General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFederal Prosecutors, in a Policy Shift, Cite Warrantless Wiretaps as Evidence
WASHINGTON The Justice Department for the first time has notified a criminal defendant that evidence being used against him came from a warrantless wiretap, a move that is expected to set up a Supreme Court test of whether such eavesdropping is constitutional.
Prosecutors filed such a notice late Friday in the case of Jamshid Muhtorov, who was charged in Colorado in January 2012 with providing material support to the Islamic Jihad Union, a designated terrorist organization based in Uzbekistan.
Mr. Muhtorov is accused of planning to travel abroad to join the militants and has pleaded not guilty. A criminal complaint against him showed that much of the governments case was based on e-mails and phone calls intercepted under a 2008 surveillance law.
The governments notice allows Mr. Muhtorovs lawyer to ask a court to suppress the evidence by arguing that it derived from unconstitutional surveillance, setting in motion judicial review of the eavesdropping.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/27/us/federal-prosecutors-in-a-policy-shift-cite-warrantless-wiretaps-as-evidence.html?_r=1&
jsr
(7,712 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)to "legalize" their fascism.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Not.
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)RC
(25,592 posts)That warrant-less wiretap should have been thrown out from the get-go and who ever authorized it needs to in jeopardy of his job and bank account.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Get into stupid stuff like the Bill of Rights and Civil Rights and we're in loony-bin territory, yes sir or ma'am.
for those new to the concepts.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)You served us well until our arrogant, criminal government decided it was a hindrance to their fascist agenda.
It's a real slap in the face to see them use a case involving a suspected terrorist to destroy our right to privacy.