Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 09:25 PM Oct 2013

NSA Spying Not Very Focused on Terrorism: Power, Money and Crushing Dissent Are Real Motives Ops

Proof that Power, Money and Crushing Dissent Are NSA’s Real Motives for Spying

By Washington's Blog
Washington's Blog 24 October 2013

The NSA not only spied on the leaders of Germany, Brazil and Mexico, but on at least 35 world leaders.

The Guardian reports:

One unnamed US official handed over 200 numbers, including those of the 35 world leaders, none of whom is named. These were immediately “tasked” for monitoring by the NSA.


SNIP...

And even the argument that 9/11 changed everything holds no water. Spying started before 9/11 … and various excuses have been used to spy on Americans over the years. Even NSA’s industrial espionage has been going on for many decades. And the NSA was already spying on American Senators more than 40 years ago.

Governments who spy on their own population always do it to crush dissent. (Why do you think that the NSA is doing exactly the same thing which King George did to the American colonists … which led to the Revolutionary War?)

Of course, if even half of what a NSA whistleblower Russel Tice says – that the NSA is spying on – and blackmailing – top American government officials and military officers (and see this) – then things are really out of whack.

SOURCE with LINKS to details and sources:

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/10/proof-that-nsa-spying-is-not-really-focused-on-terrorism.html

57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NSA Spying Not Very Focused on Terrorism: Power, Money and Crushing Dissent Are Real Motives Ops (Original Post) Octafish Oct 2013 OP
NSA is gone rogue? notadmblnd Oct 2013 #1
Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) warned us in 1975... Octafish Oct 2013 #4
I've thought for a long time that is how Washington DC politics work. notadmblnd Oct 2013 #10
It would explain a whole lot. Enthusiast Oct 2013 #28
Agreed. Dirt on a key politician is worth money, potentially a lot of money. GoneFishin Oct 2013 #50
Plus 1,000,000! Enthusiast Oct 2013 #27
Do you know what year (s) the NSA was wiretapping Uncle Joe Oct 2013 #35
NSA Watch List Octafish Oct 2013 #40
I'm trying to figure out why they wiretapped Howard Baker; he was a moderate Republican? Uncle Joe Oct 2013 #43
''What did the president know and when did he know it?'' Octafish Oct 2013 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author Octafish Oct 2013 #44
Like the CIA... awoke_in_2003 Oct 2013 #46
Rogue nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #2
What's that do to democracy? Octafish Oct 2013 #5
Yup nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #7
About what I assumed… Jackpine Radical Oct 2013 #3
When story first broke I quoted Tice nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #6
What if they used it to, eh, filter out those who opposed their wars for profit? Octafish Oct 2013 #9
Corporate fascism. woo me with science Oct 2013 #8
exactly G_j Oct 2013 #30
''Money trumps peace.'' -- George AWOL Bush, pretzeldentin' on Feb. 14, 2007 Octafish Oct 2013 #32
This is amazing to watch agent46 Oct 2013 #48
Just incredible to watch. woo me with science Oct 2013 #49
We either strip corporations of their power, or they will soon finish the job of stripping us Zorra Oct 2013 #55
+10000000 woo me with science Oct 2013 #56
Well that would explain a lot. zeemike Oct 2013 #11
It goes to the heart of the matter. Octafish Oct 2013 #36
K&R ReRe Oct 2013 #12
I've thought for years... Oilwellian Oct 2013 #24
More thought on this subject... ReRe Oct 2013 #25
Those who oppose the War Party are enemies to be watched. Octafish Oct 2013 #41
Oh come on now! They NEEDED the bridge of the starship Enterpoop Rex Oct 2013 #13
THAT is what it's all about. Octafish Oct 2013 #51
They tapped Obama's phone while he ran for the Senate. Wilms Oct 2013 #14
They tapped when Cheney was running things. Rex Oct 2013 #16
Probably got the scoop on when he ran for state senate... Octafish Oct 2013 #54
Recommend jsr Oct 2013 #15
Everyone knows it, right? RobertEarl Oct 2013 #17
K&R. Thanks. JDPriestly Oct 2013 #18
The Ring of Truth as always, Octafish. kicking. nt navarth Oct 2013 #19
DURec leftstreet Oct 2013 #20
k&r Puzzledtraveller Oct 2013 #21
The ones that they can't blackmail for control, they murder. Th1onein Oct 2013 #22
+1 notadmblnd Oct 2013 #33
I think the real scandal is that while they demand billions in funding sabrina 1 Oct 2013 #23
The real motives certainly include Enthusiast Oct 2013 #26
This should a permant feature of the Greates page pscot Oct 2013 #29
du rec. xchrom Oct 2013 #31
K & R !!! WillyT Oct 2013 #34
Recommend! KoKo Oct 2013 #37
this should surprise nobody but the simpering sycophants KG Oct 2013 #38
Big brother will not tolerate the impertinence of light being shined on the reprehensible policies indepat Oct 2013 #39
Thank you Occupy PeoViejo Oct 2013 #47
Thank you, Octafish! nt City Lights Oct 2013 #42
You anti NSA people are 'like children Ichingcarpenter Oct 2013 #52
kick woo me with science Oct 2013 #53
K & R AzDar Oct 2013 #57

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
4. Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) warned us in 1975...
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 09:57 PM
Oct 2013
“That capability at any time could be turned around on the American people and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything: telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn’t matter. There would be no place to hide. If this government ever became a tyranny, if a dictator ever took charge in this country, the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back, because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the reach of the government to know. Such is the capability of this technology.

"I don’t want to see this country ever go across the bridge. I know the capability that is there to make tyranny total in America, and we must see it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision, so that we never cross over that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return.”

DU Link: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023398994



So, the NSA put him on the "Watch List."



Secret Cold War documents reveal NSA spied on senators

History News Network, 9-25-13

As Vietnam War protests grew, the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) tapped the overseas communications of prominent American critics of the war -- including a pair of sitting U.S. senators. That's according to a recently declassified NSA history, which called the effort "disreputable if not outright illegal."

For years the names of the surveillance targets were kept secret. But after a decision by the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel, in response to an appeal by the National Security Archive at George Washington University, the NSA has declassified them for the first time. The names of the NSA's targets are eye-popping. Civil rights leaders Martin Luther King and Whitney Young were on the watch list, as were the boxer Muhammad Ali, New York Times journalist Tom Wicker, and veteran Washington Post humor columnist Art Buchwald. But perhaps the most startling fact in the declassified document is that the NSA was tasked with monitoring the overseas telephone calls and cable traffic of two prominent members of Congress, Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) and Sen. Howard Baker (R-Tenn.). As shocking as the recent revelations about the NSA's domestic eavesdropping have been, there has been no evidence so far of today's signal intelligence corps taking a step like this, to monitor the White House's political enemies....

CONTINUED...

http://www.hnn.us/article/153439



Not rogue as much as "Business as Usual" for blackmail, extortion, etc.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
10. I've thought for a long time that is how Washington DC politics work.
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 10:05 PM
Oct 2013

Blackmail and extortion is no longer the exception, it is the norm.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
50. Agreed. Dirt on a key politician is worth money, potentially a lot of money.
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 09:25 PM
Oct 2013

It is a forgone conclusion that some percentage of personality types will look for a way to parlay that knowledge (the dirt) into cash or political advantage. And I am guessing that percentage increases sharply among people who already think it's ok to spy on innocent people or without a warrant.

It's probably why Ed Snowden has them all panicky and shitting their pants.





Uncle Joe

(58,417 posts)
35. Do you know what year (s) the NSA was wiretapping
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 02:53 PM
Oct 2013

Frank Church and Howard Bakers's phone calls?

Best I can tell it was in the early 70's but I'm wondering specifically what the years were.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
40. NSA Watch List
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:01 PM
Oct 2013

National Security Archives says it was late 60s, early 70s -- may've been before Church Committee!



Another NSA target was Senator Frank Church, who started out as a moderate Vietnam War critic. A member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee even before the Tonkin Gulf incident, Church worried about U.S. intervention in a "political war" that was militarily unwinnable. While Church voted for the Tonkin Gulf resolution, he later saw his vote as a grave error. In 1965, as Lyndon Johnson made decisions to escalate the war, Church argued that the United States was doing "too much," criticisms that one White House official said were "irresponsible." Church had been one of Johnson's Senate allies but the President was angry with Church and other Senate critics and later suggested that they were under Moscow's influence because of their meetings with Soviet diplomats. In the fall of 1967, Johnson declared that "the major threat we have is from the doves" and ordered FBI security checks on "individuals who wrote letters and telegrams critical of a speech he had recently delivered." In that political climate, it is not surprising that some government officials eventually nominated Church for the watch list.[10]

SOURCE: http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB441/



But that committee must've really gotten the reel-to-reels burning.

Uncle Joe

(58,417 posts)
43. I'm trying to figure out why they wiretapped Howard Baker; he was a moderate Republican?
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:23 PM
Oct 2013

I don't recall Baker opposing the Vietnam War but he did seem to be an honest broker in regards to the Senate Investigation of the Watergate Scandal and he was an accomplished compromiser with the Democratic Senators of his day.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Baker

Known in Washington, D.C. as the "Great Conciliator", Baker is often regarded as one of the most successful senators in terms of brokering compromises, enacting legislation, and maintaining civility. A story is sometimes told of a reporter telling a senior Democratic senator that privately, a plurality of his Democratic colleagues would vote for Baker for President of the United States. The senator is reported to have replied, "You're wrong. He'd win a majority."[citation needed]

(snip)

In 1973 and 1974, Baker was also the influential ranking minority member of the Senate committee, chaired by Senator Sam Ervin, that investigated the Watergate scandal. Baker is famous for having asked aloud, "What did the President know and when did he know it?", a question given him by his counsel and former campaign manager, future U.S. Senator Fred Thompson.



No doubt they were looking for means of political blackmail but I'm wondering what the specific motivation was if there was one?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
45. ''What did the president know and when did he know it?''
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 05:06 PM
Oct 2013

Seems that Howard Baker had integrity, which, as every crook knows, is not a good thing to have in a trusted associate, or, cough, co-conspirator.

Response to Octafish (Reply #40)

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
5. What's that do to democracy?
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 09:58 PM
Oct 2013
Frank Church and the Abyss of Warrantless Wiretapping

John Nichols
The Nation
BLOG | Posted 04/26/2006 @ 12:00am

Thirty years ago, on April 26, 1976, the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, delivered its final report detailing the lawlessness of U.S. intelligence agencies and the need for Congress to reassert the Constitutional system of checks and balances to order to rein in the cloak-and-dagger excesses of the executive branch of the federal government.

The committee, mercifully referred to by the last name of its chair, U.S. Senator Frank Church, D-Idaho, produced fourteen reports on the formation of U.S. intelligence agencies, the manner in which they had and were continuing to operate, and the abuses of law and of power -- up to and including murder -- committed by these agencies in Chile, the Congo, Cuba, Vietnam and other nations that experienced the attention of U.S. authorities in the Cold War era.

The committee also made 96 recommendations for how to do that. Some of those recommendations, such as the committee's call for creation of a permanent Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and for a ban on assassinations of foreign leaders, were implemented. But, as the current controversy over President Bush's warrantless wiretapping program illustrates, the potential abuses about which the Church Committee warned were not entirely -- nor even adequately -- thwarted.

It was not for lack of trying by Senator Church, one of the most courageous legislators in American history, and his colleagues on the committee. As Senator Church said when the committee completed its work: "The United States must not adopt the tactics of the enemy. Means are important, as ends. Crisis makes it tempting to ignore the wise restraints that make men free. But each time we do so, each time the means we use are wrong, our inner strength, the strength which makes us free, is lessened."

SNIP...

Three decades after the Church Committee submitted its final report, President Bush admits to ordering the NSA to spy on the telephone conversations of Americans on American soil without obtaining warrants.

Most of Congress stands idly by.

CONTINUED...

http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?pid=79968

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
32. ''Money trumps peace.'' -- George AWOL Bush, pretzeldentin' on Feb. 14, 2007
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 01:47 PM
Oct 2013

The very words of George W Bush on Feb. 14, 2007, uttered at a press conference in which not a single of the callow, cowed press corpse saw fit to ask a follow-up.



And not one member of the White House press corpse followed up. I remember Cindy Sheehan tried to bring it to our nation's attention, but the press didn't run with that story, either.

agent46

(1,262 posts)
48. This is amazing to watch
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 08:36 PM
Oct 2013

It's clear to me he was repeating from memory almost verbatim the way one of his handlers explained it to him. A simple minded breakdown of NeoCon Machiavelli for the complete idiot. And he thought it was funny.

America went insane after 9/11

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
55. We either strip corporations of their power, or they will soon finish the job of stripping us
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 07:02 PM
Oct 2013

us of ours.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
56. +10000000
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 07:40 PM
Oct 2013

I've had this image in my head constantly since realizing what the PTB are doing to us. It's an image of a graph with two lines plotted on it. One line represents our remaining power, and it keeps going down over time. The other line is their power, and it keeps going up. And I have wondered exactly where that critical point is in the future when our line is too low, and theirs is too high, to have any chance of stopping them anymore.

It *is* a race. Every single day they are stripping us more of what we need to stop them.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
11. Well that would explain a lot.
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 10:22 PM
Oct 2013

Of why when no matter who is president nothing much changes.

The first inclining I had of this is when I saw an interview with Jimmy Carter where they asked him what surprise him the most about the presidency...and he said "how little power he has"
And it was not so much the words as the look on his face...his eyes are expressive...and they said there was something there he could not say.

This shit has been going on a long time.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
36. It goes to the heart of the matter.
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 02:58 PM
Oct 2013

The national security state exists to maintain national sovereignty; to perpetuate itself requires maintaining an elite of insiders, secret, anonymous, and all-powerful in martial and financial terms compared to the barbarians outside the walls of the fortress and the serfs and slaves within.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
12. K&R
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 10:36 PM
Oct 2013

Thanks for the OP, Octafish. Seriously. I'm getting "up there", as in geezerville, but I remember reading Bamford's Puzzle Palace when it first came out way back when and thought it was bad that we were all being spied upon. Now, they are not only spying on all of us, they are spying on the whole GD world! WTF? We're ALL enemies now. Who died and made the USA the effing boss of the world? That is some Hellacious hubris. I've been saying for years: "...they're 'gonna get us one of these day, they're 'gonna get us." They, as in "the world" is 'gonna get us.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
24. I've thought for years...
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 01:23 AM
Oct 2013

we've painted a big bulls eye on our children and grand children's future.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
25. More thought on this subject...
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 03:17 AM
Oct 2013

... since I posted a reply to the thread earlier. I guess because I seen a French report while ago talking about the spying, and also about spying on Merkel /Germans. You know... the world could conceivably start some sort of sanctions or boycott against the U.S. All I know is that the world got pissed when GWB's junta invaded the world, and again, they are pissed off with the current knowledge of massive world spying by us. Looks to me like we're painting ourselves into a corner. Doesn't make a lick of sense to me. The WORLD isn't our enemy!

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
41. Those who oppose the War Party are enemies to be watched.
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:13 PM
Oct 2013

...not "loyal opposition" to be listened to in confidence. These are most un-democratic people -- including the Democrat who took office after Kennedy.



Secret Cold War Documents Reveal NSA Spied on Senators

...along with Muhammad Ali, Martin Luther King, and a Washington Post humorist.

BY MATTHEW M. AID, WILLIAM BURR
Foreign Policy | SEPTEMBER 25, 2013

As Vietnam War protests grew, the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) tapped the overseas communications of prominent American critics of the war -- including a pair of sitting U.S. senators. That's according to a recently declassified NSA history, which called the effort "disreputable if not outright illegal."

For years the names of the surveillance targets were kept secret. But after a decision by the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel, in response to an appeal by the National Security Archive at George Washington University, the NSA has declassified them for the first time. The names of the NSA's targets are eye-popping. Civil rights leaders Martin Luther King and Whitney Young were on the watch list, as were the boxer Muhammad Ali, New York Times journalist Tom Wicker, and veteran Washington Post humor columnist Art Buchwald. But perhaps the most startling fact in the declassified document is that the NSA was tasked with monitoring the overseas telephone calls and cable traffic of two prominent members of Congress, Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho) and Sen. Howard Baker (R-Tenn.). As shocking as the recent revelations about the NSA's domestic eavesdropping have been, there has been no evidence so far of today's signal intelligence corps taking a step like this, to monitor the White House's political enemies.

As the Vietnam War escalated during Lyndon B. Johnson's presidency, domestic criticism and protest movements abounded. Protesters surrounded the Pentagon in the fall of 1967 and two years later organized demonstrations and the Moratorium to End the War in Vietnam. The scale of the dissent angered Johnson as well as his successor, Richard Nixon. As fervent anti-communists, they wondered whether domestic protests were linked to hostile foreign powers, and they wanted answers from the intelligence community. The CIA responded with Operation Chaos, while the NSA worked with other intelligence agencies to compile watch lists of prominent anti-war critics in order to monitor their overseas communications. By 1969, this program became formally known as "Minaret."

The NSA history does not say when these seven men were placed on the watch list -- or, more importantly, who decided to task the NSA to monitor their communications. But the simple fact that the NSA secretly intercepted the telephone calls and telegrams of these prominent Americans, including two U.S. senators, at the White House's behest is alarming in the extreme. It demonstrates just how easily the agency's vast surveillance powers have been abused in the past and can be abused even today.

CONTINUED...

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2013/09/25/it_happened_here_NSA_spied_on_senators_1970s



It can't happen here. Hah. It already has.
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
13. Oh come on now! They NEEDED the bridge of the starship Enterpoop
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 11:05 PM
Oct 2013

as their OC! How can you not love the genus ironicls of THAT!? Oct why do you hate them for their freedumbs? Don't you wont grown men in military uniform 'traversing' cyber space on a daily basis decked out like Scotty and Kirk?

Zoooom zoooooommm!!!!





|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
16. They tapped when Cheney was running things.
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 11:09 PM
Oct 2013

No telling how much information is stored, who knows where.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
54. Probably got the scoop on when he ran for state senate...
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 06:50 PM
Oct 2013

...prolly took impeachment off the table, too.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
17. Everyone knows it, right?
Fri Oct 25, 2013, 11:16 PM
Oct 2013

That is what I keep reading on DU. Heck, I knew it. Didn't KNOW it really, but had this conspiracy theory going that they were conspiring to listen....

I am not paranoid, I know they are watching me.....<grin>

Even those who were afraid of thinking the world actually had conspirators, now believe in conspiracies, and are even theorizing themselves, what do we do?

Do we make it so that all info gathered is plastered on the internet? That basically everyone has a Facebook page and the NSA daily posts what we are up to? We could start with our government officials. Foreign and domestic, and see how it goes from there?

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
23. I think the real scandal is that while they demand billions in funding
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 12:34 AM
Oct 2013

using Terror as the reason, the real work they do is for Corporations. Eg, the spying on phones and emails of ordinary people, the 'collection and storing of data' is like a high tech, multi-billion dollar way to collect info on the buying habits of billions of people (the whole world now we are told).

I think that is why they are so desperate to try to suppress all of this because if it emerges that it was all about Multi-Billion Corporations and their profit margins and not about 'Terror' at all, the funding would have to stop and investigations would have to start.

So far it does seem like there is not much work on terror going on. Unless they think Merkel is a terrorist or has 'terrorist ties'.

On the good side, all of this is leading to calls now from the International Community for International laws to curb all this spying.

The US should have led the way when they saw the potential for abuse with all the new technology, instead they took advantage of this relatively early phase before laws would be passed, which was inevitable, to abuse the technology themselves.

Thanks Octafish ...

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
26. The real motives certainly include
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 01:18 PM
Oct 2013

stifling criticism of the bank fraudsters that continue to fleece America and the world.

If you doubt this just look at the coordinated attack on the Occupy movement. It was a two pronged attack with the media smearing Occupy while the police physically attacked them.

This is your NSA tax dollar at work.

And they want to cut your social security.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
39. Big brother will not tolerate the impertinence of light being shined on the reprehensible policies
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 03:53 PM
Oct 2013

of the establishment, including Wall Street, as evidenced by the OWS movement being crushed through unconstitutional means including assault, pepper-spraying, arrest et al.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
52. You anti NSA people are 'like children
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 03:07 AM
Oct 2013

General Alexander anti NSA people are 'like children who don't want to take a bath'

Previously in the interview, Alexander compares the public's negative reaction to the necessity of intelligence collection to a child's refusal to take a bath. "It's like when you were younger — well, this is for boys," he said. "You know, when you're younger, you say, 'I don't want to take a bath.' You say, 'No, I'd never take a bath. Why would we want to take a bath?' Well, you've got to take a bath, cleanliness, (et cetera). I said, 'But isn't there a better way?' Well we don't, so we had to take baths, right, or showers. What about here, what's a better way to stop terrorists?"

that is at 16mins 22 seconds





The attempt at infantilizing the very people he is supposedly working for reveals that he views these people as lesser beings and that he wants their unquestioning submission to his will.

The whistle blowing portion of the interview also reaffirms this.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NSA Spying Not Very Focus...