Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 03:43 PM Oct 2013

Hillary Clinton: Gov't Must Not Go 'Too Far' With Surveillance

Hillary Clinton: Gov't Must Not Go 'Too Far' With Surveillance

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called for a dialogue on government surveillance Friday..."Trying to go up to the line of what is appropriate surveillance and security measures, and not over the line, is something that we need to have a full, comprehensive discussion about," Clinton said in a speech at Colgate University in Hamilton, N.Y., as quoted by the Syracuse Post-Standard.

The former secretary of state said information about U.S. surveillance programs has come to light out of context, pointing out that world leaders like German Chancellor Angela Merkel rely on U.S. intelligence to protect themselves.

Merkel expressed concern to President Barack Obama this week about reports that the U.S. may have been spying on her mobile phone. The White House denied the allegations.

"I think everybody now says, 'We have to make sure we're not going too far,' and that's a discussion that has to happen in a calm atmosphere," Clinton said, as quoted by the Post-Standard.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/hillary-clinton-gov-t-must-make-sure-it-s-not-going-too-far-with-surveillance
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton: Gov't Must Not Go 'Too Far' With Surveillance (Original Post) ProSense Oct 2013 OP
She hears us RobertEarl Oct 2013 #1
oh geeze, I guess there is not much chance left she won't run for potus. n/t Jefferson23 Oct 2013 #2
I agree that the government needs to rethink what it is doing and this should have happened in 2009 karynnj Oct 2013 #3
I'm guessing it's ProSense Oct 2013 #7
Haven't you heard? RobertEarl Oct 2013 #8
I'm guessing "too far" would be bugging Hillary's phone n/t Fumesucker Oct 2013 #4
They did, didn't they? RobertEarl Oct 2013 #5
I am guessing it has been bugged for many years - DURHAM D Oct 2013 #6
Ken Starr did. nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #9
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
1. She hears us
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 03:52 PM
Oct 2013

We are telling them to stop watching us and she hears.

Now we get the soft sell: Everyone else is doing it.

Personally I'm in favor of 24/7 spying. Let's start with all government people and lets make all the info available like a Facebook page. Proceed, Hillary.

What's good for us geese is good for the gander. Lead us on, HC, and get Bill on the train.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
3. I agree that the government needs to rethink what it is doing and this should have happened in 2009
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:05 PM
Oct 2013

Many here argued that Obama needed to dump all Bush people from national security and foreign policy in 2009 -- even though the norm is to keep some relatively high level people for awhile from the previous administration. The argument was that this would help with transition. I admit that I was NOT one who saw the dangers in keeping any people with decision making roles.

I was wrong. I assumed that the highest level people would be Obama people and there would be reviews to assess any need to change. Apparently, this was either not done - which is horrifying - or Obama administration people did look at what was done and saw no reason to change it and if Obama is being honest neglected to tell him the scope of the spying.

However, late is always better than never - this needs to be done. An unfortunate impact is that Obama deserves some of the blame - even if only for negligence or not putting people in place that would at least consider that he needed to sign off on this continuing. A second problem is that had a review been done in 2009, they could just have quietly made the change -- and would have been well positioned to say that this ended at the beginning of their watch. Now there is the question of how much of the change has to be public.

When I first heard the Merkel story with the 2006 date I thought we would hear that it was in the past and it had been wrong. Obviously, not hearing that means it continued.

It is absolutely wrong to tap Merkel or any leader's phone (as well as many lower level people). I am glad Clinton is calling for this to be looked at -- but there is the question of where was she in 2009? As SoS, did she know this was happening? Did she speak to Obama about it?

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
7. I'm guessing it's
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:16 PM
Oct 2013

"It is absolutely wrong to tap Merkel or any leader's phone (as well as many lower level people). I am glad Clinton is calling for this to be looked at -- but there is the question of where was she in 2009? As SoS, did she know this was happening? Did she speak to Obama about it? "

...because we're entering the pre-campaign phase. Can you say "posturing"?

It's going to be interesting. LOL!

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
8. Haven't you heard?
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:30 PM
Oct 2013

Joining the anti-spying network is becoming allies with all that is bad. Heard it right here on DU, I did. <gawd>

I don't blame Obama. He adopted this mess, and the moles sure as hell have not told him the truth about all the spying they do. He does need to clean house. And guess what? He can do it now. Now that all this bad press is out and even folks like you are perturbed.

Hillary would say nothing if there was not a huge groundswell.

DURHAM D

(32,611 posts)
6. I am guessing it has been bugged for many years -
Sat Oct 26, 2013, 04:16 PM
Oct 2013

by the US, China, Israel, Germany, Russia and others.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton: Gov't Mu...