Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,070 posts)
Fri Nov 1, 2013, 10:39 PM Nov 2013

President Obama issues Executive Order on Climate

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/11/01/1252319/-President-Obama-issues-Executive-Order-on-Climate-Preparedness

Fri Nov 01, 2013 at 09:14 AM PDT
President Obama issues Executive Order on Climate

by VL BakerFollow



President Obama just issued an executive order “to prepare the Nation for the impacts of climate change by undertaking actions to enhance climate preparedness and resilience."

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

November 1, 2013

FACT SHEET: Executive Order on Climate Preparedness

President Obama Establishes a Task Force on Climate

“We're going to need to get prepared. And that’s why this plan will also protect critical sectors of our economy and prepare the United States for the impacts of climate change that we cannot avoid. States and cities across the country are already taking it upon themselves to get ready… And we’ll partner with communities seeking help to prepare for droughts and floods, reduce the risk of wildfires, protect the dunes and wetlands that pull double duty as green space and as natural storm barriers.” – President Barack Obama, June 25, 2013

Today, President Obama established a Task Force on Climate Preparedness and Resilience to advise the Administration on how the Federal Government can respond to the needs of communities nationwide that are dealing with the impacts of climate change. The Task Force members include state, local and tribal leaders from across the country who will use their first-hand experiences in building climate preparedness and resilience in their communities to inform their recommendations to the Administration.

The President signed an Executive Order that directs Federal agencies to take a series of steps to make it easier for American communities to strengthen their resilience to extreme weather and prepare for other impacts of climate change.

President Obama has said that we have a moral obligation to our children and future generations to leave them a planet that is not polluted or damaged. That is why in June, the President launched a Climate Action Plan to cut carbon pollution, prepare communities for the impacts of climate change, and lead international efforts to address this global challenge. The Climate Action Plan recognizes that even as we act to curb the carbon pollution that is driving climate change, we must also improve our ability to prepare for the climate impacts we are already seeing across the country. Across America, states, cities, and communities are taking steps to protect themselves from extreme weather and other climate impacts by updating building codes, adjusting the way they manage natural resources, investing in more resilient infrastructure, and planning for rapid recovery from damages that nonetheless occur.

The Federal Government has an important role to play in supporting community-based preparedness and resilience efforts by establishing policies and prioritizing investments that promote preparedness, protecting critical infrastructure and public resources, supporting science and research needed to prepare for climate impacts, and ensuring that Federal operations and facilities continue to protect and serve citizens in a changing climate.

State, Local and Tribal Leaders Task Force on Climate Preparedness and Resilience

State, local and tribal leaders across the country are already contending with more frequent or severe heat waves, droughts, wildfires, storms and floods, and other impacts of climate change. The Task Force will provide recommendations to the President on removing barriers to resilient investments, modernizing Federal grant and loan programs to better support local efforts, and developing the information and tools they need to prepare.

Task Force members comprise governors, mayors, county officials and tribal leaders, representing a diverse range of communities. The members of the Task Force include:

State Officials:

Governor Neil Abercrombie (HI)

Governor Jerry Brown (CA)

Governor Eddie Calvo (GU)

Governor Jay Inslee (WA)

Governor Jack Markell (DE)

Governor Martin O’Malley (MD)

Governor Pat Quinn (IL)

Governor Peter Shumlin (VT)

Local Officials:

Mayor Ralph Becker (Salt Lake City, UT)

Mayor James Brainard (Carmel, IN)

Commissioner Paula Brooks (Franklin County, OH)

Supervisor Salud Carbajal (Santa Barbara County, CA)

Mayor Frank Cownie (Des Moines, IA)

Mayor Bob Dixson (Greensburg, KS)

Mayor Eric Garcetti (Los Angeles, CA)

Mayor George Heartwell (Grand Rapids, MI)

Mayor Kristin Jacobs (Broward County, FL)

Mayor Kevin Johnson (Sacramento, CA)

Mayor Michael Nutter (Philadelphia, PA)

Mayor Annise Parker (Houston, TX)

Mayor Patsy Parker (Perdido Beach, AL)

Mayor Madeline Rogero (Knoxville, TN)

Mayor Karen Weitkunat (Fort Collins, CO)

Mayor Dawn Zimmer (Hoboken, NJ)

Tribal Officials:

Karen Diver, Chairwoman, Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa (MN)

Reggie Joule, Mayor, Northwest Arctic Borough (AK)

An Executive Order to Protect Our Communities

The Obama Administration has taken significant steps to strengthen the climate resilience of America’s communities and economy. More than 30 Federal agencies developed their first-ever Climate Change Adaptation Plans, outlining strategies to protect their operations, programs, and investments to better serve communities and safeguard our public resources in the face of climate change. In the wake of Hurricane Sandy, the Administration has provided resources to rebuild the affected area to be more resilient than before, including support for more climate-resilient roads and infrastructure, and projects that protect drinking water and buffer communities from flooding. In addition, Federal agencies have partnered with states, cities, tribes, and the private sector to develop strategies to address the impacts of climate change on our freshwater resources, oceans and coasts, and wildlife. Agencies have also built new, data-driven tools to help decision makers and resource managers map and plan for future sea level rise. From Florida to Minnesota, and from Alaska to New York, Federal agencies have partnered with communities to provide funding and technical assistance to address local climate impacts such as sea level rise, flooding, and water scarcity.

To build on this progress, the Executive Order (E.O.) “Preparing the United States for the Impacts of Climate Change,” signed today directs Federal agencies to:

Modernize Federal programs to support climate-resilient investments: Agencies will examine their policies and programs and find ways to make it easier for cities and towns to build smarter and stronger. Agencies will identify and remove any barriers to resilience-focused actions and investments– for example, policies that encourage communities to rebuild to past standards after disasters instead of to stronger standards – including through agency grants, technical assistance, and other programs in sectors from transportation and water management to conservation and disaster relief.
Manage lands and waters for climate preparedness and resilience: America’s natural resources are critical to our Nation’s economy, health and quality of life. The E.O. directs agencies to identify changes that must be made to land- and water-related policies, programs, and regulations to strengthen the climate resilience of our watersheds, natural resources, and ecosystems, and the communities and economies that depend on them. Federal agencies will also evaluate how to better promote natural storm barriers such as dunes and wetlands, as well as how to protect the carbon sequestration benefits of forests and lands to help reduce the carbon pollution that causes climate change.

· Provide information, data and tools for climate change preparedness and resilience: Scientific data and insights are essential to help communities and businesses better understand and manage the risks associated with extreme weather and other impacts of climate change. The E.O. instructs Federal agencies to work together and with information users to develop new climate preparedness tools and information that state, local, and private-sector leaders need to make smart decisions. In keeping with the President’s Open Data initiative, agencies will also make extensive Federal climate data accessible to the public through an easy-to-use online portal.

Plan for climate change related risk: Recognizing the threat that climate change poses to Federal facilities, operations and programs, the E.O. builds on the first-ever set of Federal agency adaptation plans released earlier this year and directs Federal agencies to develop and implement strategies to evaluate and address their most significant climate change related risks.

To implement these actions, the E.O. establishes an interagency Council on Climate Preparedness and Resilience, chaired by the White House and composed of more than 25 agencies. To assist in achieving the goals of the E.O., these agencies are directed to consider the recommendations of the State, Local, and Tribal Leaders Task Force on Climate Preparedness and Resilience.

This is an amazing,timely action by our president. He is calling on those governors who have expressed commitment to mitigating and adapting to climate change. In states where the issue does not have the governors support he called on local officials such as Mayor Kristin Jacobs (Broward County, FL) to lead.



http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/11/01/1252319/-President-Obama-issues-Executive-Order-on-Climate-Preparedness
46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President Obama issues Executive Order on Climate (Original Post) babylonsister Nov 2013 OP
Recommended. (nt) NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #1
Thumbs Up for President Obama. Jackpine Radical Nov 2013 #2
Good, but simply being reactive isn't really enough... Scootaloo Nov 2013 #3
He's dancing as fast as he can. nt babylonsister Nov 2013 #7
I'm not criticizing, mind Scootaloo Nov 2013 #9
You were criticizing, but that's okay. babylonsister Nov 2013 #13
Whether it's enough or not is not the point tavalon Nov 2013 #10
Yes, we've passedthe turning point Scootaloo Nov 2013 #15
You can. I can. I hope to convince "we". I'm not suggesting anyone give up. tavalon Nov 2013 #18
Nce to meet another Seattleite Scootaloo Nov 2013 #20
The big recent change has been the EPA limits on new generating plants muriel_volestrangler Nov 2013 #41
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #4
Good... K&R! sheshe2 Nov 2013 #5
Good job! riqster Nov 2013 #6
This is actually a HUGE deal... alittlelark Nov 2013 #8
More proof that he's an evil, tyranicle dictator. penndragon69 Nov 2013 #11
And Agenda 21, Gun Confiscation, FEMA Camps. Don't wanna leave anything to chance, Faux Noise won't. freshwest Nov 2013 #45
My mayor is on that list! Drunken Irishman Nov 2013 #12
Good, bad, or surprising? nt babylonsister Nov 2013 #14
Good ... not surprising. Drunken Irishman Nov 2013 #16
My mayor AND my governor are on that list. cui bono Nov 2013 #37
How is this useful? You need planners and engineers, not politicians. FarCenter Nov 2013 #17
Maybe their outreach might convince people like babylonsister Nov 2013 #19
Who do you think controls what is planned and engineered in cities & states? Drunken Irishman Nov 2013 #38
Great news! Gov Jerry Brown and my County Supervisor Salud Carbajal are on the list Hekate Nov 2013 #21
He heard, and he listened RobertEarl Nov 2013 #22
Baloney. Nice try. nt babylonsister Nov 2013 #23
This x1,000. AverageJoe90 Nov 2013 #40
And if Obama was so invested in insurance companies, babylonsister Nov 2013 #24
Yeah, if the insurance companies held no sway at all NuclearDem Nov 2013 #26
^^^^^^^ sheshe2 Nov 2013 #27
while other industries continue to deny RainDog Nov 2013 #25
I have been following sea level rise for 30 years RobertEarl Nov 2013 #33
Yeah, no dispute from me RainDog Nov 2013 #34
When? RobertEarl Nov 2013 #35
I hope its not too late. maced666 Nov 2013 #28
I wish he had not had so much bullshit obstruction and sabotage BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #30
Pushing alternative energy and getting out of the ME was his first move, plus the freshwest Feb 2014 #46
kick! rec! BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #29
I agree about the overpopulation. Vashta Nerada Nov 2013 #31
Also, women need financial autonomy RainDog Nov 2013 #36
truly. BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #43
Very happy to see this, and wondering how many RW heads are exploding over it. :^P GreenPartyVoter Nov 2013 #32
It's a task force and that's a start cali Nov 2013 #39
GObama malaise Nov 2013 #42
K & R Scurrilous Nov 2013 #44
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
3. Good, but simply being reactive isn't really enough...
Fri Nov 1, 2013, 10:49 PM
Nov 2013

Especially given our nation's enormous role in creating the problem.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
9. I'm not criticizing, mind
Fri Nov 1, 2013, 11:16 PM
Nov 2013

I know that there's only so much that can be done, so fast. And I'm pretty confident that this isn't the "final word" on the subject. Like I said, this is good.

It's just kinda like passing out buckets on the Titanic, currently.

tavalon

(27,985 posts)
10. Whether it's enough or not is not the point
Fri Nov 1, 2013, 11:49 PM
Nov 2013

It's too late to fix the problem and even if we never used another single carbon atom (an impossibility), the things we must now prepare for will happen. We've passed the point of return. As well, China is now outstripping us in fucking the environment and they show as little interest as we do in stopping. Ergo, it's going to happen. The oceans will rise, the climate will become more violent and until we can no longer survive, we do need to prepare. Heck, maybe there is some way a few people can actually survive this. Of course, that brings up a whole existential argument around whether that is in any way a good thing - humans surviving this.

So, I, for one, am glad to see a nod in the direction of preparedness. This will be brutal. There were times in the past where we could have avoided some of what is to come but those times have come and gone.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
15. Yes, we've passedthe turning point
Fri Nov 1, 2013, 11:58 PM
Nov 2013

These things are going to happen even if, as you say, we halt all use of carbon.

That doesn't mean we should go "fuck it" and keep plowing Carbon into the atmosphere. And the "but China!" argument is fucking childish, what, are we trying to prevent a pollution gap or something?

We can't stop it. But we can do stuff to moderate how bad the effects will be.

tavalon

(27,985 posts)
18. You can. I can. I hope to convince "we". I'm not suggesting anyone give up.
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 12:09 AM
Nov 2013

My recycle box and my Orca card (public transportation) doesn't change anything though, in reality. I do it because it's right. Ignoring China is unwise but we don't have the karmic pull or push to get them to stop. They are just copying what we did at the beginning of our industrial revolution.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
20. Nce to meet another Seattleite
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 12:16 AM
Nov 2013

:waves:

You're right. Recycling and changing our personal electricity habits won't do much of anything. This is the sort of thing that require sweeping policy to address.

We can ignore china all day long. Using their pollution as an excuse for our own is nonsense (and it's nonsense when they do the same thing, too.) China will do whatever hte hell it's going to do, our concern needs to be with what we're doing - and I mean we in the macro level, as a whole nation, not you and I as individuals.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
41. The big recent change has been the EPA limits on new generating plants
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 06:42 AM
Nov 2013
Breaking: Obama administration moving ahead with limits on emissions from power plants

The proposal calls for any coal power plants built in the future to emit under 1,100 pounds of CO2 per megawatt-hour — considerably less than coal plants emit today, which is about 1,800 pounds on average. The rules are more stringent than some had expected; observers had been saying that they might come in at 1,300 or 1,400 pounds per megawatt-hour. (The draft rules set a limit for natural-gas plants, too — 1,000 pounds for large facilities — but new gas plants already pollute less than that. Some advocates had hoped the EPA would push the gas standard down to 800 pounds per megawatt-hour.)

http://grist.org/climate-energy/epa-chief-tells-grist-what-coal-will-have-to-do-to-survive-in-a-carbon-constrained-future/

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023701065


This would effectively stop the building of new coal generating plants, until someone can invent Carbon Capture and Storage.

And the ability of the EPA to set such limits is now in front of the Supreme Court:

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a utility industry challenge to the Obama administration’s environmental regulations that would limit greenhouse gases coming from power plants and factories.

The justices agreed to rule on whether the Environmental Protection Agency’s restrictions involving motor vehicles give the agency the power to impose similar restrictions on “stationary sources that emit greenhouse gases,” which would include everything from power plants and refineries to apartment buildings and factories. The court, however, turned away the most aggressive challenges to the EPA’s authority to regulate heat-trapping greenhouse gas emissions.

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-supreme-court-greenhouse-gas-case-20131015,0,839943.story

http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014621499

Response to babylonsister (Original post)

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
17. How is this useful? You need planners and engineers, not politicians.
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 12:00 AM
Nov 2013
In keeping with the President’s Open Data initiative, agencies will also make extensive Federal climate data accessible to the public through an easy-to-use online portal.


Hmmmm.

babylonsister

(171,070 posts)
19. Maybe their outreach might convince people like
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 12:11 AM
Nov 2013

Inhofe that climate change is real? We're moving on even if so many people aren't?

Hekate

(90,714 posts)
21. Great news! Gov Jerry Brown and my County Supervisor Salud Carbajal are on the list
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 12:24 AM
Nov 2013

There's going to be some serious work afoot. Now let's send Obama a Congress he can work with.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
22. He heard, and he listened
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 12:27 AM
Nov 2013

Yes, he did.

Who has his ear? Who is it, rather, what is it that has the wherewithal, the fortitude and the influence to make the president undertake this small step?

Insurance companies.

Insurance companies are already paying out huge sums to policy holders whose properties have been damaged by the changing weather.

Down on the Gulf coast, flood insurance premiums are on the rise. Faster than the rising seas, higher than ever, any property that ain't prepared is paying as much as 1,000 percent higher insurance bills. The insurance companies know the number$ and they are not in business to lose money. They see the future, it's their job.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
26. Yeah, if the insurance companies held no sway at all
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 12:51 AM
Nov 2013

Then why did we enact a program that requires everyone to become one of their customers?

I'm sorry, but the idea that the ACA is bad for insurance companies is laughable.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
25. while other industries continue to deny
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 12:34 AM
Nov 2013

whatever the reason, I'm glad to see this.

now watch the Legislature line up like Nascar drivers in a race to defend their sponsors.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
33. I have been following sea level rise for 30 years
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 01:33 AM
Nov 2013

The only companies that have backed the science all that time were the insurance companies. They have been losing big money. First they tried to have every property from the beach front to the mountain top get flood insurance. That way the costs could be socialized. Well, high country folks told them to forget it.

Congress, in the last year or so, passed a law cancelling out the subsidies of the beachfront/low country, and allowing the insurance companies to establish rates on low lying properties that reflected the possible harm.

In other words, flood subsidies will be a thing of the past. Just goggle "Florida Insurance costs for beachfront".

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
34. Yeah, no dispute from me
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 01:51 AM
Nov 2013

What I want to know is who owns the politicians who have introduced this sort of legislation -

In just the first month and a half of 2013, eight different anti-science bills were introduced in five states. Under the guise of “academic freedom,” these bills would allow or require public school teachers to “critically review” allegedly scientifically controversial explanations, including evolution and global warming. Neither of these theories is controversial within the scientific community. Alas, they are controversial among much of the American public.


http://www.earthmagazine.org/article/denying-sea-level-rise-how-100-centimeters-divided-state-north-carolina

This is why basic science matters for modern citizens - why creationists are so harmful - because they promote the sort of "science denial" that allows people to ignore the idea that we can take steps to ameliorate problems due to climate change.

It would not be so difficult to address this issue if one of the two major parties in this nation were not overrun with science-denying, reality-denying, kissyourassgoodbyeJesusiscoming people in this nation...who elect politicians who present a harm to the entire world, just as they did during the recent near catastrophe in the world financial markets.

When are responsible people going to recognize it's irresponsible to elect Republicans because of their alignment with the anti-reality brigade?
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
35. When?
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 01:58 AM
Nov 2013

When the voting machines are audited completely.

When the reality of the change we have wrought on the environment is realized fully and accepted.

Ain't holding my breath waiting, and have moved to a place that is over 350 feet above present day sea level.

Look for insurance policies written for properties below 350' to be rewritten!

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
30. I wish he had not had so much bullshit obstruction and sabotage
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 01:12 AM
Nov 2013

To have to wade through and waste precious time, so that he *could* have addressed this sooner.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
46. Pushing alternative energy and getting out of the ME was his first move, plus the
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 03:07 AM
Feb 2014

funds set loose in 2009 for wind and solar. He did a lot but got no credit by media. The blackout was in effect by then and the fossil fuel magnates were planning their revolt. It took place in 2010 because he refused to sign KYX in 2009 and beyond. Now the sabotage has become more direct with rail accidents to pressure for the pipeline, and jamming the Amtack passenger transportation grid to cause more economic loss.
Meanwhile the Koches are buying up state legislatures and voters in red states want those pipelines to go through for temporary jobs and money to leave the rural areas.


BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
29. kick! rec!
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 01:08 AM
Nov 2013





I'd recommend the world address human overpopulation as a critical part of mitigation as well.

Unfortunately, people don't like "interference" or even to think of the cumulative effects of their babymakin'.
 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
31. I agree about the overpopulation.
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 01:13 AM
Nov 2013

Governments should be addressing this issue. People need better access to contraceptives.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
36. Also, women need financial autonomy
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 01:59 AM
Nov 2013

Of the sort that is available via microfinancing, etc.

And girls/women need education.

When women have more control over their lives, their rates of childbirth drop. Education provides the grounding for this. When they have some financial autonomy, they have more choice over whether and when to get married, as well.

So, one key to creating a sustainable planet is to empower women around the world.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
39. It's a task force and that's a start
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 03:55 AM
Nov 2013

the members of the task force are all elected officials. there aren't any activists or scientists.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama issues Ex...