General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama Advisors considered replacing Biden
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/01/us/politics/book-details-consideration-of-replacing-biden-on-2012-ticket.html?_r=0Book Details Obama Aides Talks About Replacing Biden on 2012 Ticket
President Obamas top aides secretly considered replacing Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. with Hillary Rodham Clinton on the 2012 ticket, undertaking extensive focus-group sessions and polling in late 2011 when Mr. Obamas re-election outlook appeared uncertain.
The aides concluded that despite Mrs. Clintons popularity, the move would not offer a significant enough political boost to Mr. Obama to justify such a radical move, according to a newly published account of the 2012 race.
The idea of replacing Mr. Biden with Mrs. Clinton had long been rumored, but the journalists Mark Halperin and John Heilemann, in their new book, Double Down, provide a detailed description of the effort inside the senior circle of Obama advisers. It was pushed by the chief of staff at the time, William M. Daley, despite the close personal rapport Mr. Daley had developed with Mr. Biden, a fellow Irish Catholic and veteran of Washington politics.
When the research came back near the end of the year, it suggested that adding Clinton to the ticket wouldnt materially improve Obamas odds, the authors write in their sequel to Game Change, which chronicled the 2008 campaign. Biden had dodged a bullet he never saw coming and never would know anything about, if the Obamans could keep a secret.
More at link
tridim
(45,358 posts)FSogol
(45,524 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,376 posts)If you read the story (which I did early this morning), the book only claims that his "advisers", NOT him, purportedly looked at this as an option (among other things) and admitted he may or may not have even had any input in the strategy.
This is Jonathan Martin/Mark Halprin stuff.
FarPoint
(12,430 posts)List and explore the options.....present them to the candidate and/or the President.
Then make a final decision...........
BumRushDaShow
(129,376 posts)It has been corrected.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,376 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)Just because his aides considered it and made a case for it, doesn't mean the President ever actually considered it.
mfcorey1
(11,001 posts)talking heads will all nave anonymous sources who told them something. The criticism of the ACA is fading so there is a need for a new crisis. When will we get back to the work of the people? Damn! There is more drama in politics than there is gossip on TMZ.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)about ACA criticism fading ?
Denzil_DC
(7,255 posts)Never any - any - consideration of VP/HRC switch. Not even entertained by the only person who mattered. Or most of us. Back to Halloween.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Denzil_DC
(7,255 posts)But Clinton was exhausted and not in great health during that period anyway, so I'm not even sure she'd have been up to it or up for it even if any focus group findings had been more favorable.
That's the problem with these sorts of books, especially when the likes of Halperin are involved ...
Laelth
(32,017 posts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Halperin#Criticism
-Laelth
BumRushDaShow
(129,376 posts)are like old photos on the wall of a dive bar that leave behind stains when removed.
RC
(25,592 posts)for the Right of Center people Obama has surrounded himself with.