General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPakistan's Interior Minister: Drone killing of Taliban Leader is: 'Death of peace efforts'
Pakistan's interior minister has said the death of Pakistani Taliban leader Hakimullah Mehsud has destroyed the country's nascent peace process.
"This is not just the killing of one person, it's the death of all peace efforts," Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan said.
Pakistan's security forces have been put on high alert following the US drone strike on Friday.
It came a day before a Pakistani delegation had been due to fly to North Waziristan to meet Mehsud.
Mr Nisar said the government would lodge an official protest with the US embassy.
<snip>
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24787637
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)The minister's complaint is risible.
JEB
(4,748 posts)Too bad we don't drone our own war criminals.
cali
(114,904 posts)with negotiating with the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
I don't know enough about the peace talks that the Minister and Pakistan were engaging in to comment on them or their chance of any success.
dtom67
(634 posts)can Pakistan remote-control bomb them?
What about the three others killed?
I missed their part of the trial that brought about their death warrant.
Oh, that's right, there wasn't one......
Oh, right. Not a citizen= has no human rights= they are all just towel- head terrorists anyways.
If the NEXT " Legitimate Target" was standing next to YOUR family at the Dairy Queen, would you approve of an immediate strike?
We have ALL been brainwashed into believing that people do not have inherent value, and therefore killing people is just business as usual. Besides, we have enough to worry about in our own lives; its just easier to not care. I'm guilty of it , too.
But I'll NEVER sign off on this cowardly terrorist tactic of bombing suspects from afar. What good is it to kill 1 enemy ( + 3 unknowns) if you create hundreds of new enemies doing it?
Drone Warfare is all about Money; we aren't in enough wars to boost corporate profits, so we need a NEW style of warfare that does not require us to " be at war" with the nation in question. And this new style insures that we NEVER have a shortage of enemies.
Cheer for in discriminant slaughter and eternal war if you want to.
I'll pass......
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)including entire villages disregarded as merely inconvenient ... states our "just cause" that we need more enemies.
Like the War on Drugs...got to keep the private prisons full. "War on Terror for Those We Deem Non Essential or Have the Audacity to be Opposed to American Empire Snatching Up Their Minerals and Sovereign Wealth", well keeps the troops paid, MIC churning right along, is a cozy little cycle. Got to fund our foreign prisons, get those shiny new military bases surrounded by concrete, more fighter jets that either don't work or we don't need. Ad nauseum.
There is no "good reason" to stop, given the entire "Beltway" has their hands in the deadly, but financially lucrative shitstorm.
Yet, it's the very reason all but the World's Policemen can afford to give their own citizens national health care. Or, jobs when the unfortunate soldiers come home. We can't afford it...too busy inventing the next bomb, missile, drone.
For shame.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)And this particular murder at this particular time is incredibly stupid. Many Pakistanis are about to die as a direct consequence.
The Pakistani Taliban's main beef is with the Pakistani government, not us. They didn't really start coming after us until we started killing their leadership. Then, seven CIA officers paid the ultimate price, and then we droned them some more. Then, they tried to blow up Times Square, and then we droned them some more. Do you think this is the end?
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)It's a bit high-handed of you to dismiss a minister trying to have peace talks in his own country. Far more Pakistanis are at risk than Americans from the violence.
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)Negotiations with a rebel group can never extend beyond conditions under which it will disarm, and to what level of its membership amnesty can be extended.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)It's imperialistic.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)in charge, problem solved.
Response to cali (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)the Pakistani government are a pack of duplicitous, undermining, stab you in the back, lying sacks of crap.