Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 01:36 PM Nov 2013

Where do all the angry white men come from?

His latest work strokes a broad, acerbic brush over the white supremacists of the Mason-Dixon line, the NRA and Tea Party stalwarts of the Bible Belt, the men's rights activists of cyberspace and the high school spree shooters of parental nightmares. The common feature, he argues, is their shared belief that certain degrees of status, privilege and social advantage, perceived to be their natural or god-given rights, have been snatched away by sudden social change. The resulting anger is targeted not at a globalised neoliberal economic system that has declared ordinary people expendable – irrespective of their race, class or gender – but immigration, civil rights and feminism. In a sense Kimmel is describing the irrational emotional fallout of the economic gender revolution detailed in books like Stiffed and The End of Men.

The thesis can only really be made to work by means of tortuous logic which excludes all expressions of violence and anger from non-whites, non-males or those, like Anders Breivik, who were forged in a very different cultural furnace. Kimmel also glosses over alternative explanations, most notably in his case studies of high school spree shooters, which quite clearly point to aggressive bullying and emotional abuse as the principal cause of the switch being flipped to overload.

Nonetheless there is more than a jingling ring of truth to his argument. When one looks at the horrific abuse meted out to feminist campaigners such as Caroline Criado-Perez for having the temerity to ask that a woman should feature on British banknotes, to Laura Bates for fighting back against street harassment and everyday sexism, or to Anita Sarkeesian for highlighting sexist tropes in video games, it is hard to see it as anything but aggrieved entitlement. The hate campaigns seem firmly rooted in outrage that uppity girls should be intruding upon men's inalienable right to behave how they like, harass who they want, control culture as they wish and shape society in their own image. Like: "You'll prise Lara Croft's skimpy shorts from my cold, dead hands."

It is easy, and indeed essential, to condemn such misogynistic hate campaigns. However if those attitudes are at least partially stoked by very real and profound economic and social changes that have left some men feeling disempowered, marginalised, maligned and neglected, is it enough to simply demand that they suck it up and deal with it? I'm not sure.


http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/07/angry-white-men-gender-stereotyping
80 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Where do all the angry white men come from? (Original Post) ismnotwasm Nov 2013 OP
Angry white mothers' vaginas? NuclearDem Nov 2013 #1
I would agree. HappyMe Nov 2013 #6
Happy mommies vaginas! ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #7
I did read it, just felt the need for a stupid joke. NuclearDem Nov 2013 #10
Oh, I'm sorry ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #15
Angry White Vaginas Dr. Strange Nov 2013 #9
That's been done under the code name "Twilight" ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #16
If only women had VAGINADOS! theHandpuppet Nov 2013 #69
You know that sounds like fast food ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #74
Angry white storks? randome Nov 2013 #2
Looking under angry cabbage patches? ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #11
Men are dogs RobertEarl Nov 2013 #3
Excellent article. Whisp Nov 2013 #4
They remind me of that "only child" who can't accept the new baby. polichick Nov 2013 #5
That's pretty offensive pscot Nov 2013 #8
There are many who it white males who try to be part of the solution. ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #12
Good grief, white males have been "king of the mountain" for hundreds of years... polichick Nov 2013 #13
Sixteen tons was written by a white man about part of the white experience Fumesucker Nov 2013 #18
Love that song ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #20
Coal mining is an Appalachian phenomenon largely and it was (and is?) mostly white males doing it Fumesucker Nov 2013 #33
It's profound when you think about it ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #37
I have compassion for poor people, just not more for poor white males than others. polichick Nov 2013 #24
As a I wrote just recently, I prefer to treat people as individuals rather than as part of a group Fumesucker Nov 2013 #31
Too bad more white males don't treat others as individuals - maybe women would... polichick Nov 2013 #34
I don't know a single white guy that complains HappyMe Nov 2013 #22
I was referring to the "angry white men" in the op title. polichick Nov 2013 #26
Asshats and fools. HappyMe Nov 2013 #32
I agree with your point but. Springslips Nov 2013 #39
I'll stick with the analogy. polichick Nov 2013 #44
no. but his opinions and thought were listened to while others were ignored. seabeyond Nov 2013 #46
Why do you think it's invalid? ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #48
Yes somewhat. It treats the individual and a group as the same. Springslips Nov 2013 #61
It's kind of like a continuum ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #71
the key to this argument is one word: perception noiretextatique Nov 2013 #72
They are made to a surprising extent Fumesucker Nov 2013 #14
The article suggest changing culture ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #19
White males in particular have been cynically manipulated with cunning propaganda Fumesucker Nov 2013 #28
That I agree with 100% ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #35
I know several guys that will tell you the white male is the most discriminated agains. brewens Nov 2013 #17
If they Jamaal510 Nov 2013 #40
My fundy sister has complained about "white Christians" being under attack. Silent3 Nov 2013 #21
They love to be persecuted! Try and stop the from forcing their superstition on the rest of us brewens Nov 2013 #73
You know some white men get pretty angry about the right stuff. Kurska Nov 2013 #23
Don't you think that transcends whiteness? ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #27
I think there is a definite imbalance of power between different races in our society. Kurska Nov 2013 #38
Whiteness is called "the invisible standard" ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #45
IMO Mr Dixon Nov 2013 #25
+1 freshwest Nov 2013 #52
I think there's this underlying FEAR of equality, alp227 Nov 2013 #75
They object to loosing their privileged position... Deep13 Nov 2013 #29
"perceived to be their natural or god-given rights" noiretextatique Nov 2013 #30
It seems that the most entrenched, the most privileged, the most entitled demographics are often... LanternWaste Nov 2013 #36
Yes, the "Class Warfare!" squeals by the top 1 percent (& their media slaves) are a perfect example. Arugula Latte Nov 2013 #41
It's been going on for centuries ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #42
White people have always had it way easier. HappyMe Nov 2013 #56
Yeah, I laugh at that 'taking away good American jobs' stuff too. Rozlee Nov 2013 #62
i wrote a post about this, or kinda, the other day. just copying and posting seabeyond Nov 2013 #43
One thing that is changing Sea ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #47
my niece was in tears today. a working mom dealing with a sick child after sick child. seabeyond Nov 2013 #49
That is infuriating ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #50
i feel for her. at this age with the young ones going into school, they are getting seabeyond Nov 2013 #51
Riane Eisler Locrian Nov 2013 #53
Nice! ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #57
My theory is that they scored low on South Park's TMI scale. Initech Nov 2013 #54
where ever they come from, I just wish they would go back !! lunasun Nov 2013 #55
"Most men are assholes." Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2013 #58
Not the men in my life ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #59
But common. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2013 #60
No... cyberswede Nov 2013 #63
The article did make sense about a real problem for men in gender assigned roles. Rozlee Nov 2013 #64
Thank you ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #68
Uneducated parents AgingAmerican Nov 2013 #65
Thanks for this post. chervilant Nov 2013 #66
You're very welcome ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #67
Hate campaigns against "uppity girls" BainsBane Nov 2013 #70
Figments of their own pseudo-superior imaginations Zambero Nov 2013 #76
Most of them between their mid 60s and early 80s Warpy Nov 2013 #77
Inside the radio. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #78
.... ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #79
This right here? Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #80
 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
10. I did read it, just felt the need for a stupid joke.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:03 PM
Nov 2013

Manboobz is one of my all time favorite blogs.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
2. Angry white storks?
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 01:53 PM
Nov 2013

[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.
[/center][/font][hr]
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
3. Men are dogs
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 01:56 PM
Nov 2013

I should know, I am an old one.

Men have made a mess of the world, for sure. Been telling them that for 30 years and yet they keep on messing things up.

Used to be a man could head out hunting for a few weeks at a time, and when they got home the fires were still burning - warm, soft and wet.

Now we have fast autos that drive themselves! Instant coms that keep track of you. Nuclear bombs to make us all feel safe. Eh?

Women lost control of men a long time ago and now it's all messed up.

This post written with a great slobbering amount of tongue-in-cheek words. Be careful of eating them as a snack, or lunch. Might make you start barking....

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
4. Excellent article.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 01:57 PM
Nov 2013

Fears that a black man being President could lead up to a Woman President, and I ain't havin' no woman tell ME what to do is part of it all! It's prevalent and not only found in the outhouses of the Baggers.

pscot

(21,024 posts)
8. That's pretty offensive
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:02 PM
Nov 2013

From the comments thread:
You can tell me boardrooms are filled with white males. You can talk about equality and a fairer deal for women, for racial minorities and homosexuals and I would agree completely- in principle.

But telling me white hetero males have an advantage means nothing if I'm white, male and hetero and I can't get a job, I'm treated as part of an underclass, and categorised as 'part of the problem' by feminists

polichick

(37,152 posts)
13. Good grief, white males have been "king of the mountain" for hundreds of years...
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:05 PM
Nov 2013

Suddenly they're crying because the mountaintop is no longer always theirs?! Boo-hoo.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
18. Sixteen tons was written by a white man about part of the white experience
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:11 PM
Nov 2013

Some people say a man is made outta mud
A poor man's made outta muscle and blood
Muscle and blood and skin and bones
A mind that's a-weak and a back that's strong

You load sixteen tons, what do you get
Another day older and deeper in debt
Saint Peter don't you call me 'cause I can't go
I owe my soul to the company store

I was born one mornin' when the sun didn't shine
I picked up my shovel and I walked to the mine
I loaded sixteen tons of number nine coal
And the straw boss said "Well, a-bless my soul"

You load sixteen tons, what do you get
Another day older and deeper in debt
Saint Peter don't you call me 'cause I can't go
I owe my soul to the company store


Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
33. Coal mining is an Appalachian phenomenon largely and it was (and is?) mostly white males doing it
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:28 PM
Nov 2013

The experience certainly isn't exclusively white but it is mostly white.


ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
37. It's profound when you think about it
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:36 PM
Nov 2013

The manipulation of Appalachian coal miners is a perfect example of using a demographic (white males) to reinforce classism as well as toxic gender standards while at the same time creating fear of the "other"

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
31. As a I wrote just recently, I prefer to treat people as individuals rather than as part of a group
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:26 PM
Nov 2013

Unfortunately very often a full wallet complains more loudly than an empty belly.

polichick

(37,152 posts)
34. Too bad more white males don't treat others as individuals - maybe women would...
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:28 PM
Nov 2013

make $1 for the $1 a male makes - and black males wouldn't be profiled as often.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
22. I don't know a single white guy that complains
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:16 PM
Nov 2013

or cries about that. Not one.

I'm pretty sure you are referring to the Limbaugh type men, no?

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
32. Asshats and fools.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:27 PM
Nov 2013

Like I said I don't know any like that, and if I did wouldn't listen to anything they had to say.

Springslips

(533 posts)
39. I agree with your point but.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:42 PM
Nov 2013

I agree with your gist: nobody should expect preference over other groups because he is a white man. And certainly hundreds of year of wasp-male domination was wrong.

But I hate the structure of your argument; not one white male living today was king of the mountain for those hundreds of years. I've seen this argument used many times before and it is invalid.

Use another argument.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
46. no. but his opinions and thought were listened to while others were ignored.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 03:00 PM
Nov 2013

or he was the one addressed when it was time for a decision to be made. or he did not get the mark up at the auto repair shop or buying a vehicle like the woman did. or his medical issues were studied and researched at the expense of others.

thru out life, he had advantages that others did not, that he does not even recognize, simply because he is man.

Springslips

(533 posts)
61. Yes somewhat. It treats the individual and a group as the same.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 03:57 PM
Nov 2013

A kin to guilt by association.

The original post showed disgust of the angry white men because, " they were the top of the mountain for hundreds of years." Yet I believe there is not a single angry white man around who is hundred of years old, and took great advantage of other groups in those years. Let's invent a Mike, a teabaggers ignoramus: he is an angry white male and blames affirmative action for the fact he's stagnant in his career, and drips with white privilege and entitlement. It would be invalid to say to him, " shut up and take it, after all you ran things for 500- years." Mike did not run things for 500- years.

Now Mike's is certainly wrong, for many other easily pointed out reasons. And certainly it is true that white male privilege and supremacy did advantage Mike over minorities and women to some degree that Mike isn't willing to admit, and yes this does entail ancestral heritage to some extent. Yet it is likely that Mike comes from common stock and his ancestress did not actually stand at the top of the hill, and his poorly hidden racial beliefs are relics pass down by, and reinforced today by, upper class propaganda aimed at splitting the lower classes via race, sex, gender, sexuality, ect.

Which is another reason I don't like the argument: it forgets the role of class.

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
71. It's kind of like a continuum
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 05:54 PM
Nov 2013

Starting with the white male, then the white female, then various races and ethnicities and cultures THEN you get to classism.

A quote by somebody; "everyone has privilege, it's just a matter of what and how much"

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
72. the key to this argument is one word: perception
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 06:14 PM
Nov 2013

whether an individual was or was not king of the mountain has nothing to do with the issue, except in a perverse sort of way. the author suggested that members of rw extremist groups have this in common: a perceived sense of entitlement, and a perceived sense of victimization because of cultural changes, e.g., competition from non-whites, and white women in the workforce. so, their perceptions are in fact that they should be kings of the mountain, and that women and minorities have taken their rightful place. white men who are not rw extremists probably do not have those same perceptions.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
14. They are made to a surprising extent
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:08 PM
Nov 2013

Listening to talk radio, watching Fox, reading and posting to Free Republic and on and on.

It's designed to keep you angry because anger is addictive and you'll keep coming back for your fix. The fact that the anger is a political tool used by cynical elites doesn't register with most of them.

Such and old technique really, I'm sometimes surprised how many people can't see it.

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
19. The article suggest changing culture
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:13 PM
Nov 2013

Which is inclusive I thought.

Yes, men need to change and adapt to a rapidly shifting world. So too does the culture in which those angry white men are forged.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
28. White males in particular have been cynically manipulated with cunning propaganda
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:22 PM
Nov 2013

It's insidious and it's everywhere, the complaint here on DU is that Fox News is on in a great, great many public places and I suspect that many of the complainers aren't part of the target demographic, white males.

Try finding liberal talk radio in most markets in the US, it'll be some low powered station that can't be heard further than you can spit if it exists at all. Meanwhile conservative talkers are everywhere over the radio dial.





ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
35. That I agree with 100%
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:30 PM
Nov 2013

The messages white males are constantly hit with are about what supports a perverse masculinity, (like Republicans) using heteronormative standards.

brewens

(13,596 posts)
17. I know several guys that will tell you the white male is the most discriminated agains.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:10 PM
Nov 2013

These guys have lived their entire life in Idaho. They probably all have gotten jobs over minorities at one time or another because they were a good ol' boy. Still, they believe it because at one time or another, a minority actually got a fair shot.

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
40. If they
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:45 PM
Nov 2013

believe that they're being discriminated against, I'd be more than willing to trade places with them.

Silent3

(15,234 posts)
21. My fundy sister has complained about "white Christians" being under attack.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:15 PM
Nov 2013

It's not just men with these issues.

brewens

(13,596 posts)
73. They love to be persecuted! Try and stop the from forcing their superstition on the rest of us
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 01:24 AM
Nov 2013

and they are being attacked!

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
23. You know some white men get pretty angry about the right stuff.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:16 PM
Nov 2013

I'll admit that the poor treatment of workers and gay people in this country gets me pretty heated at times.

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
27. Don't you think that transcends whiteness?
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:21 PM
Nov 2013

Or rather acknowledges white privilege and abhors social injustice?

There is a power inequity, and white men who use that power for positive change and social growth aren't at issue here.

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
38. I think there is a definite imbalance of power between different races in our society.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:37 PM
Nov 2013

And that white people pretty much uniformly get the better end of that deal.

I don't like the term white privilege, because I think far too often it is a description of a statistical average (white people being generally better off) that is applied on the individual basis. I've known white people that grew up with basically the entire deck stacked against them (poor, biological problems, abusive parents etc...) in that respect I'd consider them way worse off than a very wealthy African American going to a private school from a loving family. To me, the term white privilege implies that every white person has an innate advantage over every minority. We're all a function of many very different socioeconomic factors and I think that "white privilege" is too much of a simplification. Essentially, I think it is fair to say white people enjoy an unfair advantage, but I don't think it is fair to say any individual white person is "privileged" if all you know about them is their race.

That said being white is on the whole going to give you a better footing in society. There is a ton of empirical evidence for that, like "white sounding names" receiving on average far more interview call backs than "black sounding names" when you empirically control for qualifications. I can probably find the journal article for that if you want.

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
45. Whiteness is called "the invisible standard"
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:56 PM
Nov 2013

Against all else is measured; I think about being white in the terms of privilege. Otherwise I have no frame of reference other than racism. And that's why I use the term. I think white privilege grossly misunderstood sometimes.

Mr Dixon

(1,185 posts)
25. IMO
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:19 PM
Nov 2013

Last edited Thu Nov 7, 2013, 08:00 PM - Edit history (1)

WOW I find it funny that the angry white males are rebelling against change when they have been the benefactors for so long. For every perceived injustice brought upon them in this so-called new society of change. Cry me a river that you’re not in the cat bird seat any more, everyone should be equal, equal work for equal pay, black, white, male, female, gay or str8 EQUAL is key word. The bottom line is the rich have jettison the poor white man, now he has to get in line with those whom he used to look down upon, sucks doesn’t? Well here is the upside, your blinders have been removed, “you can see clearly now the rain in gone, you can see all the obstacles in our way”.


The analogy is: peasants and noblemen, some peasants are selected to keep the rest of the peasants in check while the noblemen screw us all; problem is once the castle walls are high enough (Rich enough) then all the peasants become unless to the Rich/noblemen, then you’re shoved back in with the rest of us peasants, welcome home.

alp227

(32,034 posts)
75. I think there's this underlying FEAR of equality,
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 03:22 AM
Nov 2013

because equality means that "white male" is no longer the default standard of "American". That is why Prop. 8 passed in California. That is why "feminism" and "affirmative action" are dirty words. America has a ME culture. A ME culture that has brainwashed white men into believing they're the superior type of person. If you want to see that mentality in the extreme, look up "anti-white" paranoia or white nationalism.

Deep13

(39,154 posts)
29. They object to loosing their privileged position...
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:24 PM
Nov 2013

...while at the same time denying that a privilege exists. In fact, most white men are no better off than anyone else, but the patriarchal system conditions white men to defend the status quo, because that's just the way it is supposed to be.

noiretextatique

(27,275 posts)
30. "perceived to be their natural or god-given rights"
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:25 PM
Nov 2013

i think this is key:
"...the NRA and Tea Party stalwarts of the Bible Belt, the men's rights activists of cyberspace and the high school spree shooters of parental nightmares. The common feature, he argues, is their shared belief that certain degrees of status, privilege and social advantage, perceived to be their natural or god-given rights, have been snatched away by sudden social change."

its the perception of their "rightful" place in society that drives angry white men, and the perception that some undeserving other has taken their rightful place. poor and working class white people can have this perception, even though they may not benefit from having those beliefs. and yeah: suck it up and deal with.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
36. It seems that the most entrenched, the most privileged, the most entitled demographics are often...
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:30 PM
Nov 2013

It seems that the most entrenched, the most privileged, the most entitled demographics are often the first (and the loudest) to cry "oppression" when other demographics attempt to share those very same privileges and entitlements.

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
42. It's been going on for centuries
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:52 PM
Nov 2013

I think that's why it's so hard for some to acknowledge. There are white males and white women for that matter see themselves as oppressed by programs such as affirmative action, which existed to create racial balance. If we could get the ERA passed, that would help with gender imbalance.

I had a professor once who said modern racism could be traced to the English defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588- the Spanish the original "brown people" while extensive racism certainly existed prior to that; he said that was the victory that solidified "white power" in politics on the world stage

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
56. White people have always had it way easier.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 03:35 PM
Nov 2013

My grandparents came here from Poland, and faced a bunch of challenges. But they were never turned away from a job, apartment or anything based solely on skin color.

I always laugh when republicans say that migrant workers are taking good American jobs. Really? Pack up yourself and your white family and go do that back breaking work for a couple of bucks a day.

You know, I really don't know how to feel about being a white woman. Grateful? Guilty? I know that I have always had it easier than any woman of color.

Rozlee

(2,529 posts)
62. Yeah, I laugh at that 'taking away good American jobs' stuff too.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 04:01 PM
Nov 2013

Like the great American dream job of plucking chicken feathers, which was the first job my parents had when they landed in the US. Quite glamorous, that. I think that's where my mom picked up TB.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
43. i wrote a post about this, or kinda, the other day. just copying and posting
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 02:53 PM
Nov 2013
think back to when the 40-60 yr olds were teenage friends.

the guys i hung with were open, nonsexist, pretty cool dudes. fast forward. this is what we see.

more what i think is that misogyny is there. and growing with the net and the norm of porn, the sex trafficking ect... mens group and connection to them thru the net. the inundation of the ugly allowed to be said everywhere about women, all the time, from everyone. limbaugh for example. everywhere in our society. media. entertainment. i saw your boobie, with a fuckin hollywood something.

right now, our boys have not faced much of life and still optimistic. they have not faced the disappointments or hurts for the most part.

the grueling structure of simple life.

i think by 40 all of us, but men recognize the dishonesty of the story told them. disappointment ect... all thru the eyes of privilege and entitlement. and you know what? they did not get what was owed them. whereas the women are saying, we do not owe you shit, lol. to different pulls that separate greater.

i think that basis is there. well established. the base sexism/misogyny. and i think that by 40 they embrace it as a truth as an excuse for whatever uncomfortable feelings. they have had 40 yrs of being conditioned by society seeing women as things, parts, inferior.

i do not think our boys are gonna have it any better. cause of the social culture being fed them. unless.... they take the time to recognize and say no.... not their life. i think a lot of kids are doing that. i think that our generation is fuckin up once again, lol and this will be a learning lesson for our young. that is what i am seeing anyway.

interesting question.

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
47. One thing that is changing Sea
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 03:01 PM
Nov 2013

Is the mixing of races and cultures, I know it's still largely segregated, but slowly improving.

The sexism; it's like stepping in a huge pile of dogshit, you think you've cleaned it off, but you still smell it and you realize there's just more of it.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
49. my niece was in tears today. a working mom dealing with a sick child after sick child.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 03:08 PM
Nov 2013

and try to keep her job.

how much privilege and entitlement factors into it. and where it leaves women.

me looking back over my last 20, and where it leaves me.

my mother and where it left her.

at the least. my niece got a hard dose of reality of our roles in life.

ismnotwasm

(41,989 posts)
50. That is infuriating
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 03:12 PM
Nov 2013

Working with women, we give a lot of leeway for say, breast feeding mothers, we do have decent maternity leave but still not enough support as the children grow. It's so hard.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
51. i feel for her. at this age with the young ones going into school, they are getting
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 03:21 PM
Nov 2013

sick all the time. she has another five years with the youngest still having to get to more an immune stage. she the only always up in middle of night taking care of. the one to take off work. the one to take to the doctor.

then, women are ragged on for not being nice, giving, sexy or adventurous enough.

i was so damn lucky (and so was hubby) that i could stay home and be tired and do all this with him having absolutely NO interference in his work life.

i do not know how women do it. unless they just have a break down in tears here and there. put head down, and continue on

Locrian

(4,522 posts)
53. Riane Eisler
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 03:24 PM
Nov 2013
In domination-oriented systems, men are socialized to distance themselves from women and anything stereotypically considered feminine. But in partnership-oriented cultures, men can give more value to caring, caregiving, nonviolence, and other traits and activities deemed inappropriate for men in dominator societies because they’re associated with “inferior” femininity.


http://www.rianeeisler.com/books.htm

Rozlee

(2,529 posts)
64. The article did make sense about a real problem for men in gender assigned roles.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 04:29 PM
Nov 2013

Such as mentioning that we women have expanded our roles to include choices that in the past were closed to us such as doctors, pilots, police officers and other traditional male vocations. I was a soldier, just a nurse since the military doesn't allow women to serve in its elite fighting forces. But, like the op states, men are still expected to be protectors and providers in our society. Their roles are expected to be manly and able to support their families. Look at women's fiction and men's action movies. C'mon, admit it. How often is the hero an interior decorator or a guy that works the evening shift at Burger King? No, the hero is always a cop, an international spy, a rugged Army Ranger or some type of he-man. He may also be a vampire or werewolf, but he won't be no interior decorator or work at the Taco Cabana for barely over minimum wage. Women can still be thought of as pretty and sexy being doctors, firefighters and working for minimum wage at a burger joint. A guy that's an administrative assistant or one that's in a minimum wage job isn't considered as desirable or manly to many unenlightened people.

chervilant

(8,267 posts)
66. Thanks for this post.
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 04:29 PM
Nov 2013

I wish this had gotten more attention. The "bro code" strikes me as the latest incarnation of "male privilege," and Thomas Keith's documentary shows just how much the stereotypes we inflict on our children are damaging to us all. To whit:

--College age women are four times more likely to be sexually assaulted than any other age group.

--56% of college males surveyed reported that they would rape a woman if they were certain they would get away with it.

--84% of women who are raped know their assailant.

--99% of convicted rapists are men (52% white, 16% black)

--Men commit suicide four times more than women.

And the admins remain unresponsive to Feminist DUers' repeated requests that the TOS be revised to address the sexism and misogyny on this forum. I am dumbfounded by this.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
70. Hate campaigns against "uppity girls"
Thu Nov 7, 2013, 05:46 PM
Nov 2013

Sounds familiar.

Kudos for the GD post. I was surprised to see you post in here but am glad you did.

Zambero

(8,964 posts)
76. Figments of their own pseudo-superior imaginations
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 03:40 AM
Nov 2013

Change is universal and inevitable. Acceptance of change is not always. Those who perceive loss of a long-held privileged status will either come to grips with and accept the fact that they are not inherently superior to others, or express outright hostility when confronted with it. Right wing propagandists and quite a few of their political adherents would be out of business without the latter category.

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
77. Most of them between their mid 60s and early 80s
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 03:52 AM
Nov 2013

served in the peacetime military and never had an occasion to think of war as anything other but glory and who never had any reason to doubt any of the political propaganda they were fed. They were Nixon's "silent generation" and Reagan's apocryphal "Reagan Democrats."

The Boomer angry white males were usually more rural than other Boomers and missed the whole party in the 60s. That's really why they're angry and why they rave and rant about hippies all the time. They also saw the biggest drop in men's wages ever along with seeing their full time domestic servants (wives) need to go out to work and that makes them angry too. They never seem to connect the dots about their paychecks buying less and less each year and vicious conservative policy.

The saddest are Gen X who were kids during Reagan's 8 years and who were soothed by his pitchman's voice into voting GOP ever since, thus deepening the debt hole they're still standing in.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Where do all the angry wh...