Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ohio Joe

(21,760 posts)
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 04:37 PM Oct 2013

Nebraska approves climate-denying study; scientists refuse to conduct it

A study on the impact of climate change on Nebraska, recently approved by the state, may not be carried out — because its own scientists are refusing to be a part of it.

The problem, according to members of the governor-appointed Climate Assessment and Response Committee, is that the bill behind the study specifically calls for the researchers to look at “cyclical” climate change. In so doing, it completely leaves out human contributions to global warming.

At a discussion yesterday, the Omaha World-Herald Bureau reports, Barbara Mayes, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service, pointed out that “cyclical” isn’t even a scientific term.

And it’s not just a misuse of language: State Sen. Beau McCoy, who added the word to the bill, is a known climate denier. “I don’t subscribe to global warming,” McCoy said during an earlier debate about the legislation. ”I think there are normal, cyclical changes.”

At the meeting, a number of scientists stood up to declare that they refused to take part in the study:

http://www.salon.com/2013/10/24/nebraska_approves_climate_denying_study_scientists_refuse_to_conduct_it/#

Good. These fundie assholes should not be allowed to dictate how science works to suit their agenda.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Heather MC

(8,084 posts)
4. They should take the money, and do the studing proving there hypothesis is incorrect. And Climate
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 05:41 PM
Oct 2013

Change actually exist

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
6. It's already been proven, time and time again. And the human contribution to it has been
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 06:20 PM
Oct 2013

proven time and time again.

Anthropogenic global warming/climate change is established science. This study would be a complete waste of taxpayer dollars, in addition to being a crappy study designed to prove a conclusion foregone by the legislature.

This simply isn't how science is done. Period.

 

Heather MC

(8,084 posts)
14. True, I am just saying maybe these idiots will listen if it's their money they used for the study
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 10:38 PM
Oct 2013

Of course it's been proven to people who don't believe in fairytales. and Magical beings swooping in at the last second to restore everything and protect them from the destruction they are causing,
but maybe this will help them step in to reality.

And let's face it, they can take the money and just download a report off Yahoo and hand it to them in 6 months


cui bono

(19,926 posts)
2. Thank you scientists!
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 05:02 PM
Oct 2013

Seems like all sorts of people are standing up to crackpots lately.

Texas textbooks, Reid on SS, scientists on climate change...

 

Thucydides

(212 posts)
5. Kind of like Texas School Book publishers refusing to print "creation science" in text books!
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 06:08 PM
Oct 2013

Sounds like Americans are starting to wake from their slumber.

 

Nanjing to Seoul

(2,088 posts)
13. If you replace "Creation" with utter and "Science" with "bullshit," it's exactly my opinion of
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 07:59 PM
Oct 2013

Creation Science,

CK_John

(10,005 posts)
7. Nebraska of all places will be impacked the most, when the bread basket is up around Hudson Bay.
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 06:20 PM
Oct 2013

They should be preparing for their new life stye.

infidel dog

(273 posts)
17. Probably both of them.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 02:09 PM
Oct 2013

I think they're planning to part the rising sea levels, or just walk on the waters.

The Wizard

(12,545 posts)
10. republicans hate science
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 07:06 PM
Oct 2013

It requires logical reasoning and empirical data. Republicans would rather make shit up. It's easier to give someone the finger rather than a helping hand.

Whoopdedoo

(60 posts)
12. This Conservative is
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 07:43 PM
Oct 2013

Running for governor next year. He isn't much into the LGBT and Gays at all either. There is no real reason he is a climate change denier other than he is a contrarian. Either that or he has some big donors who 'encourage' him to be one.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nebraska approves climate...