Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 12:37 PM Mar 2012

Murkowski Regrets Voting For Blunt’s ‘Religious Conscience’ Measure: ‘I Have Let These Women Down’

Murkowski Regrets Voting For Blunt’s ‘Religious Conscience’ Measure: ‘I Have Let These Women Down’

By Igor Volsky

Alaska Republican Lisa Murkowski told a local newspaper yesterday that she regrets her vote for the so-called Blunt amendment, the GOP’s alternative to President Obama’s rule requiring employers to provide contraception coverage as part of their health care insurance plans. Under the amendment, which the Senate tabled with the help of just one Republican, employers would have been empowered to deny coverage of health services to their employees on the basis of personal moral objections.

“I have never had a vote I’ve taken where I have felt that I let down more people that believed in me,” Murkowski told the Anchorage Daily News’ Julia O’Malley, claiming that the amendment’s language went “overboard”:

“If you had it to do over again, having had the weekend that you had with women being upset about the vote, do you think you would have voted the same?” I asked.

“No,” she said.

Murkowski said she believes contraception should be covered and affordable, except when it comes to churches and religiously affiliated organizations, like some universities and hospitals. She sponsored a contraception coverage bill as a state legislator in 2002. That bill exempted “religious employers.” She said her position hasn’t changed.

“I have always said if you don’t like abortion the best way to deal with it is to not have unwanted pregnancies in the first place,” she said. “How do you do that? It’s through contraception.”

I pointed out that her support for birth control conflicts with the Catholic mandate against it. “You know, I don’t adhere to all of the tenets of my faith. I’m a Republican, I don’t adhere to all of the principles that come out of my party,” she said. “I’m also not hesitant to question when I think that my church, my religion, is not current.”

Murkowski called the Blunt Amendment a “messaging amendment” that “both sides know is not going to pass” and said “Republicans didn’t have enough sense to get off of it.” She also condemned Rush Limbaugh’s deragatory comments about a Georgetown law student testifying in favor of greater access to birth control. “I think women when they hear…mouthpieces like that say things like that they get concerned and they look to policymakers,” she said. “That’s where I feel like I have let these women down is that I have not helped to give these women the assurance they need that their health care rights are protected.”

- more -

http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/03/06/438394/murkowski-regrets-voting-for-blunts-religious-conscience-measure-i-have-let-these-women-down/


The Republican Party is having a meltdown
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002377092

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Murkowski Regrets Voting For Blunt’s ‘Religious Conscience’ Measure: ‘I Have Let These Women Down’ (Original Post) ProSense Mar 2012 OP
So, why didn't she take time to think about it before she did it? Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2012 #1
I'll bet she's getting a lot of feedback from women sufrommich Mar 2012 #11
If people like Murkoski want to be viewed as "moderates" Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2012 #12
I agree.nt sufrommich Mar 2012 #13
Bullshit Bandit Mar 2012 #2
It's easy to have a crisis of conscience... brooklynite Mar 2012 #3
She's sorry that women are paying attention and calling her out. NOT sorry about the vote itself. bullwinkle428 Mar 2012 #4
Bingo! IndyJones Mar 2012 #14
Great. You don't get a do-over. Bake Mar 2012 #5
It's called BLUNT-RUBIO.................... russspeakeasy Mar 2012 #6
You tell them!! tsuki Mar 2012 #7
Said the scorpion to the frog. DCKit Mar 2012 #8
Gee, that was fast. Arugula Latte Mar 2012 #9
Murkowski 'Stunned' By Rush's 'Incendiary Comments' ProSense Mar 2012 #10
No other repub would express regret even close to this... cynatnite Mar 2012 #15
FREDO!!! bluestate10 Mar 2012 #16
Well at least the traitor admitted surfdog Mar 2012 #17
Lisa is a hypocrite. Blue_In_AK Mar 2012 #18

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
11. I'll bet she's getting a lot of feedback from women
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 04:48 PM
Mar 2012

in Alaska and I'll bet very little of it is good feedback.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,422 posts)
12. If people like Murkoski want to be viewed as "moderates"
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 04:50 PM
Mar 2012

they need to VOTE like ones. Otherwise, they are just as bad as the rest of the Republicans.

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
2. Bullshit
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 12:43 PM
Mar 2012

She would do exactly the same thing again. She marches in lock-step with every Republican. She is just trying to have it both ways in hopes that her "base" will continue to eat up her bullshit as they always have.. She is very two-faced...always has been and I guess always will be...

Bake

(21,977 posts)
5. Great. You don't get a do-over.
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 12:44 PM
Mar 2012

Don't bother apologizing now.

Don't they teach that shit in Alaska?

Bake

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
10. Murkowski 'Stunned' By Rush's 'Incendiary Comments'
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 04:46 PM
Mar 2012
Murkowski 'Stunned' By Rush's 'Incendiary Comments'

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) told TPM on Tuesday that she was "stunned" by Rush Limbaugh's smear of Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke.

"There was the incendiary comments made by Rush Limbaugh that I think are just adding to this sense that women's health rights are being attacked," Murkowski said.

"The comments made by Limbaugh, I was just stunned," she added. "In the end, I'm a little bit disappointed that there hasn't been greater condemnation of his words by people in leadership positions."

Including Republicans? "Everybody," she responded. "What he said was just wrong. Just wrong."

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/murkowski-stunned-by-rushs-incendiary-comments


cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
15. No other repub would express regret even close to this...
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 05:14 PM
Mar 2012

I'm okay with it. Hopefully, she remembers this should anything like this happen again. We will see.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
16. FREDO!!!
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 05:58 PM
Mar 2012

Murkowski had great opportunity presented to her when she bravely stood up to teabaggers to win re-election. She has been an enormous downer ever since. One could only wonder how many people voted for her who would have voted in the democrat if they had known how Murkowski would pigeonhole right back in with the republicans that abandoned her.

 

surfdog

(624 posts)
17. Well at least the traitor admitted
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 06:33 PM
Mar 2012

That she doesn't think about her votes before she cast them

She should've kept her stupid mouth shut

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
18. Lisa is a hypocrite.
Tue Mar 6, 2012, 07:16 PM
Mar 2012

In 2002 she sponsored a bill in Alaska's state legislature entitled “An Act requiring that the cost of contraceptives be included in certain health care insurance coverage,” also known as the Prescriptive Equity Act of 2002.

Here's her sponsoring statement:

In order to bring Alaska into compliance under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, we have introduced House Bill 313, also referred to as “Prescription Equity”. Last year, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruled that an employer’s failure to cover prescription contraceptives in employee health benefit plans constitutes unlawful sex discrimination.

While HB 313 calls for contraceptive coverage, it only requires it in a plan already offering prescription drugs and does not require an insurer provide coverage for abortion. In the scope of this bill, a religious employer would be exempt from offering coverage for contraceptives if it is against their doctrine.

Coverage of prescriptive contraceptives can be a point of contention for some. However it is important to realize contraceptive coverage is healthier for the women, the family and society than an unintended pregnancy. In 1996, 42 percent of the live births in Alaska were from unintended pregnancies. Additionally, many doctors will prescribe contraceptives to a woman not for sexual reasons, but for the overall health of the women from regulating menstrual cycles to alleviating dermatology problems and other hormonal imbalances.

The more effective forms of contraception are generally the most expensive. Women and their families who must pay out of pocket may opt for less expensive and sometimes less effective methods, increasing the risk for unintended pregnancies. Women of reproductive age currently spend 68 percent more in out-of-pocket health care costs than men. Much of the gender gap in expenses is due to reproductive health-related supplies and services.

Cost analyses show if health insurance policies were to include coverage for these contraceptive supplies, cost to employers would be minimal – as little as $1.43 per employee per month. In 1998, coverage inequality was brought into the spotlight as Viagra hit the market. Within two months of entering the U.S. market, more than half of all Viagra prescriptions received some insurance reimbursement, while overall coverage for oral contraceptives did not reach this level until they had been on the market for over 40 years.

To date 17 states offer comprehensive coverage for prescription contraceptives, while an additional 15 states offer partial mandates or optional coverage. The sponsors and co-sponsors of HB 313 strongly urge your support of this legislation.



http://www.themudflats.net/2012/03/02/lisa-murkowski-was-for-contraceptive-coverage-before-she-was-against-it/


While she does allow for an examption for religious employers, this is a far cry from the over-reaching of Blunt's amendment. By her recent vote she demonstrates that she is only following her Republican lords and masters in the US Senate. Too bad she doesn't come up for re-election until 2016.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Murkowski Regrets Voting ...