Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

William769

(55,148 posts)
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 10:19 AM Nov 2013

Feds Offer Health Benefits to Children of Domestic Partners

A new federal rule issued last week will allow more children of same-sex couples in which one or both spouses work for the federal government to obtain health care.

The Office of Personnel Management announced October 30 that it was amending the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program to allow federal workers living in states where same-sex marriage is illegal but are in domestic partnerships to enroll their children. The final rule takes effect January 1. The same amendment applies to the program covering vision and dental benefits.

OPM officials acknowledged in a statement that they recognize the legalities around same-sex marriage are in flux and that the agency may have to adjust eligibility rules accordingly.

“We recognize that the legal landscape is rapidly changing, and certain states that currently do not allow same-sex couples to marry may soon allow them to do so,” the statement read. “Same-sex couples may also relocate from states where they cannot marry to states where they are permitted to marry. The possibility that the relevant state marriage laws may change mid-year has the potential to create significant administrative difficulties.”

http://www.advocate.com/parenting/2013/11/06/feds-offer-health-benefits-children-domestic-partners

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Feds Offer Health Benefits to Children of Domestic Partners (Original Post) William769 Nov 2013 OP
Every child should be covered no matter who their guardians are or how they are related seveneyes Nov 2013 #1
 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
1. Every child should be covered no matter who their guardians are or how they are related
Wed Nov 6, 2013, 10:25 AM
Nov 2013

I believe Vermont was one of the first states to put this in place.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Feds Offer Health Benefit...