Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 04:52 PM Oct 2013

Welfare, Not Full-Time Work, Is Now America's No. 1 Occupation

This is the headline you would see if you clicked on the editorial at Investors.com on Oct 25th. It came from a report on CNS news that trumpeted, among other things

"That means there were about 1.07 people getting some form of means-tested government benefit for every 1 person working full-time year round."

Problem is that there is just enough truth in the flawed analysis to make people think it's the whole story. It's not, and you should educate yourself so that you know better when someone, and they will and have, tells you or someone in your presence that such a state of affairs exists.

In their simplistic and biased version there are two groups of people - those working, and those getting benefits. In the real world, the harder world, there are three - those who get benefits, those who work with none, and a large group in the middle who work and get some benefits as well, such as the woman, after having worked for McDonalds for 10 years, who works full-time, found herself unable to make ends meet for herself and her children. She called their help line and was told to investigate "...food pantries, federal food stamps and Medicaid.", Here.

from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, here.


The overwhelming majority of SNAP recipients who can work do so. Among SNAP households with at least one working-age, non-disabled adult, more than half work while receiving SNAP — and more than 80 percent work in the year prior to or the year after receiving SNAP. The rates are even higher for families with children — more than 60 percent work while receiving SNAP, and almost 90 percent work in the prior or subsequent year.

The number of SNAP households that have earnings while participating in SNAP has been rising for more than a decade, and has more than tripled — from about 2 million in 2000 to about 6.4 million in 2011. The increase was especially pronounced during the recent deep recession, suggesting that many people have turned to SNAP because of under-employment — for example, when one wage-earner in a two-parent family lost a job, when a worker’s hours were cut, or when a worker turned to a lower-paying job after being laid off.



So as Barry Ritholtz points out in his blog at The Big Picture, here.


So, there are two points to be made.

There is huge overlap between “year-round full-time workers” and “recipients of means-tested government benefits,” and even organizations as blinded by ideology as CNS and IBD should recognize as much.
The American taxpayer – through the various safety net programs mentioned – effectively supplements the unlivable wages provided by companies like McDonald’s which is, I suppose, “increasing shareholder value” by outsourcing part of its employees’ incomes to SNAP and other taxpayer-funded programs. If such companies paid their employees a livable wage, said employees would, I’m sure, be delighted at the prospect of not being on public assistance. Hence, if the GOP wants to slash the social safety net, it must consider agreeing to a raise in the minimum wage. You can’t have it both ways – advocating for no minimum wage and then bemoaning the number of people seeking assistance.


Worth a read.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Welfare, Not Full-Time Work, Is Now America's No. 1 Occupation (Original Post) jtuck004 Oct 2013 OP
And, as usual, the headline has nothing at all to do with the reality. PDJane Oct 2013 #1
And at least tens of thousands, if not hudreds of thousands, will see that and in our jtuck004 Oct 2013 #2
Bankers, all the financial people get federal welfare RobertEarl Oct 2013 #3
But ...if both parties do this...and Lib Dems Push back and it goes nowhere.. KoKo Oct 2013 #4
Not vote for Ronald Reagan to create an economy in which the bankers could do this, jtuck004 Oct 2013 #12
can't say I disagree with much of what you say. Still...things may KoKo Oct 2013 #14
It's horrible for scores of millions of people, with no relief in sight. None. jtuck004 Oct 2013 #15
They don't even have to be "our" bankers. They can be bankers from foreign countries or AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2013 #9
K&R...Definitely I'm a Ritholtz Fan. Guy is the best in the business about WS Scams KoKo Oct 2013 #5
So let's do the smart thing BrotherIvan Oct 2013 #6
You forgot. We must cut social security and medicare. Top priority. Enthusiast Oct 2013 #7
Post haste! BrotherIvan Oct 2013 #16
I've got loops at the top of my cowboy boots, are those bootstraps? n/t Egalitarian Thug Oct 2013 #18
Maybe BrotherIvan Oct 2013 #19
And let's get that TPP approved. AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2013 #10
I almost forgot! BrotherIvan Oct 2013 #17
They've just GOT to keep the myth going that there are "makers and takers" to elect Republicans... Spitfire of ATJ Oct 2013 #8
Once upon a time, sulphurdunn Oct 2013 #11
+1...It's the way it's turned out ...for Sure! KoKo Oct 2013 #13
 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
2. And at least tens of thousands, if not hudreds of thousands, will see that and in our
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 06:01 PM
Oct 2013

busy world where they don't have (or choose not to take) enough time to read beyond the headlines, it will inform their worldview.

I've already heard this elsewhere, and it's not the first time.


 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
3. Bankers, all the financial people get federal welfare
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 06:11 PM
Oct 2013

The government spends trillions on making sure the bankers and other high finance people have a market for them to steal from.

Defense employees, too.

There is virtually no market that can stand on its own without federal support.

We are a Socialist nation in most aspects. Only idiots are blind to that fact.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
4. But ...if both parties do this...and Lib Dems Push back and it goes nowhere..
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 06:46 PM
Oct 2013

Then What?

I have no idea. Do you know what we could do?

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
12. Not vote for Ronald Reagan to create an economy in which the bankers could do this,
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 08:34 PM
Oct 2013

would have been a good start. Carter said we are spending too much, need to cut back - and he, and Volcker, were correct. Reagan sold the myth to people that all their hard work, the conditions they had created by borrowing and spending too much were the fault of black people and needed to be stopped. Too many Democrats agreed and flushed the New Deal down the toilet, leaving it to become a program of maintenance, eventually to be whittled down as the corps and thugs got stronger. Reagan tossed Volcker and gave us Alan Greenspan, who gave us, along with a lot of his co-conspirators, the financial crisis that has hurt so many people, and may eventually destroy the country.

You can read a better outline by Joan Walsh here: http://www.salon.com/2013/10/01/the_real_story_of_the_shutdown_50_years_of_gop_race_baiting/print

They are the ones who made where we are today possible.

We are so far in the hole that is most likely the Democratic Party will never be the party to fix it, given their support of the FIRE sector. (No? Look who has the money.) It will take a whole new coalition, and probably not within your (or my) lifetime. Our lot will be to work until we are 75 and then drop dead. (Maybe 40-60 years down the road, in a much less prosperous America, and a party headed by mainly Latinos and Black folks, who decide enough is enough, something may start up again. Or maybe never.

Then again, I may be too optimistic.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
14. can't say I disagree with much of what you say. Still...things may
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 10:18 PM
Oct 2013

change ...given the direction the country and economy are going. Oh...I know ...Wall Street is looking "recovered" and on a roll.

But the economy is not good. Small Business is not doing well. Out here in many parts of the US..things are not looking up at all. They focus on NYC/Silicon Valley and Hedge Funds buying up real estate (homes) to rent out to people who can't afford homes or were thrown out of original homes because of Bankster Mortgage Fraud and Deregulation of standards for both Lenders and Borrowers.

There's a Game A'Foot to cover it up. But, the rot is still there. They might pull off another Bubble or Swindle...but, don't think the "next time" it will go their way because many people are wise to them. That's my hope that they implode on another crooked scandal much sooner than later.

But...I try to be an optimist. Your scenario is maybe closer to what will happen.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
15. It's horrible for scores of millions of people, with no relief in sight. None.
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 11:38 PM
Oct 2013

>my hope that they implode on another crooked scandal

Problem is, the people are un-armed, in an intellectual sense. I hear people calling for raising taxes on the wealthy, which is fine, but then we just get their dollars back. That's like supplying a rebel army (in this case the people) with all the bullets they can use, but no guns. We get all their dollars back and then what? People aren't prepared to fight them on Wall Street, and in the banks. They know diddly-squat about finance, nothing about off-shoring business deals, jack about manufacturing, nothing about programming (else there would be a sustained roar of laughter over the architecture of the health insurance web sites), and they don't even have the phone numbers of the carloads of attorneys who do nothing all day but look for ways to screw jo and jane worker-bee and avoid taxes while doing it. Nor are they prepared to live in the world of no-growth, which is exactly what we are living through. They rejected it in 1980, and ran up debt to live on. Now the people who own the debt are being paid back in our freedoms.

The government is doing NOTHING to help people understand what kind of world they are facing, nothing about finance, they aren't telling people it's ok to call bullshit on the schemes and quasi-legal crap that goes on. Instead they backstop the criminals, cover for them, and rake in donations.

Remember what happened in France when they got out the guillotines? They lopped off a few tyrants heads, then the wealthy took over, and before they were through killing they lopped off the heads of thousands of people who started the original revolt, and the wealthy remained in control.

Without massive training of and a whole new set of concepts by the people, we could have a revolution here tomorrow, Jamie Dimon and a few others could get what they have been protected against, and the next thing that would happen would be the killing and imprisonment of thousands of the people revolting. Within 20 years the banks and wealthy would likely own it all again.

Which is why, when I am asked by younger folks, I tell them to learn a second language, get a passport, and find another country you can live in, because they may seriously need a Plan B very soon, if they hope to have much of a life at all.



 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
9. They don't even have to be "our" bankers. They can be bankers from foreign countries or
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 07:52 PM
Oct 2013

international banksters who owe no real duty of loyalty to any country.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
5. K&R...Definitely I'm a Ritholtz Fan. Guy is the best in the business about WS Scams
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 06:49 PM
Oct 2013

..has a Book About it...and is incredible in his Blog.

Also Recommend Yves Smith's "Naked Capitalism Blog" .......for Market Watchers and Dems who Market Watch.

K&R!

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
6. So let's do the smart thing
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 06:53 PM
Oct 2013

Let's NOT invest in jobs or education; and let us completely get rid of the minimum wage! Because deficits or grand bargains or seven mountains or something. For fuck's sake!

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
16. Post haste!
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 12:15 AM
Oct 2013

Can someone please explain where the straps on boots actually are because I have no damned idea!

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
19. Maybe
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 12:10 PM
Oct 2013

I found this on Wikipedia

The phrase appears to have originated in the early 19th century United States (particularly in the sense "pull oneself over a fence by one's bootstraps&quot , to mean an absurdly impossible action, an adynaton.

Sounds about right to me!

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
17. I almost forgot!
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 12:17 AM
Oct 2013

Trade agreements, the more the merrier! And let's not worry about a jobs bill or put any thought into how to get the economy going and people back into homes and well-paying jobs. I mean really, there are women out there who think they should control their own bodies! There are Muslins and wars on holidays! Baby Jesus just shed a tiny tear! Priorities people!

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
8. They've just GOT to keep the myth going that there are "makers and takers" to elect Republicans...
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 07:49 PM
Oct 2013

Doesn't matter if a big percentage is things like the Earned Income Tax Credit or Mortgage Deduction.

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
11. Once upon a time,
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 08:19 PM
Oct 2013

it was tacitly accepted that government assistance programs were part of the price paid for not having a full employment economy. Over time the understanding became that government assistance was a subsidy to capitalism for low wages and a slowly increasing structural unemployment rate. Big business has wanted to renege on this arrangement since the 70s when the off shoring of American manufacturing, union busting and assaults upon the social safety net began in earnest. The global corporate business model stands or falls on ever and ever cheaper labor as the scarcity and hence the cost of resources increases along with the human labor pool, which drives labor costs down as standards of living decline. Eliminating or drastically reducing public assistance not only generates cheaper labor and reduces living standards but also transfers wealth up the income scale and facilitates the advance of plutonomies.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
13. +1...It's the way it's turned out ...for Sure!
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 08:46 PM
Oct 2013

Quote from you:

The global corporate business model stands or falls on ever and ever cheaper labor as the scarcity and hence the cost of resources increases along with the human labor pool, which drives labor costs down as standards of living decline. Eliminating or drastically reducing public assistance not only generates cheaper labor and reduces living standards but also transfers wealth up the income scale and facilitates the advance of plutonomies.

We are going to be fighting against this for a loooong time. IMHO.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Welfare, Not Full-Time Wo...