Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,081 posts)
Wed Oct 23, 2013, 09:51 PM Oct 2013

Corporate Media's Hidden Wave of Consolidation


Corporate Media's Hidden Wave of Consolidation

Wednesday, 23 October 2013 13:57
By Mike Ludwig, Truthout | Report


Faye Steuer is a former psychology professor living near Charleston, South Carolina, who spent much of her career researching how violence on television affects children. Over the years, Steuer learned about the inner workings of the media business and stumbled upon what she believes to be an even bigger problem.

"As I did that, I became more and more aware of how the consolidation of media ownership was really having an impact on democracy, and that worried me even more than the impact of (TV) violence on children," Steuer tells Truthout.

A historic wave of corporate media consolidation is changing the landscape of America's most utilized news source - local TV news. Media reformers say the consolidation diminishes the public's access to information and, in turn, harms our democracy.

In the first eight months of 2013, 211 full-power broadcast stations changed hands, the highest number in a decade, according to a recent report by media watchdog group Free Press. ...................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://truth-out.org/news/item/19587-corporate-medias-hidden-wave-of-consolidation



5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Corporate Media's Hidden Wave of Consolidation (Original Post) marmar Oct 2013 OP
> 90% of media world-wide was already owned by 6 megacorps; and snot Oct 2013 #1
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Oct 2013 #2
K & R n/t Oldtimeralso Oct 2013 #3
Ted Cruz was protecting his media buddies when he blocked the FCC nominee last week. Here's more okaawhatever Oct 2013 #4
KnR Hekate Oct 2013 #5

okaawhatever

(9,462 posts)
4. Ted Cruz was protecting his media buddies when he blocked the FCC nominee last week. Here's more
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 12:59 AM
Oct 2013

from Time magazine:
Why did Cruz do this? Because he opposes the DISCLOSE Act, a bill that would require super PACS, corporations, unions and other outside groups to disclose to the Federal Elections Commission when they spend more than $10,000 to air political campaign ads. Democrats and public interest groups have been urging passage of the bill as a way to bring greater transparency to political ad funding, but many conservative groups and lawmakers oppose the legislation. In April, Cruz and other GOP senators wrote a letter to the FCC saying the bill raises “grave constitutional concerns for speech protected by the First Amendment.”
With the bill stalled, some Democrats have suggested that the FCC might be able to use its existing authority over TV broadcasters to require such disclosures


Read more: http://business.time.com/2013/10/18/heres-why-sen-ted-cruz-is-blocking-fcc-nominee-tom-wheeler/#ixzz2ic1VA5Bs

If SUPERPACS and other groups who don't disclose donors stop advertising, the media will lose a great deal of profit and influence over the elections. The Republicans are doing their best to make sure their Republican propaganda wings are well funded and well hidden.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Corporate Media's Hidden ...