'll be able to upgrade his entire wardrobe with the settlement he'll win.
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 11:52 AM
Oct 2013

NYPD and Barney's stepped in it big time.

Historic NY

(37,452 posts)
11. +1
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:00 PM
Oct 2013

police are in trouble for making the stop period, it was a legal purchase, once the card was accepted in full for payment....Where were the store dicks? Who signed the complaint?

PotatoChip

(3,186 posts)
34. I was thinking the same thing. Why is the NYPD
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:46 PM
Oct 2013

(in essence) working for Barneys? For example, check out the bolded part of the article... Gee, I wonder if the NYPD would ever be found in plain clothes 'periodically visiting' a store in Queens or Harlem with a similar issue? Somehow, I doubt it.


The NYPD said it has gotten 53 grand larceny complaints this year for credit card fraud at Barneys’ Madison Ave. store and has made more than 47 arrests. But it’s unclear how many of those arrested were actually charged with a crime and how many were, like Christian, released.

Plainclothes officers visit Barneys periodically because of problems with fraudulent use of cards, the NYPD said.



The whole incident is infuriating on a number of levels.

I hope the young man is well compensated for this. I thought racial profiling in NYC was supposed to end w/the Stop & Frisk policy. It obviously didn't, and probably never will. At least not in the near future. Sad.

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
33. Fastest way to get social change on LE issues
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:46 PM
Oct 2013

would be to see more civil lawsuit awards that cost municipalities millions of dollars.

Response to gopiscrap (Reply #5)

raging moderate

(4,307 posts)
8. No, they just believe a young black man has NO RIGHT to have that much money.
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 11:57 AM
Oct 2013

I am so tired of this. Again and again these monsters let their masks slip and reveal their true purpose. I apologize to Mr. Trayon Christian, on behalf of his fellow Americans.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
14. "they just believe a young black man has NO RIGHT to have that much money."
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:05 PM
Oct 2013

Bingo!!!!

The hidden layer of racism....you have no RIGHT to have what we have.

matt819

(10,749 posts)
9. Let's see how this might otherwise have gone
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 11:58 AM
Oct 2013

Oh, I don't know. Let's say Barney's actually trained its employees to behave professionally and pay them a living wage. Cause you can be pretty sure that this retail worker at an upscale store wasn't raking in the big bucks.

But instead of doing that Barney's is going to pay maybe a half million dollars hourly for the two hours this former Barney's customer spent in lock-up.

Training and $40 vs. untrained racist and $1 million (or so).

Was it a MasterCard? Priceless.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
25. Glass door says the salaries are 10-11 and hour for sales people...
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:31 PM
Oct 2013

Then they earn a commission on top of that. A "counter manager" who could be a cashier or a manager of a men's accessories counter makes 20/hr.

Training is very important and so is a live able wage which those numbers don't represent especially in NYC.

dembotoz

(16,820 posts)
15. my sons pay stupid sums of money for warhammer 40000 guys
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:12 PM
Oct 2013

their hobby
they paint them, they buy and sell them on ebay

mind you not over 300 bucks at one time
but over time---damn

my youngest flips a bunch of burgers to afford it

but at the end of the day

it is his money



indepat

(20,899 posts)
21. The crime of living in 'Murika while black must be getting old to so many,
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:25 PM
Oct 2013

but so many others cannot come to grips with their not-so-subtle racism.

Hutzpa

(11,461 posts)
30. So the store went bankrupt in 1996
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:42 PM
Oct 2013

then emerged from bankruptcy in 1999.

The store has changed hands twice which is obviously from bad management, but they're harassing
a black kid for splurging.

Funny, the criminal pointing finger at the innocent to create a diversion.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
48. They charge $349 for a belt (sold in a store with no carpet or wall coverings btw)
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 01:20 PM
Oct 2013

and the CUSTOMER is the criminal ???

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
32. Reminiscent of the Oprah incident in Switzerland
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:45 PM
Oct 2013

When they wouldn't show her (the black woman) the $12,000 (I can't remember how much it was; I just remember it was a lot; maybe it was $36,000) handbag.

If your face is black, you are immediately under suspicion, whether you are a 19-year-old engineering student or one of the richest and most famous women in the world.

This is a special kind of discrimination. I grew up in postwar America, during the Civil Rights era. I remember as a preteen when the rabbi of the temple we went to came to tell us kids about the experiences he'd just had marching next to MLK in Selma. And he told us to remember one thing, as members of a group that had been discriminated against: no matter what kind of discrimination you thought you faced (redlining, job discrimination, and other forms of discrimination were still prevalent in US cities and towns), you were still privileged as "white-looking" Americans. Black youth our age could never mask the color of their skin, and that would be an ever-present mark for bigots to discriminate against, every day in every way. He wanted us to feel what that was like.

Nothing's changed much since the early 1960s. (I take that back, a lot has changed, but remnants of this kind of discrimination are still widespread in our society.)

surrealAmerican

(11,362 posts)
41. This is far worse.
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 12:58 PM
Oct 2013

Yes, the racist stereotyping is similar, but nobody at the shop in Switzerland called the police about the matter. This young man was actually arrested here - despite the fact that the sale was made (which means his debit card account had the funds to cover this purchase).

Orrex

(63,219 posts)
44. One minor thing
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 01:14 PM
Oct 2013

If he signed for it, as the article indicates, then they likely (but not definitely) ran it as a credit card rather than debit. That means a customer could potentially lack sufficient funds yet still complete the transaction depending on the time of day (around 19:00, apparently) and other factors.

Of course, that absolutely doesn't explain why the cops were so quick to track him down and pounce on him like that.


Orrex

(63,219 posts)
76. Was that the question?
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 12:24 AM
Oct 2013

I think not.

The question was whether or not the transaction verified the funds in his account, and it was asserted here that he used his debit card.

If he had to sign for it, it's more likely that it was processed as a credit card transaction.


That doesn't say anything at all about the obvious racism in this case; it simply examines the mechanics of the transaction.

Orrex

(63,219 posts)
80. Did you actually read reply #44?
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 06:46 AM
Oct 2013

You seem to thnk that you're zinging me with the fact that they called the cops on him because he's black, but reply #44 states outright that the mechanics of the transaction are independent of that fact.

In short, I already made the point that you're trying to make now.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
82. Did they ASK...
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 07:11 AM
Oct 2013

... to run the card as a debit? Probably not. Which makes it their problem.

And it could be that the DIDN'T want to run it as a debit to get a signature, thinking they had snared a dangerous belt thief.

I'm pretty sure the clerk that rang up this transaction is looking for another job.

Orrex

(63,219 posts)
83. Depends on the store
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 08:32 AM
Oct 2013

I've been to lots of stores that don't offer debit as an option, requiring signatures for every transaction. They might have run it as credit simply because that's how they do it.

And it could be that the DIDN'T want to run it as a debit to get a signature, thinking they had snared a dangerous belt thief.
Now that's actually a great point. If they can accept both credit and debit, it might be worth asking why they go with one or the other in each case. Here are a few options that occur to me off the top of my head:

1. They accept only credit, not debit.
2. They accept both credit and debit but default to credit unless the customer stipulates otherwise.
3. They accept both credit and debit and let the customer choose
4. They accept both credit and debit but default to credit above a certain limit
5. They accept both credit and debit but default to credit after a certain time of day
6. They accept both credit and debit but required a signature for debit in this case
7. Employee error caused the transaction to process as credit
8. They accept both credit and debit but processed as credit for the reason you identify

I could probably think of a dozen or more permutations beyond that, but it's clear that there are more possibilities at play than "they process as debit unless they're racially profiling."


Regardless, in the current case--as I've stated previously--their policy doesn't justify siccing the cops on him.

get the red out

(13,468 posts)
54. This is idiotic!
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 02:01 PM
Oct 2013

He had his ID and produced it. If the name was the same as on the debit card WTF???

When I was that age, waaaay back in the early 80's, all I wanted on EARTH one Christmas was a Gucci purse. It didn't have to be a big one, it just needed to be GUCCI! It was exciting as anything to get my hands on that bag. Young people are into fashion, everything is fresh and new. They don't have the thoughts I now have like "yea, I remember when that was in style about 20 years ago". The world is so new it is all really important to get little pieces of it's shine.

A college kid that wants something that looks really cool is hardly new. Unfortunately neither is disgusting racism.

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
70. I'm shocked....
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 04:16 PM
Oct 2013

this happened in the northern state of New York? I've been led to believe things like this only happened in the racist south.






Yeah, it's sarcasm.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dept. Store Barneys Calls...