Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moriah

(8,311 posts)
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 10:29 PM Oct 2013

Possible Lead on Greece's "Maria"/"Blonde Angel" Case

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/greece-girl-marias-mother-many-2528690

A gypsy claiming to be the real mum of Maria, the “blonde angel” rescued from a travellers’ camp in Greece, was questioned by police yesterday.

Sasha Ruseva, 40, was tracked down to a squalid shanty town in the centre of Bulgaria, 300 miles from where the fair-skinned blue-eyed youngster was found last week.

And she insisted she wanted little Maria back – despite admitting that she had previously sold some of her 10 children and given others away.

<snip>

“I left a little girl in Greece because we had no food. That was maybe four years ago so she could be mine. I want her back.” Several of Sasha’s children living with her at Gurkovo, in Bulgaria’s Stara Zagora region, are albino and bear a striking resemblance to Maria, who was discovered at a Roma camp in Farsala, 180 miles north of Athens.


--------

I had seriously wondered if this little girl did not have a form of albinism, especially when I saw that allegedly the girl had problems with her eyes and seemed to be highly photosensitive in every picture, squinting. I briefly dated a guy with a variant form of albinism, he had visual defects and it's a common feature of the disorder. I think this lead has possibilities.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Possible Lead on Greece's "Maria"/"Blonde Angel" Case (Original Post) moriah Oct 2013 OP
This sounds like a good possibility. bravenak Oct 2013 #1
It's the Mirror, tabloid journalism at its worst. moriah Oct 2013 #2
it really does not matter if you use gypsy, some leople take offense but rom dont care loli phabay Oct 2013 #5
Thanks! bravenak Oct 2013 #9
its complicated due to the different nations for want of a better word loli phabay Oct 2013 #11
They're still viewing it as possible child trafficking. pnwmom Oct 2013 #3
Yep. Saw someone else posted a Dailymail article too. moriah Oct 2013 #6
If she went back to the first mother, she'd be at risk of being sold again-- pnwmom Oct 2013 #13
I don't know if "sold" is always the appropriate term... moriah Oct 2013 #16
no, sold. you notice in U.S. adoptions the parents don't make bank. adoption agencies screen Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #19
If you doubt many babies are going to the highest bidder, you're kidding yourself. moriah Oct 2013 #20
not true. my wife worked for adoption agency. that is flat out a made up statement Pretzel_Warrior Oct 2013 #21
Maybe not through her agency, or even the majority of agencies in the US. moriah Oct 2013 #22
But, but, but... jberryhill Oct 2013 #4
no its not incumbent to talk to the authorities and most avoid it. its not a tenet but distrust loli phabay Oct 2013 #7
Black people hate talking to cops too. bravenak Oct 2013 #10
pretty mich the same thing, though snitching can lead to being cast out loli phabay Oct 2013 #14
Crazy ain't it? bravenak Oct 2013 #15
This type of thing is not going to help people trust authority. moriah Oct 2013 #12
It'll be interesting, and I have no doubt that deception is common. moriah Oct 2013 #8
could be that they did not want to mention any names, as i mentioned in earlier posts loli phabay Oct 2013 #17
As I said in the other post, I couldn't blame them for it. moriah Oct 2013 #18
 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
1. This sounds like a good possibility.
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 10:35 PM
Oct 2013

The hair color doesn't mean anything to me, as you may know, a lot of black people have albinos in the family. Two really dark parents can have a tow headed, blue eyed child and we just accept it because it's normal. With black people you can't go by skin and hair color to determine parents. I guess that goes for them too.

Do we really still call them Gypsies? Really? Is that what they prefer?

moriah

(8,311 posts)
2. It's the Mirror, tabloid journalism at its worst.
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 10:37 PM
Oct 2013

However, they seemed to have pictures and interviews. Just didn't really feel it was reputable enough for LBR.

 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
5. it really does not matter if you use gypsy, some leople take offense but rom dont care
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 11:18 PM
Oct 2013

Its actually better than when outsiders try to use other terms and get it wrong. So its okay to use it as long as its not used in a derogatory manner.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
9. Thanks!
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 11:22 PM
Oct 2013

I would hate to offend somebody by calling them a racial slur or something. I prefer to know what they call themselves or like to be called.

 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
11. its complicated due to the different nations for want of a better word
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 11:25 PM
Oct 2013

Each identify with their own name and spelling hence the confusion over the correct terms, it also depends where in the world you are as some terms arw used in a derogatory manner depending where you are.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
3. They're still viewing it as possible child trafficking.
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 11:10 PM
Oct 2013

But Bulgarian officials suspect Sasha sold the youngster to the highest bidders – a group of child traffickers.

They believe a shady Bulgarian middleman known as Michalis and his prostitute partner then touted Maria around central Greece before selling her on for 1,000 euros – about £850.

SNIP
Detectives believe the couple were planning to put the youngster up for sale as a child bride. In some Roma communities girls commonly marry at 12 and their families get a hefty dowry from the new in-laws.

Fair-skinned Maria would have been a prized “investment”.


Check out all the latest News, Sport & Celeb gossip at Mirror.co.uk http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/greece-girl-marias-mother-many-2528690#ixzz2ihQrXz1G
Follow us: @DailyMirror on Twitter | DailyMirror on Facebook

moriah

(8,311 posts)
6. Yep. Saw someone else posted a Dailymail article too.
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 11:19 PM
Oct 2013
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2475971/Bulgarian-Sasha-Ruseva-believed-Marias-mother-wants-Greece.html

A Bulgarian Roma woman believed to be the real mother of the ‘blonde angel’ found in a Greek gipsy camp declared yesterday: ‘I want her back.’

Mother-of-ten Sasha Ruseva, 35, claims she did not sell Maria, now four, but was forced to leave her daughter with a friend in Greece as a baby because she could not afford the legal documents required to take her home to Bulgaria.

But the Daily Mail can reveal that a woman of her name has twice previously been arrested for trying to sell babies in Greece – and on both occasions skipped bail.

Today the Mail tracked down Mrs Ruseva, who police believe will be shown by DNA tests to be Maria’s real mother, to an impoverished gipsy camp in Nikolaevo in rural Bulgaria where her family share a one-room home without running water.


It's hard for me to say which abhors me more -- buying or selling kids. Which family would she be better off with?

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
13. If she went back to the first mother, she'd be at risk of being sold again--
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 11:26 PM
Oct 2013

assuming that was what happened the first time.

She needs to be with parents who won't view her as a potential profit making item. So do all children.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
16. I don't know if "sold" is always the appropriate term...
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 11:36 PM
Oct 2013

... even if some exchange of cash is involved in an adoption. I know a lot of couples here in the US who are more than willing to pay for medical and living expenses to adopt an unwanted baby, and I consider it more along the lines of charity in most cases (as well as enlightened self-interest -- if mama's healthy, baby's healthy). If some woman went around trying to sell her kid, I wouldn't judge a couple for adopting it as their own and giving the woman some money to help her find her way. My judgment, if I were called to make one, would have everything to do with how the couple treated the newly adopted child.

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
19. no, sold. you notice in U.S. adoptions the parents don't make bank. adoption agencies screen
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 02:06 AM
Oct 2013

and do home visits with social workers to determine the parents' fitness and well-being for raising adopted child. Even then they get it wrong.

This is outright child trafficking which is outlawed.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
20. If you doubt many babies are going to the highest bidder, you're kidding yourself.
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 02:24 AM
Oct 2013

Sure, they may "screen" -- but often the deciding factor is the credit score, I have little doubt.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
22. Maybe not through her agency, or even the majority of agencies in the US.
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 02:34 AM
Oct 2013

But there is a very questionable practice involving private adoptions of newborns that really can't be stopped I don't think. One of my best friends, (I've known him since I was five and he asked me to give the eulogy at his mother's funeral) got his girlfriend pregnant, and they decided to go for adoption. She ended up finding a couple, not through an agency, that paid for her living expenses for the last six months of her pregnancy and three months postpartum (they asked her to pump and send breastmilk during that time). They also paid for all of her medical care. He got to meet them and they seemed very nice, and very desperate for a baby... and very, very wealthy. He knew that his kid would have a better life there, so he didn't contest the adoption.

She later decided to do surrogacy to make a living for several years. (Edit to add: they split up before she actually said she was pregnant, and "girlfriend" was a stretch. He doesn't have that bad of taste now.)

Yes, it happens. And when it comes to foreign "charities" and adopting babies from overseas, that's adding another layer of middlemen making money off of children. It's exploitation in its own way.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
4. But, but, but...
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 11:14 PM
Oct 2013

This was a statement she made to police?

We were just thoroughly lectured by our resident DU expert on Rom people that it is a central principle of their culture not to tell the truth to authorities, and that it would be genocidal to expect them to do so.

So, on that basis...

 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
7. no its not incumbent to talk to the authorities and most avoid it. its not a tenet but distrust
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 11:20 PM
Oct 2013

I have always respected you as a poster but to diminish the fear of pogrom is weak, would you do the same to someone of jewish extraction who talked of the real fear of the past rehappening.

 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
14. pretty mich the same thing, though snitching can lead to being cast out
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 11:28 PM
Oct 2013

So its taken real seriously in the community as being cast out is a big deal. What i find funny is that the same people who would support african americans being distrustful of the autjorities or jews being fearful of another holocaust deny the same support to the rom.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
12. This type of thing is not going to help people trust authority.
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 11:26 PM
Oct 2013

Apparently in the case regarding the infant boy, one article said he was taken when the very young couple took him in for medical treatment. That really bothers me, and I hope they show that couple leniency if there were no signs of abuse or neglect.

An author I fancy had a character suggest that the best way to deal with being captured and interrogated by the enemy was to lie as creatively as humanly possible, because eventually under torture the truth will come out but you can hope to have muddied the waters enough that they can't figure out which story is the truth. I'm glad the lady in Bulgaria has been willing to speak up instead of leaving the couple who raised Maria out to hang, but I can see them trying to protect her and let it be her decision to break anonymity. Formal adoptions often place great value on that anonymity, and I can see it being important in informal adoptions too. Blood does not always make a family.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
8. It'll be interesting, and I have no doubt that deception is common.
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 11:20 PM
Oct 2013

I had wondered if all the stories were being put out there to cover up the real one. DNA will tell.

 

loli phabay

(5,580 posts)
17. could be that they did not want to mention any names, as i mentioned in earlier posts
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 01:33 AM
Oct 2013

Real names have power and are not given freely.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
18. As I said in the other post, I couldn't blame them for it.
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 01:50 AM
Oct 2013

Aside from cultural taboos regarding names, I could see them wanting to protect the birth mother's privacy and let it be her choice to come forward. Especially if she was going to be accused of selling her child to them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Possible Lead on Greece's...