Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 06:05 AM Oct 2013

Botching F-35 dwarfs ACA website

By Daniel Ruth

There isn't enough lipstick in the world to make the Affordable Care Act's website pig look like a Vogue model. Little wonder then Roget's Thesaurus is groaning under the weight of Washington's ire to describe perhaps the worst inept debut since The Lone Ranger.

How else to characterize a $300 million (and counting) federal government website that turned out to be the bureaucratic equivalent of Donkey Kong?

Fiasco? Check. Boondoggle? You betcha. Train wreck? Yep. Blunder? No doubt. Farce? Absolutely. Let's all pile on. Congressional hearings are in full outrage, high dudgeon. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius is being fitted for the public stocks. The criticism, the dismay, is all very fair.

But the congressional crusade for fiscal accountability would seem to be somewhat selective. If the Beltway is going to fulminate over $300 million wasted to create a website, surely there must be some froth to spare for the $400 billion already flushed away to develop the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, which after years of delays and cost overruns has yet to shoot so much as a pea against an adversary in combat.

more

http://www.tampabay.com/opinion/columns/ruth-botching-f-35-dwarfs-aca-website/2148965

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
1. It's not like the public is mandated to buy an F35 through an exchange
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 06:15 AM
Oct 2013

If one is not provided by their employer, I mean.



 

reddread

(6,896 posts)
2. can I opt out?
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 07:01 AM
Oct 2013

Actually I think I prefer paying for weapons that cant kill anyone.
We may be making progress here.
Its only money.

Downtown Hound

(12,618 posts)
4. The ironic thing about the F-35 is that it was supposed to be the "cheap" alternative to the F-22
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 11:30 AM
Oct 2013

As it turns out, it's the single most expensive project in all of human history.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
7. If we can't afford to educate our children, to heal our sick or care for our elderly ...
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 06:08 AM
Oct 2013

... just what is it the defense budget is defending?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Botching F-35 dwarfs ACA ...